Courtney is a Lecturer and Research Assistant Professor in the College of Engineering Honors Program at the University of Tennessee. She completed her Ph.D. in Engineering & Science Education at Clemson University. Prior to her Ph.D. work, she received her B.S. in Bioengineering at Clemson University and her M.S. in Biomedical Engineering at Cornell University. Courtney’s research interests include epistemic cognition in the context of problem solving, and researcher identity.Dr. Marian S. Kennedy, Clemson University Marian Kennedy is an Associate Professor within the Department of Materials Science & Engineering at Clemson University. Her research group focused on the mechanical and tribological characterization
research assistant.Justin Lee Clough, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Justin Clough received his Bachelors of Science in Mechanical Engineering with minors in mathematics and applied physics from the Milwaukee School of Engineering. As an undergraduate, he has worked on research projects with the National Science Foundation, Argonne National Laboratory, and the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. He is working on his doctorate in Mechanical Engineering at Rensselaer Poly- technic Institute specializing in computational materials and volunteers with Engineering Ambassadors.Ms. Elizabeth S. Herkenham, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Ms. Herkenham is the K-13 Education Outreach Director of the School of Engineering (SoE) at
Education at Purdue University.Mr. Harsh Wardhan Aggarwal, Purdue University Graduate Research Assistant, Purdue UniversityMr. Sayan Biswas, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Purdue University Sayan Biswas is a PhD student in the department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Engineering, Purdue University. His research interest is rocket propulsion and computational fluid dynamics of reacting flows. He is also interested in different educational methods in aerospace engineering. Sayan teaches rocket propulsion, air breathing propulsion, and fluid mechanics. Other than teaching, Sayan like launching model rockets and flying airplane.Mr. Brandon S Coventry, Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University
life cycle engineering has been developed based on this approach through a multi-university research project, entitled “Constructionism in Learning: Sustainable Life CycleEngineering (CooL:SLiCE).” The pedagogic significance of CooL:SLiCE is that it enables betterlearning within the sustainable engineering domain by utilizing effective learning modules forpersonalized environmentally responsible product design. The CooL:SLiCE platform provides aweb-based portal with three learning modules: 1) Visualization and online computer-aideddesign (CAD), 2) Sustainable product architecture and supplier selection (S-PASS), and 3)Manufacturing analysis. These modules were first piloted by a team of students from threeuniversities with different
. Goldstein, MH., Meji, CV., Adams, RS, Purzer, S. (2016). Developing a measure of quality for engineering design artifacts. Proceedings of the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October
Psychology, Counseling, and College Student Personnel at the University of Louisville. Her research interests include understanding the role of achievement motivation in the development of academic underachievement, particularly among gifted students.Dr. Patricia A Ralston, University of Louisville Dr. Patricia A. S. Ralston is Professor and Chair of the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville. She received her B.S., MEng, and PhD degrees in chemical engineering from the University of Louisville. Dr. Ralston teaches undergraduate engineering mathematics and is currently involved in educational research on the effective use of technology in engineering education, the incorpo
, MS1:Milestone 1, in which student teams present their preliminary design ideas. (Note that in thetranscript the pseudo-student/Instructor 2 refers to “MS1”.)Besides building a fully functional autonomous OSV, each ENES100 team is assigned a missionto solve with their OSV design. The students will test their OSVs in a sand pit containinggeographical features such as a liquid pool and varying terrain. In the context of the role-play,pseudo-student/Instructor 2’s “team” was assigned the chemical mission; the “team” had tomeasure and neutralize the pH of the liquid in the pool.The fishbowl structure of the design review roleplay included an inner and outer circle of UTFs.The inner part of the fishbowl contained pseudo-student/Instructor 2 and
Homsher for championing the ideaand providing funding for the event.References [1] McIlwee, J. S. and Robinson, J. G., Women in engineering: Gender, power, and workplace culture. SUNY Press, 1992. [2] Lockwood, P., “Someone like me can be successful: Do college students need same-gender role models?,” Psychology of Women Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 36–46, 2006. [3] Rosenthal, L., London, B., Levy, S. R., and Lobel, M., “The roles of perceived identity compatibility and social support for women in a single-sex stem program at a co-educational university,” Sex Roles, vol. 65, no. 9-10, pp. 725–736, 2011. [4] Miyake, A., Kost-Smith, L. E., Finkelstein, N. D., Pollock, S. J., Cohen, G. L., and Ito, T. A., “Reducing the gender
-class activities helpedthem balance different aspects of well-being and remain engaged with their work. Furtherresearch can explore how these activities help students build the capacity to "bounce-back" fromhigh-stress work environments.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the National Science Foundation for theirsupport of this work under the CAREER grant #EE-1351156. Any opinions, findings,conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this poster are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors also wish toacknowledge Alison W. Bowers for her contributions made to this study. References1. Olson, S., &
that are generalizable to a largerpopulation 9. Qualitative researchers collect textual data through interviews, observations,documents, or other methods in an effort to understand the lived experiences of individuals orgroups 9. A mixed methods approach combines qualitative and quantitative approaches in aspecific way which best answers the desired research question(s) 9,11. My research follows thequalitative research tradition to explore the development of students as cross-disciplinary teammembers.Qualitative educational research often seeks to gain insight into the lived experiences of anindividual or group of people through direct interaction between the participant and theresearcher. This connection between the qualitative researcher and
Society for Engineering Education, 2017Using Super Heroes to Relay Biomechanics Principles in Education Anahid Ebrahimi, Jill S Higginson University of Delaware, Newark, DE anahide@udel.edu BACKGROUND RESULTS Recent literature has supported student-centered learning to promote positive learning outcomes and A list of biomechanics
associations are directly targeted in workshops andincorporated in the club activities. Specifically, the multidisciplinary teamwork, multiple teamleaders, and presenting engineering topics to middle and high school students. These exercisescontribute to the development of highly effective engineers who know the technical backgroundand are groomed in professional practices.AcknowledgementThe support provided by National Science Foundation under grant number 1439738 is greatlyappreciated. The engineering and education faculty mentors of the program from ManhattanCollege also deserve recognition for their contribution to this program.References[1] A. T. Kitkpatrick, S. Danielson and S. Perry, "AC 2012-4805: ASME Vision 2030's Recommendations for
is the “end all, be all” solution to improve retention and graduation rates, but itis an excellent tool that can assist in improving engineering persistence.6 References[1] X. Chen, “STEM Attrition: College Students’ Paths Into and Out of STEM Fields (NCES 2014001),” National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, 2013.[2] E. F. Redish, “Discipline based education and education research: the case of physics,” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, vol. 21, 2000.[3] E. Longfellow, S. May, L. Burke, and D. Marks-Maran, “They had a way of helping that actually helped’: A case study of a peer assisted learning scheme,” Teaching in Higher Education, vol
relevant standards, developing and writinglesson plans, and using effective, research-based teaching strategies. The preservice teacherswere given a template for writing lesson plans (see Appendix B), and as a class they reviewedthe template and example lessons prior to writing their first lesson.The lesson plan format used in this course began with the aim of the lesson, or what thepreservice teachers will be teaching about, a lesson standard, and the lesson question(s), of whichthe students will be able to answer by the end of the lesson. Following this, the preserviceteachers described the learning objectives (what students will be able to do) and the assessmentfor each objective. The next section prompted the preservice teachers to reflect on
, June, 2015. (4) H.W. Kraebber, E.S. Donaldson, and K. M. Hackney, Impact of Study Abroad – 10Years of Trips to Germany with Students, ASEE International Forum, Indianapolis, IN, June,2014. (5) S. Acharya, L. Nutt, and T. Kersmann, Development of a Faculty-Led Education AbroadProgram and the Lessons Learned, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2014. (6) R. O’Connell and M. Ayllon, Student Perceptions of Global Knowledge and SkillsAcquird During a Five-Week Study Abroad Program, IEEE 2016. (7) S. Berka, E. A. Serman, M. Echeverria, L. Erickson, S.Scholz, and A. Geithner,Integrating a Portfolio of Short with Long-term International Programs in the EngineeringCurriculum
know you well. Determine application deadlines for schools where you are interested in applying. Draft application statement(s).Most graduate programs in engineering expect that you will apply 9-12 months in advance of thesemester in which you wish to begin graduate school. Thus, during the fall term of your finalyear of undergraduate studies, you should complete the following tasks: Narrow your list of places to apply; generally 3-8 completed applications is a good goal. Ideally, you will apply to a range of schools (size, location, ranking, etc.) where you can make a strong case that you are a good investment and “fit” for their program. Identify your backup plan – “safety” school, work, volunteering
to get student feedback on your performance as a GTA independent from the instructor(s) for future job applications • Pay attention to how courses are structured, material is presented, and students are assessed in order to assess pros and cons of different strategiesCo-instructionAn initiative of one of the Deans of Engineeringat our university was to create a teaching Professor Perspectivefellowship funded by the Engineering School.The development of this internship was inspired “I implemented the teaching internship programby the Woodruff School Doctoral Teaching at UVA because in my own experience, myIntern Program in place at the Georgia Institute participation in a similar program at Georgiaof Technology
deciding who to ask for recommendations, and detailed advice is given on how toprepare background information that will assist letter writers in highlighting the range ofapplicants' skills and abilities.IntroductionRecommendation letters are typically one component of a larger application package, which mayalso include transcripts, test scores, statements of purpose, and a resume. Before asking forrecommendation letters, you should consider the purpose and scope of the opportunity, anddetermine what types of recommendations would be most appropriate and helpful in convincingthe reviewer that you are the best fit for this opportunity.For instance, typical graduate school applications require the following elements: Statement(s) of Purpose: an
, beginningwith the works of Eli Whitney and the standardization of parts in the 1860’s, Fredrick Taylor’sstudies on workplace efficiency, standardized work and scientific management in the 1890’s, andthe Ford Production System’s novel concepts of the assembly line, manufacturing strategysequence, conveyor systems, and flow style production in 1910 (Shternberg, 2011). The lecturethen covered the background of the Toyota Motor Company and its early pioneers, Eiji Toyoda,Taiichi Ohno, and Sakichi & Kiichiro Toyoda.The presentation then discussed the basic ideas of the Toyota Production System, including anexplanation of its process and underlying philosophy. The lecture described the Toyota House ofQuality, including Just-In-Time and Jidoka, as well as
Paper ID #17875Benefits of One-on One Resume Advising for Undergraduate EngineeringStudents Participating in a Summer Research ProgramMs. Candyce Hill, Michigan State University Candyce is a graduate assistant for Undergraduate Research in the Provost’s Office and a student assistant in the College of Engineering Dean;s Office at Michigan State University (MSU). She is a second year student in the Master of Arts in Student Affairs Administration program at MSU. She holds a Bachelor’s degree in History and Judaic Studies from the University of Michigan (U of M). Before coming to MSU, Candyce worked as a teacher in Tulsa
Conference and Exposition, Seattle, Washington.Torok, S. E., McMorris, R. F., & Lin, W. C. (2004). Is Humor an Appreciated Teaching Tool? Perceptions of Professors' Teaching Styles and Use of Humor. College Teaching, 14-20.Ziv, A. (1983). The influence of humorous atmosphere on divergent thinking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(1), 68-75.
." 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, June 2015. doi:10.18260/p.24004.3. Dr. Johnson, Suzette S. "Agile Systems Engineering: What is it and What Have We Learned?" Software Process Improvement Network. March 22, 2012. Accessed February 11, 2017. http://www.uces.csulb.edu/spin/media/pdf/INCOSE_LA_SPIN_AgileEngineering_Johnson.p df.4. Dr. Valasek, John. Introduction to Systems Engineering. PDF. College Station: Vehicle Systems & Control Laboratory, September 4, 2016.
education, faculty in your department who have been more vocal about pedagogyand associated research, and members of the ASEE collegiate chapter.Involvement with Engineering Education ResearchThere are a few approaches to get involved with engineering education research if it is not theprimary focus of your doctoral work.Express an interest to learn and collaborate with an engineering education faculty mentor(s) thatyou have sought out, who may be faculty outside of your department. Investigate if they have on-going research projects that you could assist with on a voluntary (unpaid) basis, but that wouldultimately allow you to co-author papers and/or participate in poster or presentations at on-campus symposia, regional or national conferences. A
, S.G., 2001. Identifying determinants of academic selfconfidence among science, math, engineering, and technology students. Journal of women and minorities in science and engineering, 7(4).5. Gibbons, J.D., and S. Chakraborti. 2011. Nonparametric statistical inference. Chapman & Hall/Taylor & Francis.6. Hollander, M., D.A. Wolfe, and E. Chicken. "Nonparametric statistical methods.7. Wheatley, B. B., Catton, K., and Donahue, T. H. (2017), An Active Learning Environment to Improve First-Year Mechanical Engineering Retention Rates and Software Skills. ©2017 American Society for Engineering Education. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, June 25th – 28th, Columbus, Ohio – in review8. Grow, G.O., 1991