-related, personal/hobby, professional/research,entrepreneurship) as well as open-text answer, although none of the users availed themselves ofit. Our goal was a coarse break-down, as these are only a few general areas we believed to berelevant; the lack thus far of any alternate answers via the open-text box does not necessarilyconfirm our category selection.Interestingly, most of the participants were checking out kits for extracurricular activities: eithertheir own personal hobbies, their professional lives, or for entrepreneurial pursuits. Theseanswers may indicate that the library tech-lending program is supporting the personal hobbiesand interests of the campus community more effectively than course-related projects. This ismost likely a
deployed in contributing fields. For example, as discussed above,for contributors to engineering education research from social science backgrounds, tying anepistemology and methodology together as above may be a point of confusion.Data Point 3: TaxonomyA third data point in this story comes from the recent Taxonomy for the Field of EngineeringEducation Research project. The project, which was funded by the National Science Foundation,sought to standardize terminology and create a new taxonomy to map and communicate thefield’s research.21 To date, seven different versions of the taxonomy have been developed. Thefirst version was developed during a workshop for the project at the University of Michigan in2013. Each subsequent version was developed
and uncertainty. In this first project, students build their own reactiontimer. We provide a cursory overview of what an Arduino is, how to connect the circuit, and howto upload the code. While the opportunity exists to discuss concepts around circuitry, voltage,and ohms law -- these are topics that we reserve for future activities. This activity provides anintroduction and overview to using Arduino as a tool for scientific investigation. Figure 1 - Wiring Diagram for Arduino Reaction TimerIt should be noted that for simplicity, this circuit does not use a current limiting resistor for the Page 26.1205.3LED nor a
focuses on the interactions between student moti- vation and their learning experiences. Her projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their problem solving processes. Other projects in the Benson group include effects of student-centered active learning, self-regulated learning, and incor- porating engineering into secondary science and mathematics classrooms. Her education includes a B.S. in Bioengineering from the University of Vermont, and M.S. and Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Clemson University.Prof. Patrick Gerard, Clemson University
junctures. 3. Improve STEM faculty understanding of the educational methodology that integrates concepts across STEM courses. 4. Strengthen relationships with four-year institutions, particularly project partner Drexel University, to encourage transfer and on-going STEM education.Six UMS (three male and three female) were drawn from a pool of over twenty applicants in thespring of 2014. These six students were welcomed to Drexel in a kickoff event in which threestudents (one undergraduate and two graduate) gave their perspectives on research experience,followed by a session of over forty posters from fourteen labs representing all departments inDrexel’s College of Engineering and School of Biomedical Engineering. A flowchart
Long Island University, and a Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering from Lehigh University. Dr. Lenox served for over 28 years as a commis- sioned officer in the U.S Army Field Artillery in a variety of leadership positions in the U.S., Europe, and East Asia. He retired at the rank of Colonel. During his military career, Dr. Lenox spent 15 years on the engineering faculty of USMA – including five years as the Director of the Civil Engineering Di- vision. Upon his retirement from the U.S. Army in 1998, he joined the staff of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). In his position as educational staff leader of ASCE, he managed several new educational initiatives – collectively labeled as Project ExCEEd
applications of DSP that can helpcaptivate students and motivate them to learn the theoretical material. Perhaps the best way toexpose students to the applications of DSP is with a laboratory course, but at some institutions afull laboratory course in DSP is not feasible due to time, space, and funding constraints.Alternatives to laboratories include projects, simulations, and demonstrations. Although manyDSP algorithms can be demonstrated using offline (not real-time) processing, somedemonstrations are just more compelling if they operate in real-time. A real-time demonstrationwith audio signals, for example, can be more interesting because the user can use his/her ownvoice as the input and hear the results immediately.Many authors have explored
buildings, while developing a deeper understanding of indoor environmental quality, occupant impacts, and energy use. She is the Principal Investigator of a multi-disciplinary and multi-institutional research project, NSF EFRI-Barriers, Understanding, Integration – Life cycle Devel- opment (BUILD). As the associate director of education outreach in the Mascaro Center for Sustainable Innovation, Pitt’s center for green design, she translates research to community outreach programs and develops sustainable engineering programs for K-12 education.Prof. Amy E. Landis, Arizona State University Dr. Landis joined ASU in January 2012 as an Associate Professor in the School of Sustainable Engi- neering and the Built Environment
positively to their understanding of acceleration calculations in thenormal-tangential coordinate system. The overall positive feedback supports the suitability of thislaboratory exercise for implementation in a sophomore-level engineering dynamics course. Further, thislaboratory exercise may be used as a strategy to address ABET student outcome (k), “an ability to use thetechniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.”A copy of the laboratory handout and the Xcode project (source code for the smartphone application)used for the student laboratory exercise reported in this paper may be obtained by contacting the leadauthor.IntroductionThe use of mobile phones has grown considerably in the past decade. According
by developing models that take advantage of new information and process understanding enabled by new technology. He has developed a number of models and software packages including the TauDEM hydrologic terrain analysis and channel network extraction package that has been implemented in parallel, and a snowmelt model. He is lead on the National Science Foundation HydroShare project to expand the data sharing capability of Hydrologic Information Systems to additional data types and models and to include social interaction and collaboration functionality. He teaches Hydrology and Geographic Information Systems in Water Resources.Madeline Frances Merck, Utah State UniversityMr. David J Farnham, Department of Earth
, subsystems, and systems. 4. Apply programming concepts and application software to general purpose and specific purpose systems. 5. Apply mathematics, physics and sciences to solve technical problems. 6. Communicate effectively, both orally and in writing. 7. Function effectively as part of a project team. 8. Recognize the need for professionalism, excellence, and continuous improvement.The student outcomes are published on the website, on-line catalog, in front of the departmentoffice and on bulletin boards throughout the buildings. These outcomes are assessed at thecourse level. Both levels of assessment include direct and indirect measures. Table 1 presentsthe program specific outcomes as they map to the ETAC/ABET [1] student
Paper ID #13471An Online Course and Teacher Resource for Residential Building Codes andAbove Code Construction MethodsDr. Tripp Shealy, Virginia Tech Tripp Shealy is an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech.Miss Audra Ann Kiesling, Clemson University Audra Kiesling is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Glenn Department of Civil Engineering at Clemson University.Mr. Timothy R. Smail, Federal Alliance for Safe Homes Tim Smail, Senior Vice President – Engineering & Technical Programs A results-driven professional, Tim has extensive educational, project management and research experience in disaster
Paper ID #11166Application of RFID Technology in Patient Management SystemDr. Lash Mapa, Purdue University Calumet (College of Technology) Lash Mapa is a Professor in Industrial/Mechanical Engineering Technology at Purdue University Calumet (PUC). His undergraduate and graduate degrees are in Chemical Engineering. He has several years’ experience as a Chemical Engineer, Process and Project manager with European and U.S. manufacturing organizations. Currently, he is involved in the MS Technology program at PUC and has managed over thirty lean six sigma projects with manufacturing, service industry and educational
ConstructedResponse) project at Michigan State [6], the data are then utilized to develop rubrics forhuman scoring. These rubrics are used in formative assessment. Microsoft’sPowergrading approach [7, 8] is similar. A similarity metric is used to group studentresponses into clusters. An instructor can grade a representative item from each cluster,and assign a score to each cluster. Each cluster is also given customized formativefeedback.The clustering approach has proven useful in other domains as well. A recent paper onmathematical language processing uses cluster-based analysis to assign partial credit tomathematical derivations [9]. This is probably more challenging than doing the samewith prose answers, because it must be able to recognize different ways
, workshops, and field trips (Appendix C). Specialcare is given in selecting participants who can function in a highly independent and technicalenvironment. YSP participants are monitored closely, but encouraged to contribute to furthering Page 26.415.5research projects, and actively taking part in all aspects of the program.Program ResultsBRAIN GamesThe following charts contain questions asked of those participating in BRAIN games. Students learned alot from this activity 100.00% 90.00% 80.00% 70.00% Response Rate
but not solarge as to invalidate the tools. Steps should be considered to educate students about potentialbias.IntroductionTeamwork is an integral part of Engineering and Engineering Education.1 Well-designed groupand team projects can help students gain valuable teaming skills, and accrediting bodies requirethese skills of engineering graduates.2,3 But teamwork is not without its problems. Social loafingand “I better do it myself, if I want an A” syndrome are part of many peoples experiences withgroup and teamwork.4 A well-designed peer evaluation process can improve the studentexperience and lead to more powerful learning outcomes.Peer evaluation can be used to foster a better team experience and to equitably recognizeindividual student’s
Paper ID #12684General Engineering Plus: Creating Community in a Flexible yet TechnicalEngineering DegreeDr. Malinda S. Zarske, University of Colorado, Boulder Malinda Zarske is the Engineering Master Teacher for the General Engineering Plus program at the Uni- versity of Colorado Boulder. A former high school and middle school science and math teacher, she has advanced degrees in teaching secondary science from the Johns Hopkins University and in civil engi- neering from CU-Boulder. Dr. Zarske teaches engineering design in First-Year Engineering Projects and Engineering Projects for the Community, a sophomore-level course
round of tenredesign projects involving a range of arts and sciences courses undertaken by schools including Page 26.853.2 1Penn State, University of Central Florida (UCF), Wisconsin-Madison, and Virginia Tech, five ofthe ten projects reported improved learning outcomes, four reported equivalent achievement, andone was not conclusive. Some of the improvement techniques included computer-basedassessment and feedback, online student discussion groups and learning communities, computer-lab group work (with faculty present) in lieu of a lecture, and online, self-paced interactivetutorials with
interest in socio-scientific issues, and how they saw the role ofethical reasoning in their future profession as an engineer.Brief field notes taken after each interview helped in the preliminary data selection. Two of theinterviewed students, Tom (a junior-year engineering major) and Matt (a junior-year computerscience major), talked about weaponized drones as part of their interview. They had writtenabout this topic in their sophomore year as part of a capstone research project in the STSprogram. Besides the thematic congruence, another thing that caught our attention was that bothstudents regarded drone warfare to have negative consequences but, to different degrees, wantedto absolve the designing engineers of bearing responsibility.One of us
and the necessity of scaffolding forsupporting collaborative learning. Page 26.901.2 In STEM field, Soundarajan proposed the Peer Instruction for online collaborativelearning, in which students were assigned different roles in different tasks7. Bohorquez andToft-Nielsen integrated collaborative learning in specific course instruction and revealed theeffectiveness of problem-oriented method and collaborative learning in biomedical engineeringeducation8. Dong and Guo developed and adopted the Collaborative Project-based LearningModel to promote students’ collaborative learning in computer-networking curriculum, andclaimed the improvement in
physical projects (manually made or 3-D printed) simulating an ancient device of their choice.Results from student and peer evaluations are consistently favorable.I. Introduction How many people know that the first 3-D image in the history of humankind was created34,000 years ago by a ‘paleoengineer’ on the rock ceiling of a cave in Italy? How many of usknow that about 12,000 years ago, hafted tools contributed to the discovery of farming on amajor scale, allowing ancient ‘agricultural engineers’ to invent more effective farming tools?What about 10,000 years ago, when Mesolithic ‘mechanical engineers’ were able to createhypermicroliths (extremely small stone tools) with skills comparable to present-day diamondcutters, except without a
, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects throughout the United States. He is a licensed professional engineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, and learning through historical engineering accomplishments. He has authored and co-authored a significant number of journal articles and book chapters on these topics.Major Daniel J. Fox, U.S. Military Academy MAJ Dan Fox is an Instructor in the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree from the United States
has a heavyemphasis on theory and mathematical modeling as opposed to a more practice based curricula,which was the standard engineering education approach until the modern approach gained favorin a shift that occurred between 1935 and 1965.6 As a result of this shift, many engineeringstudents do not spend much of their time engaged in actual design and build processes until latein their degree program.7Maker spaces have an opportunity to revolutionize the current system by providing an extra-curricular means for students to engage in more hands-on projects and develop a large range ofthe skills that are currently being underdeveloped. Maker spaces go beyond the traditionalmachine shop environment familiar to the undergraduate curriculum
Leadership Program (GEL) is to “create an elite cadre ofengineering leaders with exceptional abilities to lead engineering teams by providing purpose,direction and motivation to influence others to achieve collective goals.”In prior papersi an overview of the complete structure of GEL has been described, including theassessment of industry’s need for improvement in engineering leadership and the current impactand consequences of poorly led engineering projects. A representative syllabus and approach tothe engineering, product development, technical and scientific content was also presented.Further, the global risk to the competitiveness of companies if this need is not addressed waspresented in 2012ii.The following sections describe themes that the
the first African American to earn promotion and win tenure in the Vanderbilt University School of Engineering. Currently, he serves as Associate Chair of the EECS De- partment. He also serves as the Director of Undergraduate Studies for both electrical engineering and computer engineering. Dr. Robinson leads the Security And Fault Tolerance (SAF-T) Research Group at Vanderbilt University, whose mission is to conduct transformational research that addresses the reliability and security of computing systems. Dr. Robinson’s major honors include selection for a National Science Foundation (NSF) Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Program Award and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA
paper describes the survey results.Engineering students and faculty members in the audience were asked about theirperceptions of the educational value of the competition for both the competitors and theaudience members. They were also asked about their perceptions of the personalcharacteristics of the competitors. As this research project was funded through anInstructional Enhancement Grant, the goal was to examine the perceived educationalvalue of Idol. This examination aims to help identify ways learning and teaching are –and can be further – enhanced through Idol.Overall, the results of the survey pointed to an overwhelmingly positive response to thepresentation competition and the educational value it provides. The engineering studentsand
unexplored3,4,5. This paper addresses this literature gap and aims to broaden theconceptualization of engineering identity by studying the development of engineering identity ofLatina/o undergraduates from their perspective and experiences. The forecasted growth of Latinas/os in the United States has encouraged a range ofinstitutions to assess how this shift in population will affect various programs of study especiallythose in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) where Latinas/os arecurrently underrepresented. In engineering, the number of Latina/o students enrolling hasincreased since the 1990s and it is projected to continue to increase, though not at the same rateas the Latina/o population growth. Engineering is one
on federal and industry funded projects totaling over $20M. Page 26.964.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 A Comparative Analysis of Information Sharing and Access to Engineering Education Research DataAbstract The rapid growth of engineering education as a field of rigorous research has resulted inan explosion of available data and research results. There are numerous research efforts currentlyunderway that gather data on a variety of topics that have the potential to help us betterunderstand how students learn engineering. However, there are
had not been recognized.It was not until the advent of USAF Project RAMCAD during 1986-88, with TRW and VirginiaTech as partners, that the need to rigorously evaluate design alternatives was specified as adeliverable. During the conduct of this research, system parameters were partitioned formallyinto design dependent and design independent subsets. The result was a Design EvaluationFunction of the form E = f (X; Yd, Yi), shown last in Figure 2.Although too late for the First Edition in 1981, all subsequent editions of Systems Engineeringand Analysis by Blanchard and Fabrycky incorporated the DDP concept for system designevaluation.1 Also, an added notion was adopted demonstrating that equivalence must beemployed within each alternative
production and retention of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) talent is currently a major threat to the country2. In fact, to address heightened concern regarding the United States’ global position, several national efforts have been implemented to increase the number and diversity of students pursuing degrees and entering STEM careers. In 2012, the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology announced that by 2022, the country would need 1 million more STEM professionals than projected to be produced18. One critical asset to reaching this capacity lies in the cultivation of competent, adaptable engineers prepared