. Q4: Course objectives were clearly defined and reflected in the 0 3 4 2 0 course evaluation Q5: The instructor’s feedback was valuable 1 4 3 1 0 Q6: Industry sponsor mentorship was valuable 2 5 2 0 0 SA = Strongly Agree, A = Agree, N = Neither Agree nor Disagree, D = Disagree, SD = Strongly DisagreeConclusionThe capstone course provides important experiences in the early days of engineering students’careers for them to interact with professional engineers from the industry. The intent of
learn how to use the oscilloscope, they were able to see the signals, frequencies, and other parameters that are discussed in the classroom, but are best demonstrated with hands-on activities. Students were able to see how changing input parameters from the signal generator included in the software reflected different responses at the circuit output. The best thing about this experience is for students to perform the different labs in the comfort of their homes with only the Analog Discovery Board which has a very low cost. Students can have a virtual laboratory anywhere, once they have access to a PC or laptop. The ease of using the board, the FFT, the potential to develop a number of experiments
led efforts have so far culminated into anew entrepreneurship course for undergraduates, a campus-wide student innovation competitionsupported by significant corporate sponsored financial and other resources, and a new maker-space for students. Faculty and students have worked together to also develop and launchnumerous video training resources on the Colorado School of Mines digital hub. Collectively,all these new innovation and entrepreneurship activities reflect an astounding success in only oneyear.What Has Not Worked?Although our institution has progressed significantly in implementing an innovation andentrepreneurship mindset on campus, it is currently still a challenge to get more faculty on-boardand integrated with these initiatives
-making process become even more complex whendecisions are made in small group settings. There is research evidence that group interactionsand discourse processes can facilitate learning with reflection and co-construction of knowledge(e.g., [4] and individual achievement [5]). However, these verbal interactions may also preventsuccessful collaboration and lead to unproductive results (e.g., [6]). The purpose of this studywas to examine the relationship between verbal interactions that occur in a team and theindividual achievement and team performance. More specifically, the study explored: 1. To what degree the question, conflict, and reasoning episodes relate to students’ individual performance? 2. What is the strength of
contract, thus many courses plan to implement Top Hat.Second, we plan to develop online quizzes to test students on weekly lectures, readingassignments, and online material in both new courses. Online quizzes are also being piloted thissemester in our Intro 160 course. There is evidence to suggest that quizzes promote self-reflection and a deeper understanding. [4] These online quizzes can also serve as assessment ofthe course content, allowing course coordinators to make adjustments in real-time based on quizresults. [3, 5] Third, particularly in the hands-on course, we will provide online tutorials, videos,and lectures--commonly known as "flipping the classroom." [5] This strategy will be largelyimplemented in the Design Practicum course to
mathematics (STEM) electives in high school. APh.D. student fellow from Drexel University and teacher from the Science Leadership Academy(SLA) in Philadelphia will teach robotics and engineering principles through open-endedprojects that address several of the NEA grand challenges. These projects are structured usingconstructivist pedagogy that ties into five core values: inquiry, research, collaboration,presentation, and reflection. We will introduce this study into an ethnically diverse robotics classcomprised of sophomore, junior, and senior students. The predisposition of students to studytopics relating to robotics will be assessed at the start of the study and then after each project hasbeen completed. Initially, predisposition will be
in other disciplines. Moststudents in the computing fields can be classified as reflective sensing sequential visual learners1.In the classroom, instructors adapt to this. Courses taught in computer science encourage activelearning and interactive exercises. In class, concepts are explained visually through diagramsand pictures, even though the ultimate solutions manifest themselves in textual form as sourcecode. However, when it comes to feedback in the computing field, the variety received is not as great.This is unfortunate, for feedback has overwhelmingly been shown to be the single most powerfulinfluence on student success2. Hounsell states:“It has long been recognized, by researchers and practitioners alike, that feedback plays
successful. The second exam in this course is mathematicsintensive. As can be seen in Figure 1, before inverting this fluid mechanics course, averagescores for Exam II were discouragingly low. After inverting this course and including themathematics review sections, the second exam average has been equal to or even above the otherexams’ averages. Scores on the comprehensive final have also benefitted from course inversionand the mathematics review. (The lower score on the first exam may be attributed to a relativelylarge contingent of juniors whose first inverted course experience was fluid mechanics. Learningin an inverted setting requires some adjustment, and the first exam scores can reflect that.)Scores for 41 conventionally-taught students and
42 Fourth Year (Senior) 184 55 38 Total 898 246 195We had varied responses from different classes. However, we had chosen samples randomly and theminimum response from a class was more than 18% of the class population, making aggregated analysis ofthe responses statistically valid.Reliability and ValidityIt is important to conduct a thorough measurement analysis of the instrument. It gives assurance that thefindings reflect accurate measures and that results are trustworthy. Test reliability indicates the extent towhich individual differences in scores are ‘true’ differences. As a proof of
compared to ascertain the relative gains (if any) thatare directly attributable to the MILL model intervention, which is the objective of this work.Acknowledgement The work described in this paper was supported by the National Science FoundationIUSE Program under grant number DUE-1432284. Any opinions, recommendations, and/orfindings are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.References1. SME Education Foundation website: http://71.6.142.67/revize/sme/about_us/history.php2. Ssemakula, M.E. and Liao, G.: ‘Implementing The Learning Factory Model In A Laboratory Setting’ IMECE 2004, Intl Mech Engineering Congress & Exposition, Nov. 13-19, 2004; Anaheim, CA.3. Ssemakula, M.E. and Liao, G
nonparametric data. Additionally, there is no estimation of population parametersin OOM; the statistics in OOM reflect solely the data collected. In an OOM analysis, theresearcher provides a hypothesized pattern for the data, and the analysis checks the obtained dataagainst that pattern. The resulting statistic, called a Percent Correctly Classified (PCC) index, isthe percentage of the data which fits the hypothesized pattern. For this paper, the hypothesizedpattern was an increase in students’ scores on the Awareness, Motivation or Exposure subscalesafter the lecture as compared to their scores before the lecture.Table 2 shows the results for this model. The column labeled “Percent Correctly Classified(PCC)” gives the percent of students whose score
habilitation at a cost to the agency, to working in manufacturing and being employed. It isnot important that the product create a large revenue stream, but it must cover the operations ofthe facility and employ workers. Products that have been developed by student teams in the pastinclude identification tags for uniforms, to-go boxes made from recycled paper, assembly andcharging of fire extinguishers, and traffic cones with reflective tape. An illustration from thework of the student team that worked on the fire extinguisher project is shown in Figure 2.Other products sold in this state through the “preferred” product process include personal carekits for prison intake, food service items, hard hats, personal protective equipment, and evenspecialty
. Meeting as a group to discuss specific action items based on the survey results, such as curriculum changes and development of instructional materials and technologies.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation’s AdvancedTechnology Education Program under Grant No. 1304843. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Brief: Advanced Manufacturing Technology SB-13-90, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C., 1990.2. Online resource available at: http://www.census.gov/foreign- trade
Term 2 might contribute to the shift tohigher letter grades in the final exam, as these online assignments tend to promote self-directedlearning and timely reflection. One limitation of the comparison is that the two exams are notexactly the same. It is difficult to filter out other factors, which might influence the examperformance such as the variations in exam questions and the diversity of students. Despite thislimitation, it is positive to conclude that the online homework assignments can engage studentsin learning in a better way than or at least in a similar way as the paper homework assignments. ComparisonofFinalExamGrades 25
-weekly meeting, the customer introduced some additionalrequirements either as a replacement for the ones that the interns wanted to eliminate, or just the fact that “hehas forgotten to mentioned them during the initial requirement phase”. Again, this was intentionallyincorporated to the project, to reflect what can happen in the real world, and also introduce the concept ofchange control.C. Team OrganizationGiven the the nature of the project, the development team required expertise in both hardware and software.There were number of students who had higher level of interest in one of these areas, and the rest did nothave a strong preference, this allowed us to divide the interns to two groups of five. The two groupsremained fluid throughout
charts (Plots A and C in both figures)reflect Anatomy course scores and the bottom bar charts (Plots B and D in both figures) reflectStatics course scores. Data is initially presented with regards to the MCT instruments applicationin a pre- and post-testing format for both classes and then data is presented for the PSVT:R in thesame fashion. Kurtosis and skewness will be discussed as relevant descriptive statistical data foreach bar chart and comparisons can then easily be made between the Anatomy and Statics preand post-performance on both instruments. A typical bell curve centered on the mean has beenprovided to aid visual confirmation of data normality.MCT ResultsBased on the pre-MCT results, the Anatomy course (Fig. 1, Plot A) had kurtosis
374*Numbers in demographic table reflect surveys with complete demographic data for 752 respondents. Thereare missing demographics for 54 respondents and they were excluded from the comparison analyses.MeasuresWe included the following measures in our survey instrument:Intrinsic motivation/excitement about major/career. To measure excitement and intrinsicinterest in the subject matter and major we asked students to rate the importance of the followingfour items in their choice of a major on a 7 point Likert scale: 1) Doing something that I aminterested in; 2) It is fun being able to discuss difficult technological matters. 3) I am interestedin the methods, theories and insights of the discipline; 4) I am interested in the subject
5) Orthographic Projection with feedback. Inclined and Curved Surfaces• Video mini-lectures. The team has professionally 6) Pattern Folding developed 2-5 minute video introductions to 7) Rotation of Objects about One Axis module topics, which are available in common 8) Rotation of Objects about Two or formats for use with a variety of computer More Axes platforms. 9) Reflection and Symmetry• Video how-to instructions. Additional videos 10) Cross-Sections of Solids
recordedthroughout each semester were also considered. These grades were given by a group of peermentors responsible for helping to administer laboratory activities and grading logbooks. Somementors participated in the role for multiple semesters and were thus more experienced atassigning logbook grades, but there was additionally some turn-over each semester. Each of thethree or four mid-semester gradings focused both on quality of work (e.g., appropriate content,content clarity, and organization) and on general logbook proficiency (e.g., regular entries,quantity of documentation, and adequate reflection), and to a lesser degree on contentcorrectness. Since the logbook grades were performed by peers rather than experiencedengineering professors, lesser
constraints on the controlled variable and the tuningparameters. Manipulated variable constraints are meant to reflect the inherent capacity of theprocess to cause and/or reject change in the case of setpoint response or load disturbances,respectively. Controlled variable constraints are meant to meet desired objectives such as productquality constraints. Constraints on the tuning parameters are meant to limit the search space byutilizing experiential knowledge or analytical knowledge.In this study, the IMC filter time constant will be estimated. Its estimation is done by optimizingeither the integral absolute error (IAE) or the integral square error (ISE) over a desired timehorizon, tf. Other performance measures could also be considered. The
understood of the role of international engineers, and inparticular, engineering students, in the research and design behind such products. In looking atthese gaps in academic literature, this paper will employ the use of autoethnography, the processof using one’s own experience and narrative to formulate and piece together the context of theirexperience in a reflective and analytical manner.11, 12. This methodology will prove important inunderstanding the context of the taboo issue the engineering student will confront. To assesspreparedness for working with taboo subjects, the metrics of global preparedness and globalcompetency will be examined and tested through the use of an autoethnographic study designedto examine the experience. These
. After analysis of these interviews isunderway, interviews with members of “mobilized publics” will be conducted to examine thisrelationship from both sides.AcknowledgementsThis material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant#1551152. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References1 Riley, D. 2008. Engineering and Social Justice. San Rafael, CA: Morgan and Claypool.2 National Academy of Engineering (NAE). 2005. Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting EngineeringEducation to the New Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 47.3 National Academy of
students in this study.This study included a few outcomes and conclusions that would be helpful to engineeringtechnology education practitioners, they include: At the start of the research only 10% of the engineering technology students knew how to find technical information in the library. Reflective comments and post-test results indicated that the assignment exposed all of the students to literacy skills, with most exhibiting skill improvement. Students practicing the newfound skills earlier in the project were more successful in demonstration of those skills than students that waited. Unstructured topics were difficult for these students to deal with; some were concerned about the quality of
3. The main points were well presented 4. Maintained eye-contact with the audience not the screen or the projector 5. At the end summarized effectively what was presentedFigure 2 reflects the feedback from this section. Again, most students had a significantimprovement in this category throughout the semester. For example, student 1 showed a16.5% improvement in his second article presentation when compared with the firstarticle. And yet another 7.5% increase on his performance on his research presentation.That is a total of 24% enhancement throughout the semester. A similar rate ofimprovement is observed for student 10 between his first and second article presentation.His score declined in the thesis presentation
1734 $o&! WBYZ 6289 n%pqT4 $BCD W234 6%&! nXYZ A789 1opq* Time 0 represents member’s original teams. Each team at any given time point after Time 0was composed of three original or “core” members and one guest member. No team had morethan one guest member from the same team throughout the duration of the course. The onlyindividuals a member had contact with on more than one occasion were those individuals whowere apart of that member’s core team.Materials All scales were framed in order to have members reflect on the most recent project theycompleted with that specific team, whether it be the members home team or a guest team.Behavioral integration
fabrication processes. Elements of Occupational Supervision: Preparation, training, and problems of the supervisor. Project Design I: Principles of project management and engineering economics. Development of proposals for senior design project. Project Design II: This is a capstone course for engineering technology majors. Students will work with a professor to design a project that reflects several aspects of the student’s curriculum. Group work. Students will prepare a written project report and give an oral presentation.The project management institute defines project management as “the application of knowledge,skills, tools, and techniques to project activities to meet project requirements8”. To do so
. Puentudura1 is aimed at guiding the process oftechnology integration in a classroom with an ultimate goal of redefining teaching and learningmethodologies. Figure 1 illustrates on how the course curriculum developed for AdditiveManufacturing course at XXXXXX reflects upon SAMR framework.As shown, integrating mobile based scanning technology to additive manufacturing for realizingstudent project designs with the help of SAMR framework helped in significantly enhancing andtransforming the course outlook over the semester. The course enhancement helped in exposing thestudents to effectively integrate mobile based scanning technology, a reverse engineering approachfor identifying and addressing interface challenges. Figure 1
with disruptive, accusatory or off-topicsituations in presentations.The final exercise in the seminar course requires the student to present a mini-seminar of theirown to the class, with the rest of the class as audience and reminding them about (and sometimesdemanding of them) technique usage. While this is not time consuming, it does demand that thestudents draw on past classes and not just fall into old habits.Methods:Assessments were carried out throughout the course of the classes, at the end of each class, at thethrough student self-reflection exercises and end of semester class evaluations and comments.Additionally, the UIUC Instructor and Course Evaluation System (ICES) anonymous reviewsand ratings were incorporated. Although these are
descriptivestatistics and look for trends in student comments about the materials and their learning. Thesurvey has been the least useful aspect of the assessment, with some courses having low responserates. Open-ended reflections have been useful for insights into the impact of the materials onstudent attitudes.5.2 Assessment ResultsPiloting and assessment of materials is in its second year. Materials have been used at all theuniversities in the project, in courses with a variety of topics and levels. Class sizes have rangedfrom 12 to over 80 students. Results from 12 different courses (some of them in multiple terms)have been completed (Table 2). All the measures have found improvement in the post-intervention papers over the pre-intervention papers. Of
undergraduatecourses that build upon pre-requisite content, course-based practice minimizes repetitivetreatment of previous material. Mayo (2004) advocates a balance of fundamental coursetheory with active, case-based instruction so that students not only reflect upon pastexperience to construct new learning, they also share knowledge in a social construct. Thisapproach was a benefit to students in this case study as they learned collaboratively, buildingthe depth of their design aptitude.Readers are encouraged to extrapolate the process and steps of this case study for theirdiscipline specific content areas. While the experiences and projects of this case study maybespecific for design students, the application of exposing students to projects from inception