Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering education experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former Senior Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education, Shuman is the Founding Editor of Advances in Engineering Education. He has published widely in engineering education literature, and is co-author of Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost, Schedule and Risk - Lessons Learned from the Space Shuttle (Cambridge University Press). He received his Ph.D. from the Johns Hopkins University in Operations Research and a B.S.E.E. from the University of Cincinnati. Dr. Shuman is an ASEE Fellow
from Purdue University. Her research is focused on identifying how model-based cognition in STEM can be better supported by means of expert technological and computing tools such as cyber-physical systems, visualizations and modeling and simulation tools.Dr. Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Distinguished Service Professor of industrial engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering education experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former Senior Editor of
Program Evaluator, the Editor-in- Chief for the IEEE Transactions on Education, a Senior Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education, and an Associate Editor for the International Journal of STEM Education.Dr. Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Distinguished Service Professor of industrial engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering education experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former Senior Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education
“computer intensive (CI)”. In the ENV programcurriculum, the two senior capstone project courses satisfy the WI and OPO requirements;Hydrology and Air Quality are the two courses that are designated as CI and satisfy thegraduation requirements.Engineering topics that are part of the curriculum are appropriate to the discipline ofenvironmental engineering in many ways. Courses like CADD Laboratory, Engineering ProjectAnalysis, and Professionalism & Ethics, Statics, Strength of Materials, EngineeringThermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics support material and concepts in courses such asEnvironmental Engineering Hydraulics, Water Quality, Water and Wastewater Treatment, AirQuality, and Air Pollution Control. Moreover, topics covered in the above
investigation of the ethical behavior of engineering undergraduates. Journal of Engineering Education, 2012. 101(2): p. 346.10. Holsapple, M.A., et al., Framing faculty and student discrepancies in engineering ethics education delivery. Journal of Engineering Education, 2012. 101(2): p. 169.11. Burt, B.A., et al., Out-of-classroom experiences: Bridging the disconnect between the classroom, the engineering workforce, and ethical development. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2013. 29(3): p. 714-725.12. Finelli, C.J., et al., An Assessment of Engineering Students' Curricular and Co‐ Curricular Experiences and Their Ethical Development. Journal of Engineering Education, 2012. 101(3): p. 469-494.13
differentiatestraditional engineering majors (mechanical for this study) from interdisciplinary majors such asBioengineering or Biomedical engineering. A key finding was that “Students who score highly onknowing an engineer as a reason for selecting a major, wanting a good potential salary, designingand building things, and their perceptions of the present were likely to be traditional engineers.Students who want to prove themselves in the hardest possible major and benefit society are likelyto be in interdisciplinary majors.” In addition, “BIOE (bioengineering) females feel they have agreater understanding and ethical responsibility, and confidence in their choice of majorcompared to top enrollment (traditional engineering and other majors) females.” Rasoal, et
to upper level courses in their major, ● Electronics and systems, ● Programming and circuit building, ● Technical skills such as soldering, ● Various concentrations in electrical and computer engineering, ● Ethics and professional development, and ● Technical documentation and presentation. The SparkFun Inventor Kit was selected for the new and improved course because there is anextensive online community for SparkFun and Arduino. Since this is a freshman course, it is veryimportant that there are a variety of resources available to help them complete the assignments.The SparkFun Inventor Kit includes sample programs, sample circuit diagrams and schematics, anArduino Uno microcontroller, sensors, resistors, LEDs
understand themselves as products of, and participants in, traditions of art, ideas, and values • To enable students to respond critically and constructively to change • To develop students’ understanding of the ethical dimensions of what they say and doStudents must complete one letter-graded course in each of the eight categories in GeneralEducation where one of those courses must also engage substantially with the Study of the Past.The eight Gen Ed categories at Harvard College are: • Aesthetic and Interpretive Understanding • Culture and Belief • Empirical and Mathematical Reasoning • Ethical Reasoning • Science of Living Systems • Science of the Physical Universe • Societies of the World
engineering students often dothe opposite: they focus on social (and sometimes SJ) dimensions but exclude technical ones.With the exception of Science and Technology Studies (STS) and occasionally ProfessionalCommunication and Engineering Ethics, most HSS disciplines rarely try to bridge the social andthe technical. Combined, this dichotomy of the engineering curriculum into the technical(engineering sciences) and the social (HSS), with perhaps some occasional (yet often superficial)sociotechnical integration in engineering design, constitutes a disservice to future engineers.Engineers-to-be need to practice thinking not just technically or socially, but sociotechnically.By practicing sociotechnical thinking, engineering students can improve their
Student Outcomes to Knowledge and SkillsTo help implement the new model, we hierarchically prioritize the ABET criteria to guide thedesign of direct measures 20. The hierarchical prioritization is shown in Figure 4. Criteria 3c ofthe ABET 2000 program outcomes calls for students to demonstrate an ability to “design asystem, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability”. We view this student outcome as paramount to engineering practice andencompassing of the remaining student outcomes 21. In support of criteria 3c the remainingABET student outcomes call for a foundation of knowledge that facilitates
ensuring aspects of quality and validity ininterpretive research in engineering education for capturing the social reality under study17. Thisframework serves as a guide for both “making the data” and “handling the data” in qualitativework, establishing measures for process reliability and theoretical, pragmatic, procedural,communicative, and ethical validation17. An in-depth examination of our quality considerationsfor “making the data” can be found in our previous paper8. We are also currently developingquality assurance steps for “handling the data,” and will describe these steps in a futurepublication.Our qualitative research utilizes a one-on-one, semi-structured interview method8 derived fromMcIntosh’s “serial testimony” technique18,19. We
communicating (within a team and with the customer), timemanagement, and engineering ethics. Table 1 – Results from surveys in IE 212 (N=51) Question Pre-module Post-module P-value Significance survey survey Importance of investigating the market 2.4 ± 1.1 2.7 ± 1.0 0.02 Yes Identify an opportunity 2.0 ± 1.0 2.4 ± 1.0 0.01 Yes Analyze solutions 2.4 ± 1.1 2.5 ± 1.0 0.12 No Identify supply chains and distribution 1.9 ± 0.9 2.3 ± 0.9 0.004 Yes opportunities Evaluate technical feasibility 2.1 ± 1.1 2.3
, social, political, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainability.”• (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in aglobal, economic, environmental, and societal context.2Some of the ABET criteria are proposed for revision in 2016-2017, but the following draftdefinition of “Engineering Design” shows ABET continues to continue the connection betweenengineering and public policy: Engineering Design – Engineering design is the process of devising a system, component, or process to meet desired needs, specifications, codes, and standards within constraints such as health and safety, cost, ethics, policy, sustainability, constructability, and
member of ASCE, a member of DBIA, Green Globes, and National Institute of Building Science. He is also a board member of USGBC Central California Chapter, and a Senior Fellow of the Environmental Leadership Program (ELP).Dr. Zhanna Bagdasarov, California State University - Fresno ”Dr. Zhanna Bagdasarov is an Assistant Professor of Management at California State University, Fresno. She received her Ph.D. in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from the University of Oklahoma. Her research interests focus on ethical decision making in organizational contexts, trust repair between leaders and subordinates, and the influence of emotions in the workplace. She has published her work in such outlets as Journal of Business
, 2016 From Problem Solvers to Problem Seekers: The Necessary Role of Tension in Engineering EducationIn this paper it is proposed that the current focus on problems in engineering education andtechnological literacy may be more constructively reframed by focusing on tensions. PriyanDias claims engineering has an identity crisis that arises from tensions inherent in: 1) theinfluence of the profession on society, 2) the role engineers play, and 3) what constitutes validknowledge in engineering. These are ethical, ontological, and epistemological tensionsrespectively, which Dias frames as a tension between identities of homo sapiens and homo faber.Beyond the tensions in engineering there are additional tensions that arise
a humanities course, and the archivist fromNYU Libraries. This activity shows how liberal education can have a natural fit within theengineering curriculum. In particular, we wish to demonstrate how even a small-scale project,using available resources, will help to accomplish ABET Criterion 3: Student Outcomes.ABET’s Student Outcomes encourage engineering education to follow an active learning model,to discuss the social context and ethics of engineering solutions, and to develop skills of analysis,teamwork, and communication. Our archival interventions, though admittedly limited in scope,embody the principles ABET’s Student Outcomes. By working in groups with primary sourcematerials related to science and engineering, we encouraged
experience: Assistant Professor, Universidad Icesi, Graduate lectures includes: Life Cycle Analysis, Process Management, Methods Engineering (manufacturing and service industry) & Process Improvement. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Developing Student Outcomes in Real-World Learning Experiences: The Case of the Solar Decathlon in Latin AmericaAbstractEngineering students face a future in which professional skills (e.g., working inmultidisciplinary teams, ethics, and communicate effectively) will be equallyimportant as hard skills (e.g., design systems and solve technical problems).However, the development and assessment of these skills by the time ofgraduation is still a challenge for
courses in Sustainability, Humanitiesand Social Sciences, Ethics, as well as soft skills such as writing, communication and teamwork.7,8,9 Strategies for pedagogical reforms included cornerstone and capstone courses, projectand problem-based learning, active participatory learning opportunities, instructionallaboratories, learning a second language, and foreign country internships.10,11,12,13Nevertheless, most engineering education programs continue to emphasize the technical aspects,while the social and environmental aspects remain externalized.14 Barbara Olds15 notes that “theeducation of science and engineering students has for too long been merely “technical”, oftenneglecting human complexity in order to achieve quantifiable correctness
-disciplinary teams, an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems, anunderstanding of professional and ethical responsibility, an ability to communicate effectively,the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global andsocietal context, a knowledge of contemporary issues, and an ability to use the techniques, skills,and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.All of these criterions are outcomes of a service learning course for engineers. The outcomeslisted above cannot all effectively be reached through a single traditional course. Introducing theconcepts and true importance of professionalism, communication, team work and problemsolving in a service oriented program
Technology Janille Smith-Colin, Georgia Institute of TechnologyAbstractThe Global Engineering Leadership Minor aims to develop global engineer-leaders, that is,engineers who can contribute and lead effectively in domestic and international contexts insolving global grand challenges and other societal problems, working effectively across cultures.The Minor is based on the Global Engineering Leadership Development (GELD) conceptualframework, adapted from the Skills Model of Leadership. The Minor curriculum includeslearning and application of leadership theory, enhancement of engineering problem solvingskills, development of interpersonal skills (communication, collaboration, ethics, andmanagement), application of systems-level
is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 First-Year Students’ Conceptions of Sustainability as Revealed Through Concept MapsAbstractThe term sustainability is over-used and often misused in society. Further, sustainability andsustainable engineering are complex topics. This research explored how first year engineeringstudents define these complex ideas, and the impacts of two different instructional methods ontheir ideas. Sustainability knowledge was evaluated using concept
demands of highly technical curriculum, the syllabi, projects andlearning activities often include little if any information about the concept of academic integrity.It is ironic to note that cheating is related directly to concepts found within the National Societyof Professional Engineers Code of Ethics, where it states: Section III. Professional Obligations.Item 9. a. “Engineers shall, whenever possible, name the person or persons who may beindividually responsible for designs, inventions, writings, or other accomplishments”[19](emphasis added).In addition, many industries who hire engineers also place a high value of intellectual property,such as reported in Duke University’s Engineering Management Blog, which states that “Thevalue of a frim
and business. Each team had to research policiesor regulations that relate to their topic, determine the stakeholders for the problem, and develop astudy to investigate the issue. Given the limited time of one semester to develop and completetheir study, all groups conducted survey-based research or observational studies. Each grouplearned about ethics in research and was required to complete human subjects based researchtraining and to submit their study to the university institutional review board.A total of six research projects were completed with each requiring a problem statement and/orresearch questions, literature review, development of data collection procedures, experimentaldesign, data analytics, oral presentations, and a final
-emphasizing social and economicpillars. Furthermore, most instruction on sustainability, as reported in the literature, appears tofocus on teaching the engineering student to be an engineer who practices sustainabledevelopment rather than a consumer who has a role in sustainable practice. In part, thisemphasis on the engineer's role in sustainability is a result of the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET)'s mandate that engineering undergraduates complete theirdegrees having achieved student outcome (c): “...an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability
Paper ID #16261A Civil Infrastructure System Perspective - Not Just the Built EnvironmentDr. Douglas Schmucker P.E., University of Utah Dr. Schmucker has 20 years experience in teaching and consulting. Focused on high quality teaching following the T4E, ExCEEd, and NETI teaching models, he currently is a full-time teaching professional with a focus on practice, project, and problem-based teaching methodologies.Dr. Joshua Lenart, University of Utah Dr. Joshua Lenart is an Associate Instructor with the Communication, Leadership, Ethics, and Research (CLEAR) Program at the University of Utah where he teaches technical
categories with well-defined learninglevels selected for the classification of specific PIs. The Learning Domains Wheel wasimplemented with Venn diagrams to represent details of the relationship of popular learningdomains categories, interpersonal skills, and the types of knowledge. INTERPERSONAL IT skills Teamwork Affective Professional ethics Leadership Drawing Life-long learning
confidence, motivation, expectancy, andanxiety). A confidence interval was derived by bootstrapping the data since normality wasrejected. The PI (Project Impact) items in the survey shown in Table 2, were also averaged andbootstrapped.Table 2. Survey administered to a) senior students upon completion of the capstone project,and b) recent graduates Item Statement/Question Rate how the project affected your ability to (1-No Impact; 3-Moderate Impact 5-High Impact): PIa Apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering PIc Design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability
demonstrations.The survey results from each question are examined based on both self-declared genderand ethic background of students. The Roomba Robot was demonstrated in the C++section of the laboratory class.Programming Demonstration 2: Speed Gait: The speed gait demonstration providesstudents with hands-on-experience developing a real-world programming application.Students brainstorm and develop an inexpensive system to measure the average walkingor running speed of patients for a biomechanics lab. The strength of this demo is in itssimplicity; students develop a useful tool from common engineering materials, achievingthe following learning objectives: • Expose students to real-world programming applications not seen in lecture • Inspire students
themselves in their roles as engineers, theirdefinitions of an engineer started to change. As they discussed their journey throughundergraduate school and their career their description of what it meant to be an engineer nolonger reflected the stereotypes that they described initially. They started to personalize theirdefinitions to now embody personal traits, and they started to describe engineering as part oftheir individual and collective identities. Andy described engineers as individuals with a “strongwork ethic… and high integrity,” “being comfortable around technical information,” and“definitely takes a different kind of thinker to be an engineer.” She also described it as “fun,”likening engineering to being “[…] a private detective.” Others
and process development and 15 years of teaching experience at the secondary and post-secondary levels.Dr. Donald D. Carpenter P.E., Lawrence Technological University Donald D. Carpenter, PhD, PE, LEED AP is Professor of Civil Engineering at Lawrence Technological University where he teaches courses on ethics/professionalism and water resources. Dr. Carpenter has served as the University Director of Assessment and the founding Director of the Center for Teaching and Learning. He conducts funded pedagogical research and development projects, has published numerous engineering education papers, and provides faculty development workshops on effective teaching. In 2006, the Kern Family Foundation named Dr. Carpenter a