probability and statistics to engineering students arethe theoretical nature of the topic and the disconnection of the material taught with real-worldengineering problems. Although the engineering curriculum in most cases has been updated andexpanded to incorporate group work and project-based learning, most of the mathematicaloriented courses are still taught in a passive manner.Our goal is to enhance students’ critical thinking by integrating case studies to our introductorycourse in probability and statistics. This is typically a sophomore-level core course in theindustrial engineering curriculum. Students who complete this course, should be able tounderstand the role of uncertainty in engineering models, apply critical probability concepts
imposes pedagogical challenges.The TPACK framework is derived from the interactions between three knowledge domains:technology-, pedagogy-, and content-knowledge. In the context of TPACK, technologyencompasses technological products and the knowledge, skills, tools, and processes needed todesign, build, and operate these products.2,3 Pedagogy refers to principles and techniques ofconducting and assessing effective teaching and learning. Finally, content refers to fundamentalconcepts, theoretical foundations, and knowledge connections and arrangements useful inclassroom environment.4 An intentional application of the TPACK framework can facilitateeffective pedagogy through technology integration by making use of the interactions among thethree
of the curriculum for the Department of Engineering. The research and teaching interests of Dr. Nagel tend to revolve around engineering design and engineering design education, and in particular, the design conceptualization phase of the design process. He has performed research with the US Army Chemical Corps, General Motors Research and Development Center, and the US Air Force Academy, and he has received grants from the NSF, the EPA, and General Motors Corporation.Dr. Elise Barrella, James Madison University Dr. Elise Barrella is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at James Madison University, who focuses teaching, scholarship, service, and student mentoring on transportation systems, sustainability, and engi
graphical concepts and the presence of robustmisconceptions. This paper is a work-in-progress describing the status of thedevelopment of such an instrument. Details documenting the evolution of arepresentative inventory item will be highlighted in this paper.IntroductionIn the early days of engineering education, students completed one or two years ofdrafting training as part of their curriculum. At the time, this made sense because it wasengineers who created the drawings and other documentation needed to construct ormanufacture their designs. Gradually, drafting became the job of technicians asengineers focused on the more complicated aspects of engineering analysis; however,engineers remained principally involved in the creation of the design
Communication via Self-Reflection” CHE Curriculum session) #11972 • “Technical and Professional Communication for Chemical Engineers” #13875 • “Student Led Example Problems in a Graduate-Level Advanced Transport Phenomena Course” #13944 • “Using an Article in a Sophomore Engineering
Challenge. Particularly, participants prominently improved theirencouragement skills. Only the Challenge attribute displayed divergent improvements.Introduction Leadership traits are not always emphasized in the engineering curriculum of highereducation institutions. Once in college, if a student starts an engineering program, leadershipopportunities are typically only available through extracurricular activities or internships1. This islargely because traditional engineering programs are not able to accommodate specific coursesthat foster leadership traits in their degree plan. This lack of curriculum integration can often beattributed to the topic’s perceived complexity and the growth in the number of required corecourses that subsequently
evaluation of the Texas A&M freshman integrated engineering program. in 1995 Frontiers in Education Conference (1995).2. Olds, B. M. & Miller, R. L. The effect of a first-year integrated engineering curriculum on graduation rates and student satisfaction: A longitudinal study. Journal of Engineering Education 93, 23–35 (2004).3. Ambrose, S. A. & Amon, C. H. Systematic design of a first-year mechancial engineering course at Carnegie Mellon University. Journal of Engineering Education 173–181 (1997).4. Froyd, J. E. & Rogers, G. J. Evolution and evaluation of an integrated, first-year curriculum. Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1997 27th Annual Conference. Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change 2, 1107
preparedcybersecurity workforce to defend IT infrastructure and fight against cybercrimes. It’s projectedthat the US is in an urgent demand of thousands of information security workers. The NationalScience Foundation has established a number of grants to award projects that promotecybersecurity education and curriculum development. Some of these projects have reportedsuccess of teaching hands-on skills through Gamification, a game-like learning environment.CTF (Capture-the-Flag) events are particularly successful in attracting college students, evenfrom non-IT/CS major and high school students into cybersecurity. This paper summarizes thecurrent popular Gamification technologies and the practice of using CTF and competitionprojects in classroom
“Extremely Satisfied”.The factors that were found to be significant through this ordinal logistic regression model werethen implemented into an industrial engineering curriculum classroom. The course was anintroductory course in engineering economics in the Industrial Engineering curriculum. Theinstructor ensured that any quiz or exam was given back within a week of being administered,following the recommendation that frequent and detailed feedback is most effective for students.The instructor also ensured from the first day of class and through reminders that he wasavailable after class and in office hours for any questions or concerns. This allowed students tofeel that if they were struggling with a concept, the teacher was approachable and
) process engineering, and (4) CAD/CAM. Acollaborative curriculum writing process was undertaken, in which a core set of common course-level learning outcomes was developed, and an analysis was carried out to determine whichoutcomes contributed most to meeting institutional educational objectives. This resulted in acommon core of learning outcomes serving the needs of all participating institutions. This formsthe MILL Manufacturing Competency Model (MILL Model for short). The MILL Model wasimplemented at all four institutions4. The student outcomes and competencies addressed underthe MILL curricular model are shown in Table 1. Table 1: Curricular Competencies of the MILL Model. Manufacturing Processes
students are recruited by theadjunct to work for his or her company.Like many institutions, the number of hours in UTC’s BSEE is capped by the state at 128.Further restrictions are added by the University which require 21 hours of general educationcourses (excluding math and science requirements that count towards the engineeringcurriculum). To make the most of the remaining hours in the presence of an ever expanding bodyof knowledge, power-related projects were integrated into the College’s two-semester seniordesign projects 5. Student projects include the design of a substation, a building-wide energymonitoring system, and a wind turbine suitable for third world countries. As a mechanism toextend education beyond the 128 hour limit, UTC is
recognition of the need 6. An ability to recognizePreparation for and and have the preparation and for, and an ability to engage in the ongoing need fordepth of continuing ability to engage in independent life-long learning. additional knowledge andlearning. and life-long learning in the locate, evaluate, integrate, broadest context of technological and apply this knowledge change. appropriately.Notes:1. Proposed EAC Criterion 5 supplements this outcome by specifying “a major design experience based on the
suggests thatthere are ways to understand organizational culture and how, by extension, an organization’sleaders act with regard to its culture.2Schein defines culture as, "a pattern of shared basic assumptions learned by a group as it solvedits problems of external adaptation and internal integration, which has worked well enough to beconsidered valid, and, therefore, to be taught to new members as the correct way to perceive,think, and feel in relation to those problems."2 Using Schein as a guide, a culture then is nothingmore than a collection of habits and values which are created as a byproduct of reaching theorganization’s goals, and then passed on to subordinates who are members of the unit. Largeorganizations have complex cultures because
Paper ID #17285MAKER: Star Car 2015Ms. Emily Ann Marasco, University of Calgary Emily Marasco is a Ph.D. student at the University of Calgary. Her research focuses on creativity and cross-disciplinary curriculum development for engineering students as well as for K-12 and community outreach programs.Ms. Stephanie Hladik, University of Calgary Stephanie Hladik is a M.Sc student in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Calgary. Through her research she is exploring topics related to the integration of engineering into K-12 curricula. In particular, she is interested in bringing electrical engineering
developing formal degree programs and professional development programs for incumbent engineers, community college instructors, and high school science and technology teachers. He is the PI and co-PI of several federal and state funded projects for course, curriculum and laboratory development in advanced automotive technology.Dr. Jimmy Ching-Ming Chen, Wayne State University Assistant Professor 2015-present Wayne State University Ph.D 2006 Texas A&M University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Automatic Parking Vehicle SystemAbstractVehicle automation, autonomy and connectivity is a subject of mechatronics integrating manyengineering disciplines including
parents’views regarding the impact of PLTW on their children’s abilities34 or teachers’ perceptions ofbarriers to student learning of science or math.22 Literature pertaining to pathways generallyfocused on factors that influenced students to pursue STEM degrees or persist in college,19,23,25,44although one of these articles focused on what motivated teachers to pursue technologyeducation degrees.45 The final three articles pertaining to PLTW Implementation varied widely:one was a curriculum analysis of PLTW and the alignment of PLTW curricula with national andMinnesota state standards,28 a second was on lessons learned from effective PLTW partnershipteams,37 and a third was on the extent of PLTW service-learning integration.46Table 5 presents an
Integrated STEM Instructional Leadership (PreK-6) Post-Baccalaureate Certificate Program at TU. She currently serves as the Chair of the Pre-College Engineering Education Division of ASEE, and is a member of the ASEE Board of Directors Committee on P12 Engineering Education.Ms. Elizabeth A. Parry, North Carolina State University Elizabeth (Liz) Parry Elizabeth Parry is an engineer and consultant in K-12 Integrated STEM through Engineering Curriculum, Coaching and Professional Development and a Coordinator and Instructor of Introduction to Engineering at the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University. For the past sixteen years, she has worked extensively with students from kindergarten to graduate school
and Family in the American West (Rutgers University Press, 2014), which was funded by a fellowship from the National Endowment for the Humanities. Her current research project, ”The Ethics of Extraction: Integrating Corporate So- cial Responsibility into Engineering Education,” investigates the sociotechnical dimensions of CSR for engineers in the mining, oil and gas industries and is funded by the National Science Foundation.Dr. Carrie J. McClelland P.E., Colorado School of Mines Carrie J McClelland is an Associate Teaching Professor at Colorado School of Mines. Carrie is a regis- tered professional engineer with a passion for teaching the next generation of engineers to be well-rounded professionals who consider
Mechatronics Curriculum and Packaging Automation Laboratory Facility. In 2010 he as Co-PI received NSF-ATE grant entitled Meeting Workforce Needs for Mechatronics Tech- nicians. From 2003 through 2006, he was involved with Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL in developing direct computer control for hydrogen powered automotives. He is also involved in several direct computer control and wireless process control related research projects. His current interests are in the area of packaging machinery system design & control, industrial transducers, industrial process control systems, modeling and simulation of Mechatronics devices and systems in virtual environment, programmable logic controllers, programmable logic
active in SPEE throughout his career, serving as president in 1906-07 and in numerous other roles well into the 1940s. He was the fourth recipient of SPEE’sLamme Award in 1931 and was honored with many other awards during his long career.20Jackson was also a strong supporter of libraries, believing that they were integral to theinstructional and research programs of engineering schools.21In his paper, Burgess expressed a concern that public libraries were failing to provide appropriatebooks for young people, artisans and industrial workers who had an interest in science andengineering. The main reason for this, he argued, was that few, if any, librarians had thetechnical knowledge and experience that would allow them to assess the quality of
their living environment which allows for an overlapbetween students’ social and academic activities.19, 20 COMPASS creates a learning communitybased on cohort participation in STEM based classes with other students like themselves with anopportunity for a residential component based on the students’ specific academic interests, acombination of the types of learning communities mentioned above.To increase the chances of retention, students must be involved early with both faculty and peersin the academic and social systems of the institution.13, 21-25 Learning communities assist in thisprocess.26 Institutions implement learning communities as a way to increase student involvement,build community, create a connection to the curriculum, enhance
courses, when context,application, and sometimes even notation can be quite different. This is often true forengineering students with respect to the Calculus sequence.In courses such as Calculus, concepts and solution methods are typically presented within amathematical context. While some students can recognize the underlying structure and themathematical construction, others have trouble identifying patterns or parallel thought structures,which makes it difficult for them to generalize the concept to a range of problem types. Forexample, students in an Introduction to Mathematical Statistics course were reported to claimthey do not know how to integrate a probability distribution over a region. The pre-requisite forthe course is Multivariable
, Palestine and Libya.Dr. Nazmi Abdel-Salam Almasri, The Islamic University of Gaza - Palestine Nazmi Al-Masri is an associate professor of TEFL and curriculum development. Since he obtained his PhD from Manchester University, UK, in 1994, he has been working at the English Language Department, the Islamic University of Gaza- Palestine. He teaches Technology in TEFL, ELT Methodology, ELT Research Methods and ESp courses.He participated in building the English language curriculum and textbooks used in Palestinian schools and currently participating in four EU funded projects.Ms. Anna Rolinska, University of Glasgow Anna Rolinska has 15 years of experience in teaching English as a Foreign Language. For the last 6 years she
Paper ID #16361NUE: The Freshman Experience and Nanotechnology Solutions to Engineer-ing Grand ChallengesDr. Edward W. Davis, Auburn University Edward W. Davis received his PhD from the University of Akron in 1996. He worked in the commercial plastics industry for 11 years, including positions with Shell Chemicals in Louvain-la-Nueve Belgium and EVALCA in Houston TX. He joined the faculty at Auburn University in the fall of 2007. In 2014 he was promoted to Senior Lecturer. He has regularly taught courses in three different engineering departments. In 2015 he began his current position as an Assistant Professor in the
, organizations, policy, initiatives) of change and documenting the good, hard work required across disciplinary boundaries to achieve meaningful change in STEM ed- ucation.Ann Sitomer, Oregon State University Ann earned a PhD in mathematics education from Portland State University in 2014. Her dissertation examined the informal ways of reasoning about ratio, rate and proportion that adult returning students bring to an arithmetic review class and how these ways of thinking interacted with the curriculum. Other research interests include teachers’ professional noticing of learners’ mathematical thinking and orga- nizational change. Ann works on both the implementation and research sides of the ESTEME@OSU project.Dr
moremobile applications are designed and developed for the M-Learning. In this paper, a novelmobile-optimized application architecture is proposed to integrate the remote laboratory intomobile environment for the M-Learning. With this mobile optimized application architecture, theremote experiment applications can use a common codebase to deploy native-like applications onmany different mobile platforms (such as, iOS, Android, Window Mobile, etc.). To demonstratethe effectiveness of proposed new architecture for M-Learning, an innovative remote networkedSmart Vibration Platform (SVP) experiment is successfully implemented based on this newapplication architecture. This remote SVP experiment has been used in several
., Majerich, D., “A Feedback-Based Approach for Evolving a Blended Class Model for Large Enrollment, Multiple Section Circuits Courses,” IEEE Frontiers in Education, Oct. 2015, El Paso, TX.15. Ferri, B., Ferri, A., Majerich, D., and Madden, A., “Effects of In-class Hands-On Laboratories in a Large Enrollment, Multiple Section Blended Linear Circuits Course” accepted in ASEE Journal on Advances in Engineering Education.16. Newman, D., Clure, G., Morris Deyoe, M., Connor, K. Using Technology in a Studio Approach to Learning: Results of a Five Year Study of an Innovative Mobile Teaching Tool. Pedagogical Applications and Social Effects of Mobile Technology Integration. Ed. J. Keengwe. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2013.17. Newman, D
activities toimprove learning outcomes by a project based learning paradigm. The designed labs will be usedthrough the class content and flow into the course context through the semester so that an activelearning and engagement of the student will be reached.Mobile Security Laboratory DevelopmentWe have initiated the mobile computing and security projects and labs and integrated them toclassroom since Spring 2012. Most of the labs were developed and applied in the softwareengineering and senior design classes, which are senior courses for computer science andelectrical engineering students. Later, with new labs developed more courses continued, weapplied in wireless computing and graduate courses. The mobile computing and security labswere developed
,and is followed up with writing assignments. CSE 1002 Intro to CSE is open to freshmen CS andSE majors and is offered only in fall semesters. Objectives of the course are defined as:• Enhance understanding of the CS and SE academic majors,• Develop team building skills and encourage group participation,• Develop computational thinking skills,• Provide an awareness of ethical issues unique to computing,• Provide an understanding of the history of computing, and• Develop an awareness of the career opportunities available to computing majors.Experience with summer computing camps for high school and middle school students hasdemonstrated that using a robot-based curriculum helps increase confidence in the use
curriculum. The positive impacts of these examples have stimulatedexciting discussions among ME students. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) Figure 4. Electrical / Hydraulic Analogy Example: (a) Hydraulic Mechaical System, (b) Mechanical parameters; Torque/Angular velocity/Angle analogy, (c)concept of resistance and capacitance, (d) Mechanical Flow and restriction in flow,(e) Hydraulic system with flow branching, and (f) analogous electrical system with current node.IV. Results and DiscussionAn issue of “too abstract and not too visible” ECE content materials was often cited bynon-electrical engineering majors when pursuing an