Transportation Research Center (MTRC). A member of the faculty for 36 years, he is a licensed professional engineer and board-certified environmental engineer. During his academic career, he has published over 100 refereed and reference papers and report and made almost 170 papers and poster presentations. While much of his externally- funded research has focused of environmental and water resources engineering, his work in the areas of education, transportation, and construction has included improving instructional processes in laboratories, delineation of roadway systems and NEPA compliance for highways using remotely-sense data, modeling highway evacuation strategies and environmental impacts for predicting pavement
safety.Kwaku Frimpong Boakye, University of Tennessee - Knoxville Kwaku Frimpong Boakye is a graduate research assistant at the University of Tennessee pursuing a Ph.D. program in Transportation Engineering. His research area focuses on traffic and highway safety or risk analyses. He also has the passion of working with pre-collegiate students motivating them to consider careers in STEM programs in college. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 An Overview and Preliminary Assessment of a Summer Transportation Engineering Education Program (STEEP) for Ninth GradersAbstractA summer educational and experiential learning program for
engineering at a much higher ratethan men1,2. The Society of Women Engineers (SWE)3 reported that less than half of men leaveengineering, while two thirds of women leave the profession. Fouad, et al. completed alongitudinal study that included surveying 5,562 women who graduated with a bachelor’s degreein engineering1. The women that had obtained engineering degrees were sorted into threecategories: those that did not pursue a career in engineering after graduation (10% of the womensurveyed), those that left the engineering profession (27%), and those that stayed (60%) (doesnot equal 100% because of rounding)1. Although the absolute percentages reported by SWE andFouad, et al. are quite different; the relative percentages of women leaving the
Education, 2016 Challenges and opportunities for recruiting students to undergraduate civil engineering programsAbstractSociety needs more civil engineers, with the projected near-term need for civil engineers greaterthan any other engineering discipline. Ailing national infrastructure and projected retirementrates have led to job projections suggesting that the near-term need for civil engineeringgraduates is almost double that of any other engineering discipline. This need, combined withother attractive attributes of civil engineering, should make civil engineering a top engineeringmajor at many undergraduate universities.In spite of the career opportunities readily available to graduating civil engineers, and in
the EBOKis to encourage ten identified engineering profession’s members and stakeholders to usethe EBOK to think about where they are and where they may want to go.The ECM describes, using a tiered structure, engineering knowledge, skills, and abilities(not attitudes) collectively referred to as competencies. Unlike the EBOK, the ECMcompetencies are not connected to a particular milestone in an engineer’s career and,even more specifically, are not linked to licensure. The ECM is designed to serve as aresource for practitioners and academics across all engineering disciplines.The paper then suggests aspects of the EBOK and the ECM capabilities/competenciesthat are not explicit in the CEBOK2 outcomes and ought to be at least considered
in Washington and Califor- nia, and received his undergraduate and graduate degrees from the University of Washington. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Student Perspectives for New Civil Engineering Majors (The Role of Technology)AbstractThis research examines how today’s incoming civil engineering student must prepare forhis or her college career. Student perspectives from the bookends of the academicexperience – from current freshmen to seniors – are uniquely gathered and disseminated,and their personal experiences are closely examined. The use and impact of technologyand the role that it plays is also studied. The guidance and insights shared and
company. She is a registered professional engineer, project management professional and LEED accredited professional. Her career vision is to become a global leader in research that builds capacity and broadens the participation of students completing construction and engineering degrees and entering the technological workforce by shaping practices and policies in retention, informal learning, pedagogy, professional competency, work- force development and life-long learning. Her research interests are in investigating students’ develop- ment of leadership skills and other professional competencies and in students’ involvement in curricular, co-curricular and extra-curricular activities. Dr. Simmons is a NSF CAREER
career, Mr. Aldrich has held project management and leadership positions with a national general contractor and several engineering firms before forming Aldrich + Elliott twenty years ago. He has served with distinction in the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) where he held the position of national President in 2008-2009. He is a registered professional engineer in Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine and Massachusetts and is a fellow member of both NSPE and ASCE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 The Case for a Master’s Degree for Civil Engineering LicensureAbstractFor nearly fifty years, different organizations and authors engaged in engineering practice
Department at Angelo State University. Before starting his academic career he spent 24 years as a practicing engineer in both the public and private sector. He is a registered professional engineer in both Colorado and California.Dr. Tori Rhoulac Smith, Howard University Dr. Tori Rhoulac Smith is the Director of Undergraduate Studies in the College of Engineering, Ar- chitecture, and Computer Sciences at Howard University in Washington, DC. In this role, she works to continuously improve the undergraduate student experience and oversees recruitment, admission and ori- entation, retention, advising, career development, and academic support programs. Dr. Rhoulac Smith earned M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in civil engineering from
comparison of pre- and post-survey resultswhile maintaining student anonymity.There are many research questions that could be pursued using the IVS. In this paper results arepresented that could be used to investigate three research questions: Q1. After completing the infrastructure module, do students rate infrastructure systems as more important compared to other government services and products? Q2. Do students feel that infrastructure challenges are more important to their careers after completing the infrastructure module? Q3. How do students’ grades* for infrastructure components change after completing the infrastructure module?Descriptive results are given without statistical analysis because there were only
of Undergraduate Programs for his Department.Dr. Kenneth J. Fridley, University of Alabama Kenneth J. Fridley is the Senior Associate Dean for Administration at the University of Alabama. Prior to his current appointment, Fridley served as Head of the Department of Civil, Construction and Environ- mental Engineering at the University of Alabama for 12 years. Dr. Fridley has been recognized as a ded- icated educator throughout his career and has received several awards for his teaching efforts, including the ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education) Leadership Award in 2010. At the University of Alabama, Fridley has led efforts to establish several new programs including new undergraduate degree programs
staff, gaps in communication, or simple human error. Sometimes these issues are not welldocumented in the published literature.The 2013 offering of the course had some first year “teething troubles” because the studentsfound it hard to find the motivation to devote time to the non-technical issues, which theyperceived as being less valuable for their future careers. This 2013 student survey commentregarding the course objectives is typical of the some of the feelings evident: “If the courseaimed to waste my time it certainly succeeded”. Some comments from student evaluations werequite positive, however (particularly regarding the failure case study project), and the course wasjudged to have more or less achieved its intended purpose. That said
principles, a number ofstudents spent significant time in office hours to improve their understanding of these topics.Those students with more background in physics, statics and thermodynamics were able tocomplete the assignments more quickly.Other class activities: Field trips, guest speakers and class discussionTable 4 describes the field trips and guest speakers included in the course. These activities weredesigned to take advantage of interesting local projects and also to familiarize students withdifferent careers that engage with the built environment, including emergency managers, realestate developers, computer scientists (who design GIS/3D spatial mapping and imagingprograms), local policy makers, and architects. Selected photos from the
professional skills needed to establish a foundation for a successful career andfulfill the high calling of a practicing Civil Engineer.Procedures for systematic collection of assessment data were instituted and have been in placefor more than ten years. Data is collected on all twenty-two adopted outcomes, including asubset of nine outcomes specifically focused on professional skills. Data from direct and indirectmeasures are collected on an annual basis including Fundamentals of Engineering (FE)knowledge area scores, Embedded Indicator results, and Senior Exit Survey responses. Each ofthese assessment methods is described, collected data is summarized over a period of severalyears, and results are compared to investigate useful relationships between
topics such as low impact development and carbon sequestration, and is active in the sustainability education community. Dr. Haselbach is a licensed professional engineer and a LEED AP (BD+C). Prior to her academic career she founded an engineering consulting company in the New York – Connecticut area. Her degrees include a BS in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Cornell, an MS in Chemical Engineering from UC Berkeley, and a PhD in Environmental Engineering from the Uni- versity of Connecticut. She is currently an Associate Professor in Civil and Environmental Engineering at Washington State University, an Associate Director of the USDOT Tier 1 UTC: Center for Environ- mentally Sustainable Transportation
to the real world and their future engineering careers. Afterbrainstorming a number of ideas, the faculty instructor approached the local Habitat forHumanity (HfH) affiliate and asked them if they would be willing to collaborate. This choicemade sense because HfH is active in the local community, and they are seeking to deepenpartnerships with the university and university students. At the time, the local HfH affiliate wasfocusing their efforts on rebuilding homes in a nearby community that had experienceddevastating floods two years before. They invited the students to work on one of their projectswhich involved reconstruction of a home that had been completely destroyed, pictured in Figure1. In addition, the local HfH communications and
more motivating, appealing and thereforeefficient manner through the use of digital animation and computer software7. In addition toutilizing methods like these in the classroom, the authors of this paper are putting forth additionaleffort to better prepare students for their career after college. This is being accomplished byprovided students with instructions describing how to create these interactive images on theirown. The idea is that they can become better acquired with the software which could beappealing to future employers, and they can use these skills for verifying the solution to varioushomework assignments in a variety of classes, and the like outside of college.Model DevelopmentThe topics of the interactive images (recorded
Engineering Education, 2016 Paper ID #15701Dr. Leidy Klotz, Clemson University Leidy Klotz is an engineering faculty member at Clemson University, where he developed and teaches courses like the one described in this paper. He does research on decision making and education for sustainability.Prof. Amy E. Landis, Clemson University Dr. Landis joined Clemson in June 2015 as the Thomas F. Hash ’69 Endowed Chair in Sustainable Development. Previously she was an Associate Professor at Arizona State University in the School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment. She began her career as an Assistant Professor at the
Paper ID #16701The Engineering Classroom is Still RelevantDr. Eric J. Fitzsimmons, Kansas State University Dr. Fitzsimmons is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at Kansas State Uni- versity. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering with a specialization in trans- portation from Iowa State University. During his graduate career, Dr. Fitzsimmons worked at the Institute for Transportation (InTrans) at Iowa State University and received training to specialize in highway safety, particularly in rural areas. Dr. Fitzsimmons worked closely with staff at the Iowa Department of
independentlearning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Holistic Mentoring Through Sharing an Entire Course Built on the ExCEEd ModelAbstractFaculty mentoring is a process/activity that can occur early, mid-career, or even whenadministrators are returning to a teaching role. Mentoring can take on numerous forms to includeclassroom observation, discussions on content within a course, philosophical discussion overwhat content to include and how it can be best delivered, formal/informal review of coursecontent, review of individual lesson notes, sharing a syllabus and text, and the sharing of lessonnotes, homework, exams, design problems, and study guides or any portion of
., Europe, and East Asia. He retired at the rank of Colonel. During his military career, Dr. Lenox spent 15 years on the engineering faculty of USMA – including five years as the Director of the Civil Engineering Di- vision. Upon his retirement from the U.S. Army in 1998, he joined the staff of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). In his position as educational staff leader of ASCE, he managed several new educational initiatives – collectively labeled as Project ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education). As ASCE’s Executive Vice President, Dr. Lenox led several educational and professional career-development projects for the civil engineering profession – with the overall objective of properly
public policy, assessing stakeholder needs and desires, resource analysis, and collective impact engagement. Currently, he is working closely with several local and national organizations to research and rally opposition against the transfer of federal public lands to state governance.Dr. Steven J. Burian P.E., University of Utah Dr. Steven J. Burian is an associate professor in the Urban Water Group in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at the University of Utah. Dr. Burian’s career spans more than a decade during which he has worked in design engineering, as a scientist at Los Alamos National Laboratory, as a profes- sor at the University of Arkansas and the University of Utah, and as a director of
Paper ID #16217Developing Global Learning Outcomes in a Civil Engineering ProgramDr. Steven J. Burian, University of Utah Dr. Steve Burian is an Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Utah. Dr. Burian’s career spans two decades during which he has worked in design engineering, as a sci- entist at Los Alamos National Laboratory, as a professor at the University of Arkansas and the University of Utah, and as a co-founder of Harit Solutions, an engineering design and sustainability consulting firm in India. He has research and teaching expertise related to the engineering of
for engagement with theproject. At the completion of the week participants need to provide their reports to ourpartner (and to copy these to their portfolios).A particular strength of this approach is the opportunity for intergenerational mentoring.Scenario Weeks are open to the whole cohort, allowing for mixing of student engineers at alllevels. The ability to lead, mentor and evaluate other engineers is a key skill for theprogression of any engineer’s career, however it is one that is seldom provided in a traditionaldegree program due to the homogeneity of most of the teams that a student experiences.AccreditationAccreditation of this program will occur through Engineers Australia (EA). Fullaccreditation of engineering degrees requires
leader of character who can understand, implement, and manage technology; andto inspire cadets to a career in the United States Army and a lifetime of personal growth andservice.The civil engineering program established 16 student outcomes to achieve the mission and meetthe ABET accreditation requirements: Our students upon graduation: 1. Design civil engineering components and systems. 2. Demonstrate creativity, in the context of engineering problem-solving. 3. Solve problems in the structural, construction management, hydraulic, and geotechnical discipline areas of civil engineering. 4. Solve problems in math through differential equations, calculus-based physics, and general chemistry. 5. Design
alicensing board perspective, the experience requirements need to be very broad becauseengineers from all backgrounds, i.e., design, construction, industry, management, regulatory,product development, technical sales, i.e. from all “walks of life” should be able to becomelicensed. Therefore, the nature of engineering experience required is universal only in a verybroad sense.In the past year, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) has acted to further define theearly career engineering experience that is ideal for a civil engineer to become ready to practiceat the professional level (2). This new policy was formulated on the basis of the experientialcomponents outlined in the 2nd Edition of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (3
Engineering from Lehigh University. Dr. Lenox served for over 28 years as a commissioned officer in the U.S Army Field Artillery in a variety of leadership positions in the U.S., Europe, and East Asia. He retired at the rank of Colonel. During his military career, Dr. Lenox spent 15 years on the engi- neering faculty of USMA – including five years as the Director of the Civil Engineering Division. Upon his retirement from the U.S. Army in 1998, he joined the staff of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). In his position as educational staff leader of ASCE, he managed several new educational initia- tives – collectively labeled as Project ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education). As ASCE’s Executive Vice
the studentcan follow the steps, more like a technician than an engineer, they are not internalizing the depthof knowledge required for understanding and solve problems of greater complexity that they maysee in their careers. The regurgitation of in-class problem steps is due in part to the limited timecadets allocate for their out-of-class assignments.Creating homework assignments that challenge students to think critically and do not exceed theexpected out-of-class time is difficult. Additionally, free response questions that do challengethe students’ comprehension is burdensome to grade when providing meaningful feedback.USMA does not employ Teaching Assistants, and instructors are required to manage courseadministration, write the course
United States Army.The Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering is one of 11 departments at the Academy,and both the civil and mechanical engineering programs are ABET accredited. The mission ofthe Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering parallels the Academy’s mission, whilefocusing on educating and inspiring students in the fields of civil and mechanical engineering2:To educate cadets in civil and mechanical engineering, such that each graduate is acommissioned leader of character who can understand, implement, and manage technology; andto inspire cadets to a career in the United States Army and a lifetime of personal growth andservice.The civil engineering program established 16 student outcomes to achieve the mission and meetthe
highest grade point average (GPA) students. The other group seems to experience great difficulty with the open-ended learning and the independent problem solving that is needed for successful project completion. Sometimes they struggle greatly to carry their part of the work for the team to completion. This group does not necessarily correspond to the lower GPA students. The department hopes to explore further how to facilitate better open-ended problem solving earlier in the students’ careers. Perhaps this reflects the need for a combination of the triplet of Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes necessary for successful civil engineering practice. • There continues to be some confusion with the multiple