Outcomes and Analysis of Student Evaluation of Instruction ReportsThe course is offered to junior students in two different section for Fall 2016 semester. Thestudent count in the first section is 30 students, and the second session consist of 49 students.There were two sessions per section in a given week each of which last 1 hour 50 minutes.In line with ABET specifications, following student outcomes are identified with thisEngineering Course. • Student outcome M2: Manufacturing Engineering Graduates have proficiency in process, assembly and product engineering and understand the design of products and the equipment, tooling, and environment necessary for their manufacture. • Student outcome M3: Manufacturing Graduates
Mechanical Engineering Technology Program. She holds a Ph.D. from Purdue University in Mechanical Engineering Technol- ogy, focus on Digital Manufacturing. Her research is focused on mechatronics, digital manufacturing, digital thread, cyber physical systems, broadening participation, and engineering education. She is a Co-Director of Mechatronics and Digital Manufacturing Lab at ODU and a lead of Area of Specializa- tion Mechatronics Systems Design. She worked as a Visiting Researcher at Commonwealth Center for Advanced Manufacturing in Disputanta, VA on projects focusing on digital thread and cyber security of manufacturing systems. She has funded research in broadening participation efforts of underrepresented
presentations as assessed by various cognitive assessments of these workshops’ content?MethodParticipants: The targeted program participants were undergraduate and graduate master’s students atvarious stages of their program with major emphasis on upperclassman.Design: The design used to address the research questions was a cross-sectional design whichallows for the gathering of individual’s perceptions and opinions about fundamental aspects of aprogram, issue, or intervention. This type of design is very effective since it provides a quick“snapshot” of current skills, behaviors, attitudes, and beliefs in a particular population.Instruments: As a means of assessing the quality of the individual workshop presentations, a
Assessment EducationLife Cycle Analysis (LCA) is a methodology to quantitatively assess the overall environmentalimpact of products, processes, and systems. LCA is an invaluable tool for assessment ofenvironmental impact based both on data and the entire life cycle. EET 320 Renewable EnergySystems, is an upper-level undergraduate course at Drexel University which instructs students onthe concepts and methods of LCA. This class is available for students from all twelve (12)disciplines in the College of Engineering as part of the Green Energy Manufacturing Programwhich strives to increase student awareness regarding the impact of engineering practice on theenvironment as well as to teach students engineering design and analytical skills to minimize
micromechanics modeling, materials synthesis, structural characterization and device evaluation. The goal of his research is to develop ad- vance structural materials for the next generation ground, aerial and space vehicles with enhanced safety and energy efficiency. Since 2012, his research has been funded by DOE, DOEd, and DOD with a total of 3 million, of which 1.4 million as PI. He has published or submitted 49 technical articles since 2007 (25 referred journals and 24 conference proceedings). Dr. Lin’s teaching interests lies in Mechanical Design, Solid Mechanics, and Dynamics. Currently, he is advising 4 Ph.D. students, 3 Master students, and 2 undergraduate students. Since 2011, 5 Master students graduated from his
Printing, Casting, and Entrepreneurship1. AbstractCasting is one of the oldest manufacturing processes. 3D Printing is known as one of the newesttechnologies used in the manufacturing field, and it is almost thirty years old. Although bothtechnologies are commonly used in various fields of industry and daily life, this research studyreports a unique implementation of both technologies in a new entrepreneurial environment. Theentire study had been performed in Summer 2016 as part of the Research Experiences forTeachers (RET) Supplement of a National Science foundation (NSF) funded project. In tenweeks of extensive design, 3D Printing, and casting studies, several best practices between theP16 educators and students have been established. As a
undergraduate and graduate levels. His tremendous re- search experience in manufacturing includes environmentally conscious manufacturing, Internet based robotics, and Web based quality. In the past years, he has been involved in sustainable manufacturing for maximizing energy and material recovery while minimizing environmental impact. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Interdisciplinary Senior Design Project to Develop a Teaching Tool: Extruder Tutor Plastic InjectionMolding MachineIn recent years there has been a big push to get students into the STEM fields. However, what seems to be lackingin this academic push is the hands on side of it. Engineering simply just isn’t about equations, but
he taught undergraduate and graduate courses. Dr. Aqlan has also worked on industry projects with Innovation Associates Company and IBM Corporation. His work has resulted in both business value and intellectual property. He has published several papers in reputed journals and conferences. Dr. Aqlan is a senior member of the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE) and has received numerous awards and honors including the IBM Vice President award for innovation excellence.Dr. Omar Ashour, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College Dr. Omar Ashour is an Assistant Professor of Industrial Engineering at Pennsylvania State University, The Behrend College, Erie, PA. He earned his MEng in Industrial
of a product with respect to “X”. DfX can be defined as “methodologies,techniques and working practices that cause a product to be designed and manufactured for theoptimum manufacturing cost, the optimum quality, and the optimum achievement of lifecyclesupport”5.The term “X” refers to a particular design aspect that is determined based on the importancegiven by a stakeholder6. Mentioned below are a few design aspects of DfX based on different X: 1. Design for Environment (DfE): Design for Environment explores upon the design approach that addresses to reduce the impact of a product, process or a service throughout the life cycle on human health and environment. The main goals of DfE are: a. Encouraging and recognizing
actually developing and building physical prototypes towards a final goal of developing and/orimproving a product. Something you can touch and in most cases see work. This newly developed courseis designed for non-engineering majors as well as engineering students as an introduction and survey ofrapid-prototyping, especially centered on the advent, impact, and utility of 3D printers and supportingdigital technology: computer-aided design (CAD) and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) software.The course covers both the concepts and practice of 3D printing and prototyping, emphasizing hands-onwork developing computer-based design models (“drawings”) and fabricating prototypes (“parts”) usingcurrent tools for desktop manufacturing including 3D