PD (professional development) experience took place in December. I created a unit to team teach with our 8th grade science teacher, Holly. She was very excited about the experience. I shared the lesson plans with her and secured all necessary materials for the unit. I taught the first class and then we team taught the next 2 classes and then she taught the last class on her own. She felt confident by the 4th class. My second PD experience took place in May. I shared BD (another rural teacher in program)’s MagLev unit with Holly… I told her I would help her in anyway except I could not be there to teach the unit… We are planning on meeting this summer to plan a life science unit and maybe more
feasibility of distributing large softwareengineering projects across the academic curriculum, Tvedt et al. [12] propose that students fromdifferent courses collaborate by taking different roles in a simulated software factory, and Walkerand Slotterbeck [13] explore the teaching of large scale teamwork in a small college environmentby using multi-semester, multi-course projects that require students to work together in teams.The objectives of Fenwick et al.’s, Tvedt et al.’s, and Walker and Slotterbeck’s work are broad andrelated to bringing an entire curriculum closer to real-world software engineering practiceswhereas the objectives of the work reported in this paper are focused on knowledge and skillsparticular to software project management.3
Administrative Support Coordinator) for recruiting high schoolstudents; the 15 student assistant volunteers for making the discussion boards manageable; JeffZampell for organizing the student assistants and helping create supplemental materials.8. References[1] Cormier, D. (2008). The CCK08 MOOC – Connectivism course, 1/4 way. Dave’s Educational Blog, October 2,2008. Retrieved fromhttp://davecormier.com/edblog/2008/10/02/the-cck08-mooc-connectivism-course-14-way/[2] Parr, C. (2013). MOOC creators criticise courses’ lack of creativity. Times Higher Education, October 17, 2013.Retrieved fromhttps://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/mooc-creators-criticise-courses-lack-of-creativity/2008180.article[3] Leckart, S. (2012). The Stanford Education Experiment
lead women to think that they are not a fit forcareers in engineering. The authors describe several ways in which women have differentexperiences from men, particularly in confronting sexist environments or supervisors. Inaddition, particularly for women, the authors write, a boring or mundane internship can leadstudents to question whether they belong in engineering at all.The accounts presented in this paper add to this story by highlighting the experiences of studentsat and after graduation. One caveat, however—our sample is somewhat different from Seron etal.’s in that they followed engineers through their undergraduate experience whereas we selectedengineers at career launch (the end of or shortly after their undergraduate experience). In
increase their commitment to teaching may help, but continuing tohire new faculty whose primary emphasis and interests is in research, inevitably doesreinforce existing cultural norms that favor research over teaching.Facilitate and Support Faculty in Acquiring Relevant Practical Experience:Encourage faculty members, particularly the young, to get involved with the practicein their locale, and devise equitable system(s) that allow faculty to gain theengineering experience they desperately need, in order to keep up with newdevelopments in their areas of specialization. Thus asserting the view thatengineering faculty “with practical experience under their belt” would, in general,make better teachers. Administrator (deans, chairs, and decision makers
minimize the weight of their BMS by thinking critically about where it isnecessary to use more or less adhesive.Dynamic behavior predictions and shaking table testing follow the construction of each team’sBMS. Students calculate the mass and stiffness to determine the natural frequency of their BMS.The mass is recorded using a scale, and the stiffness is calculated using the empirical Equation 1. + / 5 = Stiffness = K = + 325 + 900[unitsare ] (Eq. 1) ,,- 01 16 >where, B = total length of added braces (in); G = total number of gusset plates; S = total
are paying the most attention to are academic integrity issues. The standards for plagiarism or collaboration on an assignment may be different in other countries. We have put a lot of emphasis on needing to educate this influx of international students that academic integrity is very important here.[26]Several studies conducted in the 1990’s pointed to academic dishonesty and cheating being onthe rise, but found that courses in ethics could reduce the students’ propensity to engage inunethical academic or business practices.[21] All of these solutions, which were focused onstudents, would probably not be able to be put in place by a single instructor or in one course, butrather need to be addressed, supported and
geometric dimensioning and tolerancing,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 78, # 1-3, June 1998, Pp/. 29-35. 4. Srinivasan , Vijay, “Reflections on the role of science in the evolution of dimensioning and tolerancing standards,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture January 2013 227: 3-11 5. Mohen, Prashant, “Toward Automatic Tolerancing of Mechanical Assemblies: Assembly Analyses,” Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, Vol. 14, Dec. 2014, Pp. 41009:1-14. 6. A. Saravanan, A., Balamurugan, C., Sivakumar, K., and S. Ramabalan , “Optimal geometric tolerance design framework for rigid parts with assembly
classroom and as homework, that use of the approach be integrated in both classand lab settings, and that use be expanded to course pre-requisites as well as follow up/advancedcourses. Overall, the use of experimental centric approaches to learning and teaching appears tooffer a promising method of increasing and enhancing circuits based classes so that futureengineers will be better able to meet the needs of a rapidly changing world. Further research isneeded on the role of faculty teaching style, specific course content, and long-term achievementoutcomes.References: 1. Suitts, S. (2003).Fueling Education Reform: Historically Black Colleges Are Meeting a National Science Imperative. Cell Biol Educ. 2003 Winter; 2: 205–206.doi
ReferencesBreuker, J., Wielinga, B. J., Breuker, J. A., Wielinga, B. J., & Wielinga, B. (1984). Interpretation of verbal data for knowledge acquisition. University of Amsterdam.Breuker, J.A. (1984). A theoretical framework for spatial learning strategies. In C. Holley and D. Dansereau (Eds.), Spatial learning strategies. New York: Academic Press.Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanisms of аnаlogical learning. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 199–241). London: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://groups.psych.northwestern.edu/gentner/publications2.htm#analogyHeckler, A. F. (2010). Some Consequences of Prompting Novice Physics Students to Construct Force Diagrams. International
why theymatter. s.l. : Association of American Colleges and Universities, 2008.4. Unmasking the effects of the student engagement on college grades and persistence. Kuh, G.D.,Cruce, T., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. s.l. : Journal of Higher Education, 2008, Vol. 79.5. Baxter Magolda, M. B. Self-authorship as the common goal of twenty-first century education. [bookauth.] M. Baxter Magolda & P. King. Learning partnerships: Theory and models to educate for self-authorship. Sterling : Stylus Publishing, 2004.6. Cardone, T., Turton, E. S., Olson, G., & Baxter Magolda, M. Learning partnerships in practice:Orientation, leadership, and residence life. American College Personnel Association and WileyPeriodicals, Inc. 2013.7
; Brumbelow, K. (2014). Data-driven curriculum redesign in civil engineering. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2014 IEEE,1-9.Fowler, D., Macik, M., Turner, J., & Hohenstein, J. (2015). Facilitating program, faculty, and student transformation: A framework for curriculum redesign. Journal of Transformative Learning, 3(1), 59-73.Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In J. Mezirow and Associates (eds.) Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3-33). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Ryan, R. M
willingparticipation of the student subjects who completed the experiment and provided incrediblyuseful feedback about potential refinements to our methods.References[1] J. Sweller, “The worked example effect and human cognition,” Learn. Instr., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 165–169, Apr. 2006.[2] S. Kalyuga, P. Ayres, P. Chandler, and J. Sweller, “The expertise reversal effect,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 23–31, 2003.[3] R. Moreno, M. Reisslein, and G. Ozogul, “Optimizing Worked‐Example Instruction in Electrical Engineering: The Role of Fading and Feedback during Problem‐Solving Practice,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 83–92, 2009.[4] J. Sweller, “Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning,” Cogn. Sci
satisfaction 4.6/5) and believed that the camp helped them significantly in understandingtopics in nanotechnology (4.8/5). The most popular activity was the Scanning ElectronMicroscope when the students were amazed by how different things looked under highmagnifications.References 1. Prins, R. J., MacDonald, S., Leech, J., Brumfield, J., Ellis, M., Smith, L., and Shaeffer, J., Techfacturing: A Summer Day Camp Designed to Promote STEM Interest in Middle School Students through Exposure to Local Manufacturing Facilities, 2010 ASEE Southeast Section Conference. 2. Sala, A., Sitaram, P., and Spendlove, T., Stimulating an Interest in Engineering Through an ”Explore Engineering and Technology” Summer Camp for High School
knowledgeinto new frameworks.Flexibility in topic, discussion, structure and partners is key to providing a meaningful classroomexperience for students, while also teaching engineers to remain nimble, contextual and criticalin thought as they evaluate solutions to a design problem.Incorporation of multiple professional and peer viewpoints, in the form of professional advisorsand alumni mentors, gives students diverse perspectives as well as comfortable resources toconsult outside of the classroom, and demonstrates that many approaches can exist in tackling adesign challenge.Bibliography 1. Atman, C. J.; Adams, R. S.; Cardella, M. E.; Turns, J.; Mosborg, S.; Saleem, J. Engineering Design Processes: A Comparison of Students and Expert
Conference on Mathematics Education in a Global Community, Palermo, Italy, 2007.11. Allen, K., The Statistics Concept Inventory: Development and analysis of a cognitive assessment instrument instatistics (Doctoral dissertation), SSRN Electronic Journal, 2006, doi:10.2139/ssrn.213014312. Wilcox, B., Caballero, M., Baily, C., Sadaghiani, H., Chasteen, S., Ryan, Q., and Pollock, S., “Development anduses of upper-division conceptual assessments”, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 11, 020115 – Published 23September 2015, http://journals.aps.org/prstper/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.02011513. Streveler, R., Miller, R., Santiago-Roman, A., Nelson, M., Geist, M., and Olds, B., “Rigorous Methodology forConcept Inventory Development: Using the 'Assessment Triangle
. Forexample, one participant wrote that s/he liked, “the emphasis of communication in the graded portions [ofthe service-learning module], this is something that Engineering classes do a very bad job at teaching even though itis essential in CE”.Finally, a large number of the student participants said a major benefit of the experience was theopportunity to get to know their classmates and professors better. “This also helped me meet and bondwith classmates, which means more study buddies!”, wrote one participant. Other examples stated, “Duringthe build day, it was rewarding to work with our peers in a challenging setting outside of school. We were able toapply skills in leadership, creativity, and initiative” and, “Volunteering and working with our
5 5 0 2 8 12 14 18 22 24 28 0 -5 -5 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 18 22 24 -10 -15 -10 -20 -15 Time (s) Time (s) Figure 7. The difference
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)’s Gordon EngineeringInstitute of Leadership program is a well-established co-curricular programTechnology targeting undergraduate students. Students work experientially to(2007) develop hands on leadership skills, building towards a competency model, and a small subset complete a second year as senior fellows, running leadership labs and mentoring younger students to “learn by doing.”Northeastern Northeastern’s Gordon Engineering Leadership program offers aUniversity (2008) customized masters degree or a stand-alone graduate certificate for master’s students. The program offers courses on leadership and
, "Competency assessment: methods for development and implementation in Nursing education," The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, September 30, pp. 1-7.10. Voorhees, R. A., 2001, "Competency-based learning models: a necessary future," New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 110, Summer, pp. 5-13. 11 11. Jiang, M., Parent, S., and Eastmond, D., 2006, "Effectiveness of web-based learning opportunities in a competency-based program," International Journal of E-learning, 5(3), pp. 353-360.12. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., and Ross, G., 1976, "The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving*," Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), pp. 89-100.13. Jones, E.A., and Voorhees, R.A., 2002