Page 26.771.8 Figure 4. Model map for a low performing VCVD team.AcknowledgementsThe authors are grateful for support provided by the National Science Foundation grant EEC-1160353. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References1. Koretsky, M.D., D. Amatore, C. Barnes and S. Kimura. (2008). Enhancement of student learning in experimental design using a virtual laboratory, IEEE Transactions on Education, 51(1), 76-85.2. Koretsky, M.D., Kelly, C. & Gummer, E. (2011). Student Perceptions of Learning in the Laboratory: Comparison of Industrially-situated Virtual Laboratories
-Sacre, M, Atman, C, J, Shuman, L,J, " Characteristics of freshman engineering students: Models fordetermining student attrition in engineering ", Journal of Engineering Education, 86, 2, 1997, 139-149.[2] Grose, T, K, "The 10,000 challenge", ASEE Prism, 2012, 32-35.[3] Johnson, M, J, Sheppard, S, D, "Students entering and exiting the engineering pipeline-identifying key decisionpoints and trends", Frontiers in Education, 2002.[4] Olds, B, M, Miller, R, L, "The effect of a first-year integrated engineering curriculum on graduation rates andstudent satisfaction: A longitudinal study", Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 1, 2004, 23-36.[5] Froyd, J. Ohland, M, W, "Integrated engineering curricula", Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 1, 2005
featuring their classroom professor and students who wereinstead exposed to a non-local professor. Additionally, an end of course survey revealed that ingeneral students had no preference for who was featured in the videos. Further refinement of theclass materials management system and the inclusion of additional course modules areopportunities to improve and further validate this study.Section 1: IntroductionOver the last several decades, more and more U. S. students are enrolling in college, with nearlyforty percent of Americans obtaining at least a two-year college degree1,2. The United States haslong been the leader in higher education, boasting a majority of the top universities and collegesin the world3. As the economy moves away from an
is required to assess a givenoutcome. In Figure 3, Part 3 displays a grading rubric which is utilized to evaluate student work.The distinction between the two different Part 3’s is important to note. Some courses utilizecoursework that demands objective evaluation. Other courses utilize work that must besubjectively graded. The inclusion of rubrics is critical in ensuring a consistent grading effortwhen evaluating subjective material.It is important to note that the form has only four entries that are editable by the faculty: thenumber of students engaged in the assessment, the number of students satisfying the performancetarget, the percentage equivalent and faculty comments. These editable variables were carefullyconsidered in the design
. Using thismethodology students were successful in iterating a working game that was always in apotentially shippable state. Students were able to change their game objectives and refinefeatures over the course of the project, resulting in all expected outcomes being achieved.Bibliography1. Rubin, Kenneth S., Essential Scrum: A Practical Guide to the Most Popular Agile Process, Addison-Wesley Professional; 1st edition (August 5, 2012), ISBN-10: 0137043295.2. Waterfall method. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterfall_model3. Baldwin game design document available from http://baldwindesignconsulting.org4. http://cateme.org5. Grimheden, M.E., Mutual learning experiences – Mechatronics capstone course projects based on Scrum, American Society for
on learner motivation, metacognition, and knowledge transfer. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2012. 28(5): p. 477-487.8. Brown, S.E., A ; Montfort, D ; Adam, J ; Van Wie, B ; Olusola, A ; Poor, C ; Tobin, C ; Flatt, A, Effectiveness of an Interactive Learning Environment Utilizing a Physical Model. Journal Of Professional Issues In Engineering Education And Practice, 2014. 140(3).9. Easley, A.P.-W., The effectiveness of a hands-on desktop module for learning open channel flow concepts, in Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2012, Washington State University.10. Abdul, B., Van Wie, B. J., Babauta, J. T., Golter, P. B., Brown, G. R., Bako, R. B., Ahmed, A. S., Shide, E. G., Anafi
making the inverted format work for a large undergraduate course.Bibliography1. Bligh, D.A., What’s the use of lectures?. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass, 2000.2. B. Morin, K. M. Kecskemety, K. A. Harper, P. A. Clingan, “The Inverted Classroom in a First-Year Engineering Course,” 120th ASEE Conference & Exposition, June 23-26, 2013, Atlanta.3. G. S. Mason, T. R. Shuman, K. E. Cook, “Comparing the Effectiveness of an Inverted Classroom to a Traditional Classroom in an Upper-Division Engineering Course,” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 56, No. 4, November 2013.4. Bishop, J.L. and M.A. Verleger. The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research. in 2013 ASEE Annual Conference. 2013. Atlanta, GA: American Society for Engineering
; Daly, S.R. (2011). The challenges of returning: Transitioning from an engineering career to graduate school. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC.8. Peters & Daly, (2013). Returning to graduate school: Expectations of success, values of the degree, and managing the costs. Journal of Engineering Education.9. Peters, D. L. & Daly, S. R. (2012). Why do professionals return to school for graduate degrees? Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition,, San Antonio, TX.10. Mosyjowski, E. A., Daly, S.R., Peters D.L., & Skerlos, S.J. (2013). Designing a survey instrument for a national study of
of http://catalog.utk.edu/content.php? 1. Transportation Engineering ITennessee- catoid=1&catoid=1&navoid=104Knoxville &filter%5Bitem_type%5D=3&filt 2. Transportation Engineering II er%5Bonly_active%5D=1&filter %5B3%5D=1&filter%5Bcpage% 5D=9#acalog_template_course_fil ter Civil Engineering29.Texas A&M http://catalog.tamu.edu/09- 1. Transportation EngineeringUniversity 10_ug_catalog/course_description s/index.htm Civil engineering
integrate retention data collected from thecollege with an analysis of the survey and reflective essays to evaluate our hypotheses.References CitedAdams, E. A., C. L. Antaya, T. P. Seager and A. E. Landis. (2014). “Improving learning productivity and teamwork skills in freshman engineering students through conative understanding.” American Society for Engineering Education, June 15-18, 2014 Indianapolis, IN. Refereed conference proceeding accepted.Brainard, S. G., & Carlin, L. (1997, November). A longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 1997. 27th Annual Conference. Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change. Proceedings. (Vol. 1, pp. 134-143
students are formed by random assignment. Each team member's agreed-upon task(s) must be clearly defined and well documented in a group report that accompanies thefinal deliverables.Each team must create a 3-D CAD model of the p-v-T surface in any CAD software package thatis royalty-free for the public, open source, or commercially available with free student license.Packages from AutoDesk, for example, have been made available for all students without cost,while TurboCAD offers free trial period, and Google SketchUp is freely available to the public.Specialized commercial software such as SolidWorks and Creo are also allowed if it has alreadybeen installed on campus computers, so that no additional licensing cost will be incurred.Proficiency in
biomedical concepts of biomimicry, material properties andmechanics were successfully tied into a demonstration based activity. Page 26.1.8Safety and HazardsComprehensive safety standards should be practiced during the activity. It is recommended thatlaboratory gloves be worn during the part of the activity where the students pour the binder intothe mold. Caution must be taken when handling the PDMS to avoid clothing and skin contact. Itis also recommended to have the leader of the activity (or aids) put the molds into and removethe molds from the oven(s) with oven mitts. This mitigates the risk of burn injury. Aknowledgeable operator is required to
Outcome FrequencyIntroductionFirst-year programs nationwide typically feature an introductory curriculum featuring a semesteror yearlong “Introduction to Engineering” course or sequence. Examining a number of thesecourses shows that the content can vary significantly. For example, one course could focus onMATLAB programming while another course could emphasize technical communication. Mostcourses are a combination of these topics to varying degrees; therefore, an NSF-sponsoredproject to classify these courses was conducted which resulted in the First-Year Introduction toEngineering Course Classification Scheme.1 This taxonomy allows programs or instructors toquantify the content of their course(s) using the scheme. As a result, the scheme has
sabbatical will be integrated into the biomedicalengineering curriculum to make students aware of their ability to shape the medical deviceregulatory process and serve as a voice for the field.References1. “And Now for Something Completely Different.” Ian MacNaughton (Director). Columbia Pictures (USA), 1971. DVD.2. National Academy of Engineering, “Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century.” Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2005.3. “Quality System Regulation.” Title 21 CFR Part 820, 2014.4. “Animal Welfare.” Title 9 CFR Subchapter A, 2013.5. “Protection of Human Subjects.” Title 5 CFR Part 46, 2009.6. “Institutional Review Boards.” Title 21 CFR Part 56, 2014.7. W. R. Hendee, S
. Page 26.13.8Appendix 1: Project scope documentProject Name:Sponsor Organization and Department:Project Champion(s):Executive Sponsor:Scoping Contact:Project Team:Client Overview Client Summary: Background information (employees, revenue, offices, divisions, etc.) Relationship History: How did we connect? Have they worked with (program name) in the past?Project Summary Project Overview: One or two lines “Scope” Business Issue / Opportunity: More in depth discussionPrimary Project Objectives Objective 1 Objective 2, etc.Project Benefits Benefits to Client: List of benefits Page 26.13.9 Benefits to
Proceedings, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.4. Thomas, Jeffery S. and Philpot, Timothy A., “An Inverted Teaching Model for a Mechanics of Materials Course,” 2012 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, San Antonio, TX, 2012.5. Cavalli, Matthew, Neubert, Jeremiah J., McNally, Dustin, and Jacklitch-Kuiken, Debbie, “Comparison of Student Performance and Perceptions across Multiple Course Delivery Modes,” 2014 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.6. Swartz, Brian, Butler Velegol, Stephanie, and Laman, Jeffrey A., “Three Approaches to Flipping CE Courses: Faculty Perspectives and Suggestions,” 2013 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA, 2013
global, economic, environmental, and societal context i. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning j. a knowledge of contemporary issues k. an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. Figure 3. Student Outcome essay prompt. Page 26.18.11 SO Differential (S-W) Response Frequency, N=21 x 386420 a b c d e f g h i j k-2-4-6 Figure 4. Student Outcome essay response delta
. Dordrecht, [Great Britain]: Springer.Osareh, F. (1996). Bibliometrics, Citation Analysis and Co-Citation Analysis: A Review of Literature I : Libri. Libri, 46, 149-158. doi: 10.1515/libr.1996.46.3.149Peters, H. P. F., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (1991). Structuring scientific activities by co-author analysis. Scientometrics, 20(1), 235-255. doi: 10.1007/BF02018157Price, D. J. d. S. (1965). Networks of Scientific Papers. Science, 149(3683), 510-515. doi: 10.1126/science.149.3683.510Sci2 Team. (2009). Science of Science (Sci2) Tool Indiana University and SciTech Strategies. Retrieved from https://sci2.cns.iu.eduSmall, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two
Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.2. Timoshenko, S., (1953). History of Strength of Materials. McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y.3. Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press, California.4. Aronson, E., (1995). The Social Animal. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York.5. Guzzetti, B. J.; Snyder, T. E.; Glass, G. V.; Gamas, W.S. (1993). "Promoting Conceptual Change in Science: A Conceptual Meta-Analysis of Instructional Intervention From Reading Education and Science Education". Reading Research Quarterly, 28: 116-159.6. Graesser, A. C., Baggett, W., & Williams, K. (1996). "Question-driven Explanatory Reasoning". Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10:S17-S32.7. Losch, M. E
of maturity and responsibility. Students were provided withall the sufficient SAP software manual as well as one example problem that was assigned as aterm project.For Grading purposes, SAP Project constitute 10% of the overall grade, and on average casestudy analysis, exam(s), quizzes, class discussion and homework include 20%, 40%, 10%, 10%and 10% of the term grade, respectively.II. Simulation gameThe goal of the instructors in this study was to integrate lean concepts into the supply chainmanagement course and facilitate better understanding of the course material for the students. Asdescribed earlier, evaluating literature and analyzing the benefits of the other existing games,TimeWise Simulation was selected as the supplementary
experienced faculty.In addition to the two courses in this paper, BoardReach Extended has been deployed in othercourses inside and outside East Carolina University. Data collection is still ongoing and theresults will be reported later.REFERENCES[1] Ala-Mutka, K. M. (2005). A survey of automated assessment approaches for programmingassignments. Computer Science Education, 15(2), 83-102.[2] Douce, C., Livingstone, D., & Orwell, J. (2005). Automatic test-based assessment of programming: Areview. Journal on Educational Resources in Computing (JERIC), 5(3), 4.[3] Edwards, S. H. (2003). Improving student performance by evaluating how well students test their ownprograms. Journal on Educational Resources in Computing (JERIC), 3(3), 1
with theopportunity to accelerate their leadership development and realise their full leadership potential. Thepower of the program comes from combining the practical leadership experience the students receive as aresult of their roles in various student societies and project teams with leadership training, mentoring andcoaching. This allows the students not only to learn new skills and knowledge but to apply and adaptthese elements in a real work situation all within the security of a safe learning environment.REFERENCES[1] Crawley E.F., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., Brodeur, D.R., & Edstrom, K. (2014) RethinkingEngineering Education (2nd ed.). Springer.[2] Beyond Engineering. (n.d.). Retrieved June 26, 2014 from the Institution website[3
/spanish_dictionaries.htmlOccupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Susan Harwood (n.d). Susan Harwood Training GrantProgram, [www document] https://www.osha.gov/dte/sharwood/Olbina, S., Hinze, J., & Ruben, M. (2011, April). Safety in Roofing: Practices of Contractors That Employ HispanicWorkers. Professional Safety , pp. 44-52. Page 26.488.8
andgradually transform the curricula in its entirety, thus paving the way for a new generation ofprofessional engineers and an exciting innovative future.AcknowledgmentsThis work was partially supported by the Syracuse University College of Engineering andComputer Science Faculty Excellence Award and the National Science Foundation under grantCBET-1403405. Page 26.505.17References1. S. D. Sheppard, K. Macatangay, A. Colby, W. M. Sullivan, Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (2008).2. E. J. Coyle, L. H. Jamieson, W. C. Oakes, Integrating Engineering Education and Community Service
size reeducation and quick response time, to the system. This projectcovered major technical disciplines of mechatronics engineering. It also provided a real-worldengineering design practice for students. The successful completion of the project confirmed theeffectiveness of the Mechatronics curriculum for students’ multidisciplinary learning and practicalcompetence. Moreover, the ground work established in this project provides a valuable bench-marking system for Mechatronics students and classes in which various control designs areempirically evaluated. Page 26.518.12References[1] Norman S. Nise, Control Systems Engineering 6th edition, ISBN
for remote robot teleoperation: Applications in training and simulation." In IIE Annual Conference and Expo, pp. 977-982. 2008.[2] Pereira, Carlos Eduardo, Suenoni Paladini, and Frederico Menine Schaf. "Control and Automation Engineering Education: combining physical, remote and virtual labs." In Systems, Signals and Devices (SSD), 2012 9th International Multi-Conference on, pp. 1-10. IEEE, 2012.[3] Soares, F., C. P. Leão, V. Carvalho, R. M. Vasconcelos, and S. Costa. "Automation and control remote laboratory: a pedagogical tool." International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education 51, no. 1 (2014): 54-67.[4] Sekar, Ramnath, Sheng-Jen Hsieh, and Zhenhua Wu. "Remote diagnosis design for a PLC- based automated system
essentially a programming class, the importance of the PLC was limited due to the “softwareonly” approach to the lab. Further, the original curriculum was developed around a procedurallywritten lab. While it was acceptable to use procedural instructions in some instances for learningactivities, it generally did not support conceptual learning of the material. This was articulatedwell by Eiriksdottir et al. who stated that: “Specific instructions help initial performance,whereas more general instructions, requiring problem solving, help learning and transfer.”2Finally, because the system was originally developed in the mid 1990’s, the hardware andsoftware were both out of date and difficult to support. Not only had the limited maintenanceresulted in
Page 26.564.13a freshman through capstone product development sequence.Bibliography 1. Cooper, Robin. Kaplan, Robert S. “Profit Priorities from Activity-Based Costing”. Harvard Business Review. PP 130-135. May-June 1991. 2. Charney, Cyril. “Time to Market: Reducing Product Lead Time”. Society of Manufacturing Engineers. 1991. 3. “Vocational Education in the United States: The Early 1990s”. Institute of Education Sciences. U.S. Dept. of Education. 4. “Reality Check: The U.S. Job Market and Students' Academy and Career Paths Necessitate Enhanced Vocational Education in High Schools”. NFA Research. March 2012. 5. Sirkin, Harold L. “To Ease the Skills Shortage, Bring Back the Vocational High School
leading his team at his company. He wouldbe engaging in free-traited behavior. This implies that a person could operate within therealms of large comfort zones professionally while having a small comfort zone at a personallevel. In our research, we validate the idea that a person´s personal and professionalrelationship with uncertainty is not directly correlated; rather, they could be considereddifferent comfort zones.Little’s (2005, 2006, 2007) research validates that personally construed action, termedidiogenic action, has the capacity to confront biogenic and sociogenic forces. We similarlyargue that once you start to feel comfortable by “stepping out” of your comfort zone youbegin to change your biogenic disposition in either your personal
Science of the U.S. House of Representatives hearing on Undergraduate Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education: What's Working? Retrieved from http://gop.science.house.gov/hearings/research06/march%2015/seymour.pdf5. Freeman, T., Anderman, L., and Jensen, J. (2007). "Sense of Belonging in College Freshmen at the Classroom and Campus Levels." The Journal of Experimental Education 75.3: 203-20. Web.6. Hoffman, M., Richmond, J., Morrow, J., and Salomone, K. (2002). "Investigating "sense Of Belonging" In First-Year College Students." Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice 4.3: 227- 56. Web.7. May, G. S., & Chubin, D. E. (2003). A retrospective on undergraduate engineering success for