Paper ID #16217Developing Global Learning Outcomes in a Civil Engineering ProgramDr. Steven J. Burian, University of Utah Dr. Steve Burian is an Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Utah. Dr. Burian’s career spans two decades during which he has worked in design engineering, as a sci- entist at Los Alamos National Laboratory, as a professor at the University of Arkansas and the University of Utah, and as a co-founder of Harit Solutions, an engineering design and sustainability consulting firm in India. He has research and teaching expertise related to the engineering of
9 .Some have suggested that strategies to improve retention in the first year include hands-onengineering projects 10,11 and real-world experience 12 . Participation in co-ops increasesself-efficacy which is reported to improve retention; albeit co-op experiences do not usually occuruntil after the first year 8 .Other researchers argue that student’s pathways through engineering are guided by theiridentification with engineering rather than a homogeneous curriculum acting like a pipeline 13 . Inessence, freshman engineering retention might be improved by stronger identification withengineering careers 14 . Studies have shown positive results from efforts in career planning 15 anddeveloping a better understanding of what engineers do 14
communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring com- munication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, effective teach- ing practices in design education, the effects of differing design pedagogies on retention and motivation, the dynamics of cross-disciplinary collaboration in both academic and industry design environments, and gender and identity in engineering.Miss Cassandra Jo Groen
Bachelor of Engineering in Aerospace Engineering from the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology and his PhD from the Queensland University of Technology. He started his pro- fessional career in 1995 as a project engineer at Roaduser Research International, and following his PhD joined the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) in the Autonomous Systems Laboratory. At CSIRO he held various roles including Principal Research Scientist, project leader and the Robotics Systems and Marine Robotics team leader before moving to QUT in 2013. A strong advocate of robotic systems in civilian applications, Dr Dunbabin is involved in a number of initia- tives aimed at promoting, educating and
educators, we not only need to convey information, but must alsoprovide students with different learning styles and diverse backgrounds the means to develop theskills required for a broad range of career paths, from teaching and research to design, industryand production.8 Three of the most important abilities for engineers — logical reasoning, critical thinking, andproblem solving — are some of the toughest to teach. In addition to these abilities, developing acommand of electromagnetics requires the ability to visualize and manipulate fields and vectorsin three dimensions, making this subject one of the most difficult to teach within the field ofengineering.9 Usually, individuals who are highly educated in the subject, such as instructors,have
Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections of motivation and learning strategies. Matusovich has authored a book chapter, 10 journal manuscripts and more than 50
lead, in turn,to an increased number of students who will pursue careers in engineering or other STEM fields.One means to accomplish this is through the National Science Foundation’s ResearchExperiences for Teachers (RET) program5, which seeks to develop collaborative relationshipsbetween pre-service and in-service K12 STEM teachers, community college faculty and theengineering research community, with the goal of allowing STEM teachers to translateuniversity-gained knowledge and research experiences into their classrooms. This paper reportson an ongoing (2014-2016) RET project at the University of South Florida (USF).Our approach to developing a high quality RET professional development experience for STEMteachers is based on our beliefs that
designed to consist of four sections. The traditional PBL teachingstrategies are utilized with some expansion in key areas that we felt were missing in the long termgoals of most summer STEAM programs, specifically, making the connection to a job, career,major, or field of study. Based on this thinking, a learning block is composed of the followingsections as can be seen below:Learning blocks are then strung together to create a much more dynamic program for a week longsetting such as the one seen below:The order of a learning block is important. The first portion is specifically tailored to give realworld careers, jobs, majors, fields of study that engage the learner upfront. These examplesdemonstrate what concepts we are about to teach and how
, students are asked to relate theirsimulation leadership experiences to more domain-specific problems that they might encounterin their future careers. This paper will present three simulation scenarios that the group has testedand will share the experiences encountered by participating students as well as the faculty andstaff organizers.IntroductionTraditional undergraduate engineering programs offer students little in the way of leadershiptraining. They also offer students little exposure to complex real-world problems. Yet, thegeneral expectation is that one day our students will be able to lead the way in solving complexproblems.At Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, we seek out ways to provide our students withexposure to real world problems
was for their peers and how the experience of teaching will benefit them in their future career as Army officers.AssessmentAssessment of peer-guided learning was conducted via feedback from each student throughoutthe 4 phases of execution and an overall course assessment. Student feedback includedobservations from the faculty mentor and student self-reflection. Mentors graded the peerinstructors in two phases. The first was the planning and preparation, where the mentor wasavailable for assistance and received a full rehearsal of the lesson that the students would peer-teach. The mentor based this grade on the amount of prior preparation the students completedbefore the initial meeting, and their ability to make effective
to learn more about entrepreneurship and tobetter understand how it can affect their career prospects and choices. While this does not meanevery engineering student will become an entrepreneur, as many as 60 percent want to learnmore about entrepreneurship.6 However, the rigid requirements that define an engineeringcurriculum at most universities can make it difficult for students to have the opportunity to focuson entrepreneurship. 7 Co-curricular options, such as out-of-classroom accelerators, providemotivated students with this opportunity.The Evolution of Entrepreneurial Education at the University of Colorado BoulderThe University of Colorado is situated in Boulder, a true hub of innovation and technology thatincludes a local community
$1000 of increased aid is positively correlated with probability of retention andgraduation.6Instead of time spent working to help pay for school, students would be able to redirect their timetowards studying and participating in co-curricular activities. The sizeable scholarship andcontinued support through their college career would make a very attractive recruitment tool.Many admitted URMs were choosing not to enroll at Cal Poly because other schools are able tooffer large scholarships, and several internal reports have recommended scholarships.7RecruitmentTargeting students who could best benefit from PEEPSThe NSF S-STEM scholarships are intended for academically talented, financially needystudents, and PEEPS has been designed to be offered
Paper ID #16840Pioneering a Math-Based Grammar Course for Engineering and Other STEMMajorsMr. Brad Jerald Henderson, University of California - Davis Brad Henderson is a faculty in writing for the University Writing Program (UWP) at University of Cali- fornia, Davis. Henderson holds a B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Cal Poly State University San Luis Obispo and a Masters in Professional Writing (MPW) from University of Southern California. Currently focusing his career on engineering communication and professionalism, he has worked as a design engineer and technical education specialist for Parker-Hannifin Aerospace
track” engineering student will take) and EngineeringProblem Solving I (the first engineering class a freshmen student will take). However, highschool GPA was a better predictor in both cases. Of the variables commonly available in studentrecords systems, we conclude that both ACT math score and high school GPA should beconsidered when predicting performance in Pre-Calculus and Engineering Problem Solving, aseach adds considerable explanation of variance.IntroductionMultiple criteria are used to decide which math class an engineering student needs to take at thebeginning of their college career. Some universities use a placement exam or a combination of aplacement exam and student data (for example, high school GPA or number of high school
academically advised by a faculty member. STEM career exploration and research support: lab tours, faculty presentations, and interactions with local STEM professionals from industry Cohort building activities (Houston/Rice acculturation).Details on Curriculum: Chemistry, Physics and CalculusAll concepts covered in the summer residential program are topics in the first two semesters ofChemistry, Physics and Calculus. Both foundational and conceptually difficult topics areselected for the summer. Topics are covered at the same rate in the summer (e.g., 3 hrs onReaction Stoichiometry) as in the fall (e.g., 3 hrs on Reaction Stoichiometry). Curriculum is alsoselected that helps students learn and master solving complex word problems. RESP
, individuals require technical knowledge. They cannot, however, rely on a skillset alone if they hope to enjoy fulfilling careers. Individuals need a mindset that adds “know-why” to technical “know-how” to contribute to the success of their colleagues and employers, as well as to create value for others. An entrepreneurial mindset is key to personal and professional success. Engineers equipped with this mindset understand the bigger picture and, therefore, can recognize opportunities, evaluate markets, and learn from their mistakes. These engineers are capable of more than solving technical problems; they are constantly looking for unexpected ways to create value After recognizing the
excellence in research and teaching with awards from organizations such as the American Medical Informatics Association, the American Society for Engineering Education, the American Cancer Society, and the Society for Women’s Health Research. She is a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and a Senior Member of both the IEEE and the SPIE.Stephanie Ruth Young M.Ed., The University of Texas - Austin Stephanie Young is a doctoral student in educational psychology at the University of Texas at Austin. Her research focuses on educational pathways to STEM careers, underrepresented minorities and females in STEM, and psychosocial influences on STEM learning. In her time at the University of
unknown at the time of graduation.7,8 Thisdistribution is typical of many BME undergraduate programs, including the one at ourinstitution.At the Master’s level, students come from diverse training, including research and industry, andbackgrounds including sciences, mathematics, and several fields of engineering. Many areseeking to redefine their career direction, and most Master’s students are seeking employment inindustry after graduation. An informal survey conducted as an introduction to this courserevealed that 11 out of 12 students’ goals were to work in industry or at a start-up company upongraduation.As a result of these differences, instructors must consider different instructional styles dependingon their audience. Traditionally, the
leading major, complexprojects who have had their own moments of “This is it. This is how I (or my project/career)end.” What can we as engineering educators do to best equip our students to prepare for thosemoments and challenges, and have the knowledge, resolve, and adaptability to solve enoughproblems to get their projects home?This paper explores that challenge and some related lessons that we, the authors, have learnedand which we seek to continue to explore with like-minded educators and practitioners. Our goalis to find how best to prepare project managers that have both the deep knowledge and honedadaptability to navigate their projects and teams through tough, challenging crises that they arecertain to experience. We don’t pretend to have
quality. The efforts to increase instructionalquality depend on faculty development (focus on faculty), instructional development(focus on student, course and curriculum), and organizational development (focus onstructure and process).5Changes in higher education, impact of technology, and paradigms shifts in approaches toteaching and learning, contribute significantly to the scope and breath of facultydevelopment.6 Faculty in purely teaching institutions (non-research environments),especially those teaching in technology-based and career-oriented programs, generallylag behind the pace of technological change in terms of their professional developmentactivities due to their non-association with research activities. They face two majorchallenges
lives and their careers may be positively impacted by their generalstudies.Throughout the course, students were encouraged to examine art through the lens of engineeringachievement and engineering through the lens of artistic merit. The course aimed to challengestudents to see new opportunities that arise from the effective combination of form and functionin existing objects and in original designs. The course assessment focused most strongly on thefollowing outcomes: First, that students have the ability to recognize the meanings and uses ofform, and second, that students have the ability to use form to create new opportunities forfunction. Measures to explore the success of meeting these outcomes were obtained by astatistical comparison of
Engineering and Mechanical Engineering Technology. Before starting his career in academia, Williamson served as a naval architect and electronics engineer for the Department of the Navy and received the Civilian Service Medal for his efforts during the first Gulf War. Dr. Williamson’s teaching, research, and publication interests span a range of topics including trans- port phenomena, metallurgy, thermomechanical stir processing, and university-K12 partnerships. He is a strong advocate for information technology literacy within public schools, He is the past Secretary and current member of the Board of Directors for the Commonwealth Center for Advanced Manufacturing (CCAM) which is a public-private partnership between
Paper ID #15020World Energy in Engineering DesignDr. Michele Putko P.E., University of Massachusetts - Lowell Michele is a lecturer in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at UMass, Lowell. She earned her Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Old Dominion University and her M.S. from Auburn University. She also holds a Masters of Strategic Studies form the U.S. Army War College, and a B.S. from the United States Military Academy. She retired as a Colonel from the United States Army after a 28-year career in multi-functional logistics. Her research interests include energy literacy, climate change literacy, and
Provost for Academic Affairs and a Board of Trustees Distinguished Professor of Educational Psychology at The University of Connecticut. She holds the Letitia N. Morgan Chair and is well known for her work on academically talented students. She was Principal Investigator for the Na- tional Research Center on the Gifted and Talented for 20 years and has authored or co-authored over 250 articles, books, book chapters, and technical reports. Her administrative responsibilities include all aca- demic programs as well as Honors and Enrichment, Student Success, Career Development, Institutional Research and Analysis, Excellence in Teaching and Learning, and Summer Programs.Dr. Joseph S. Renzulli, University of Connecticut
content and what questions or misconceptions the professormight need to address at the beginning of the next class. This might also provide students withmore of a sense of professor-student interaction.Recording Participation and Attendance in a Flipped ClassroomClass participation and attendance are important. Attending and engaging in class is similar toprofessional career skills that employers value. Class participation also supports the professor’sability to formatively assess students’ understanding of content through questioning, and usestudent responses to guide instruction.12 In addition, students learn from each other and from theprofessor. So, recording participation and attendance, and providing a grade incentive wasworthwhile in this
Hurricane Katrina. Previously, he served as an unre- stricted line officer in the U.S. Navy onboard a guided missile destroyer and the second Aegis cruiser.Prof. Dante Dionne, Korean Air Dante Dionne is an Organizational Leadership PhD candidate and a Senior Innovation Technology Man- ager at Korean Air. The past 20+ years of his career has centered on management and professional services consulting. Where, he has specialized in leading multi-national project teams in the design and implementation of digital marketing, mobility and innovative technology solutions. Dante holds an MA in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from the Chicago School of Professional Psychology and a BS in Business Management with a minor in
al. describe efforts to use the Alice programming environment to teach introductoryprogramming concepts.53 Interestingly a later report assessing the efficacy of the curriculum usingAlice indicated that while pre-post testing indicated learning gains with the environment, focusgroup data indicated a dissatisfaction with Alice as an introductory language, resulting in a switchto LabVIEW.54 A possible explanation given for the dissatisfaction of Alice was that students didnot perceive it as being a “real” programming environment they might use in industry, whileLabVIEW was. Certainly, helping students connect the utility of skills they learn in the classroomto those that will be important in their later career is important. In some cases
Graphics, Juniper, R3Logic, Cisco, Qualcomm, MediaTeck, etc.) and the Government (NSF, ARO, MDA, DOD, AFOSR, DOE, etc.). He is a recipient of several best paper awards, the 2009 NSF CAREER award, the 2014 MURI award, the 2008 IEEE Computer Society (CS) Meritorious Service Award, the 2012 IEEE CS Outstanding Contri- bution, the 2010 IEEE CS Most Successful Technical Event for co-founding and chairing HOST Sympo- sium, the 2009 and 2014 UConn ECE Research Excellence Award, and the 2012 UConn SOE Outstanding Faculty Advisor Award. He serves on the program committee of more than a dozen leading conferences and workshops. Prof. Tehranipoor served as the guest editor for JETTA, IEEE Design and Test of Computers, and IEEE
, several undeclaredlearning outcomes resulted from the course structure and project choice-1) Acquiring an appreciation for not being too ambitious under a given set of constraints. Thislife lesson is important for practicing engineers, who inevitably work under time and costconstraints for their entire careers. At least one of an inability to print 3D designs, poor quality of3D printed components, student-selected components arriving late or out-of-stock, low lightoutput of prototype, failure of supplied components (the failure rate of the levitators was over20%), LED overheating (one prototype lamp LED fell off when the solder melted due toovercurrent) or extensive redesigns were experienced by many of the students. This was reflectedin some of
focusesthe model of university-industry collaborative cultivation on the needs of studentinternship. The collaborative models can be divided into two categories. The firstcategory is a “theoretical study before internships” model, such as the “3+1” model. Inthis model, the students will study at university for the first three years and do privateenterprise internships in the last year. For example, Xi'an University of Science andTechnology arranges for students to complete study in the enterprises in the seventhand eighth semesters. The student should finish courses related to enterprises’ actualoperation, be familiar with the enterprise, start pre-job training, develop career plans,etc. in the seventh semester, followed by the post practice in the