Paper ID #15402Assessment of Retention Where Students Create and Teach Laboratory Ex-periments through a Capstone ProjectDr. Daniel J. Magda, Weber State University Professor, Mechanical Engineer, Ph.D. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Assessment of Retention Where Students Create and Teach Laboratory Experiments Through a Capstone ProjectAbstractThe objective of this paper is to improve student retention of their engineering mechanicseducation with a teaching/learning strategy implemented in their capstone design project class.There are many quotes from great historians and current
as a lecturer and lab manager in the Department of Me- chanical Science and Engineering (MechSE) at the University of Illinois. While remaining interested and active in the field of experimental fluid mechanics, he has chosen to spend most of his professional energy on improving the teaching of thermo/fluids laboratory courses through the development of engaging and intellectually-stimulating laboratory exercises, as well as improving introductory mechanics education and design courses in the MechSE department.Jason W Morphew, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 An Analysis of Recipe‐Based Instruction in an Introductory Fluid
Paper ID #16199A Laboratory Study of Student Usage of Worked-example Videos to SupportProblem SolvingDr. Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Edward Berger is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, joining Purdue in August 2014. He has been teaching mechanics for nearly 20 years, and has worked extensively on the integration and assessment of specific technology interventions in mechanics classes. He was one of the co-leaders in 2013-2014 of the ASEE Virtual Community of Practice (VCP) for mechanics educators across the country.Prof. Michael Wilson
Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula' American Journalof Physics 66 (338), 1998.[7] L.C. McDermott, P.S. Shaffer, and M.D. Somers, 'Research as a guide for teaching introductory mechanics: Anillustration in the context of the Atwood’s machine', American Journal of Physics 62 (46), 1994.[8] R.R. Hake, 'Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics testdata for introductory physics courses', American Journal of Physics, 66 (64), 1998.[9] J. Bernhard, 'Teaching engineering mechanics courses using active engagement methods' Physics Teaching inEngineering Education, 2000.[10] P.C. Boylan-Ashraf, S.A. Freeman, M.C. Shelley, 'A Case for a Reform in Teaching
adjunct professor for Bioengineering at the University of Pittsburgh, and an automation consultant for Crossroads Consulting, LLC. Brian’s consulting, teaching and research focus areas include hardware and GUI software integration primarily using LabVIEW by National Instruments and kinematic and kinetic data collection and analysis methods for human body movement characterization especially as related to normal and perturbed (slipping) gait. Dr. Moyer earned a BS in mechanical engineering from Carnegie Mellon in 1993, a MS in mechanical engineering from the University of Pittsburgh in 1996, and a PhD in Bioengineering from the University of Pittsburgh in 2006. Brian teaches courses in computer programming for engineers
over thirty years of teaching experience at different universities such as Northeastern, Suffolk and Tufts. He has been teaching as a professor in the department of mechanical engineering at Wentworth Institute of Technology for the last twenty years. Dr. Olia has taught variety of courses such as Statics, Dynamics, Mechanics of Material, Vibrations and System Dynamics. Professor Olia has pub- lished more than eighteen technical papers in the areas of stress concentration in the hybrid composites, adhesively bonded composite joints with gaps subjected to bending, biomechanics and dynamic response of adhesively bonded joints. Professor Olia has appeared in a WBZ-TV Channel 4 news interview as an expert on MBTA crash
particular, physical models are incredibly usefulfor teaching system modeling and system identification. These courses make an excellentcandidate for low-cost laboratory experiences, as commercially available systems fromeducational suppliers can cost on the order of ten thousand dollars. This motivates anycontributions to the literature in the development of relatively inexpensive laboratory systems forupper level dynamics and mechanics courses.The low-cost laboratory experience developed in this paper is a two-degree of freedom spring-cart system, with a particular application to system identification. The physical system wasdeveloped by modifying an inexpensive set of educational equipment to create a spring-cartsystem. The actual lab experience
earned his Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer En- gineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign as a Mavis Future Faculty Fellow and conducted postdoctoral research with Ruth Streveler in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interests include creating systems for sustainable improvement in engineering education, promoting intrinsic motivation in the classroom, conceptual change and development in engi- neering students, and change in faculty beliefs about teaching and learning. He serves as the webmaster for the ASEE Educational Research and Methods Division. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Scaling-up project-based
the instructor’s direct guidance. If successful, these activities can switch the balance tolearning from teaching and foster a more long-term internalization of the content. Since manyengineering students are better at deriving than memorizing, active learning can help them makethe connections between concepts, in addition, and as an aide to, acquiring and retainingknowledge. Active learning has been well researched in the educational literature. Most notably,the papers by Felder and Brent,2,3 focusing on collaborative-cooperative activities, have helpedconfirm the effectiveness of these approaches by documenting higher academic achievement,better high-level reasoning and critical thinking skills for students in STEM. Here
Toronto. He is currently an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Memorial University, teaching mechanics and design. His research areas are automated modeling, vehicle dynamics and control, vibration-assisted drilling, and nondestructive testing of power transmission line poles. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Challenges and Logistics in Flipping a Large Classroom for Junior-Year Mechanical VibrationsA junior-year Mechanical Vibrations course with 110 students was “flipped” to increase studentengagement and learning outcomes. Each week, a gapped notes handout was created. Theoryand derivation videos were generated using open-source software
relatively simple approach was given. Because ofthe set effect, some participates inclined to use the same complex procedure to solve the problemwhile those who were not exposed to the complex procedure could solve the problem with a betterstrategy. Consequent studies have shown that the Einstellung effect was relevant to methods ofteaching because it occurred more often in the participants from a school using “drill methods”than in a school making more use of “progressive methods” [2] .The Einstellung effect occurs very often among engineering students when they encounter a newproblem which seems solvable by the procedure they have used for drill problems. Since methodsof teaching have influence on this phenomenon, we could adopt appropriate
Paper ID #15694Enhancing Mechanics Education through Shared Assessment DesignProf. Roger G. Hadgraft, University of Technology Sydney Roger Hadgraft BE(Hons), MEngSc, DipCompSc, PhD, FIEAust is Professor of Engineering and IT Pro- fessional Practice in the Faculty of Engineering and IT at the University of Technology Sydney. He is a civil engineer with 25 years involvement in leading change in engineering education, with a particular focus on problem/project-based learning (PBL), at RMIT, Monash, Melbourne and Central Queensland Universities. Roger is an ALTC (Australian Learning and Teaching Council) Discipline Scholar in
awareness.) Touch, in particular, may be underappreciated as a component in studentlearning, since it can increase students’ long-term memory and recall of the phenomena.One of the drivers of the debate is the increasing complexity and expense of laboratory equipment.In order to give students a taste of the current state-of-the-art in industry and in graduate researchlabs, university faculty have sought to acquire highly accurate and sophisticated tools, which mustbe housed in dedicated laboratory spaces and maintained by teaching assistants who candemonstrate their use to undergraduate students. In contrast, the laboratory experiences proposedin this research are purposely designed to be portable, affordable, and when possible, studentowned, and
created, as part ofthe software termed Virtual Mechanics Laboratory (VML). We have created VML as a unifiedvideo motion and deformation analysis tool that can be used in both dynamics and mechanics ofmaterial course projects. In the project with VML mechanics of material module, first, studentswill capture a digital video image of a plate-shaped elastic object subjected to a plane-stressloading with a high-resolution digital camera that is widely available nowadays. Subsequentlyin the computer laboratory, students will select target region of interest (ROI) to “measure” thepixel displacement and material deformation within the ROI, using the digital motion trackingalgorithm termed “Digital Image Correlation (DIC)” algorithm built in the VML
-305. 11. Sanchez, K., Magana, A. J., Sederberg, D., Richards, G., Jones, G., & Tan, H. (2013). Investigating the Impact of Visuohaptic Simulations for Conceptual Understanding in Electricity and Magnetism. Paper presented at the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA. 12. Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Salkind, G. W., Bolyard, J., & Suh, J. M. (2013). Effective choices and practices: Knowledgeable and experienced teachers' uses of manipulatives to teach mathematics. Online Journal of Education Research, 2(2), 18-3313. Olympiou, G., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2012). Blending physical and virtual manipulatives: An effort to improve students' conceptual understanding through science laboratory
projects related to engineering and engineering education: value-added manufacturing (Dr. Katie Whitefoot), taxonomy of engineering education (Dr. Cynthia Finelli), pioneers in engineering education (Dr.Cynthia Atman) and inquiry-based learning in mechanics (Dr. Brian Self).Dr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011
Morton Krousgrill, Purdue University, West Lafayette Charles M. Krousgrill is a Professor in the School of Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University and is affiliated with the Ray W. Herrick Laboratories at the same institution. He received his B.S.M.E. from Purdue University and received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Applied Mechanics from Caltech. Dr. Krousgrill’s current research interests include the vibration, nonlinear dynamics, friction-induced oscillations, gear rattle vibrations, dynamics of clutch and brake systems and damage detection in rotor systems. Dr. Krousgrill is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). He has received the H.L. Solberg Teaching Award (Purdue ME) seven