Session 1247 Vacuum Systems Laboratory Development: Teaching More About Making Less David M. Hata Portland Community CollegeAbstractThe implementation of new associate degree programs in semiconductor manufacturingat community colleges across the nation has created a critical need for vacuum technologycourses and supporting laboratories. Unfortunately, few resources have been available tosupport technology-level courses in vacuum systems. This paper describes the results ofa two-year project to develop a vacuum technology course, implement a vacuum systemslaboratory, and provide
, heattransfer, mass transfer, kinetics, unit operations and process control) with design, culminating inthe capstone design course, a 10 credit senior design laboratory course.The major area of improvement is the way we teach the use of the programs. In the past we useda computer and LED panel in the classroom to show how to use software, with studentsdeveloping program use skills on their own using the Department’s computers. Departmentalcomputers were limited in both number and current technology. Programs are now on anetworked system, providing a better environment to manage software in terms of updates.Networked computers use a Window operating environment. It also possible to have studentsintegrate material from multiple applications and to share
Section 2520 Evaluation of Student Preferences and Learning Outcomes of Computer Based Teaching for a Manufacturing Processes Laboratory Christine E. Hailey, David E. Hailey, Jr. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering / Department of English Utah State University AbstractStudies conducted by a number of investigators indicate that there are no negative outcomeswhen computer-based teaching (CBT) is used in place of or in conjunction with a traditionallecture. We performed three studies concerning student preferences and learning as a
technologyassociate degree program and now has become required courses for both the associate and bachelordegrees in Mechanical Engineering Technology.The presenter is constantly exploring more applications of robotics/sensors/vision system interface.This paper is written to suggest to educators in engineering technology, options to consider ininstruction of automated manufacturing applications. AcknowledgmentThe author wishes to acknowledge the support provided through funding by a National ScienceFoundation project, A Machine Vision Application Teaching Laboratory - KSUS of some equipmentused in the laboratory. He also wishes to acknowledge Associate Professor Zexiang Zhao, HenanProvince, China as the 1996-97
Session 2265 Applied Algebra with Laboratory Experimentation Richard Ciocci, Cathy Godbois, Eric Leung Harrisburg Area Community CollegeThis paper describes a work in progress. Students in a variety of majors at the communitycollege-level are required to take at least two courses in math and science. Often these studentselect to take college algebra, which neither prepares them for a data-oriented environment in theworkplace nor exposes them to scientific methodology. These students need an interdisciplinarycourse or a course with an interdisciplinary focus, which gives them these
tapes and chemicals sent to homes. It is possible but expensive to send awell equipped electronic laboratory to an individual home. This would require a multi-meter,AC-DC signal sources, an oscilloscope, a prototype board, and RLC discrete components. It ispossible that given a very good video tape walk-through on all of the equipment and each of thelaboratory exercises, the student could learn something and that the equipment might survive.Should this plan be approached, considering the cost, the potential to teach electronics ismarginal. The opportunity to make mistakes in the presence of someone who can assist in therecovery from those mistakes is a necessary element of the hands-on-laboratory. A laboratorywithout the possibility of mistakes
. However,the positive impact on teaching and learning was even more significant. The most obvious andimportant benefit came from exposing MET students to state-of-the-art control technology. IfMET programs are to fulfill their mission of delivering students who are prepared to “hit theground running”, it is imperative that laboratory equipment reflect what exists in the real world.Students in an MET “Air Conditioning and Refrigeration” elective will benefit from exposure tothe building automation equipment that they will encounter during their careers. Page 3.200.5 5 Figure 4. The user
learning approach in the course.This student feedback provided the impetus to seek the support needed to establish anexperiential learning environment where a laboratory supplanted, for the most part, classroomand homework activities. To date, the laboratory has involved a total investment ofapproximately $126,000, three quarters of which has gone into equipping experimental stations.Support for the laboratory has come mostly from private industry and a private educationalfoundation (60% of total), but the early and generous commitment of university and departmentalresources was central to establishing the laboratory. Operating costs for the laboratory aremodest, except for the salary provided to the professor to teach the course. No
technology: Power Electronics. With the explosion of Internet Access and the need to have more students to access theuniversity facilities, distance learning becomes very effective teaching tool for some engineeringsubjects. One of the difficulties of conducting distance learning of engineering courses is howstudents can conduct experiments remotely in an effective way. With new Internet DevelopmentSoftware and LabView program from National Instrument, the distance learning laboratorybecomes a reality. We will discuss the requirements on both hardware and software for distancelearning laboratory course. We will also use one project, DC Motor Speed and Torque Controlusing Single Phase Controlled Rectifier Circuit, to demonstrate that students
do so, but the team-teaching format adds vitality and broadens the scope of thematerial to be addressed.Several labs are necessary on a part-time basis to support the Environmental Systems courseincluding an electronics classroom, elementary circuits laboratory and access to water for someof our river modeling experiments.In summary this course has required a significant commitment by our department to insure itssuccess. Based upon our students' enthusiasm for the course/laboratory, we feel the course hasbeen worth the sacrifices.5. THE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS ENGINEERING TRACKA track in our Systems Engineering major is comprised of a two-course, sequential offering. Thefirst course in the track, Environmental Systems Engineering is the topic
integrating process safety principles into the unit operations laboratory, the studentsreceive a “hands on” exposure to process safety. The intention is to make process safety anintegral part of the day to day work in the laboratory. The importance of safety in the unitoperations laboratory is reflected in the course syllabus, which states the first objective ofthe course as:“Develop a constant awareness of safety in the laboratory so that all laboratory work iscarried out in a safe manner.” (Caspary and Ellis, 1997)The MTU unit operations laboratory provides an ideal setting for teaching process safetyand for preparing chemical engineers for safety in the chemical industry. The laboratoryhas two levels (each approximately 30’x85’) and a third level
Session 3557 Interactive Multimedia: An Alternative to Manufacturing Laboratories Thomas J. Crowe, Elin M. Wicks, and Herman Budiman University of Missouri - ColumbiaABSTRACTTo ensure the continuation of important laboratory experiences, a new approach tomanufacturing process laboratories is undertaken. A multimedia software package is beingconstructed to allow students to explore a virtual industrial park. The industrial park iscomposed of five virtual companies: a machine shop, a welding shop, a materials lab, a sheetmetal shop, and a foundry-forging company
fundamental concepts and experimental methods for conducting processengineering laboratories.Three major topics are covered in the laboratory course: reactor theory, kinetics, and masstransfer. The goal of the project is to produce one to two multi-media modules for each majortopic. The modules are designed to teach students how to collect, analyze and interpret data toobtain design parameters for engineered processes or mathematical modeling of contaminanttransport in the environment. Each module contains concept, laboratory and analysis tutorials,videos of each lab, and an animated laboratory that can be used by the students to evaluate theeffect of different design and operational parameters.Students are expected to review the modules at various
) design of experimental procedurewith statistical design of experiments; and (4) evaluation of industrial products. Examples are usedto illustrate the advantages and drawbacks of each method.I. INTRODUCTION To educate a new generation of engineers for the twenty-first century, engineering educatorsface many challenges such as the development of students’ ability in critical thinking, creativity,collaborative work, and communication. Laboratory education can play a pivotal role in attainingthese goals. However, due to the limitation of traditional laboratory teaching, its potential benefitshave never been fully realized. The problem becomes more acute if the laboratory course isequipment-intensive. Since students are usually not familiar
, students encounterthe math, science and engineering of real (virtual) devices and are able to work with themconveniently.Having these virtual devices available gives more of a “real world”-like experience in performingthe required experiments. Of course it is still virtual, but it is a practical laboratory encounter forcourses that must enroll so many students.Other virtual devices that have been developed and used include a ball falling in a gravitationalfield, a satellite orbiter and a Bungy Jump simulation.Course materials can be found at the URL: http://www.cps.msu.edu/~cps131References1. S. B. Niku, "Teaching Mechatronics to First-Year Engineering Students," Computers in Education Journal, Vol.VII, No. 3, pp. 6-9, July-September 1997
utilization fraction (about 0.014) of theavailable hours in a year. Providing learning opportunities for students with scheduling conflictsis another strong point of this ability to teach engineering laboratory via the Web.When first installed, the main weaknesses were equipment or communication bugs. Nearly all ofthese have been worked out. With NSF support, all stations in the controls lab have beenupgraded. They now have Windows NT 4.0 operating system with Pentium Pro Intel processors.All computers (and not engineering equipment) are on uninterruptible power supplies, so evenacross brief power outages, the lab remains up and available.The main challenges being experienced now are the common challenges of distance education.These challenges
Session 2259 LABVIEW BASED ELECTRIC MACHINES LABORATORY INSTRUMENTATION S. A. Chickamenahalli, V. Nallaperumal, V. Waheed Wayne State University/Wayne State University/Patti EngineeringAbstract This paper presents an innovative instrumentation project that consisted of interface of adc motor-generator set to an IBM PC using National Instruments Data Acquisition (NIDAQ)tools and display of experimental data using LabVIEW software. The goal was to achieve real-time measurement and display of experiment waveforms on the PC screen and store thesewaveforms for later use in reports, illustrations
than like a state-of-the-art teaching laboratory in a sophisticated majoruniversity. With which are the freshmen likely to feel more comfortable and at ease? This maybe a substantial shift for engineering educators, who enjoy playing with and showing off thefancy gadgets, but too often students get lost in the gadgetry and don’t understand the basicconcepts. Structure of the First-Semester Hands-On ExperiencesThe material in the new first-semester course begins with very basic physical and mathematicaltools, and then moves into general introductory mechanics taught from a physics perspective. Itfollows closely the material and approach suggested by Arons 7, but emphasizes the use of thesetools in engineering problems. Added
Session 3613The Use of Sophisticated Process Design Software to Teach Basic ChE PrinciplesThrough the Design of a Ketchup Manufacturing Process in a SophomoreLaboratory CourseZ. Otero Keil, Ph.D., P.E., Department of Chemical Engineering, Rowan University,Glassboro, NJ 08028Abstract:Engineering process design software and simulators allow for the effective integration ofdesign early in the engineering curriculum. Design experiences early in the curriculumoffer opportunities to expose students to engineering applications that serve to increaseunderstanding of technical material and enhance student interest in engineering. The useof sophisticated software has made it
computers in teaching. At the same time there has been a would have the following benefits:corresponding reduction in laboratories undertaken by • The control and prevention of unsafe conditions could bestudents, especially where large classes are involved. With achieved through the application of safe limits by theincreasing student/staff ratios the cost of running well staffed computer. The student would not be able to run thelaboratories has become unacceptable. At the same time very experiment outside these limits.few universities
adequately meet the needs of students engaging in civilengineering professional careers. A new laboratory curricula (presented in this paper) designedto combine modeling and experimental activities with computer analyses and theory enablesstudents to achieve an improved understanding about structural behavior. The resultingcurriculum (description of each laboratory) and strategies to increase student learning arepresented in this paper.INTRODUCTIONAt Northeastern University all civil engineering students are required take a theory-basedstructural analysis course and a structural laboratory course simultaneously. Building offelementary statics and mechanics courses, the theory-based course teaches students how tocalculate deflections and forces in
the course content but the work environment theywill encounter which involves team projects, technical reporting, problem solving, and massiveinformation processing skills. This paper summarizes two NSF projects geared at these problems.First, a summary from industry partners defining sufficient breadth and depth for undergraduatesin the area of microelectronics. Second the development of a new microelectronics laboratoryconducted in a "simulated corporate environment", which is designed to prepare students for theenvironment they will encounter in the workplace in addition to teaching the course material. Thenew microelectronics laboratory involves the integration of software, measurement tools, andproject-based learning. "Project-chips
mechanicalengineering laboratories and leading the NSF Gateway Coalition's Materials Program Area team.JEFFREY MOREHOUSE is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at USC. His long-term researchinterests involve energy-related systems, including solar, automotive, HVAC and general power producing devices.Teaching is focused on the thermal sciences and their applications, plus the capstone design course. He is thefaculty advisor to the student chapters of SAE, Pi Tau Sigma, ASHRAE, and the collegiate auto racing team.DAVID ROCHELEAU is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at USC. His primary research interestis in the area of applied mechanisms and robotics. Teaching responsibilities include courses in Computer-AidedDesign, Computer-Aided
Session 1547 Graphical Analysis Applications in an Electrical Engineering Technology Laboratory William F. Reeve Purdue University Abstract Troubleshooting frequently focuses on the process of developing a systematic logicalapproach to the identification and solution of a problem. Identifying the problem, devising ahypothesis for its cause, postulating a test strategy that will identify the source of the fault,implementing tests to confirm the fault, and correcting the fault are some of
educational methods as “problem-based.”That is, learning how to solve problems is not the same as Problem-Based Learning.Indeed, many engineering programs have introduced “industrial” or “good engineering”practices into their laboratories. For example, the University of Missouri’s ChemicalEngineering department felt that their laboratory courses should encourage students to getresults while also teaching them to write concise reports. In short, lab should not onlydemonstrate theory. As a result, they replaced simple theory-based goals with “practical,industrial problems.”iii Although this change incorporated many of the ideas of the PBLapproach, it is learning through problem solving that defines PBL. This approach notonly allows important knowledge
department’s objective is to provide studentswith hand-on experience in modern measurement techniques, data acquisition, and extensiveuse of computers for analysis and reduction of experimental data. The lab courses, therefore,not only fulfill the pedagogic principle of validation of the engineering principles and laws,but also form an effective platform for enhancing the written and oral communication skills ofour students through presentation of formal reports and oral presentations. In the lab coursesthat I teach in the thermal fluids area, I try to go beyond these basic objectives by providingstudents an opportunity to design and build new laboratory systems, or augment the existingequipment with modern instrumentation, and controls. In my lab
Session 3548 Engineering Technology Feedback Control Laboratory at University of Central Florida Alireza Rahrooh University of Central Florida Abstract Closed-loop feedback control system is an important component of a well-roundedengineering technology program However, since feedback control systems tends to be a rathercomplex topic, students react positively to hands-on experiments that assist them visualize controlsystems in practical situations. and, in today’s technology, utilizing and
Session 3659 Enhancement of Freshman Engineering Laboratory through Remote Web-based Experiments Robin Carr, Andrew Gregorowicz, Adam O'Donnell and Robert Quinn Drexel UniversityIntroduction - Three remote web-based engineering laboratories were developed andimplemented on a large scale - approximately 500 freshman engineering students participated.Before performing the remote labs, students become proficient in the use of a general purposeengineering workstation which includes a precision DMM, function generator, high-speedstorage oscilloscope, frequency counter, multiplexer
Session 3226, Paper 1 Real Time, Remote Circuits and Electronics Laboratories for Distance Learning Prof. J. Michael Heneghan Department of Electrical Engineering St. Cloud State University St. Cloud, MNAbstractEmploying distance education techniques in teaching electrical engineering courses willcontinue to grow. One of the major obstacles in distance education is providing relevant,hands-on laboratories for students. This project is aimed at giving students real-timeaccess to standard laboratory instrumentation and
Chip Carrier (PLCC), and Small Outline Package (SOP), were prepared(Fig. 1). These packages were already molded and dissectioned by the Teaching Assistance (TA)ready for grinding and polishing in the lab. Students were divided into three groups with three orfour students in each group and assigned each package. Photographs of specimens were takenwith a low magnification (40x) stereoscope in one of the MSE laboratories followed bypolishing. Students investigated four different package features: cross-section (A), wire bond(B), circuit pattern on the die (C), and lead fingers and die (D) (Fig 2). Students reported the 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional features of the assigned package, and the function of eachcomponent and its requirement. This was