of Engineering at International Game Technology where he man- aged corporate wide research and development. Dr. Wade spent ten years at Sun Microsystems during which time he managed the development of Enterprise Servers. Prior to this, he led advanced develop- ment of supercomputer systems at Thinking Machines Corporation. Dr. Wade received his SB, SM, EE and PhD degrees in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Dr. Roberta S Cohen, Stevens Institute of Technology A Teaching Professor at Stevens Institute of Technology since 2009, Professor Cohen spent 26 years in the Telecommunications industry as a technical and managerial contributor to numerous programs
. Infact, other disciplines such as large-scale systems theory may need to be applied to addressthe management of large data when it comes to real-time control of complex systems.References 1. Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK). Retrieved December 31, 2015, from http://sebokwiki.org/wiki/Guide_to_the_Systems_Engineering_Body_of_Knowledge_(SEBoK) 2. Blanchard, B. S., & Fabrycky, W. J. (2010). Systems Engineering and Analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 3. Banks, J., Carson, J. S. II, Nelson, B. L., & Nicol, D. M. (2009). Discrete-Event System Simulation (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 4. Buede, D. M., &
Paper ID #15385Systems Engineering and Capstone ProjectsDr. Fred J. Looft, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Prof. Looft earned his B..S, M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering at the University of Michi- gan. After a brief period on industry, he joined the faculty of WPI 1n 1980 where he is now a professor in the ECE department and a founder of, and Academic Head of the Systems Engineering program. His interests include projects based education, curriculum development, international study abroad programs and mentoring, and autonomous robotic systems.. c American Society for Engineering
. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), pp.21-40. 4. Bordia, P. (1997). Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication: A synthesis of the experimental literature. Journal of Business Communication, 34(1), 99-118. 5. Finkelstein, J. E. (2009). Learning in real time: Synchronous teaching and learning online (Vol. 26). John Wiley & Sons. 6. Wang, Y. (2006). Negotiation of meaning in desktop videoconferencing-supported distance language learning. ReCALL, 18(01), 122-145. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 2016 ASEE Conference7. Freitas, F. A., Myers, S. A., & Avtgis, T. A. (1998). Student perceptions of
s Contaminants Power Water Purifier in Retained/Store d Consumer Relocation Assembly Raw Noise of waters
use constructs of affect to i This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. NSF 14-32426,14-31717, and 14-31609. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the materialsprovided are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. understand and assess the students’ STEM affect. Each component of the theoretical frameworkis described in the following paragraphs.STEM-literacy for the 21st Century is multifaceted and includes content knowledge and habits ofmind5. For the purpose of this study, we refer to
RAND, 1948-1967 (No. RAND/N-2936-RC) (p. 4).Santa Monica, CA: RAND.20 Gibson, J. E., Scherer, W. T., & Gibson, W. F. (2007). How to do systems analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.21 INCOSE. (2011). Systems engineering handbook: A guide for system life cycle processes and activities. (H.Cecilia, Ed.) (3.2 ed.). San Diego, CA: INCOSE.22 Blanchard, B. S., & Fabrycky, W. J. (2006). Systems engineering and analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson - Prentice Hall.23 Churchman, C. W., Ackoff, R. L., & Arnoff, E. (1957). Introduction to operations research. New York, NY:Wiley.24 Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT press Cambridge, MA.25 Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems
, or B to C, etc. Late progress report is not accepted. Midterm report: This report is a compilation of the weekly reports. It is to be submitted by the project team using the “Final Report” format. Each team member prepares his/her section(s) and submits it to the project leader so that s/he can email it to the project advisor(s) by the specified deadline. Midterm report counts as three progress reports. Late midterm report is not accepted. 2 Final report: The final report is to be submitted by the end of the semester before the project presentations. The final project report format requirements are same as the ones used in SYEN 4385, see appendix. Late final report is not accepted
TechnologyIndustry Association (CompTIA), which develops vendor-neutral professional certificationslinked with various Information Technology (IT) areas, recommends a seven-step process27for tackling computer/network related issues. Here, it has been adapted for the capstoneprocess as follows, with different project phases added in parenthesis, linking it with theEngineering is Elementary (EiE)28 design process: (1) Problem identification and information gathering: What, who, where, when, why, constrains, assumptions (“Ask” phase) (2) Formulate a theory to establish probable cause(s) of the problem (“Imagine” phase) (3) Identify suitable ways of testing the theory, and if not confirmed generate a new one (“Imagine” phase) (4
, NY: Springer. 11. Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D.R., & Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer. 12. Mills, J. E. & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Engineering Education - Is Problem-based or Project-based Learning the Answer? Australian Journal of Engineering Education, 3(2), 2-16. 13. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1),103-120. 14. Frank, M. & Elata, D. Developing the Capacity for Engineering Systems Thinking (CEST) of Freshman Engineering Students. Systems Engineering, 8(2), 187
International Conference on Reconfigurable Computing and FPGAs (ReConFig), December 2013. [2] J. Cong, S. Neuendorffer, J. Noguera, and K. Vissers, “High-level synthesis for FPGAs: From prototyping to deployment,” IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 473–491, Apr. 2011. [3] Yahia Said, Taoufik Saidani, Fethi Smach and Mohamed Atri,” Real Time Hardware Co-simulation of Edge Detection for Video Processing System,” 16th IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON), pages 852-855 ,2012. [4] Xilinx UG925 (v7.0) Zynq-7000 All Programmable SoC ZC702 Base Targeted Reference Design (Vivado Design Suite 2014.2) User Guide, August 27, 2014. [5] Xilinx UG926
Opposable Mind: Winning Through Integrative Thinking, 11. Martin, Roger. Boston, Mass. : Harvard Business Press, 2009. print 12. MIB 3: Men in Black 3 . Dir. Barry Sonnenfield. Perf. Will Smith and Tommy Lee Jones. Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, 2012. DVD. University of Guelph: Changing Lives Improving Life 13. "Multiple Choice Exams." . Learning Common Library, n.d. Web. 14. Okuda, S. M., M. A. Runco, and D. E. Berger. "Creativity and the Finding and Solving of RealWorld Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
.” Proc. of ASEE Annual Conference, June 2015.8. Y. Bar-Yam. “When systems engineering fails-toward complex systems engineering," Proc. of Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2003, pp. 2021-2028.9. E. McGrath, S. Lowes, C. Jurado, and A. Squires, “SE Capstone: A Pilot Study of 14 Universities to Explore Systems Engineering Learning and Career Interest through Department of Defense.” Proc. of ASEE Annual Conference, June 2011.
government experiencedoesn't necessarily mean one has hands-on design experience and vice versa. Also designprojects in academia can provide the requisite experience but only, in our opinion, if theproject(s) involve strict engineering discipline and in-depth reviews. If design experiencedinstructors are not available, course objectives can still be met but the class will probably lackdesign room realism.How to start - Figure 13 is a summary of our recommendations if you find yourself having todevelop your own SE Design course of instruction. 12 Figure 13: SE Design Capstone Course Design Approach1. If you don't have first-hand design experience, educate yourself on how it's done