Paper ID #20575Work in Progress: Curriculum Revision and Classroom Environment Re-structuring to Support Blended Project-Based Learning in First-Year Gen-eral Engineering Laboratory CoursesProf. Brandon B. Terranova, Drexel University Dr. Terranova is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the College of Engineering at Drexel University. In his current role, he is the lead instructor for the freshman engineering program, and oversees activities in the Innovation Studio, a large-area academic makerspace. He has taught and developed courses in general engineering and mechanical engineering at Drexel. Prior to Drexel, he has taught
Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 An Active Learning Environment to Improve First-Year Mechanical Engineering Retention Rates and Software SkillsAbstractThis work proposes a foundational change from traditional lecture to an active learningenvironment in the Colorado State University First-Year Introduction to Mechanical Engineeringcourse of 145 students. The goal of this approach is to improve computational capabilities inMechanical Engineering and long-term retention rates with a single broad emphasis. Major andminor changes were implemented in the course, from specific day to day in-class activities to theaddition of laboratory sessions to replace traditional classroom
, CampbellUniversity’s implementation of the LWTL first-year curriculum was ongoing during the 2016-2017 academic year, but no LWTL-style offerings in sophomore, junior, or senior years were inplace.It was decided to limit class size to 24 students for Campbell University’s LWTL courses, sothree sections of the first-year engineering course were required to accommodate all interestedstudents. This is somewhat smaller than most Louisiana Tech LWTL course sections (most ofwhich have 40 students each), but Campbell University does not plan to implement an in-classTA. An in-class TA is standard at Louisiana Tech, and removing the in-class TA lowers themaximum number of students that can reasonably be supervised using laboratory equipment persection, but allows
run during a 13-week fall semester, and in recentyears have had an enrollment total averaging 800 students. A second offering is made availablein the spring or summer semesters, usually with a much smaller class size.Prior to July 2015, ENGG 233 followed a traditional lecture format. Content was deliveredduring three one-hour lectures each week in a large theater-style format. Students practiced theirapplication skills in C++ programming during a two-hour weekly laboratory period withguidance from graduate student teaching assistants. In 2015, the faculty decided to redesign thecourse with emphasis on algorithmic thinking and exploratory, applied learning [Pears, 2007].The language of focus was changed to Processing, a Java-based language
mentors helped studentswith, the amount of time that peer mentors and students spent together, and the perceptions thatpeer mentors had of their own actions.Participants. The student participants were recruited from 112 first-year students enrolled acrossour two sections of an introductory engineering design course in the fall semester of 2016. All ofthe students were also enrolled in one of six corresponding laboratory sections, with no morethan 20 students in a laboratory section. Four laboratory sections had 20 students, one sectionhad 19 students, and one section had 13 students. Of the 112 students, 27 (24%) studentsparticipated in the survey.The peer mentors who participated in the survey were recruited from 36 students who hadpreviously
classroom initiative todevelop a series of instructional videos for laboratory and design project skills at New YorkUniversity. Previously, a video was created to assist with prototyping and wiring a breadboardfor a lab experiment. The next video in the series is part one of a two part sequence on theengineering design process. Over the last three semesters 3D printing and computer-aided design(CAD) have been integrated into the course design project. Part one of the video uses the firsthalf of the engineering design process to 3D model a potential print to help with the courseproject. The second half of the video will document printing the part and completing the rest ofthe engineering design process cycle.The investigators wish to study the
For- mation (PFE: RIEF) for the project- Using Digital Badging and Design Challenge Modules to Develop Professional Identity. She is a member of the department’s ABET and Undergraduate Curriculum Com- mittee, as well as faculty advisor for several student societies. She is the instructor of several courses in the CBE curriculum including the Material and Energy Balances, junior laboratories and Capstone De- sign courses. She is associated with several professional organizations including the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and American Society of Chemical Engineering Education (ASEE) where she adopts and contributes to innovative pedagogical methods aimed at improving student learning and
under-represented minority groups.Dr. Mark Tufenkjian, California State University, Los Angeles Dr. Tufenkjian is Chair of the Civil Engineering Department at Cal. State LA. His research interests include advanced geotechnical laboratory testing and in-situ testing of soft clay soils. His research has been funded by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) and the Department of Defense. He is currently the PI on a STEM grant from ONR to provide engineering students pathways to careers at Navy Labs in the southern California region.Dr. Emily L. Allen, California State University, Los Angeles Emily L. Allen, Ph.D., is Dean of the College of Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology at California State University, Los
the Cardiovascular Fluid Dynamics Laboratory. He then attended MIT where he earned his M.S. and Sc.D. while working jointly with researchers at the Shriners Burns Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital. While at MIT, he was awarded a Shell Foundation Fellowship and was an NIH biotechnology Predoctoral Trainee. Upon completion of his doctoral studies, he joined the Stanford University Genome Technology Center, receiving an NIH Kirschstein post-doctoral fellowship. He joined Michigan State University in 2004 and his research is focused on the development of parallel analytical methods and the engineering of active nucleic acids (e.g., siRNAs) through mechanism-based design. He has been recognized for his
implications for boththe student and instructor. Data may serve to inform the development of cross-disciplineengineering strategies for course and program design that addresses workload concerns. Theinformation gathered may help promote a more inclusive and accessible first-year undergraduateexperience by integrating an evidence-based understanding of workload.BackgroundEngineering undergraduate programs are known to be very demanding as course schedules havea significant number of classes, laboratories and tutorials. On average, a first year engineeringstudent at the institute of our study will have 27 hours of classes/tutorials and laboratory. Thisworkload is just for attending classes and does not account for studying, assignments, projectsand
postdoctoral studies at Emory Univer- sity as a Distinguished CCNE Fellow and NIH K99 Postdoctoral Fellow. Dr. Smith’s research interests include nanomaterial engineering, single-molecule imaging, and cancer biology. He teaches undergradu- ate and graduate courses in Bioengineering and is the Associate Head of Undergraduate Programs.Prof. Dallas R Trinkle , University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dallas R. Trinkle is an associate professor in Materials Science and Engineering at Univ. Illinois, Urbana- Champaign. He received his Ph.D. in Physics from Ohio State University in 2003. Following his time as a National Research Council postdoctoral researcher at the Air Force Research Laboratory, he joined the faculty of the
Arthur Chlebowski received his M.S. and Ph.D. from the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering at Purdue University in 2009 and 2012 respectively, where he worked towards the development and integra- tion of an implantable pressure monitoring device for Glaucoma. He then went on to work at the Jackson Laboratory in the Simon John Lab, continuing his research as a post doc and research scientist. In 2014, he took a position at the University of Southern Indiana in the engineering department, slightly switching his focus to external monitoring devices. He has taught upper level and lower level courses regarding engineering, including the programs introductory freshman design course.David J. Ellert PE, University of Southern
designed to assist students with self-efficacy beliefs and personal goals.At this University all engineering and computer science students take an introduction toengineering course that covers the engineering process, teamwork, communication skills, thedifferent branches of engineering, ethics, and co-curricular and extracurricular opportunities.Section sizes are ~30 students, so students can build community with peers and their professor.The professor of the Introduction to Engineering course is the academic advisor for his/her set ofstudents. Students declare or confirm their major by the end of the first semester. Resources tohelp students choose a major include laboratories, advisor meetings, student panels, a semester-long team project
Associate Professor in the School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environ- ment. Dr. Zapata’s research interest is in the area of unsaturated soil behavior. She has focused her work on laboratory and field characterization of problematic soils; applications related to the hydro-thermal and mechanical behavior of soils due to static and repeated loading; modeling fluid flow and volume change of soils applied to pavement structures and residential foundation systems; and the assessment of the en- vironmental effects on soil behavior. Current research activities include the study of the effects of thermal gradients on airfield pavement structures and the characterization of fiber-reinforced clay materials. She is
Engineering for Honors program, he is heavily involved with teaching and developing laboratory content, leading the in-house robotics controller maintenance, and managing the robotics project development.Mr. Michael Schulz, The Ohio State University Michael H. Schulz is a teaching assistant with the Fundamentals of Engineering Honors program at The Ohio State University. He is currently the lead developer of the robot course software development team, of which he has been a member for three years. As a Computer Science and Engineering (CSE) student, he will graduate in May, 2017 with his B.S.C.S.E and a minor in Music, Media, and Enterprise.Ms. Clare Rigney, Ohio State University, Engineering Education Department Clare has
). Cognitive Apprenticeship in Science Through Immersion in Laboratory Practices. International Journal of Science Education, 29(2), 195-213.Fleming, L., Engerman, K., & Williams, D. (2006). Why Students Leave Engineering: The Unexpected Bond. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. Chicago, IL.Garcia-Otero, S., & Sheybani, E. O. (2012). Retaining Minority Students in Engineering: Undergraduate Research in Partnership with NASA. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. San Antonio, TX.Grindstaff, K., & Richmond, G. (2008). Learners' Perceptions of the Role of Peers in a Research Experience - Implication for the Apprenticeship Process, Scientific Inquiry, and
Paper ID #17870Improving Student Success and Retention Rates in Engineering: A Four-YearLongitudinal Assessment of the DYP ProgramDr. Steffen Peuker, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Dr. Steffen Peuker holds the James L. Bartlett, Jr. Assistant Professor position in the Mechanical Engi- neering Department at the California State University in San Luis Obispo. He is teaching courses, includ- ing laboratories, in the HVAC concentration and mechanical engineering including first-year courses. Dr. Peuker’s educational research focuses on increasing student retention and success in engineering through
, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Retrieved from http://pvwatts.nrel.gov/Amelink, C. T., & Meszaros, P. S. (2011). A comparison of educational factors promoting or discouraging the intent to remain in engineering by gender. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(1), 47-62. doi:10.1080/03043797.2010.531695Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.gatesfoundation.org/Hunter, J. and J. Baygents. (2012). “Grand challenges DELI (Discover, Explore, Learn, Imagine) Project” in Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference.Jollands, M., Jolly, L., & Molyneaux, T. (2012). Project-based learning as a contributing factor to
of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educ. Res. Rev. 2, 130–144 (2007).27. Popham, W. J. Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. (Pearson, 2014).28. Reddy, Y. M. & Andrade, H. A review of rubric use in higher education. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 35, 435–448 (2010).29. Andrade, H. G. Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educ. Leadersh. 57, 13– 18 (2000).30. Kellogg, R. S., Mann, J. A. & Dieterich, A. Developing and using rubrics to evaluate subjective engineering laboratory and design reports. in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition 1–10 (2001).31. Lovorn, M. G. & Rezaei, A. R. Assessing the assessment: Rubrics training for pre-service
(2015-2016) I have the privilege of being a Course Assistant for three classes at Stanford: (1) E14: Introduction to Solid Mechanics; (2) BIOE51: Anatomy for Bioengineers; (3) BIOE80: Introduction to Bioengineering and Engineering Living Matter. I also have pleasure of serving as the Safety and Operations Manager at the Volkswagen Automotive Innovation Laboratory, which includes managing the machine shop and teaching students how to use the machinery. In this role I am able to advise and educate students on design choices for their personal and research projects from ideation phases to functional products, with an emphasis on design and manufacturing techniques. c American Society for