Conference Session

The Intersection of Higher Ed and Industry

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mitchell L. Springer PMP, SPHR, Purdue University - West Lafayette; Mark T. Schuver, Purdue University - West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

organization are an additional burden against gross revenue thatresults in a reduced profit/residual to the academic department(s); the home department foradministered academic programs.Coupling the need for controlling overhead rates with the theoretical employment vulnerabilitiesof being employed in a self-funded administrative organization, it is even more important thatemployment growth capitalizes on individual knowledge, skills and capacity for growth withineach specific individual context. The manifestation of this theory and practice is twofold: to freesenior employees to perform those many activities requiring their advanced knowledge and skillset, and, to fill open opportunities for employment at the lowest levels of the organization.Filling

Conference Session

Focus on Faculty Development

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laura D. Hahn, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Cinda Heeren

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

://chairacademy.com/conference/2007/papers/best_practices_for_supporting_adjunct_faculty.pdf15 Kezar & Maxey (2015). Ibid.16 Lyons (2007). Ibid.17 Sorcinelli, M., and Aitken, N. (1995). Improving teaching: Academic leaders and faculty developers as partners.In W. Wright, W.McKeachie, and B. Hofer (Eds.), Teaching improvement practices: Successful strategies for highereducation. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Co.18 Pulford, S., Ruzycki, N., Finelli, C., Hahn, L., and Thorsen, D. (2015, June). Making value for faculty: Learningcommunities in engineering faculty development. Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.2446519 Sirum, K. L. and Madigan, D. (2010). Assessing how science faculty

Conference Session

The Intersection of Higher Ed and Industry

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nikitha Sambamurthy, Purdue University - West Lafayette; Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University - West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

assessment options,” New Dir. Community Coll., vol. 1994, no. 88, pp. 69–83, 1994.[6] H. G. Andrade, “Teaching With Rubrics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly,” Coll. Teach., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 27–31, Jan. 2005.[7] Y. M. Reddy and H. Andrade, “A review of rubric use in higher education,” Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 435–448, 2010.[8] R. Stiggins, J. A. Arter, J. Chappuis, and S. Chappuis, “Classroom assessment for learning,” Doing It Right- Using It Welha, 2007.[9] S. M. Brookhart, How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. Ascd, 2013.[10] S. Bargainnier, “Fundamentals of rubrics,” Pac. Crest, pp. 1–4, 2003.[11] C. A. Mertler, “Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom,” Pract. Assess. Res

Conference Session

Focus on Faculty Development

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexandra Coso Strong, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Mel Chua, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

”  Scenario:  Guided  by min  facilitator­provided  discussion  questions,  each  group  will  create  a  list  of  desired  “features”  for  the   hypothetical new hire(s). Each feature should be supported by a specific need of at least one person. 35­50  Feature  request  synthesis:  Participants  will  synthesize  their  table’s  “features”  and  “needs” notecards min  into one large table of features/needs by merging/clustering their ideas with the ideas from other tables.  50­60  Presentations  and  discussion: Each  large  participant  group  will  present/explain  their synthesis  to  the min  room. These will be used to start a whole­room discussion. 60­65  Presentation  of  POD

Conference Session

The Intersection of Higher Ed and Industry

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mitchell L. Springer PMP, SPHR, Purdue University - West Lafayette; Mark T. Schuver, Purdue University - West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. San Antonio, TX.: American Society for Engineering Education.5 Triola, M. (2010). Elementary Statistics. 11th Ed. San Francisco, CA.: Addison-Wesley.6 College of Technology (2012). 2012 MS Student Handbook. West Lafayette, IN.: Graduate Office, College of Technology.7 Dyrenfurth, M., Newton, K., Schuver, M. & Elliott, S. (2009). ROI: Return on Investment as a Factor in Designing Graduate Research Projects for Mutual Benefit. In Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. Austin, TX.: American Society for Engineering Education.8 Springer, M. L., Bertoline, G. R., & Schuver, M. T. (2013

Conference Session

Focus on Faculty Development

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pradeep Kashinath Waychal, Guruji Education Foundation

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

goal-settingexercises. In general, academic institutes do not use the human resource management practicesthat organizational behavior experts prescribe. Many administrators end up declaring a faculty‘pass’ or ‘fail’ and do not think that they can and must optimize their performances. In fact, theyhave to play a major role in optimizing performances of their faculty to increase chances ofsuccess of their organization.AcknowledgementsWe thank all the faculty colleagues who participated in the exercise. We also thank Mr. AbhayJoshi who improved the language of the paper and anonymous reviewers who reviewed andappreciated the paper.References1 L. Johnson, Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., and Freeman, A, 'The Nmc Horizon Report: 2015 K-12

Conference Session

The Intersection of Higher Ed and Industry

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pradeep Kashinath Waychal, NMIMS University; Pramod Jagan Deore, R. C. Patel Institute of Technology, Shirpur, India; Jayantrao Bhaurao Patil, R. C. Patel Institute of Technology, Shirpur, India

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

', Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11 (2004), 247-72.8 Ruth Deakin Crick, and Guoxing Yu, 'Assessing Learning Dispositions: Is the Effective Lifelong Learning Inventory Valid and Reliable as a Measurement Tool?', Educational Research, 50 (2008), 387-402.9 S. M. Lord, J. C. Chen, K. J. McGaughey, and V. W. Chang, 'Measuring Propensity for Lifelong Learning: Comparing Chinese and U.S. Engineering Students', in Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2013 IEEE (2013), pp. 329-34.10 John C Chen, Karen McGaughey, and Susan M Lord, 'Measuring Students' Propensity for Lifelong Learning', in Profession of Engineering Education: Advancing Teaching, Research and Careers: 23rd

Conference Session

Listening and Negotiation

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janet Callahan, Boise State University; Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University; Kim LaScola Needy P.E., University of Arkansas; Cheryl B. Schrader, Missouri University of Science and Technology

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development, Engineering Leadership Development Division, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

,and employing good listening skills, faculty can effectively navigate a variety of career situationsto arrive at a mutually beneficial end.AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to acknowledge the review committee for the Women in EngineeringDivision, which encouraged them to formalize the panel discussion into a paper focused onacademic negotiation.References 1. Fisher, R., Ury, W. and Patton, B. (2012). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Third Ed., London: Random House 2. Harvard Business Essentials: Negotiation, 2003. 3. Kolb, D.M., Williams, J. (2003) Everyday Negotiation, Navigating the Hidden Agendas in Bargaining, Jossey-Bass. 4. Babcock, L., and Laschever, S., (2003). Women Don’t Ask

Conference Session

Pedagogical Considerations for Teaching Engineering Professionals

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles E. Baukal Jr. P.E., John Zink Co. LLC; Floyd B. Ausburn, Oklahoma State University; Lynna J. Ausburn, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

, Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning, in R.E. Mayer (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 19-30). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.24. J. Sweller, P. Ayres, and S. Kalyuga, Cognitive Load Theory, New York: Springer, 2011.25. J.E. Kemp and D.C. Smellie, Planning, Producing, and Using Instructional Technologies (7th ed.), New York: HarperCollins, 1994.26. K. Burke, A pragmatic approach to criticism of multimedia, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 6(1), 57-75, 1977-78.27. R. Slawson, Multi-Image Slide/Tape Programs, Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, 1988.28. R.D. Owens and G.O. Coldevin, Effects of varied temporal visual overlapping in multi-image tape-slide presentations