that were (at the time of this paper) informally committed. These experienceshave led us to carefully document and reflect on our recruitment experiences and in what followswe present data and analysis of these experiences. In turn, we speculate about the broadercontext that may be generating the unusual difficulties we have faced in securing fieldworkparticipation.Encountering difficulties in mediated recruitmentIn the first phase of research, we employed a direct recruitment strategy, which involved aresearcher directly contacting potential study participants (i.e. new engineers) and asking them tobe involved. While this process yielded eight engineers who consented to be part of the study,none ultimately were enrolled in the study because
from variousethnicities and cultural backgrounds also reflects my very shelteredness in this corner ofcampus. I don’t...there are no international students who take theater. So I don’t engage in thosestudents very often here on campus. So I think we can’t necessarily put that on the studentseither.” He continued, noting that the students did a reasonable amount of research, but that the“biggest barrier for them right now would be for those people to actually test those things.”This theme was strongly reinforced when a cross-cultural group of panelists were invited toattend and critique the students’ final presentations. Panelists remarked several times that theyknew people from the targeted regions on campus, and wondered why none of the
approachencourages collaborative and multidisciplinary learning for the students and helps them acquirethe knowledge and skills necessary to compete in the global market and to contribute to the NSNTfield in an environment that is reflective of today’s workplace.II CoursesFor this project, the collaborators developed and offered two NSNT courses that satisfy electiverequirements for mechanical, chemical, and electrical engineering Bachelor of Science (BS)degrees as well as for chemistry and physics BS degrees. The first course, “Nanoengineering andNanoscience” (cross-listed course numbers: CHEM 431; EE490; ME490; PHYS492) was offeredduring Fall 2015. It covered the fundamentals of nanoscience and nanoparticles based on theirphysical and electronic
time helping to fill a community need. Service-learning combinescommunity engagement, critical reflection, reciprocity, and public dissemination in an effort tocreate effective partnerships2-3.Studies have shown that service-learning is a high-impact practice that increase student effort ina course through the process of solving real-world problems4-6. The application of service-learning to the classroom allows for students to participate in “active, challenging, learningexperiences, experience diversity, interact with faculty and peers about substantive matters,receive more frequent feedback, and discover the relevance of their learning through real-worldexperiences.”2 Additional benefits of service-learning have been found related to
prerequisite for validity, refers to the consistency of assessmentscores; validity refers to the degree to which interpretations of scoring are correct andappropriate [12]. Moskal and Leydens [12] describe three types of evidence to support the validity of arubric: content, construct, and criterion-related evidence. Content-related evidence refers to howmuch a student’s assessment response reflects the student’s knowledge of the content area.Construct-related evidence refers to a student’s reasoning process for performing a task orsolving a problem. Criterion-related evidence refers to the extent the results of an assessmentcorrelate with current or future events. Criterion-related evidence are commonly found inengineering courses where classes
device,such as the government. Also, features were accidentally included such as lifespan which shouldbe captured in the stakeholder/feature model, whereas things that reduce the lifespan could havebeen included. An example would be wild animals that accidentally step on the device due to itsuse in the Savannah or birds that defecate on the device, reducing its reflective properties,ultimately diminishing its capability of purifying water. Students also had difficulty with thedirectionality of various interactions. Next, we had the students develop the logical architecture.It seemed fairly obvious to us that the domain model that was developed would influence theinternal components that comprise the logical architecture; however, the students
colleagues. There is a nice balance between realizing that we are students early in our undergraduate career, in the mini-lectures, and fully capable colleagues in the EBL training or researcher seminars… this program provides a hands-on and personal experience unlike a lot of other opportunities. I like that were running our own projects yet we have a professor or graduate student to refer to.There may be a need for more scaffolding related to experiment and research methodology. Thestudents’ lack of experience led to apprehension and anxiety during the research project in spiteof the advising and mentoring resources as expressed by multiple fellows’ reflections: …my least favorite part of the program has been
. He is a consulting geotechnical engineer in Michigan. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Accreditation Insights and the Next Body of KnowledgeAbstractThe American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) organized the Civil Engineering ProgramCriteria Task Committee (CEPCTC) in October 2012. The CEPCTC charge was to determine ifthe current ABET Civil Engineering Program Criteria (CEPC) should be changed to reflect one ormore of the 24 outcomes of the second edition of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge. Aftertwo years of work, a proposed CEPC was approved by the relevant ASCE committees andforwarded to ABET for approval and incorporation into accreditation criteria. Two previous
(mechanical, civil, aero/astro, for example) so eventhough many of the students are chronologically second year students they experience “firstyear” dynamics.A “large class” is usually defined by the institution offering the class. For example, in a stateuniversity a “large class” could be 300 to 500 students, while in a smaller, private institution itcould be 30 to 50 students. Certainly, classroom dynamics will be different between the 500students and 50 student classroom if only reflected in the size of the classroom space. Theimportant point is that Introduction to Solid Mechanics or Statics will be one of the largerclassroom experiences for entry-level engineering students at the location where they areenrolled. In this research, classroom sizes
reflections thatthe desired outcome of being able to integrate the course threads and skills as shown in thetheoretical framework were also achieved.Cornerstone students also reported similar positive outcomes for learning in the new coursecompared to students in the traditional courses, and even reported how they couldn’t imagine thecourses not integrated. In teaching evaluations, the reported scores for each instructor wereslightly lower, but not significantly different than the teaching evaluation scores received on theseparate courses. Since this was the first time with the new curriculum, this result is notsurprising. Comments were reviewed carefully in order to improve both courses for the nextyear. One prevalent comment was the desire for more
either workingwithin the immediate community or as part of a mission trip to a foreign country, but thisapproach blurs the distinctions between community-based learning and service learning. In anattempt to provide clarity, Weigert offered the following six elements to describe servicelearning:3 the student provides meaningful service, the service that students provide meets a need or goal of some kind, members of a community define the need, the service provided by the students flows from course objectives, service is integrated into the course by means of one or more assignments that requires some form of reflection on the service in light of course objectives, and assignments rooted in the service must be
becomeresponsible for their own learning, which necessitates reflective, critical thinking aboutwhat is being learned22. In PBL, students are asked to put their knowledge to use and tobe reflective and self-directed learners.”23Barrows and Kelson24 identify five goals behind the design of PBL instruction. Self-directed learning is explicitly stated. The goals are the following: 1) construct knowledge; 2) acquire problem-solving skills; 3) become self-directed learners; 4) develop effective collaborative skills; and 5) enhance intrinsic motivation to learn.The act of engaging in SDL is an essential component of the student learning in PBL.Whether this is implicit for the students or made explicit by their facilitators, the studentsare
already trying to resolve existing gender gaps, there was a 64 percentdecrease in the number of first-year female students interested in concentrating in ComputerScience from 2000-2012.6 The problem of representation is even more distinct with regards torace; for example, in 2014, though only 26% of jobs in computing were held by women, only 3%of those jobs were held by African American women.6Such circumstances make it imperative to develop middle and high school initiatives to supportcomputing literacies for all, but particularly for those students whose demographic characteristicsare not currently reflected by the populations supporting the computing workforce. Similarly, itis as imperative for researchers to better understand variables that
regarding how their work impacted people, society, and/or theenvironment. This may truly reflect a lack of these circumstances, or may indicate that someindividuals are not adept at recognizing such issues. For 34% of the jobs, ethical/moral dilemmaswere encountered infrequently and were not of significant personal concern, compared toethical/moral dilemmas encountered infrequently but of significant personal concern in 16% ofthe cases. Smaller percentages of the jobs were reported to have frequent ethical dilemmas thatwere and were not of significant personal concern; 9% and 8%, respectively. Finally, 2%indicated that the moral/ethical dilemma was the primary reason that they had left their job.These cases might reflect that the individual was in
relative prevalence and strength of certain factorsindicative of potential for organizational change. These factors underlie many postsecondary educationimprovement interventions’ theories of action and take into consideration the context in whichpostsecondary initiatives are situated. Finally, we reflect on the practicality of our research model towardsinforming and revising an intervention’s theory of action, as well as its feasibility for other efforts toimprove and study related change in postsecondary education organizations.IntroductionInterventions to improve postsecondary teaching and learningIn response to public opinion, as well as research in postsecondary education, the US continues efforts tostrengthen postsecondary education to
completion.Engaging learners in the very notion of asking them to evaluate work of their peers for thepossibility of uncovering abnormalities or inconsistencies(2) creates a reflective atmosphere.During this evaluation process, there is a period of reflection that takes place, which supports anatural dialogue(2); hence, extending the power for learning. This process naturally allowslearners to rely upon their previous knowledge of the subject and compare data presented toeither confirm incorrectness or to create a new understanding of the topic in which to investigateand support. Therefore, Active Learning helps students to “scaffold the zone of proximaldevelopment for individual construction of knowledge and to facilitate effective learning,”(2)(p.889). It
CxCprogram for students as well as to the satisfaction of all stakeholders, that we have exploredusing focus groups, a qualitative assessment method, somewhat atypical in the engineeringcommunity. At this stage in CxC’s development we opted for focus groups because we believedthat a more in-depth and open-ended approach to assessment lends itself to expanding ourcomprehensive reflection of the program to-date. More to the point, we were curious about theunique experiences of our students and wanted to know how they compared to previousassessments we’d performed about CxC.Key Findings of Previous AssessmentsFrom the beginning of the CxC program in the College of Engineering, faculty and CxC staffhave sought feedback on how to effectively implement
effects of programmatic decisions on students.Those effects are then parlayed into a broader conversation about engineering education as awhole.This paper is an invitation to envision a more humanistic alternative to the unrestrained freemarket ideologies marshalling the state of affairs within engineering education. These sameideologies are steering the state of affairs elsewhere in society, but here we examine engineeringeducation as the local space that we occupy intellectually, physically, emotionally,epistemologically, and ontologically. Engineering education is a local reflection of a globalphenomenon. The paper begins with a brief contextual history of neoliberalism in highereducation before focusing on engineering education at Tulane. It
different offerings of the same course, butoccasionally significant changes in the exam are reflected in changing scores (see, for example,IME 330 final exam). The authors intend to continue using this assessment tool to track studentprogression towards GD&T mastery throughout the curriculum. The data can serve as anindicator of the effects of any system changes (instructor, course activity, prerequisite orsequence, etc.) as well as monitor general improvement or decline in performance.Of course, exam questions are not the only way to assess the effectiveness of the new integratedeffort. Some of the inspiration for the effort began in the job offerings, job descriptions, and jobinterviews that students and instructors have been seeing more of
reflect high hopes and some ambitionand excitement. Those that feel most positively report holding regular meetings with theinstructors in their trio. Most instructors indicated that their students seemed incrediblycomfortable with their classmates, which indicates that the integrated classes are contributing tomore connectedness among those enrolled. Of 14 instructors (7 from English, 4 fromCommunication, and 3 from Technology) who responded to the final journal prompts, 10instructors indicated that teaching an integrated course like this one was pedagogically sound andrewarding in some fashion, either for themselves or for their students. These 10 instructors (5from English, 3 from Technology, and 2 from Communication) all expressed willingness
summer bridge program was to smooth the transition for incoming engineeringgraduate students who were both demographically underrepresented and matriculating from a differentundergraduate university. Given the unique challenges these individuals face upon entering this newcontext, the experiences of past graduate students were leveraged to inform the development of thesummer bridge. A group of current engineering graduate students who were primarily fromunderrepresented groups (i.e., women and racial/ethnic minorities) identified key areas where graduatestudents new to the university (i.e., those matriculating from a different undergraduate program) mightbe disadvantaged and need further support. Through personal reflection and discussion with
regulations (writing assignment 2), withpersonal opinions and reactions to the case, offering time for reflection of some of the conceptsexplored in the class. This combination (sometimes more elegantly achieved than others) isexemplified by this submission to the forensic engineering assignment: These improvements are relatively inexpensive from an economical point of view… the state will definitely not be happy with these extra expenses, so this is controversial… the construction team could be at a high risk of losing their engineering license and the media will most likely stir up some harsh and unnecessary labels to them…This student is reflecting on many of the case study’s key ideas, but struggling to articulate hisideas
confidence or self-efficacy.This study focuses on students enrolled in first-year project-based engineering courses at a largepublic university in the Midwestern United States. A mixed-methods approach was used for datacollection and analysis. Pre- and post-course surveys were administered to collect informationabout student demographics and personalities and to measure the students’ engineeringconfidence and self-efficacy. Students were also asked to record the amount of time they spenteach week on different tasks (e.g., project management, using CAD software, communication,and working on written reports) in an Activity Log. Post-course interviews were conducted toallow students to reflect about their team experiences during the semester.Our
, pounds, and feet) into more computable units for wind force. The display on thewhiteboard reflects back to the participants that their task cannot continue as it had beenaccomplished up to the present moment. The goal of calculating was impeded by the variousunits of measurement, which Bob saw, recognized, and decided to have changed. For theparticipants, the whiteboard “structures mutual orientation to a shared interactional space” 12. Itbrings the group’s attention to a space where everyone can see the agreed-upon record of thegroup’s activity and appraise its progress in satisfying the task. Bob noticed the impediment andacted in a way to further the group’s desired activity. He refined the equation to make simplercomputations. The
, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a CAREER award to explore the use of e-portfolios to promote professional identity and reflective practice.Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com
each rotation, teams present problem statements based on insights fromtheir primary research and potential design projects to address the identified needs. Participantsmaintain a blog to capture and reflect on their observations, which also allows them to share theirexperience with the other students. Upon completion of the Bioengineering Clinical Immersionprogram, students are well prepared for the senior design capstone course that emphasizesdevelopment of medical devices conceived from validated end-user needs. This paper alsodiscusses implementation challenges and program modifications, including having medicalstudents team with bioengineering students.2. IntroductionEngineering students entering the medical product industry are often
associated with – incorporating writing in engineering classes. The finalparts of the survey ask respondents to identify specific resources that might help them expandinclusion of writing in their courses, followed by a series of demographic questions to bettercharacterize the participant population. Most generally, the survey results suggest that facultyrecognize the need for and importance of writing in engineering, which is in part reflected intheir own courses. However, they continue to perceive challenges associated with includingwriting in engineering courses, with a particular emphasis on various resource constraints. Thepaper concludes with a brief overview of next steps, including plans for developing supportingresources for faculty and
Hosted by The University of Pittsburgh.Background from Prior LiteratureA challenge instructors often face is how to make abstract concepts concrete for their students.Drawing on experiential-learning theory (ELT), Baker, Jenson, and Kolb2 recommend aprocedure that moves students through a four-stage process of: experiencing, reflecting,abstracting, and acting. The incorporation of case studies in the classroom is one method ofsimulating experiencing, reflecting, abstracting, and recommending actions based on the realworld scenario depicted by the case. Additionally, engineering education literature hascontinuously shown that projects with industry can be helpful for undergraduate and graduatestudents, even
course, students on averageanswered 90% of these questions correctly, reflecting an average increase of 38%. Thiscorresponds to an average normalized (Hake) gain12 G of 0.79; in other words, students achievedon average 79% of their possible learning gain on this assessment instrument.As is customary with concept inventories, learning gains were somewhat more modest asmeasured by the MCI, with average scores increasing from 44% pre to 61% post, an averageincrease of 18%, and a normalized gain G of 0.32. Although this indicates that only one-third ofthe potential gain in conceptual understanding was realized on average, these results comparefavorably with those reported by others for the MCI. During initial development and testing ofthe MCI
(VTECC) and CATALYST Fellow at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a CAREER award to explore the use of e-portfolios to promote professional identity and reflective practice. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Disciplinary Influences on the Professional Identity of Civil Engineering