, disciplinary affiliation(s), gender, non-engineering degrees in background, additional administrative roles (Deans, Directors), and institutional characteristics. 2. How are the characteristics of LTS faculty different from other engineering faculty? a. It is hypothesized that LTS faculty might be different than other engineering faculty, since differences have been found among the students who engage in LTS; for example, women might be over-represented among LTS faculty compared to engineering faculty overall. b. The demographic characteristics for LTS faculty were identified to answer research question 1. The characteristics for engineering faculty overall were taken
designss,models, and a other intterventions, who benefitts? Who doe s not benefitt? Who suffeers?Engineerrs are increassingly recognizing the neeed to effecttively engagge communitties [3] in theedevelopm ment of desig gns. A sociall justice frammework provvides a founddation for deemocratic,participattory, effectiv ve, and sustaainable comm munity engaagement by aaccentuatingg an often-missing dimension d in n engineering g contexts: community c aagency. As ffaculty and sstudents try ttodevelop solutions s in programs su uch as Engin neers Withouut Borders, thhey should cconsider theprioritiess
the aim of this preliminary study into the integration of a molecular dynamicssimulation into a traditional tensile test lab. Students’ ability to use the presence or absence ofdislocations or the formation and motion of dislocations as the basis for explanations fordifference in macroscale and nanoscale sample stress-strain behavior varied, but was generallylimited and fragmented. Recommendations for better integration of the lab components focus ona reduction of concepts in the tensile test lab, increased analysis of simulation data for easiercomparison across samples, and re-sequencing of topics before and after this the tensile test lab.Bibliography1. Krause, S., Decker, J., Niska, J., & Alford, T., & Griffin, R. (2003
Paper ID #13887Are automated assessment tools helpful in programming courses?Mr. Raymond Scott Pettit, Abilene Christian University Raymond S. Pettit teaches courses in programming, artificial intelligence, objected oriented design, al- gorithms, theory of computation, and related subjects in ACU’s School of Information Technology and Computing. Prior to joining the ACU faculty, he spent twenty years in software development, research, and training the Air Force Research Lab and NASA’s Langley Research Center as well as private indus- try. His current research focuses on how automated assessment tools interact with student
experimental de la capacitie portante du sable sous des foundations directes etablies en surface.” Annales des Travaux Publics de Belqique, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp5-58.4. Sutton, M. A., Orteu, J.-J., Schreier, H. W. (2009) Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements: Basic Concepts, Theory and Applications, Springer, New York.5. Hall, S. A., et al. (2010) “Discrete and continuum analysis of localized deformation in sand using x-ray μCT and volumetric digital image correlation.” Géotechnique, Vol. 60, No. 5, pp 315-322.6. Hall, S. A. (2012) “Full-field displacement/strain measurements and digital image correlation – principles and
could examine other ways to view studentvolunteerism and the potential effects that those experiences have on the attitudes of personaland professional social responsibility in engineering students.AcknowledgementsThis material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant#1158863. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.Bibliography1 A. W. Astin, L. J. Vogelgesang, E. K. Ikeda and J. A. Yee, How Service Learning Affects Students, Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, 2000.2 J. S. Eyler, D. E. Giles, C. M. Stenson and C. J. Gray, "At a Glace: What We
techniques.Further research into the existing data set could also lead to new insights. A strictly discursiveanalysis may reveal other common underlying interactions that could increase our understandingof change in conceptual understanding. 1. Streveler, R. A., Litzinger, T. A., Miller, R. L. and Steif, P. S. (2008), Learning Conceptual Knowledge in the Engineering Sciences: Overview and Future Research Directions. Journal of Engineering Education, 97: 279–294. 2. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J. and Glaser, R. (1981), Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices. Cognitive Science, 5: 121–152. 3. Montfort, D., Brown, S. and Pollock, D. (2009), An Investigation of Students' Conceptual Understanding in
afirst-year course. We believe that the pedagogical process used in this course is transferable toother educational contexts.References: 1. Allen, D., Allenby, B., Bridges, M., Crittenden, J., Davidson, C., Hendrickson, C., Matthews, S., Murphy, C., and Pijawka, D. (2008), Benchmarking sustainable engineering education: Final report. EPA Grant X3-83235101-0. 2. Wiggins, J., McCormick, M., Bielefeldt, A., Swan, C., and Paterson, K. (2011), “Students and sustainability: Assessing students’ understanding of sustainability from service learning experiences”, paper presented at the 2011 Annual American Society of Engineering Educators (ASEE) Conference and Exposition, 26-29 June 2011, Vancouver, Canada
. Page 26.814.11AcknowledgementsThis study was supported by the INSPIRE Institute for Pre-College Engineering at PurdueUniversity.References[1] Cech, Erin A. 2013. "The Self-Expressive Edge of Occupational Sex Segregation." American Journal of Sociology 119(3):747-89[2] Ceci, S. J. & Williams, W.M. (2011). Understanding Current Causes of Women's Underrepresentation in Science.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, doi:10.1073/pnas.1103900108 .[3] Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 351−373[4] Auster, C. J., & Mansbach, C. S. (2012). The gender marketing of toys: An analysis of color and type of toy on the
Field Session, students are put into cohorts of 20 students, having 8 cohorts total. Each of the cohorts go through each of the Field Session sections a different order, once again due to space constraints. The curriculum has been designed so any student can go through any of the Field Session sections at any time, leading to ease of scheduling. Figure 4 below is an example of two cohorts schedules from Summer 2014. Students are given this schedule at an introduction meeting the first day or Field Session. Cohort M T W R F S M T W R F S S M T W R F
=300.[16] Culver, R.S., & Hackos, J.T. (1982). Perry's Model of Intellectual Development (Vol. 72). EngineeringEducation.[17] Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., and Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's Ways of Knowing:The Development of Self, Voice and Mind. New York: Basic Books.[18] Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and Reasoning in College: San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.[19] King, P. M., Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and PromotingIntellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults: San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.[20] Kuhn, D. (1991). The Skills of Argument. England: Cambridge University Press
program, Leading Oneself. In defining“leader”, student responses shifted from simplistic definitions that viewed leaders asauthoritarian figures with the responsibility for command and controlling others to morecomplex definitions that view leaders as those who have a positive and authentic relationshipwith and responsibility to those s/he is leading. There is a shift from a focus on the leader to afocus on the relationship the leader has with others. In defining “leadership”, once again thestudent responses shift from simple to more complex definitions. They started with a focus onthe leader him or herself, and moved to an understanding of leadership as a process that must bemarked by positive interactions and relationships with others. These
Paper ID #12126Implementing and Evaluating a Peer Review of Writing Exercise in a First-Year Design ProjectDr. Kathleen A Harper, The Ohio State University Kathleen A. Harper is a senior lecturer in the Engineering Education Innovation Center at The Ohio State University. She received her M. S. in physics and B. S. in electrical engineering and applied physics from Case Western Reserve University, and her Ph. D. in physics from The Ohio State University. She has been on the staff of Ohio State’s University Center for the Advancement of Teaching, in addition to teaching in both the physics department and college of
introductorylevel design classes, including 2.007’s main curriculum. Outside of a very limited set of provided raw materials, students had to source all of their own parts, with the instructors acting only as advisors. Example purchased parts included wheels, the main drive motor, motor control unit, throttle and brake pedals, power transmission parts, and power switches. In this manner, the lab section introduced them to the complexities of choosing parts, reading specification sheets, and making design choices that related to how easy or hard it was to acquire specific sized parts. The “makeorbuy” tradeoff also focused the students on deciding which parts were critical to their design and
using online and blended course delivery”. Sue C. Evans and Ihab Habib, Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, Tennessee Academy of Science presentation 2012 ”THE EFECT OF ADVANCED APPLICATION TECHNOLOGY ON CONSTRUCTION PROJECT c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Paper ID #11286MANAGEMENT” Ihab S Habib, Abu Sarwar, Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, TN. TennesseeAcademy of Science presentation 2011 Page 26.28.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015
, pp. 181-204, Summer 2013.[2] W. Karlen, Ed., Mobile Point-of-Care Monitors and Diagnostic Device Design, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2015.[3] G. J. Kost, N. K. Tran, M. Tuntideelert, S. Kulrattanamaneeporn, and N. Peungposop, “Katrina, the tsunami, and point-of-care testing: Optimizing rapid response diagnosis in disasters,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 513-520, 2006.[4] M. J. Rust, N. A. Carlson, and J. H. Nichols, “A thermo-modulating container for transport and storage of glucose meters in a cold weather environment,” Point of Care, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 157-160, September 2012.[5] S. K. Esche and H. A. Hadim, “Introduction of project-based learning into mechanical engineering courses
-Bass, 1996.8. C. Bazerman, J. Little, et al., Reference guide to writing across the curriculum. West Lafayette: Parlor Press, 2005.9. J. Froyd, A. Watt, & J.M. Williams, “Writing to Design/Designing to Write: Using the Correlations between Communication and Engineering to Improve Student Reflection,” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Paper AC 2002-692.10. J. C. Anderson, D. W. Gatchell, B. Shwom, S. Benjamin, J. A. Lake, “Embedding communication in an interdisciplinary project-based upper-level engineering design course,” Proceedings of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Paper 7845, Available: www.asee.org/public/conferences/20/papers/7845
. Further description of the“before” (traditional) and “after” (flipped) classroom experience for each course is needed inorder to provide a more complete picture of the true change in the learning environment.AcknowledgementThis material is based in part upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant Number DUE-1245815. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.References[1] Berrett, D. (2012). How ‘Flipping’ the Classroom Can Improve the Traditional Lecture. The Chronicle of Higher Education. February 19.[2] Bishop, J.L., and Verleger, M.A. (2013). The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of
engineering design-based, integrated approach to STEM instructionand assessment. The Review of the LiteratureFor more than a decade, the United States has been shifting K-12 curriculum to a focus onscience, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Over time, the argument for STEMeducation has grown stronger, in hopes of establishing a citizenry that is literate in all fourSTEM areas regardless of one’s occupation. However, until recently, many STEM educationalprograms tended to focus on the “S” and “M” of the acronym, with slight mention of technologyand largely ignoring engineering. Nevertheless, the future of engineering instruction in K-12learning settings is brightening as many educational standards and
ire rt qu o VOLTA Host d? re upp S Server ta t sis ar e nc as Sm Client/Student Hardware for circuit implementation
/dbDetailForUser.do?id=3, .8. R. P. Ramachandran, K. D. Dahm, R. Nickel, R. Kozick, S. S. Shetty, L. Hong, S. H. Chin, R. Polikar and Y. Tang, ``Vertical Integration of Biometrics Across the Curriculum: Case Study of Speaker, Face and Iris Recognition”, IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 55—69, September 2014.9. J. A. Newell, H. L. Newell and K. D. Dahm, “Rubric Development and Inter- Rater Reliability Issues in Assessing Learning Outcomes”, Chemical Engineering Education, Summer 2002.10. J. A. Newell, H. L. Newell and K. D. Dahm, “Rubric Development for Assessment of Undergraduate Research: Evaluating Multidisciplinary Team Projects”, Chemical Engineering Education, 2003
Psychology, 30, pp. 157-197.2. Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., 2003, “Relationship Effectiveness for Mentors: Factors Associated with Learning andQuality,” Journal of Management, 29, pp. 469-486. Page 26.523.103. Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., Bogue, B., 2012, “Leaving Engineering: A Multi-Year Single InstitutionalStudy,” Journal of Engineering Education, 101, pp. 6-27.4. Bender, W. N., 2012, “Project-Based Learning: Differentiating Instruction for the 21st Century,” Corwin Press.5. Boss, S., Krauss, J., 2007, “Reinventing Project-Based Learning,” International Society for Technology inEducation, Eugene, OR.6. ABET, Engineering
Roundtable, 2005, Tapping ’ P Th E I v I v , Business Roundtable: Washington, D.C. 3. Blue, C. E., Blevins, L. G., Carriere, P., Gabriele, G., Leader, S. K. G., Rao, V. and Ulsoy, G., 2005, The Engineering Workforce: Current State, Issues, and Recommendations. Final Report to the Assistant Director of Engineering., National Science Foundation: Arlington, VA. 4. National Academy of Engineering, 2004, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. National Academy of Engineering: Washington, D.C. 5. National Academy of Engineering, 2004, E h E 2020 p E E h N wC y. National Academy of
T. Rath, StrengthsFinder 2.0. New York, NY: Gallup Press, 2007.7 M. A. Zimmer, “Facilitating Intergroup Dialogues: Bridging Differences, Catalyzing Change. Edited by Kelly E.Maxwell, Biren (Ratnesh) A.Nagda, and Monita C.Thompson. Sterling, Va.: Stylus Publishing, 2011. Teaching Theology & Religion, vol. 16, pp. e75–e76, Jul. 2013.8 J. E. Pizzolato, “Assessing self-authorship,” New Directions for Teaching and Learning, vol. 2007, no. 109, pp. 31–42, 2007.9 M. Peet, S. Lonn, P. Gurin, K. P. Boyer, M. Matney, T. Marra, S. H. Taylor, and A. Daley, “Fostering Integrative Knowledge through ePortfolios,” International Journal of ePortfolio, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11–31, 2011.10 W. Morgaine
://www.hpcwire.com/hpcwire/2011- 12-01/hpc_going_embedded.html4. P. Decher, “Embedding HPC: A rocket in your pocket”, Embedded, Nov. 29, 2011. http://www.embedded.com/design/prototyping-and-development/4230994/A-rocket-in-your-pocket#5. ICAF Industries Studies 2006 Report, National Defense University.6. ICAF Industries Studies 2001 Report, National Defense University.7. S. Cui, Y. Wang, S. Koay, and Y. Yang, “Revamp Computer Education with Multimedia and Game Technologies,” Proceedings of ASEE 117th Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky, June 20- 23, 2010.8. S. Cui, Y. Wang, F. M. Nave, and K. T. Harris, “Teach Computer Techniques through Multimedia,” Proceedings of the 2010 ASEE Northeast Section
thosedefinitions in the rather substantial literature related to the subject. Asking a freshman student Page 26.685.3what a professional is may yield a surprisingly common response: anyone who makes a livingwage and is good at what s/he does. This is perhaps due to the way that word is used in the US; abrief sweep of the Internet shows hobbies-evolved-into-jobs that have assumed the term“professional,” possibly as a way to elevate the stature of that occupation: fly fishing, bellydancing, blogging, etc.10In the field of engineering, however (or teaching or law or medicine, for that matter),“professional” connotes something much different from simply
neglected in the first offeringof this two course sequence was the development of a good assessment approach. This aspectwill be addressed in subsequent offerings of the course.AcknowledgementsThe authors gratefully acknowledge Venture Well (formerly the National Collegiate Inventorsand Innovators Alliance) for funding of this project. The authors also thank the Deans of theCollege of Engineering and the Villanova School of Business for supporting travel to Nicaraguato deliver the January 2014 entrepreneurship workshop to UNI students.References[1] P. Singh, S. Kulkarni, E. Keech, R. McDermott-Levy, and J. Klingler, “Progress on Making Healthcare more accessible to Rural Communities in Waslala, Nicaragua, using Low-Cost Telecommunications, IEEE
Foundation; 1979. 240 p.8. Kim KH. Can We Trust Creativity Tests? A Review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Creat Res J. 2006;18(1):3–14.9. Smyth FL, Nosek BA, Guilford WH. First year engineering students are strikingly impoverished in their self- concept as professional engineers. Proc 2011 ASEE Annu Conf Expo. 2011;AC 2011–87.10. Carberry AR, Lee H-S, Ohland MW. Measuring Engineering Design Self-Efficacy. J Eng Educ. 2010 Jan 1;99(1):71–9.11. Nilsson P. Taxonomy of Creative Design [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2015 Jan 27]. Available from: http://www.senseandsensation.com/2012/03/taxonomy-of-creative-design.html12. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Academic Press; 2013. 459
). "Models, Models, Models: The Use of Physical Models to Enhance the Structural Engineering Experience." Paper ID #1998-389, Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition. Page 26.1027.183. Saliklis, E. (2008). "Arch Building for Kids. What did they learn? What did we learn?" Paper ID #2008- 571, Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition.4. Gifford, M.P, Cervo, E.G., Savelski, M.J., Farrell, S., Hesketh, R.P., and Slater, C.S. (2003). "Non- traditional Laboratory Experiments: Olive Oil