communities-in-need typically focus on creating,implementing, and optimizing innovative technologies that can be universally applied to thedeveloping world. Many of the technological design assumptions are based upon the provider’svalues and cultural experience, and often disregard the conditions and context of the recipientcommunity. This mindset is exacerbated by the characteristic isolation that engineeringeducation maintains with regard to non-technical disciplines such as anthropology, communityhealth, and social development. A year-long course at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, currently in is third year and working with its third community, breaks theisolationism of engineering thinking by combining undergraduate and graduate
Paper ID #16500Incorporation of Liberal Education into the Engineering Curriculum at aPolytechnicDr. Devin R. Berg, University of Wisconsin, Stout Devin Berg is an Associate Professor and Program Director of the B.S. Manufacturing Engineering and B.S. Mechanical Engineering programs in the Engineering and Technology Department at the University of Wisconsin - Stout.Dr. Tina Lee, University of Wisconsin, Stout Dr. Tina Lee is an Associate Professor of Anthropology and the Program Director for the Applied Social Science Program at the University of Wisconsin-Stout. c American Society for Engineering
Paper ID #16483Student Success through College of Engineering Freshman Year ExperienceProgramProf. John Ross Tapia, New Mexico State University John Ross Tapia has a focus on student engagement and success for all students in their coursework. John Ross is an assistant professor with the Engineering Technology Department at New Mexico State University. He teaches Civil Engineering Technology courses and is the faculty lead for the Freshman Year Experience/ENGR100 course. His research focus is engineering education. Prior to working at NMSU, John worked at New Mexico’s first Early College High school and helped develop the
joined the faculty of Colorado State University, where he is now an Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and the Department of Mathematics. His research interests are in statistical signal processing, coding theory, applied harmonic analysis, and bioimaging.Ms. Melissa D. Reese, Colorado State University Melissa D. Reese received a BS in International Business/Finance and an MBA in Management/Organizational Development from Rochester Institute of Technology in 1998 and 2006, respectively. She is currently the department manager of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Colorado State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016
interactions with technologies ranging from manual manipulative like structures students design build and test with shake tables to digital manipulative with mobile devices. He continues to explore new methods to enhance informal and formal learning experiences. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016Inspiring computational thinking in young children's engineering design activitiesIntroductionComplementing science and mathematics, computational thinking and engineering areincreasingly integrated into K-12 classrooms as well as K-12 out-of-school environments. In theUnited States, these efforts are motivated by the Computer Science Teaching Association’s K-12standards, the inclusion of engineering in the
STEM areas in general, engineering in particular.Prof. Kenneth A Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Kenneth Connor is a professor in the Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering (ECSE) where he teaches courses on electromagnetics, electronics and instrumentation, plasma physics, electric power, and general engineering. His research involves plasma physics, electromagnetics, photon- ics, biomedical sensors, engineering education, diversity in the engineering workforce, and technology enhanced learning. He learned problem solving from his father (ran a gray iron foundry), his mother (a nurse) and grandparents (dairy farmers). He has had the great good fortune to always work with amazing
Paper ID #16542The Shark Tank Experience: How Engineering Students Learn to BecomeEntrepreneursDr. Tobias Haertel, TU Dortmund University Tobias Haertel studied social sciences and put his research focus on science and technology studies as well as creativity in higher engineering education. In his work, he always tries to combine the depth and sophisticated spirit of the analogue world with the interconnectedness and usability of digital techniques.Mr. Claudius Terkowsky, TU Dortmund University Since 2009, he is senior researcher, lecturer and trainer in higher engineering education. Since 2012, he is scientific lead of
perspectivesand actions evidenced by their teammates caused students to actively reflect and view thesituation in a new light. As an example, Ivan (an industrial engineer) described how electricalengineering students assisted him in achieving a new understanding of the project technology,which aided innovation. Everything in this project was something that none of us had done before, regardless of major or experience. Another thing that was innovative was all of us got to work with each other at some level. I worked with EE's and I learned from them how they design solar panel arrangements and how they use some of their power generation formulas and how they store energy in some of their battery systems. And I got to work
Colorado State University, as part of the IBM Faculty Loan program. She was instrumental in establishing the Profes- sional Learning Institute within the College of Engineering. Rosales served as program director of MAES (Mexican American Engineers and Scientists) and co-chair of the Texas Science and Engineering Festival in 2010 and 2011. The festival attracted a cross-demographic attendance of 25,000 in 2010 and 32,000 in 2011. In September 1998, Hispanic Engineer and Information Technology Magazine recognized Rosales for her many contributions to her industry, naming her as one of its 50 ”Women Who Make a Difference.” The award honors Hispanic women who are inventing new technology, new processes, or are
Paper ID #15975Pros and Cons of Laboratory Methods Used in Engineering EducationDr. Mohammad Habibi P.E., University of Wisconsin, Platteville Mohammad Habibi is an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin- Platteville. He received his undergraduate degree from Iran University of Science & Technology in 1994, his master’s from Isfahan University of Technology in 2000, and his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee in 2010. Following his postdoctoral appointments at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, he joined the faculty at Minnesota State
must be submitted. 1.2 Competition Scoring As previously stated, the competition is divided into three phases: journal paper, flightreadiness review, and mission performance. The journal paper, which is submitted prior to theflight phase of the competition, describes the concept, system design, and system testing completedduring the technology development phase (student design, build, test phase after the rules arerelease) of the competition. The paper is limited to 20-pages and must describe team coordinationand systems engineering, which includes the design of the UAS including details on test andevaluation completed during the technology development phase, ground and flight testing, andtradeoff studies. The paper is 25% of total
the American Society of Engineering Education.Dr. Margaret E. Beier, Rice University Margaret Beier is an Associate Professor of Psychology at Rice University in Houston, TX. She received her B.A. from Colby College, and her M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Margaret’s research examines the predictors of performance in educational and occupational settings. In particular, she is interested in the effects of examining gender, age, ability, personality, motivation, and self-regulation on a range of outcomes. She is a member of the American Educational Research Association and a Fellow of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychologists. c
engineering problem. In the redesigned lab, teams of students arepresented with a design challenge related to that week’s lecture curriculum, supplied withapplicable equipment and technology, and advised to self-design their own experiments andinvestigations. Learning objectives and background information are provided and students haveinstructor support for guidance and direction during their experimentation and analysis. Theredesigned laboratories endeavor to build skills that address the modern needs of the engineeringindustry, self-designed learning and innovation, and aim to increase student comprehension andinterest.BackgroundWith the advent of rapid technological development and the high demand for inventive designskills, the needs of the
Qualitative student feedback fromvarious studies has shown that students find videos to be beneficial to watch but details on watchtimes are scarce.5,7,8 One study of an information technology course at Indiana UniversityPurdue University at Indianapolis found that in a flipped class of 27 people, over half of thestudents reported watching less than 90% of assigned recorded videos.9 The study also found thata majority of the students reported rarely rewatching videos.9 As flipped classrooms becomemore common, it is important to know the extent to which students use faculty-produced videos.This paper explores how students utilize videos and analyzes their watching behavior.First-Year Design CourseIntroduction to Engineering Design (ENGI 120) is a one
Paper ID #14476Educating Construction Engineering and Management Students Through RealUniversity ProjectsDr. Carla Lopez del Puerto, University of Puerto Rico - Mayaguez Carla Lopez del Puerto, Ph.D., Associate Professor Construction Engineering and Management Depart- ment of Civil Engineering University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez email: Carla.LopezdelPuerto@upr.edu http://cem.uprm.eduDr. Omar I. Molina-Bas, University of Puerto Rico - Mayaguez Omar I. Molina Bas, Ph.D. Associate Professor and Unit Coordinator Construction Engineering and Man- agement Department of Civil Engineering and Surveying University of Puerto Rico
Filters (August; n = 10) and No BonesAbout it: Designing Knee Braces (January; n = 9). Although the kits were different according totraining session and grade level, it is important to note that EiE workshops emphasize thatalthough the science content may change from one EiE curriculum kit to the next, thephilosophies behind understanding the nature of technology and the engineering design processare consistent across kits. Further, each EiE curriculum kit follows the same structure, whichmakes it easy for teachers to learn one kit and then translate this knowledge to another. Tomaximize shared resources, the purchased kits and refill materials were made available forcheckout at the Interlocal Cooperative so participating teachers could continue
University of Calgary the Georgia Institute of Technology, Marquette University,Pennsylvania State University, and the University of Toronto. The purpose of this survey was tocollect data on various program components utilized by engineering leadership developmentprograms across the nation and to collect qualitative data on specific innovative practices. Prior to creating the survey we found that there were no clear operational definitions ofengineering leadership development program components, so we sought to work with the teamof eight engineering faculty to create operational definitions so that we could ask follow-upquestions isolating the structure of specific components. Components were categorized asEngineering/Technical Leadership
Russell Barrett Thomas Sr, United States Army MAJ Thomas is an Infantry officer with operational Army experience to include multiple combat deploy- ments and training exercises from the platoon to brigade level. MAJ Thomas served as an instructor for Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point from 2013 to 2015 and taught Environmental Engineering Technologies (EV350), Environmental Engineering for Community Development (EV450), and was Course Director and Instructor of Intro- duction to Environmental Engineering (EV385) and Environmental Engineering Seminar (EV400). MAJ Thomas is a registered professional engineer in the state of Delaware.Lt. Col. Jeffrey A
. After 10 years working in industry, he returned to school, completing his Ph.D. in Computer Science Engineering at the University of Louisville’s Speed School of Engineering in 2008. Since com- pleting his degree, he has been teaching engineering mathematics courses and continuing his dissertation research in cyber security for industrial control systems. In his teaching, Dr. Hieb focuses on innovative and effective use of tablets, digital ink, and other technology and is currently investigating the use of the flipped classroom model and collaborative learning. His research in cyber security for industrial control systems is focused on high assurance field devices using microkernel architectures.Dr. Patricia A
Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering (NYU Tandon), where he directs a Mechatronics and Control Laboratory, a Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a GK-12 Fellows project, and a DR K-12 research project, all funded by NSF. He has held visiting positions with the Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH. His research interests include K-12 STEM education, mechatronics, robotics, and control system technology. Under Research Experience for Teachers Site and GK-12 Fellows programs, funded by NSF, and the Central Brooklyn STEM Initiative (CBSI), funded by six philanthropic foundations, he has con- ducted significant K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach
Paper ID #15175Learning to Conduct ”Team Science” through Interdisciplinary EngineeringResearchDr. Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Purdue University, West Lafayette Catherine G.P. Berdanier holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. She earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota and her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from Purdue University. Her research interests include graduate-level engineering education, including engineering writing, inter- and multidisciplinary graduate education, innovative and novel grad- uate education experiences, global learning, and
use and/or increase energy saving behaviors. Dr. Lang’s current research interests focus on identifying, assessing, and developing key skills, knowledge, attitudes, and other intrinsic and extrinsic factors required for engineers to effectively lead others, particularly other engineers and across cultures.Mr. Andrew Michael Erdman, The Pennsylvania State University Andrew M. ”Mike” Erdman received his B.S. in Engineering Science from Penn State and his M.S. from USC. Erdman has also taken courses at RPI, Union, UCLA, UCSB, MIT, and Dartmouth. At Rocket- dyne (Pratt & Whitney), he helped design the Space Shuttle. As manager of Reactor Safety Analysis, Experimental Engineering, and Fluid Dynamics Technology at KAPL
Paper ID #15814An Analysis of First-Year Engineering Majors’ Spatial SkillJaclyn Kuspiel Murray, University of Georgia Jaclyn Kuspiel Murray is currently a research scientist at Georgia Institute of Technology in the depart- ment of biomedical engineering. In May of 2016 she graduated with a doctorate of philosophy in science education from The University of Georgia. She earned a bachelor of science in mechanical engineer- ing from Georgia Institute of Technology and a master of science in biomedical engineering from The University of Tennessee Health Science Center and The University of Memphis. After a brief career in
case study provides an in-depth study of the challenges andmilestones faced by the evaluation team. One challenge was understanding the uniqueengineering design-based curriculum. Another challenge was exploring the impact of a pureinquiry-based teaching program. One key milestone reached was creating a participatoryenvironment for the program evaluation. The result was an evaluation regime that was useful tothe rocket program stakeholders. Engineering an Evaluation for a Growing Rocket Program: Lessons LearnedIntroduction Perennially, educators, industrialists, social commentators, and politicians call forscience, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) instruction that matches anincreasingly multifaceted global economy
includes electro-mechanical systems for sustainable processing of mi- croalgae, NOx formation in lean-premixed combustion, and innovative teaching methods and assessment techniques. Her work is published in venues including the Journal of Engineering Education, IEEE Trans- actions on Education, Bioresource Technology, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, and Combustion and Flame. She is a member of the American Society of Engineering Education and the Algae Biomass Organization. Dr. Shuman serves as Chair-Elect for the ASEE Energy Conversion and Conservation Division in 2015-16 year. She received a Dipl.Ing. degree in mechanical engineering from Belgrade University in 1992, an M.S.M.E. from the University of
Paper ID #15076Manipulatives in Engineering Statics: Supplementing Analytical Techniqueswith Physical ModelsDr. Joel Alejandro Mejia, Angelo State University Dr. Joel Alejandro Mejia is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at Angelo State University. He is interested in research regarding underrepresentation of minority groups in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM), especially the use of culturally responsive practices in engineering education. He is particularly interested in the use of comprehension strategy instruction in linguistically and culturally diverse classrooms
Challenges of Students with ADHD in Engineering ProgramsAbstract A critical need exists in engineering education to draw on the non-traditional divergentthinking and risk- taking necessary for making radical technological breakthroughs. Literaturesuggests that individuals with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) characteristicsdemonstrate unparalleled creativity and risk-taking potential. While this group of students mayoffer significant benefits to the advancement of the nation, they are currently significantlyunderrepresented in engineering programs because of the major academic and emotionalchallenges that the rigidly structured engineering programs impose on them. Funded by theDivision of Engineering
months.Ms. Ashly Locke, Florida Polytechnic University Ashly Locke is a fifteen year Navy veteran and a Lab Technician at Florida Polytechnic University. She received a bachelor of science in Electrical Engineering Technology from Purdue University. Currently she is pursuing a master of science in Electrical Engineering at Florida Polytechnic University. Prior to joining Florida Polytechnic’s inaugural staff; she worked for fourteen years in the automotive electronics and eighteen months in the aircraft electronics industries. She has extensive experience in the education and training of adult learners. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 POSTER: Improved Student
development. Currently, Aldin is a lead tutor at the Fulton Schools of Engineering and wishes to develop effective engineering education strategies.Prof. Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause is professor in the Materials Science Program in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science
students, exploratory factor analyses identified an underlying factor structure of thescale with 38 items loaded onto one of five factors (Leadership Opportunity, Team Motivation,Engineering Practice, Innovative Changes, and Ethical Actions and Integrity), along with goodreliability evidence.I. Introduction “Our aspiration is to shape the engineering curriculum for 2020 so as to be responsive to the disparate learning styles of different student populations and attractive for all those seeking a full and well-rounded education that prepares a person for a creative and productive life and positions of leadership” (p. 52)1.As we face rapid changes in technology, society, and the world, the National Academy ofEngineering