provides background anddetails about the project.MotivationThe PEPS study follows a small, but growing, body of literature in engineering education onearly engineering career choice. While some studies focus on the proportions of engineeringbachelor’s graduates who pursue engineering jobs and graduate degrees,1,3 other studies haveexamined the specific factors related to engineering students having plans to pursue engineeringcareers, versus non-engineering careers, after college, finding that the experiences thatengineering students have in their programs have a big impact. For example, in their study ofengineering undergraduates at nine institutions nationwide, Amelink and Creamer (2010) foundthat student satisfaction with the quality of teaching
, master planning, management for energy conservation/renewable energy projects and space planning for campus expansion. As a senior administrative leader, I have facilitated climate action planning in com- pliance with the American College and University Presidents’ Climate Commitment (ACUPCC) and re- ceived the Outstanding Climate Leadership award that recognized successful carbon reduction strategies, innovative curriculum and the dynamic engagement faculty, staff and students in a the pursuit of carbon neutrality. Although my primary formal training has been in the field of architecture, recent doctoral studies at the University of Pennsylvania were focused in the field of higher education management. As part of an
Planning and Evaluation, published ex- tensively on these subjects, and serves on several professional boards and expert panels including the Board on Infrastructure and the Constructed Environment (BICE, U.S. National Research Council) and the International Panel for Climate Change (IPCC, United Nations). She is coauthor of the college text- book Systems Engineering with Economics, Probability and Statistics, J. Ross Publishing, 2012. She serves on the editorial boards for the International Journal of Sustainable Transportation and Transporta- tion in Developing Economies. Kennedy is the founding chair of the Committee on Sustainability and the Environment of the American Society of Civil Engineers’ Transportation and
each semester during one academic year. • Tier 4: $6,000 for students who complete their major preparation at Rio Hondo College and transfer as a STEM major to a four-year university or college.The NSF award is for a total of $599,988. This enables the college to present more than twentyscholarships a year for five years.Eligibility is determined by the following criteria: U.S. residency, full-time enrollment in aSTEM major (biological sciences, physics, chemistry, astronomy, materials science,mathematical sciences, computer and information science, and engineering) as shown by acomprehensive educational plan, financial need, motivation and professionalism (as described inan essay), and academic merit.Grade point average and
first part, the model development, students are guided (usuallythrough carefully crafted laboratory experiences) to develop concepts and gain familiarity withthe associated representations for those concepts. The students become accustomed to referringto their laboratory data as the authority on scientific relationships. In the deployment phase thatfollows, students apply the model to a variety of situations and test the limits of the model, oftenthrough problem solving and sometimes via lab practica. Incorporating engineering applicationsin the deployment provides the ideal structure for seeing the relationship between fundamentalscientific understanding and well-planned engineering.The Ohio State University has offered a series of Modeling
programs in a range of engineering disciplines1,2. Morgan Stateand Stony Brook in Electrical Engineering and University of Alabama in MechanicalEngineering have 2+2 programs online3,4,5. Our program in Industrial Engineering is similar tothe 2+2 online programs at other universities in other disciplines. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 discusses the degree plan andcourse modifications required for online teaching. Section 3 discusses the delivery technologyand approaches used to offer online courses. Section 4 discusses the potential market for thisprogram. Section 5 discusses marketing and outreach efforts. Section 5 presents the evaluationresults of a student survey about online courses and discuss the progress of
schedule and cost analysis and considereda topic for upper management to deal with. However, as projects become more complex and theuncertainty associated with technical aspects of them increases, the risks related to not only thoseprojects but also the environment have to be considered from a holistic or systemic perspective. Inthis dynamic environment, it is important for engineers and engineering managers to understandvarious aspects of risk management such as risk identification, risk tracking, risk impactassessment, risk prioritization and risk mitigation planning, implementation and progressmonitoring.In this paper, the authors review all the existing courses in their Engineering Management (EM)program and analyze the current offerings of
information to solve problems, life-long learning, communication, and ethical behavior. At IRE, and its sister program Twin CitiesEngineering (TCE), incoming students are presented with the outcomes during orientation. Asnew, innovative programs recruiting students before being accredited, discussion of theoutcomes and aligning program activities with the outcomes provided external credibility. Thissupported change and student buy-in to program activities that were designed to move themtowards better meeting the outcomes, but that would not be familiar to students in traditionalprograms, such as a professional development plan or metacognitive reflection activities.The IRE and TCE programs were developed as outcomes-based programs. Beginning with
Geometric Tolerancing Project Management Project organization Project selection PERT, CPM, Project planning and control, resources allocation Project team development & management Conflict and change management Six-sigma & quality improvement projects Oil & Gas exploration case studies Manufacturing logistics Productivity measures Forecasting techniques for manufacturing Capacity planning and break even
plans on pursuing a career in the automotive industry or manufacturing industry.Dr. John William Bridge, University of Washington, Bothell Dr. John Bridge, P.E. Dr. Bridge is a former Lt. Colonel and mechanical engineer in the U.S. Air Force with over twenty years of R&D experience with numerous aerospace vehicles to include aircraft and rocket systems. In addition, he has performed advanced materials characterization while in the mil- itary and at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. He has previous teaching experience at several institutions to include Bowdoin College, the U.S. Air Force Academy, and the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. Dr. Bridge is currently working with composite materials used in
, Residential Construction as an elective coursefocuses on the residential type of structure. Senior year core courses cover more detailed subjectson Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Systems and Construction Planning and Scheduling.Student Competitions is being offered in some CM programs as an elective course to preparestudents for the ASC Student Construction Management Competition and the NationalAssociation of Home Builders (NAHB) Student Chapters Residential Construction ManagementCompetition (RCMC). Project Management /Capstone Experience serves as the concludingcourse of the framework and also the curriculum to provide CM students the experience ofmanaging a comprehensive construction project on all subjects in a team environment
educational and research programs related to sustainability; coordinates and assists in the implementation of greening efforts for the campus; and participates in campus planning for sustainability. She is actively involved in programs and education surrounding renewable energy, climate action planning, and climate adaptation and resilience.Dr. Li Ding, California State University - Northridge Dr. Li Ding is a Lecturer in the Department of Manufacturing Systems Engineering and Management at California State University Northridge. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Vertical Integration of the Liberal Arts in Engineering Education WIP
opportunity arose forproviding the first-year programming students (whom will now be referred to as “programmers”to help differentiate between the various student types referenced within this paper) with ameaningful client-driven design experience. In the 2013-2014 academic year, the authors testedthe hypothesis that teams of first-year programmers can gain a subset of the benefits associatedwith service learning by establishing a client relationship with a group directly involved with aservice learning project.4-6 The purpose of the project was to develop an interactive softwareapplication that would complement a lesson plan written by engineering education majorsparticipating with a campus organization that annually performed STEM teacher workshops
initiation and scope definition,project planning and estimation, and project measurement and control, is one of the knowledgeareas in the software engineering body of knowledge (SWEBOK [8]). As a result, SPM has beenincorporated in some software engineering undergraduate curricula (e.g., [1, 2]).There is a large body of SPM theory described in the SWEBOK. Finding ways to enhance studentlearning of this theory by providing opportunities to apply it in a realistic setting, however, isoften challenging. This difficulty stems from the fact that to truly exercise project managementskills, one needs to be put in charge of a relatively long-term, non-trivial software project thatinvolves a team of software developers. Setting up such a project and a team
successfully coordinated with multiple faculty members in the submission of approximately 600 grant proposals, including co-writing, editing and serving as the Program Manager for 5 awarded STEM edu- cation grants totaling more than $12M. She has collaborated with University offices and College faculty and professional staff in the facilitation of recruitment strategies to increase the quality and quantity of undergraduate and graduate enrollment, including supervising the planning and implementation of Open House and other recruitment events. Jessica now manages the day-to-day operations of the DragonsTeach program, including supporting the development of programs of study, student recruitment, fundraising and grant
steps elaborated on below: ● Ask: What is the problem? What have others done to solve this? What are the constraints? ● Imagine: What are possible solutions? What’s the advantage of one over another? Choose the best one. ● Plan: What’s needed to execute the chosen solution? What additional skills, tools or materials are needed? Get the needed skills and materials. ● Create: Build a model according to the plan and test it systematically. ● Improve: How could the design be improved? Redesign and retest. This EDP model is cast as a cyclic process, with progress going in either direction in the cycle and sometimes shortcutting from one step to another, as is consistent with the iterative nature of
ofcollaboration technologies. Although there has been great emphasis on developing collaborationcompetencies in the engineering curriculum, empirical evidence of successful strategies fordistributed team settings is scarce. As an attempt to fill this gap this study investigates theimpact of a scalable intervention in developing virtual collaboration skills. The intervention,based on instructional scaffolds embedded with collaboration technologies, is aimed atsupporting specific processes including planning, goal setting, clarifying goals and expectations,communication, coordination and progress monitoring. A quasi-experimental design was used toevaluate the impact of the intervention on student teamwork skills. Data from 278 graduate andundergraduate
from the studentworkforce as they near completion of their co-op regarding the effectiveness of and value addedby the training program. Particular emphasis is placed on relevance to their actual workexperience, and content and duration of each topic. Additionally, managers continuouslyimprove their training experience by varying the delivery method of the subject matter throughthe coursework (i.e., lecture, workshop, self-guided, web based as examples). At least six weeks prior to the start of a training cycle, a team meets to review the effectivenessof the prior training round as well as its relevance to the work planned for the incoming students.This participative approach includes the best
knowledge that converts ideas into successful products or processes. As a result, many of the same skills such as exploring, mentoring, planning, organizing, scheduling,controlling, communicating, and leading could be used in both careers with minor modification.Dealing with people is always difficult and requires great skill. This is especially true whendealing with students. Many students are in a class not by choice, but simply because it is arequirement for graduation. In some cases, these students are uninterested in the subject,unmotivated, and quite simply bored. However, relating the subject matter directly to real worldindustrial and consumer applications tend to spark their interest. Actual products involvingautomotive components, robotic
schools, online and newspaperadvertising, attendance at local college fairs, and postings through social media. Turnout for the eventwas anticipated to yield approximately 40 interested high school juniors and seniors with everyreasonable effort made to accommodate everyone wishing to attend. As project planning andconstruction progressed it became apparent that the event should be capped at 45 participants toeffectively accommodate the range and sequence of activities planned without excessive strain onresources.Locally, PMTM was the first of its kind and created such a buzz of excitement and interest that minimalrecruiting was necessary. Word of mouth from guidance departments at local and regional high schoolshelped push registration to 98
interdisciplinary research within academic schools outside ofits engineering technology host program.This paper presents the formation and history of the partnership as well as an overview of initialinteractions and planning that lead to a large-scale collaborative effort between academia andindustry. Also detailed are the upfront commitments of academia and industry required tolaunch an open-ended project of this scale and the challenges associated with the dynamic natureof project scope, instructional delivery, timeline and budget. This examination includes a focuson the roles of faculty and industry participants during all stages of the project including pre-planning, budgeting, instruction, design, sourcing, procurement, implementation
Intelligent Systems, Control, and Robotics (CISCOR) at Florida State University. His research interests are primarily in the areas of dynamic system modeling, intelligent control, autonomous mobile wheeled and legged robotics, dynamic motion planning, and mechatronics.Dr. Matthew James Jensen, Florida Institute of Technology Dr. Matthew J. Jensen received his bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in 2006. Matthew received his doctorate from Clemson University in 2011 in Mechanical Engineering, focused primarily on automotive control systems and dynamics. During his graduate studies, Matthew was awarded the Department of Mechanical Engineering Endowed Teaching Fellowship
Programming 1 and Programming 2 at OhioNorthern University has used the term project theme of developing K-12 educational softwarefor many years, but until 2014 the project was done without the benefit of having a client tosatisfy. Consequently, the instructor could only provide feedback on the technical aspects of theimplementation, and most of the feedback was summative. With the recent establishment of anengineering education degree program, the opportunity arose for providing the programmingstudents with a meaningful client-driven design experience. The engineering education majors,acting as clients, developed lesson plans for STEM outreach programs as part of a fall semestercourse that were afterwards supplemented by software applications
change (Y-V), indicates an individual’s propensity to accept change. The fifth pair, levelof uncertainty (E-T), describes an individual’s preference in making decisions with incompleteknowledge. The sixth pair of preferences, level of hierarchical view of the system (H-R),indicates the way an individual approaches problems within a larger complex system. Anindividual whose answers fall into the (H)-category is probably more interested in applying bigpicture concepts and ideas. Conversely, (R)-type systems thinkers prefer to focus on particularsand details. The last pair of preferences, level of flexibility (F-D), describes an individual’spreference to altering plans. In large complex system problems where the environment ischanging rapidly, a
integrated through teacher views that produce dynamic project-basedlesson plans. The system encourages an interdisciplinary approach that requires studentsto draw on multiple subject areas simultaneously to solve real world problems.This paper presents the results of the initial evaluation of the DLMS. After providing thedetails regarding its infrastructure, a critical evaluation of the platform and how itsupports both teachers and students in a balanced approach to learning is presented. Thisevaluation draws upon the Felder-Silverman Learning Style Model (FSLM) in thatelements of the DLSM are evaluated within the context of the models four dimensions.The initial results of a pilot project aimed at evaluating its effectiveness in schools
the week, and will be quizzed on boththe lectures and the reading assignments.The two credit course, Design Practicum, is a hands-on design course with lectures and labs thatwill introduce students to relevant topics in engineering including: problem solving, team design,innovation, information technology, engineering, ethics in engineering, community engagementand social responsibility. This course will require partial departmental financial support, thus notall departments are currently committed to participating due to budget concerns. Just over halfof our engineering college is currently planning to participate, with approximately 600 studentsexpected to enroll this coming year. (Fall 2016/Spring 2016) This course is modeled after
experts to publish Core Grammar for En- gineers, a discourse-specific, self-instructional program for engineering students that will be released in 2016-17 (see www.thegrammarproject.com).Dr. Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Julia M. Williams is Executive Director of the Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assess- ment and Professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her research areas include tech- nical communication, assessment, accreditation, and the development of change management strategies for faculty and staff. Her articles have appeared in the Journal of Engineering Education, International Journal of Engineering Education, IEEE Transactions on
Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is President of Research Triangle Educational Consultants. She received her Ph.D.in Educational Research and Policy Analysis from NC State University in 1996. She also has an MBA from Indiana University (Bloomington) and a bachelor’s degree from Duke University. She specializes in evaluation and research in engineering education, computer science education, teacher education, and technology
Expo, 6 scholars will present their work at the 2016National Council on Undergraduate Research (NCUR), and one scholar will present his paper atthe IEEE SoutheastCon 2016.Vertically Integrated Project Based LearningThe SPIRIT program’s Project Based Leaning (PBL) activities were developed to incorporateopen-ended problem solving, teamwork, and project management. Overall the goals of theseactivities were to broaden student involvement in practical scenarios and to prepare students forthe challenges of their senior capstone project and professional practice. Three planned PBLactivities were conducted during the weekly meetings and involved structured teams working ondesign challenges. SPIRIT scholars worked in teams comprised of Seniors
electrical components like DC motors, vibration (8th Grade) motors, LEDs, resistors, and switches to design and build an interactive electronic game. Additionally, they Apply have to develop a business plan for bringing their game to market. Research Topics/Projects – atoms, free electrons, current, voltage, elements, periodic table, proportions, conductors, insulators, build circuits, power sources, LEDs, resistors, switches, motors, games types, game design, develop mind maps, business plan, and cost analysis. Curricula Access All curricula materials are hosted online for ease of distribution to teachers across the country. Teachers and other K12 personnel