inparagraph form. Unlike the discussion assignments, once turned in, students could not see eachother’s responses. The assignments were designed to check the students’ comprehension of whatthey read and watched.DiscussionsEach week there was a discussion in which the students were required to participate. Thestudents are required to post a response to the assigned topic by Tuesday of that week, inaddition to two other students’ posts by Thursday. Requiring that the students respond to others’posts involved reflecting upon the ideas of fellow students. Since a variety of majors areenrolled, this offers a unique, interdisciplinary aspect to the class. Students’ perspectives areinfluenced by their areas of study, and, as there was no one right answer to
solving, presentation, patience, persistence and reflections are noteworthy in their own right, but collectively, they are essential for success as an engineering educator. Planning. Perhaps planning is the first and most critical of the skills. It is the initial phase of preparation for any project. Most jobs and assignments can be considered as a project that need to be managed including teaching a course, running a committee, writing a research proposal or preparing curriculum. Planning involves every aspect of developing a project including a schedule or timetable right up until the actual work begins. It requires a careful thought process to include every aspect of the activity prior to starting its operation. It creates a calendar for the
analysis noted that “creativity or innovation appear in the rubric of onlyone outcome and in the discussions of only five outcomes.” It concluded that “the reportgives minimal attention to creativity/innovation. It does not present creativity/innovationas an essential element of the CEBOK.” A similar, in-depth analysis could be done forthe capabilities and competencies listed in Table 1.The seven elements in Table 1 warrant consideration by ASCE as it examines theCEBOK2 for two reasons. First, the EBOK and ECM source reports post date by,respectively, five and seven years, the 2008 publication of the CEBOK2. Some aspects ofthe world of engineering education and practice change rapidly and, therefore, the twonewer documents may reflect what are now
outcomes. The data will provide us with the ability to make comparisons todetermine the most effective way to encouraging students to persist in the COE. After reviewingthe results, we will be able to reflect and research other strategies that can be implemented toassist in student success.Faculty and Staff within the NMSU College of Engineering.Beginning in the fall of 2014, the COE implemented an ENGR 100 course and freshman yearexperience program to provide students with the necessary skills to succeed during their firstyear of college. Throughout the first semester of implementation, the ENGR 100 course wastaught by seven different professors in seven sections. Four of the professors were also servingas department heads. After assessing each
that lie at the boundaries of the solution space or connect itwith other tangential solution spaces. They may offer more ideas, not because they are morecapable or have a greater capacity, but because they spend less time checking their ideas againstthe constraints of the problem and may even actively push against those constraints.Efficiency (E): The E sub-factor reflects an individual’s preferred method for managing andorganizing ideas in solving problems. The more adaptive prefer to define problems and theirsolutions carefully, paying closer attention to details and organization, while searchingmethodically for relevant information and solutions. In contrast, the more innovative oftenloosen and/or reframe the definition of a problem before
Demonstrate appropriate syntax and correct usage of grammar and spelling Highlight or identify critical information Present, discuss, and summarize data accurately and persuasively Write thoughtful and persuasive conclusions and recommendations*Scale: The five-column rubric has become a standard practice in PITCH courses as well, with two blank columns to allow for flexibility in applying specific descriptors. 1. Poor: Shows little or no progress in achieving PITCH outcomes. Little or no progress in mastery of products or habits. 3. Average: Shows evidence of progress in achieving PITCH outcomes that reflect a merely acceptable level of mastery of both products and habits. 5. Outstanding: Shows evidence of progress in
skills anddispositions of engineers are as important to their success as the knowledge that comes withyears of study of math and science, and the frustrations along the way. Stevens describes theengineering educational experience as one of a “meritocracy of difficulty,” 1 the generalperception that the journey needs to be difficult to be worthwhile. A reflection of this on the K-12 student, and primary and secondary education at large, makes one consider where and howthe requisite “grit” 2 is forged.Makers are those who use technology to solve problems and invent solutions. The problems arepersonal in nature to the individual Maker, resulting in passionate, self-directed work towards asolution. With this work, we investigate youth actively
outcomes for classes, only competencies acquired by students are reflected. • Lifelong learning skills: the ability to curate learning paths throughout their academic career help students develop skills for ongoing learning.15There are challenges in the adoption of CBE. The lack of a unified model allows institutions totailor the CBE framework to their individual needs. At the same time, this ambiguity requiresfaculty and program designers to start from point zero, thus resulting in obstacles to CBEadoption within the institution. In this paper, we will describe the path we have taken, challengesmet, and lessons learned when designing a competency-based transdisciplinary undergraduateprogram.Program BackgroundThe Transdisciplinary
vehicles.abstractGrowing enrollment numbers in Computer Science programs in schools across thecountry are a reflection of the rapidly growing computer industry over the last fewdecades. Many schools have met the challenge of higher enrollment numbers by addingclasses to address new course content and increasing the sizes of these classes. Whilethe size of the more specialized classes may still be kept at a manageable andreasonable level, the core classes that most university students have to take presentspecial challenges for the administration. Over the last ten years, we have, at differenttimes, tried different approaches and used a variety of different class sizes toaccommodate the higher enrollment numbers for such core classes.Importantly, each approach has
compared to their peers,who were members of other clubs instead8. Schools can run successful programs if district anduniversity partnerships are established to train teachers on the best approach and receive mentorsupport from people whom share familiar backgrounds8. Unfortunately, this was not the case forour group, we lacked available mentors that reflect the culture of our student body in addition tothe lack of established partnerships with our charter school and nearby universities due to highturnover rate of coaches. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that data has beencollected on a FTC team comprised of 83% girls, 80% of students on refugee status, and 100%of students on national free and reduced lunch program.The need to
these factors into account and based on input from a myriadof potential customers on the LTU campus, the theme “Accessibility on Campus” was chosen forthe first section of the new studio course. Thus far, this theme has been quite appealing to thestudents.Course AssessmentIn order to assess the efficacy of the course in the development of an entrepreneurial mindset,several methods of assessment are planned. First, students will take a pre- and post- coursesurvey to measure changes in mindset brought on by participation in the course. Also, after eachmilestone review, time to reflect on the learning process is built into the course calendar. Thistime will involve the students writing a reflective essay and participating in a group
make meaning of thetraining, reflecting on how it impacted them personally, as well as on how it could impact theirpeers in the College. The meaning-making stage allowed cohort members to understand theapplicability of social justice work in STEM fields and the roles they play in creating systemicchange. Throughout the semester, AWE members attended training sessions on presentationskills, including how to manage an audience, how to speak in front of large groups, and how tofacilitate sensitive discussions. They also worked on building cohesiveness as a group as theystarted to examine possible locations and audiences for outreach in the university community.The time spent on AWE-related activities by cohort members ranged from one to five
understanding, or to reflect on the implications of such answer. Solving problems from textbooks may not indicate deep learning.4,12 9. Some of the conceptual problems can be caused by text books: o Some text books fail to make clear distinction between certain concepts, e.g. internal energy and heat.56 o In some popular textbooks, scientific terms are confused with everyday language semantics and with common-sense knowledge.56 o The way in which most textbooks introduce or treat the concepts of work, energy and heat are incorrect or confusing. 56 o Most books nowadays use a definition of heat closer to the presently accepted one: a process of energy transfer due to a temperature difference
: Designed to measure students’ initial interest Harackiewicz et al.7 F1 Initial & and the maintained or “hold component of situational interest” Ferrell & Barbera8 Maintained Self-Perceived Measures students sense of ability, which can Ferrell & Barbera8 F2 Ability reflect on a student’s persistence Intellectual Students feel how obtainable the knowledge of F3 Bauer11 Accessibility the subject is to them Importance & Students feel how useful and important the F4
policy.IntroductionThe subjects and competencies we choose to include in our civil engineering courses andcurricula typically reflect one or more factors. We may choose to teach a subject because it isexplicitly required by the ABET accreditation criteria, because our alumni and the employerswho hire our graduates tell us they want our graduates to have specific skills, and/or because wefeel the topic is part of the historical body of knowledge to which every civil engineeringgraduate should be exposed. This paper proposes that a new topic and skillset should be addedto our civil engineering curricula—Prevention through Design—despite the fact that none of thethree typical curricular motivations apply.Prevention through Design (PtD, also called Design for
indicated the seminar helped “a moderateamount” or “a little,” and (as during the 2013-2014 school year) only one student felt it did nothelp him/her at all with coursework. Those for whom the seminars were less relevant to helpingwith coursework may have attended sessions designed for other purposes, such as to widenexposure to the field or to introduce students to topics not closely related to current coursework.Sixteen out of 20 students (80%) rated the S-STEM program as being “very supportive” or“somewhat supportive” when difficulties were encountered. One student (5%) rated the programas “minimally supportive,” and three stated that they “have not had major difficulties requiringsupport.” These responses reflect a slight drop from the previous
spaces for entrepreneurs and students to meet Encourage schools to offer courses in entrepreneurship that are easily accessible to all students and to integrate innovation into the curriculum Identify ways for colleges and universities to award academic credits to students for starting a business Remove unnecessary costs for students starting a businesses in VirginiaWright and Katz (2016) reflected on the article written by Katz, Harshman, and Lund Dean (2000)where the authors advocated for establishing classroom norms for promoting and protectingstudent intellectual property. Why is this important? Universities and other educational institutions
—but in the first year of the survey (2011), the seminars werenot nearly as well received. This is interesting, as student responses are much more consistent inother parts of the survey, and may reflect changes to the EnSURE program over time (such asrefining the professional development seminars based on feedback from students in prior years). Table 4: Most Valuable Program Components 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total What part(s) of the summer program did you find most Percent of Percent of Percent of Percent of Percent of valuable or helpful? (n = 78) (n = 58) (n = 47
number of views for uploaded videos and time in minutes spent by studentsviewing these videos. A total of 1014 minutes were spent by students watching the short videos.The number of views by students accessing the videos was found to be 349 times. These statisticsare evident that students did access the videos for self-learning and maximum number of viewsjust before the final exam indicated that it indeed helped students prepare better.Table 1 Questionnaire on Short Videos reflecting Student’s Feedback Sr. Question No. On the scale of 1 to 5; 5 being highest; how much did the uploaded videos help 1 you prepare for the comprehensive final exam? 1
experience Active Experimentation Reflective Observation planning/trying what has been learned reviewing/reflecting on the exprience Abstract Conceptualization concluding/learning from the experience Fig. 1. Kolb’s cycle of experiential learning [7]. However, practically there are many obstacles in applying Experiential Learning methods. Thefirst problem comes from the limitation of students’ knowledge and experience, as wells as the © American
conceptualunderstanding in Heat Transfer12, 13 as well as in Dynamics14. The term “inquiry” has been usedto describe a number of teaching activities and has been used extensively in science education.The NRC15 identifies five critical features of inquiry that extend across all K-12 levels:1. Learners are engaged by scientifically oriented questions.2. Learners give priority to evidence, which allows them to develop and evaluate explanations that address scientifically oriented questions.3. Learners formulate explanations from evidence to address scientifically oriented questions.4. Learners evaluate their explanations in light of alternative explanations, particularly those reflecting scientific understanding.5. Learners communicate and justify their
) engineering and entrepreneurship education; 2) the pedagogy of ePortfolios and reflective practice in higher education; and 3) reimagining the traditional academic transcript.Dr. Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford University & SKG AnalysisDr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s
pedagogical and curricular practices at the intersection with the issues of gender and diversity. Dr. Zastavker is currently working with Dr. Stolk on an NSF-supported project to understand students’ motivational attitudes in a variety of educational environments with the goal of improving learning opportunities for students and equipping faculty with the knowledge and skills necessary to create such opportunities. One of the founding faculty at Olin College, Dr. Zastavker has been engaged in development and implementation of project-based experiences in fields ranging from sci- ence to engineering and design to social sciences (e.g., Critical Reflective Writing; Teaching and Learning in Undergraduate Science and
Michael R. Levineand Last Best Chance, LLC, for the continuous support. 6. References[1] Online. http://dictionary.cambridge.org/[2] Dewitt, Tyler (2013) Ted Talks: Hey Science Teachers Make it FUN.http://www.ted.com/talks/tyler_dewitt_hey_science_teachers_make_it_fun.html , .[3] 2014 Reflections on Gamification for Learning.http://karlkapp.com/2014-reflections-on-gamification-for-learning/, . [Online; Acessed in 23-Jan-2015].[4] Gartner Reveals Top Predictions for IT Organizations and Users for 2013 and Beyond.http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2211115. [Online; Acessed in 23-Jan-2015 ].[5] Anany Levitin and Maria Levitin. Algorithmic Puzzles. Oxford University Press, Great Britain. ISBN 978 019974044 4.[6] Understanding Poles and Zeros
personality, experiences, skills and values. This frame can provide insight into the ways that adult engineering students build their sense of professional identity through multiple modes. Successful development of an engineering identity is reflected by professional persistence. Work by Lichtenstein et al found that a minority percentage (42%) of seniors definitively planned on 12pursuing an engineering related career following graduation. Undergraduate engineering programs must try to do better to foster engineering identity development so that professional persistence is improved and the workforce is provided a steady stream of capable degreed engineers from a variety of
-84. doi:10.1002/tl[12] Gillies, R. M., & Boyle, M. (2010). Teachers’ reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 933–940. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.034[13] Greiffenhagen, C. (2011). Making rounds: The routine work of the teacher during collaborative learning with computers. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. doi:10.1007/s11412-011- 9134-8[14] Hall, S. R., Wait, I., Brodeu, D. B., Soderholm, D. H., & Nasu, N (2002). Adoption of active learning in a lecture-based engineering class. In Proceedings of the 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.[15] Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H
findings support effectiveness of computer simulations. Inmany ways simulation has been found to be even more effective than traditional instructional practices.In particular, the literature shows that computer simulations can be effective in: 1) developing sciencecontent knowledge and process skills, and 2) promoting inquiry-based learning and conceptual change.Effectiveness of CMST in education is also well grounded in contemporary learning theories thatrecognize the role of experience, abstract thinking, and reflection in constructing knowledge anddeveloping ideas and skills.16, 22, 27, 38, 61 Cognitive aspects of CMST are being further detailed in a recentarticle by Yaşar67 using a computational model of how the mind learns. Computational
California, Santa Cruz. Beckett’s continuing dissertation research examines a community-university collaboration situated in a low-income, predominantly Latino community, that created and used digital stories as artifacts and learning tools to engage members of the community (parents, teachers, district officials, union leaders, students, non-profit service providers, etc.) in reflection and dialogue around the economic, social, and cultural barriers that constituents face when advocating for student academic achievement, and to identify the strengths and solidarities that can be created to change the school system to better serve the student body (Beckett, Glass, & Moreno, 2012). Beckett has presented her research at
viability [16],[17]. Table 2 lists the four processes as well as how they fit within the structure of the capstoneand the learning outcomes they deliver. The Creative Idea Process addresses both creativeideation and team development. The Customer Discovery Process and the Client ValidationProcess address meeting customer needs at different stages of product development.Commercial viability is addressed in the process of the same name.Experiential learning has four phases: the concept, the application expectations, the experience,and reflection on the three prior phases [26]. We designed the implementation of each process tosatisfy pedagogical scaffolding that supports these phases of experiential learning without takingsignificant time or resources