¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ 6,1 6Professionalism,trustworthiness andwork-ethics 17 ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ 7,2 4Consciousness ofcost, quality, time,human and society 18
discussion with the attributes recommended forengineering graduates in Criteria 2000 as developed by the Engineering AccreditationCommission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology’s (EAC of ABET)Criteria 2000. These attributes have been widely publicized and include not only the ability toapply knowledge of the sciences, conduct experiments and design systems and components butto also function in multidisciplinary teams, understand the importance of lifelong learning andunderstand their professional and ethical responsibility. He states that this is a good start but notthe final word. Page 4.515.1The Technology Accreditation
competitive environment has perhaps become unpredictable to the pointthat challenges the even well run organizations 17. No longer do engineers work independently,and employers are looking for more quality-minded and customer-oriented work teams. Mostresearch shows that when the learner is actively involved in acquiring knowledge, theacquisition occurs much more rapidly and is more effectively retained. Therefore, howseriously should educators take the training of social, ethical, human values, andcommunication skills? Perhaps one answer would be the inclusion of cultural diversity that isbrought into the classroom by international students.Cultural diversity is the beginning of prosperity in society. It is the notion that differences canprovide for
Individual Make-up] 717 Communication Skills I18 Student Mini-Lectures Gp A. Also Evening19 Student Mini-Lectures Gp B. Also Evening20 Informal Oral Reports on Web Project Arrange to watch videotape.21 Testing 1122 Testing & Grading 1123 Disruption and Cheating 12 SPRING BREAK24 Intermediate Project Reports/Writing Exam25 Computer Simulations 8 + Handouts26 Professional Concerns and Ethics 17 (Student Exams Due)27
words in the title.The reader may have already suspected this, however, the analogy continues. Perspirationresults biologically in humans to enable them to keep cool when work is being done. Fewaspirations will be realized without an adequate work ethic. There is an old Indian saying that inorder to dig a well, you must at least dig in one place for a while. Enough said? But even here, alittle reflection is useful. If the well is being dug in a quick sand area, an obvious source ofwater, it first becomes necessary to shore up the sides of the well. Simply digging in one placefor a long time would be fruitless.Gellerman 2 concludes that, “ . . . There is an underlying order to human behavior on the job.People do constantly seek to serve their
design, prepare design memos covering the work completed in each quarter, attenddesign team meetings, and attend design team meeting(s) with the Chief Engineer, as directed bythe Chief Engineer. Design team performance is graded by the Vice President of Engineering,and that grade is factored into the final grade assigned for BE-400 by the Chief Engineer.During the summer between the junior and senior year each member of the design team isexpected to spend at least 20 hours working on assigned design team activities. In BE401, which is taken during quarter ten, the PM is responsible for making sure thatdesign specifications, ethical, moral, legal, and economic issues are resolved by the members ofthe team. An Oral Presentation and Formal
added bonus would be that any changes made toaccommodate E_F_ learning preferences would appeal especially to female students who aresignificantly more E_F_ than the male students.Specific suggestions10 for modification of the program would be to incorporate more activegroup work (E and F); more spontaneous discussion, informal problem-solving and creativediscovery tasks (P); discussion of aesthetics, ethics and social factors, work with mentors andgroups (F); and more specific, practical, hands-on realistic tasks (S). Insofar as studentwithdrawals from the engineering disciplines are highly P, the single most important change toincrease student retention would be to help students to organise their time, systematicallyallocating it to different
faculty member, lead and teach ENGR 195F. Students inthese courses earn a grade of A-F based on attendance, participation, and completion ofassignments.In ENGR 195D, faculty members meet with groups of approximately30 students for one houreach week and actively engage students in career related experiences. This instructor-led courseinvolves the student in resume writing, job fairs, career planning, internet searches for careerand academic information, ethics games, communication exercises, and engineering problem Page 4.287.3solving. This course has been well received by students.7In ENGR 195F, two upper-class-engineering students lead discussion
learning.Bibliography1. North, S. The idea of a writing center. College English 46(1984): 433-446.2. Trachsel, M. Nurturant ethics and academic ideals: convergence in the writing center. Writing Center Journal 16.1(1995): 24-45.3. Murphy, C. The writing center and social constructivist theory. In J. Mullin and R. Wallace (Eds.). Intersections: Theory-Practice in Writing Centers. Urbana: NCTE (1994).4. McCall, W. Writing centers and the idea of consultancy. Writing Center Journal 14.2(1994): 163-171.5. Neuleib, J. W. & Scharton, M. A. Writing others, writing ourselves: ethnography and the writing center. In J. Mullin and R. Wallace (Eds.). Intersections: Theory-Practice in Writing Centers. Urbana: NCTE (1994).6. Rodis, K. Mending the damaged path
for conceptual ideas. Application examples.12. Solution Implementation: The role of the “producer.” Selling ideas. The work planand implementation. Monitoring and final project evaluation. Time management. Review. Table 4 Content of Part 3: Application to Conceptual Engineering Design13. What Is Engineering Design? Definition and implications: users and customers, prod-ucts, processes, systems, ethics, and stewardship. Using Part 3 as a curriculum guide.14. The Engineering Design Process: Twelve steps to quality by design. Design problemanalysis stage. System (concept) level design stage. Parameter level design stage. Tolerance(detail) level design stage. Design evaluation stage. Guidelines for using a modified versionof the Pugh
for overall coordination, pres-entation of specific topics and grading. As part of their execution of a design, students are expected to demonstratethe establishment of design specifications and criteria, analysis and synthesis techniques, aesthetics, safety, con-struction, testing and evaluation. The courses also provide some exposure to mathematical modeling, the use ofchemical, mechanical and electrical analogs, optimization, ethics, robust design, life cycle analysis, reliability andother current topics in engineering design.The background that students have prior to embarking on a fourth-year project involving robotics includes physics,chemistry, six semesters of mathematics, statics and dynamics, electric networks and electronics, and
students coming into the course with different levels ofpreparation would need help in developing the skills necessary to delve into some significanthistorical scholarship. I wanted the course to challenge the simplistic view that history is merelya straightforward accounting of events and dates, and I also wanted to encourage analysis.I started, as previously noted, with Arnold Pacey’s broad definition of technology. Thisdefinition holds that technology is not merely technique (knowledge, skill, tools, machines,chemicals, liveware, etc.), but also includes cultural aspects (goals, values and ethical codes,ideas about progress, awareness and creativity, etc.) and organizational aspects (economic andindustrial activity, professional activity
Communication Skills 4 Presentation Skills 5 Problem-Solving Skills 6 Teamwork 7 Leadership 8 Project Management 9 Time Management 10 Ethics 11 Office Skills Page 4.29.15 Exhibit 4 (continued) CSULA Summer Engineering Internship Program Student Evaluation FormPART III1. What suggestions would you provide in order to improve the program
. Furthermore, since regular FIE review literature is used asa guide to develop the online review material, the format of the online review is inaccordance to the actual FIE review and can be used to supplement to other reviewmaterial.2. Exam Review Web Site OrganizationTo help the user, the organization of the review web site (www.eml.ou.edu/fie) was splitinto both a morning session and an afternoon session as shown in Fig. 1. In the morningsession 12 topics are covered, including Chemistry, Computers, Dynamics, ElectricalCircuits, Economics, Ethics, Fluid Mechanics, Mathematics, Materials Engineering,Mechanics of Materials, Statics and Thermodynamics. The PM session reviews materialthat is specific for a given field of study, including Chemical
itself avaluable tool for enhancing the educational experience in courses as varied as Ethics inComputing and Advanced Object-Oriented Systems. Further information on PG may be foundat http://uni22ws.unity.ncsu.edu/PG/basic_documentation.html .AcknowledgmentsThe help of the following NCSU students with this project is gratefully acknowledged: Hunter Matthews, NeilHorman, Steve Harris, Karen Proctor, Jason Horne, Drew Puch, and Weigen Liang.Bibliography1. Mills, Barbara J., and Cottell, Jr., Philip G., Cooperative Learning for Higher Education Faculty, Oryx Press,1998.2. The Deadalus Group, Daedalus Integrated Writing Environment, http://www.daedalus.com/info/overtext.html.EDWARD F. GEHRINGEREdwad Gehringer is an associate professor in the
the university level, this often lead to more required courses for all students.For instance, over a period of a few years in the 1980’s, the UConn University Senate mandatedthe following additional requirements:Ç a minimum of two courses (beyond two freshman English courses) that require writing,Ç a minimum number of courses involving computer usage and math,Ç a course in western history,Ç a course in non-western culture,Ç a course in philosophical and/or ethical analysis,Ç a course in social scientific and comparative analysis,Ç one year of a single foreign language if three years were not taken in high school,Ç two courses in literature, andÇ two courses in science and technology.Many of these
required to address the following ethical issues:• Where does the responsibility of the engineer end and the construction site contractor begin?• Should the engineer allow construction workers to endanger their lives by not using the safer design?• If design codes do not require you to use a clean sand backfill, would social responsibility Page 4.538.8 come before legal liability?Design of a Process: Kevlar Heat Treating In the module sponsored by the Department of Chemical Engineering, students work inmultidisciplinary teams and gain an introduction to materials testing, polymer science, computersimulation, and basic
illustrations. • Compose effective sentences. • Evaluate their documents to be sure that the documents fulfill their purpose and to ensure that they can be revised if necessary. • Collaborate effectively with their peers in a community of writers who provide feedback on each others’ work and occasionally write together. • Write several specific kinds of documents that recur in technical and scientific communities. • Employ computer technology effectively in the solution of communication problems. • Communicate in an ethically responsible manner.There are, of course, several options for creating a syllabus that will meet the course objectives.One approach is to have students write one
discipline; 2. understand issues pertinent to their profession’s ethics and standards and be able to incorporate these values into the engineering design process; 3. be prepared to seek professional registration; 4. be able to communicate their thinking and ideas effectively to members of the technical community as well as the general public; 5. have the desire to develop their skills and knowledge continuously through professional development, advanced graduate education and other appropriate creative activities; 6. understand and be able to solve for the needs of their clients and society at large; and, 7. have developed a sense of the marketplace in which their professional
from the time used for teaching principles ofdesign, and giving individual design criticism, and 3) engineering students and architectureorganize their work and their thought processes in an entirely different manner which will re-quire further analysis and adjustment on the part of the faculty.While working on teams is generally not part of the studio culture, most of the teams operatedsuccessfully in recent semesters. The reason for lack of success in teamwork seems to be based Page 4.556.6on the conflict in personality, differences in work ethic and habits, the lack of experience inworking on teams, and a mismatch in skill levels between
every institution. Governance boards can be foundin corporate, academic, economic development, philanthropic and health care institutions.Engineers serve on or support the governance boards at all of these types of institutions. Themodern board is responsible for overseeing business strategy development, hiring the best CEOand executive team possible, requiring adequate information, control, and audit systems,ensuring compliance with legal and ethical standards and preventing and managing crises. 3The Research ProjectAn ongoing research project is being conducted at the University of Pittsburgh by investigatorsin the Department of Industrial Engineering and the Graduate School of Business to examine the
and environmental issues 8 An ability to communicate ideas effectively in both oral and written form 9 An ability to work effectively with others to accomplish common goals 10 An ability to apply chemical engineering fundamentals to solve open-ended problems and to design process units and systems of process units including multiple operations 11 An appreciation for and a commitment to ethical and professional responsibilities 12 An appreciation for and a commitment to the continuing pursuit of excellence and the full realization of human potentialA summary sheet was prepared for each attribute which included the statement of the attribute, adescription of the attribute, and a list
14,15,16,17,18,196 2/16/99 Kinetics/Mechanics of Materials George Kent 20,21 2/2399 Engineering Economy/7 Computers/Ethics Thomas Hulbert 47,48,49,43,44,50 26,27,28,29,30,31,8 3/2/99 Thermodynamics/Fluids Mohammed Taslim 22,23,24,259 3/9/99 See discipline specific schedule10 3/16/99 See discipline specific schedule11 3/23/99 See discipline specific schedule12 3/30/99 See discipline specific scheduleWINTER 1999FE DISCIPLINE SPECIFIC SCHEDULEAll classes meet from 6:00 - 8:30 p.m.CIVIL - BOSTON MAIN CAMPUSWEEK DAY TOPIC INSTRUCTOR 9 Thu 3/11 Environmental
. Engineers use a calculator more than they write. Writing and communication are important skills for engineers. Engineers spend a lot more time communicating with technical people than with non- technical people. Every engineering problem has a right answer and a lot of wrong ones. I believe I will need to use my imagination to solve important problems and be successful in the field of engineering. It is important for an engineer to be able to speak before a group. An engineer needs to take into account a lot of non-technical concerns -- such as fashions, economics, ethics, and politics -- in solving technical problems.Financial Incentive Engineers are well paid.Family Influences My parents want me to study
instructor receives student responses.Student themselves can also ask questions of the teacher or of each other. In an Engineering Ethicsclass, an instructor might present an ethical dilemma and allow free discussion among the studentsto encourage them to express various interpretations. In a large class it is possible to have studentsbreak out into small groups and have group discussion in an Annex (temporary room). Rememberalso that the slides (images) in a presentation are presented in the White Board, making it easy toannotate, edit or emphasize a particular portion of the slide.Post-class material can be delivered to students using the same methods as the pre-class material.Chats transcripts, Slide Shows and White Boards can be easily archived
societal context and to teachengineering concepts in a way that highlights the connections and relationships between areasof study rather than as delineated, isolated topics. In a ‘big picture’ sense the course aims toproduce engineers who are ready and able to work across traditional engineering disciplinesand factor in relevant ethical, political, cultural, environmental and economic issues. Theoverall structure of the course uses applied engineering design and systems as the means forachieving this integrated approach [4].The principal characteristics of the new Bachelor of Engineering course at UB are [4]:Use of applied engineering design as an integrating theme
and Respond Conflict and Conflict Style Assessment NegOtiatiOn Intercultural Conflict Emotional Intelligence An Anger Action Plan Negotiation Skills Positional vs. Ethical Bargaining C0iWhillg Coaching Styles How to be a Good Coach3. sYNTHEsIs Decision Making Decision - Making Tools and Models Team Maintenance How to Handle Relationship Difficulties
professional and ethical responsibilities. 3. An understanding of how engineering solutions impact society. 4. An understanding of contemporary issues. 5. An understanding of the need for lifelong learning. 6. An ability to provide effective and skillful leadership.A variety of topics fit under the broad umbrella of these attributes. One key topic that hasproven to be extremely useful to engineers is an understanding of how their careers willdevelop in today's organizations. With flatter organizational structures, opportunities forupward advancement have decreased and more emphasis has been placed on efficiency andcustomer-satisfaction. These changes in organizations have modified career development forthe engineers that
1998 semester. The students were asked to provide feedback aboutcourse format and issues of professionalism and ethics. • First and foremost, there is no perfect solution to make this class better. I thought this class was great. Most of the things you guys did were good, but other people tell me that it’s hard, the book should be incorporated more, we need weekly homework, and that you should lecture for fifty straight minutes instead of having group work. This may help some people learn more, but others may learn better from the present method. • Should it be this easy? Since I’ve never been exposed to this stuff before, I wouldn’t think so. I wouldn’t go so slow
engineering problems 5. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. 6. An ability to communicate effectively 7. An ability to use modern engineering tools for the practice of engineering.X. References1. “Improving Engineering Design – Designing for Competitive Advantage”, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 19912. Dewhurst, Peter, “DFMA and Simultaneous Engineering – Current Status and Future Trends”, ASME Design Conference and Show, March 1993.3. “The Design and Manufacturing Clinic: Bringing Industrial Projects Into the Classroom”, Philip E. Doepker, ASEE National Conference, June 1999.4. “Implementing the Product Realization Process in the Design Sequence