c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 ENGINEERING ETHICS IN TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY COURSESIntroductionUniversity technology and society courses provide students with the opportunity to studyprofessional or engineering ethics, but ethics seen in a different context from that of a formalengineering ethics course. Ethics can be the unifying core for such courses. The formalprofessional ethics course might follow one or more of several possible approaches: (i) use ofrelevant moral virtues as guides to making decisions, (ii) emphasis on consequences to allstakeholders, or (iii) application of rules or codes that must be followed. These approaches canlead to conflicting solutions. An
method, systems engineering, creative problem solving, reverse engineering,team building exercises, and an overview of the engineering disciplines and applications. Eachtopic includes introductory notes, a glossary of terms and vocabulary quiz, problem sets, at leastone project, and documentation. Since a textbook is not used, students are expected to build areference binder for notes, handouts, and assignments, and maintain an engineering notebook fortheir small projects. In the second year engineering class, students select their own projects andbuild a personal portfolio. Lightly structured, the Engineering class comes with a FIRST TechChallenge robotics team, a chapter of the Technology Students Association, and access to localprograms and
functions, graphing and curve fitting; FreeMat (an open-source software similar to MATLAB) for introductory programming and data analysis; freemodeling software for designing balsawood bridges; and BASIC, in conjunction with a Boe-Botrobotics kit (Parallax, Inc.), to explore microprocessors, basic digital electronics, sensors andmotors, program control flow, and proportional control.We will develop a series of simple experiments that students can perform at home to generateand collect data (e.g. harmonic motion of a pendulum, or evaluating Hooke's law). Students willthen apply the spreadsheet and programming tools and methods described above in order tonumerically and graphically analyze both modeled and collected data.Design Projects: A set of
Program approaches its 20th anniversary, retrospection, insight, and application of lessonslearned to formulate a vision of the future are appropriate. The past and current directors of theProgram have gathered together to create a joint retrospective. This retrospective is stronglyinfluenced by the authors personal experiences both in and outside of the classroom, paperspublished by the collective authors through the years, extensive reviews of current student Page 26.633.2learning through pre/post course surveys6 and discussions with graduates that considered boththe career impact of the Program as well as views of the strengths and areas where
multidisciplinary contexts and develop theirprofessional knowledge and skills. The intent was to engage over 100 undergraduateengineering students each year in a serious pursuit of ways in which progress can bemade on these challenges.Each semester, the program begins with engineering faculty members. A solicitationis sent to all engineering faculty members inviting proposals to support teams ofstudents. The incentive is that the College provides support for up to one graduatestudent who will work with an undergraduate student team, usually ten or moreundergraduate students. The graduate student will help the team with their technicalknowledge and often greater experience about the subject matter. Combiningundergraduate students, and graduate student, and
student the Department of English at Old Dominion University. She teaches composition, scientific, digital, and technical writing, and her research interests include professional and technical writing, as well as sound studies, games, and simulation.Dr. Pilar Pazos, Old Dominion University Pilar Pazos is an Associate Professor and Graduate Program Director in the Engineering Management and Systems Engineering Department at Old Dominion University. Her areas of research include team-based work structures, collaborative learning, knowledge management and decision making.Dr. Daniel Richards, Old Dominion University Daniel Richards, Ph.D. is assistant professor of technical and professional writing in the Department of
engagement in learning: layers of context, whatindividuals bring, mediating variables, task interpretation, personal objectives, SRL processes,cognitive strategies, and performance criteria. Interested readers may refer to relevant literatureto gain an in-depth understanding of Butler and Cartier’s model 19-21.Goal, Objectives, and Overall Framework of the REU Site ProgramThe overall goal of this REU Site program is to motivate and retain talented undergraduates inSTEM careers, particularly careers in teaching and STEM education research. The specificobjectives of the program include: Page 26.99.3 Expose REU students, especially those who might
Page 26.289.5own self-efficacy in an engineering program. Table 2. Level of agreement with statements regarding self-efficacy in an engineeringdepartment based on the two groups of students. The range of responses were 1 – 5 where higher numbers indicate greater agreement. Existing, Anticipating, n=27 n=31 All faculty members treat me with fairness and respect* 4.1 4.6 I feel that I am an equal participant in group work 4.0 4.3 I am comfortable approaching instructors for help outside of class
presenting their inventions (flip chart and oral) to engineering faculty, technologytransfer faculty, parents and friends.While many of the programs described above focused on components of STEM, the EverydayEngineering program is unique as it focused on a diverse array of fields in engineering as theyrelate to all aspects of STEM including bioengineering, computer science, robotics, and electricalcircuits. Everyday Engineering was also unique in that the students were presented with thechallenge of designing an invention of their own making. Thus encouraging the students toexplore design topics most relevant to their own personal experience and fleshing out these ideasthrough team building, collaboration, and critique. Everyday Engineering engaged
challenge of representing the transformational learning that occurswhen students participate in high impact practices such as project-based, multi-disciplinaryactivities, or first year experiences. This paper illustrates the context and components of one suchmulti-disciplinary, first year experience called SUSTAIN SLO, at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, anddescribes the use of qualitative narrative analysis done to gain insight into learning outcomesbeyond typical institutional measures like retention and grades. To research these lessquantifiable outcomes, 22 students were interviewed one year after their experience in SUSTAINSLO. A team of one faculty member, a recent graduate, and four undergraduate students usedqualitative analysis techniques to see
inproviding transformational educational experiences for students, and that it is an excellent way toattract and retain diverse students to STEM disciplines. It is also one of the best places to embedinformation literacy education; PBL is an established method of bringing both disciplinary skillsand lifelong learning skills together in ways that are engaging for students, and in the case ofservice learning, impactful to communities or individual stakeholders.4,5 WPI, as well as otherinstitutions aiming to graduate future engineers across specializations, use student projectoutcomes to support professional as well as technical skills development for a wide variety ofaccreditation standards, including but not limited to those of ABET in the U.S.A
." Enhancing Student Retention: UsingInternational Policy and Practice, an international conference sponsored by the European Access Network and theInstitute for Access Studies at Staffordshire University. Amsterdam.[23] Lopatto, D. (2007). Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning.Cell Biology Education-Life Sciences Education 6, 297-306.[24] Kuh, D.D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why theymatter. American Association of Colleges and Universities, Washington, DC.[25] Bandura, A. and Walters, R. (1963) Social learning and personality development. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston,New York.[26] King, A. (1990) Enhancing peer interaction and learning in the
from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU.Dr. Jana Bouwma-Gearhart, Oregon State University Jana L. Bouwma-Gearhart is an associate professor of STEM education at Oregon State University. Her research widely concerns improving education at research universities. Her earlier research explored en- hancements to faculty motivation to improve undergraduate education. Her more recent research concerns organizational change towards postsecondary STEM education improvement at
is evident by exit surveys and freshman orientation interview answers where students informed us that this event had an impact on their decision to pursue technology degrees and/or apply to our technology degree program. This kind of high-visibility industry engagement has been a critical component of success in the RSC program. Others attempting to implement full pipelines are highly encouraged to find or create a similar experience for students throughout the technology and engineering career cycle to engage with and understand the needs and vision of industry leaders and professionals.D. Women in Technology Panel Another recruitment tool has been the annual Women in Technology Discussion Panel and
-conventional ideas from the next generation ofSTEM graduates. Personally, there is an internal satisfaction in sharing knowledge and fosteringgrowth in the next generation of professionals for industry. Without an intrinsic sense ofaccomplishment, there may be little incentive for a professional to donate their time. Theseinternal rewards must be supported by faculty through recognition and presentation of “letters ofappreciation” from the College.Faculty benefit through maintenance and upgrade of personal skills in the face of changingtechnology, having a pathway to keep course material current, developing a broader personalnetwork, and intrinsic rewards of providing a better student experience.4. Adopting Industry Fellows for Online/Distance
electroniccomponents into a course called Victorian Media Studies. In these cases, the library serves theinteresting role of ‘gap-bridger’, bringing these more engineering-friendly tools into practice inthe humanities.The low barrier to entry of the MaKey MaKey (which is essentially ‘plug-and-play’) combinedwith library support, enabled a Communications faculty member, Nicholas Taylor, to develop aclass assignment using MaKey MaKey in collaboration with a librarian, Brendan O’Connell, forhis Communications and Technology course. Students produced videos in which they builtphysical representations of intellectual concepts from the course using MaKey MaKey. Theyused the MaKey MaKey as an experimental communications medium, learning about both self
Manufac- turing Process Specialist within the textile industry, which was part of an eleven-year career that spanned textile manufacturing to product development.Dr. Robert J Prins, James Madison University Robert Prins received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Tech in 2005; he is currently an associate professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison University (JMU). Prior to joining JMU, Dr. Prins was a faculty member at Virginia State University. Dr. Prins’ industrial experience includes one year as a suspension engineer at Visteon, Inc. and five years as an engineer at Perceptron, Inc., a machine vision company
collecting more data about our respondents (demographics, etc.).The research team next worked to develop response options for all draft scenarios, country-by-country. This typically involved sending a batch of 3-5 scenarios, along with the associatedopen-ended novice and expert responses, to a pair of researchers, including undergraduatestudents, graduate students, and faculty members. Those involved with this project have typicallyworked individually and then in pairs to analyze scenarios and write response options. Early inthis process we also realized that the scenarios and response options could usually be viewed interms of three major considerations: cultural knowledge, domain/technical knowledge, andcultural sensitivity. This insight was
roles in an individual’s academic and career choices. The SCCT framework argues that these choices are influenced by three main factors: selfefficacy (the degree to which one believes that one can succeed at a given activity), outcome expectations (one’s beliefs about the outcomes of certain behaviors), and personal interests (i.e., intentions). Researchers have used SCCT to demonstrate that selfefficacy plays a crucial role in recruiting 10,11women into collegelevel STEM program. Other studies have explored handson STEM activities within the framework of SCCT and have found that it
case study in particular.14 As designed, this open-endedrole-play experience in which the roles are clearly defined and personalities described not onlyenables students to experience “live” decision making process, it also allows them to explore theeffects of personality, relationships, and ambiguous data on decisions. The challenges facedduring the “live” decision-making of the role play stands in stark contrast to the “hindsight is20/20” perspective that seems to prevail when the students read the Challenger case study,though many of the influencing factors (e.g., economic, political, ambiguous data) are similar.Students who are not playing a role are assigned one of four types of observer roles (informative,normative, responsibility, and
projects.2. PROGRAM DEVELOPME TDuring the Spring of 2010, JSU’s Technology Department was selected to receive a grant fromthe U.S. Department of Homeland Security to establish an Emergency Management Technologyprogram and offer scholarships. In September 2011, Technology Department received anothergrant from DHS, through its Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics CareerDevelopment Grants program. This grant enabled EMT program to award scholarships to moreundergraduate students who demonstrate career interest in Homeland Security. In 2014, JacksonState University received two additional grants, from DHS and Nuclear Regulatory Commission(NRC), to augment the EMT program with new curriculum and state-of-the-art laboratories.The EMT
University. He teaches context-centered electrical engineering and embedded systems design courses, and studies the use of context in both K-12 and undergraduate engineering design education. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Education (2010) and M.S./B.S. in Electrical and Com- puter Engineering from Purdue University. Dr. Jordan is PI on several NSF-funded projects related to design, including an NSF Early CAREER Award entitled ”CAREER: Engineering Design Across Navajo Culture, Community, and Society” and ”Might Young Makers be the Engineers of the Future?” He has also been part of the teaching team for NSF’s Innovation Corps for Learning, and was named one of ASEE PRISM’s ”20 Faculty Under 40” in 2014. Dr
active learning format whereby student participation ishighly encouraged has the strongest impact on students’ academic performance and theirattitudes towards the engineering profession.19 Despite of the fact that many students may havebeen academically prepared and motivated to study engineering, 50% of students who enterengineering programs as freshman do not earn an engineering degree.17, 18 The gap betweenengineers needed annually and the number of graduates available to fill positions is still wide.20,21 A change in motivation is perhaps the key factor in a students’ decision to earn an engineeringor engineering technology degree. Positive experiences in introductory electronics courses, forinstance, can influence both EE majors and non
Figure 3 was used by the researcher togive an example for each expression of leadership. The researcher then determined from theinterviews when a Maker expressed one of the leadership roles.In their Making, this person:___ 1. Listens to the problems of team members/subordinates. (Mentor)___ 2. Reviews and/or reflects upon project achievements. (Monitor)___ 3. Influences decisions made at higher levels. (Broker)___ 4. Does problem solving in creative, clever ways. (Innovator)___ 5. Clearly defines areas of responsibility for team members/subordinates. (Director)___ 6. Displays a wholehearted commitment to the job/project. (Producer)___ 7. Facilitates consensus building in work-group sessions. (Facilitator)___ 8. Protects continuity in day-to-day
recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance understanding of geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering education and practice.Natascha M Trellinger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Natascha Trellinger is a second year Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from Syracuse University where her interest in the
Paper ID #13565Learning from Senior-Level Engineering & Business Development Profes-sionals to Create Globally Competent Engineers via On- and Off-CampusActivitiesDr. Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jane Lehr is Chair of the Women’s & Gender Studies Department at California Polytechnic State Uni- versity, San Luis Obispo. She is also an Associate Professor in Ethnic Studies, Director of the Science, Technology & Society Minor Programs, and Faculty Director of the Louis Stokes Alliance for Minor- ity and Underrepresented Student Participation in STEM Program at Cal Poly. She