provides interactive seminars on interpersonal communications and problem solving skills for engineering students across the U.S. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Benefits of One-on-One Resume Advising for Undergraduate Engineering Students Participating in a Summer Research ProgramAbstractWhether they choose to pursue graduate school or employment, many rising college seniors arefaced with completing applications for post-graduation experiences. A resume is an essentialcomponent of these applications, and in an effort to support students in creating strong resumeswe developed (1) a professional development seminar and (2) an advising
concepts and science fiction medium used by students is listed in Table encourages students to take ownership of their learning [1]. There has been a recent push by the 1. Overall, students showed creativity in applying the biomechanical concepts (Figure 3). The American Society of Biomechanics (ASB), as evidenced by the first annual National Biomechanics instructor of record addressed any misconceptions and errors in the students’ biomechanical Day and 2016 K-12 Outreach Expo, to compile and present ‘hands-on’ biomechanics demonstrations analyses in a written comment with the grade. Despite varying projects, average total scores and lab activities to get K-12 school age
Communicating Making decisions Setting goals • A mixed methods approach will be used to investigate designer 1 Conducting Tests Making trade-offs Sketching • Hierarchical agglomerative clustering resulted in 5 groups student trade-off behavior using process data, artifact trade-off Evaluating Modeling Using
1. Practical, hands on approachgenerated with three core principles: 1) Low Cost, 2) Low Maintenance, Fan Input Velocityand 3) Concept Visualization. This is achieved through the following 2. Allows for design, build, and test opportunities for studentsdescription of the apparatus. The plexiglass chamber has a square base 3. Can be incorporated into multiple laboratory experimentswith a designated height. At the
Eleven PSTs participated in this study. All participants were female, with (Table 1). Overall, the number of PSTs who held uninformed oris raised to the level of scientific inquiry. Both pre-service teachers and in- engineering, can easily attain the skills and confidence needed to integrate an average age of 21 years, and with varying degrees of engineering partially informed NOE views declined and the number of PSTs whoservice teachers should be exposed to engineering design through engineering into elementary science classes. Teachers have
UniversityABSTRACT LEARNING FRAMEWORKS AND ASSESSMENT METHODS PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Research Questions: 1) Situated cognition: Writing in engineering as apprenticeship Approach feedback effectively: 1
techniques.Research Questions 1. How do STEM faculty implement humor in a standard class session? 2. What is the difference between student engagement in classes that employ humor and those that do not? 3. What differences (with respect to other teaching techniques) exist between the classes that use humor and those that do not?Humor in the ClassroomHumor has long been included in the repertoire of instructors at a variety of educational levels.At the elementary and secondary school level, humor has been shown to be a valuable tool forestablishing communication skills and sociocultural understanding while providing instructionon the subject matter across course contexts (Garner, 2006). Research at the collegiate level hasprimarily
were calculated at regularintervals to establish concordance in the coding process. The final categories are presented inTable 1. Representative sample responses are included for each code. Importantly, each studentresponse was coded for the presence and absence of each code; therefore, codes are not mutuallyexclusive.Table 1Final Categories and Sample Student Responses Categories N % of Sample Interest in a Subject Matter: Student is interested in a subject 104 26.7 “My interest in math.” Family Influences: Family is an engineer or encouraged them 77 19.7 “My father is an engineer.” Prior Experience: A prior
design. Literature in engineering curriculum development and facilitationsuccessfully focuses on creating conceptual and epistemological impact. Although the role ofstudent emotion is implied in such literature, it is rarely the focus of study and often does notconsider the relationships between instructor, curriculum, student learning and student emotion.Tonso and Bales note how emotion plays an important role in undergraduate design courses associal and emotional task functions within teamwork can contribute to a student’s role andinvolvement on a team.1-2 Literature in science education speaks to the role which emotion canhelp or hinder learning.3 We suggest that when educators consider student emotion as part oftheir instructional design
employed by a college or universityin their early careers [1].” Thus it appears there is benefit for both teacher and those taught whengraduate students take on teaching roles. Yet, for most disciplines within engineering, the doctoralstudent will complete a certain amount of coursework, pass qualifying exams, and most importantly,make a meaningful contribution via research and showcase that contribution by publications and adissertation. He or she will have minimal or no teaching requirements.By the end of the tedious process, students have a Ph.D. in hand and a capacity to solve engineeringproblems, especially ones related to their expertise. Universities such as Purdue have recognizedthat there is a difference in preparation for students that
graduation. This can beattributed to many reasons such as improved study habits, improved problem solving abilities,and a greater sense of community with fellow students all attained through attending SI.2 Background Active learning has been shown to aid in comprehension and metacognition inundergraduate students (1, 2, 3). With constant budget cuts, larger enrollment and, therefore, largerclass sizes, active learning becomes more difficult for instructors to implement effectively, if atall. While a number of solutions exist to engage students, Supplemental Instruction has beenshown at Louisiana State University (LSU) to be an effective resource that allows smaller groupsof students to be further engaged in an active environment (4, 5
questions for our initial pilot study were 1) What are the processes that preserviceteachers use to write lesson plans?, 2) What challenges do preservice teachers face when writinga lesson plan?, and 3) What strengths do preservice teachers have when writing lesson plans? Wecollected four different types of data: screen capture videos, logs of the lesson planning process,the written lesson plans, and a reflection on the lesson plans. The screen capture videos and thelogs aimed to answer our first research question concerning the lesson plan development process.The lesson plan and the reflection aimed to answer the second and third research questionsconcerning challenges and strengths. Because of the nature of our data collection for this study,we
professional development and community, creatingASEE Student Chapters unified through the national Student Division.1 The purpose andeffectiveness of these Student Chapters have been reviewed every few years by studentsinvolved in these Chapters.1-5 Further discussion of professional development communities in thebroader field of discipline-based educational research (DBER) have also been discussed withinthe engineering education community, specifically for those who would like a graduatecommunity focused on professional development but are not at an institution with others who areinterested in engineering education.6 This paper takes a broader look at graduate communities,sharing experiences from graduate students who have developed and led graduate
measures consider how two coders agree in the same passageof text and then compares it to an expected percentage of agreement due to two randomallocations of codes. To determine Kappa, Pi, or Alpha, we would determine the value for eachcode comparing each pair of coders, as well as all three coders together and then combine thecode/coder pair specific values into an average across the board. Our large codebook (64 uniquecodes), made calculating Kappa, Pi, or Alpha difficult for two reasons (1) we often used a uniquecode only once in a transcript and (2) determining 4*the number of unique codes in a transcript(three pairs plus the three coders together) required excessive effort without rewarding us withadditional insights. Instead, we considered
enhancing student confidence.BackgroundMcIlwee and Robinson 1 discussed how women engineering students excel in theoretical learning,but fall behind in hands-on learning. This difference in male and female learning styles begins ata young age. During adolescence boys are often raised to be tinkerers and encouraged to develophands-on skills, a fundamental trait of an engineer, whereas girls are socialized differently. Girlsare often not given the same access to hands-on activities, and thus they do not think ofthemselves as tinkerers and do not take part in many hands-on opportunities 1 . This socialupbringing is further enforced by a perception that they do not belong in engineering, which isreinforced by the lack of female role models and mentors
program served as the basis from which this team was developed,and as such the team follows many guidelines that are listed in Lagoudas and Froyd’s [1] workon multidisciplinary teams. Some of these guidelines include: Small Team size,Multi-disciplinary Team Construction, and Faculty, Industry, and Graduate Student teamsupport. In short, this team may be seen as an instance of the AggiE-Challenge program as thebenefits derived reflect those discussed in Lagoudas and Froyd’s work [1]. In addition to thisframework, a semester long research course focusing on aspects of Systems Engineering (SE)similar to that taken in Valasek and Shyrock’s work [2] on capstone design at TAMU wasadopted for the Railbot program.Team Size: Small TeamIt has been the
: Teaching Experiences Prior toBecoming a Professor).First Time Class/New Relationship with Course Instructor (Level 1):Learn the Course MaterialIf it is the first time you are a GTA for a course, learn all that you can by attending each of theclass sessions and taking notes as if you are enrolled in the course. Interact with the studentsduring class breaks and be willing to answer their questions. You may not always have theknowledge or time to respond in that instant during class, so record student questions to followup via email or in office hours. Developing rapport is important, as is tracking areas wherestudents tend to have difficulties in a particular course.Request additional resources from the course instructor (or previous GTAs) outside
life cycle engineering has been developed based on this approach through a multi-university research project, entitled “Constructionism in Learning: Sustainable Life CycleEngineering (CooL:SLiCE).” The pedagogic significance of CooL:SLiCE is that it enables betterlearning within the sustainable engineering domain by utilizing effective learning modules forpersonalized environmentally responsible product design. The CooL:SLiCE platform provides aweb-based portal with three learning modules: 1) Visualization and online computer-aideddesign (CAD), 2) Sustainable product architecture and supplier selection (S-PASS), and 3)Manufacturing analysis. These modules were first piloted by a team of students from threeuniversities with different
related corecourse, and looks at these math, chemistry, or physics concepts in the context ofengineering topics. This work aims to preliminarily assess the effectiveness of this newundergraduate engineering retention program recently implemented at CSU, under thehypothesis that LLs will improve retention of engineering students between their first-and second-semester courses. The results of this study are expected to inform andimprove future iterations of this program, as this model is not expected to be withoutflaws in its first implementation.More specifically, this study examines the effectiveness of this Learning Lab model bylooking at a combination of (1) Learning Lab attendance data, (2) first-year engineeringstudent feedback (taking
out-of-class activities. In thislarger study, “fun” was identified as a major reason that underrepresented engineeringundergraduate students chose to pursue out-of-class activities.PurposeThe purpose of this research is to gain a deeper understanding of undergraduate engineeringstudent engagement from the perspective of underrepresented groups. The two researchquestions used to achieve this purpose are: (1) how does “fun” manifest itself in the lives ofunderrepresented students? and (2) how is “fun” linked to student engagement in in-class andout-of-class activities? This case study investigated two students’ (one Hispanic male and oneWhite female) meanings of “fun” as they described their participation in in-class and out-of
evidence of the stress andstruggles they face to cope with the multiple demands of the academic, professional setting1 . Thesedifficulties become more pronounced if personal expectations and interests deviate from the traditionalrequirements of a tenure-track position2 . Recurring themes among these difficulties include: 1) balancingthe competing demands of research, teaching, and other professional and personal duties; 2) lack of timeto cope with all responsibilities; and 3) setting realistic expectations, particularly regarding research andpublication accomplishments1,3,4 . Emphasizing the first theme, Felder and Brent point out that aremarkably difficult challenge is finding out a way to “balance the competing time demands of teaching,research
Enthusiasm for Mathematics through RoboticsAbstractThis evidence-based practice paper describes the study of generating enthusiasm for mathematicsthrough robotics. A survey of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute undergraduate students taking theRobotics I course showed that, while many students have a great interest for mathematics, morethan 1 in 4 of those same students expressed that they were not adequately prepared for themathematics required. This is particularly concerning for those teaching engineering coursesbecause concepts of robotics and mathematics are very much intertwined. Therefore, thisinspired a study of younger middle school and high school students to i) assess preexistingnotions of mathematics and robotics, ii) introduce an
projects; leading a team; solving interpersonal problems; effective communications, etc.) Communication skills (giving oral presentations; developing written reports or materials; generating web content, blogs, or social media posts; interpersonal communications, etc.)Of course, it is also essential to think carefully about the purpose of the recommendation(graduate school applications, fellowship nominations, jobs, etc.) and select recommenders whocan speak about the applicant’s preparation for the specific opportunity.Choosing RecommendersIdeally, you will ask for recommendation letters from individuals who both know you well andcan write effectively [1]. Faculty, advisers, internship/work supervisors, coaches and
mixed lab-and-foreign language format.Study abroad programs: Context Engineering study abroad programs routinely suffer from multiple challenges, hence arecharacterized by relatively small enrollments and small numbers. Example challenges routinelyinclude four items: (1) Course formats overseas do not line up with US style/content (2) Foreign language requirements may be severe (3) US faculty often lead overseas effort, adding salary expense and suffering from lack of volunteers, and (4) Student resistance from fear of financial cost as well as time delay for degree completion. We reported previously (1,2) on a French engineering summer
leadership, teamwork,presentation and communication skills can be assembled in a series of professional developmentworkshops to prepare engineering students for their profession.IntroductionWhen engineers enter the workforce, they are expected to have professional skills and thetechnical background. According to the ASME vision 2030 necessary professional skills ofmechanical engineers include electronic communication, interpersonal/teamwork, oralcommunication, written communication, and leadership among others [1]. ASCE also has a listof necessary skills on which is communication, leadership, teamwork, and attitude to name a few[2]. IEEE lists professional skills like interpersonal, teamwork, written communication, verbalcommunication, and
, Jones, and Roos in 1990. The researchersdocumented the principles underlying the Toyota Production System, which at the time was themost profitable automotive company in the world. Womack, Jones, and Roos were the first todefine “Lean Manufacturing” and characterize the five principles of a “Lean Production System”to guide business, management, and engineering decisions (Womack, Jones, & Roos, 1990): 1) Specify value from the standpoint of the end customer by product family. 2) Identify all the steps in the value stream for each product family, eliminating every step, every action, and every practice that does not create value. 3) Make the remaining value-creating steps occur in a tight and integrated sequence so the product will flow
individualsevaluate both the personal and academic fit of each institution, along with advice for interpretingand comparing offers of financial assistance. While the specific focus of this paper is oncomparing offers to graduate programs (Master’s or PhD) in engineering in the United States, thegeneral principles may be helpful for a wide variety of post-graduate applicants.IntroductionA recent internet search on “making the choice between graduate programs” offered nearly 10million results, with the “most relevant” options being a variety of blog posts and opinionarticles. Such accounts have been published in popular media [1], [2] and by sites that focus onhigher education [3], [4], and their content ranges from identifying the pros and cons of
topic in recent years. Many questions arise that point toone theme: what can we do to bridge the gap found among minority students? There are a multitude of programs and organizations designed to increase the success ofminority students at engineering colleges across the US, such as the Society of WomenEngineers, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, and National Society of Black Engineers.Summer bridge camps and similar programs that help increase students’ academic preparation inmathematics have also been beneficial for underrepresented students (1, 2). At Louisiana StateUniversity (LSU), we provide a program that offers a potential solution to bridging the gap forminority students–Supplemental Instruction. Supplemental
in engineering or other STEM fields, either leaving theprogram or dropping out of college entirely, leave during their first-year.1–3 Previous studieshave shown that students who leave engineering are often in good academic standing and thatthere are many important non-cognitive characteristics of students who decide to leaveengineering.4–7 Attitude and self-confidence have been reported as two of the many factorsimportant for understanding and predicting engineering student retention.1,8,9 Longitudinalstudies that investigated how student confidence changes throughout their time in engineeringprograms have shown that student confidence is lowest during their first year6,10 and is loweramong female engineering students.11,12 Student
make decisions to adapt his or her approach aschallenges arise, additional data is needed, or when the initial process does not go as planned.Research is in fact a rather “messy” process. In my own dissertation research, I also encounteredthis inherent “messiness.” This publication is intended to communicate the challenges Iencountered during my dissertation research study as I observed and interviewed tenundergraduate students working on a cross-disciplinary project team.This manuscript is written as an audit trail 1–4 in first person, active voice, following theAmerican Psychological Association (APA) guidelines 5. By writing this paper as an audit trail,I can be transparent about decisions I made during my dissertation work as well as