project at the end. This paper presents our study with differentlab delivery formats, including preparation, implementation, survey data, observations, andfindings.Course BackgroundIntroduction to Engineering in our institution is a 3 credit course. The course includes one 1-hourlecture, and two 2-hour labs/week. In the lecture, students develop the skills needed during theirstudy of engineering. Topics include task/time management, effective use of notes, engineeringresearch, oral and written communications, problem-solving techniques, ethics and professionalresponsibility and institute resources. In the laboratory, students work in teams to complete avariety of engineering tasks.Each class is set to 85 students maximum. The lecture is held at a
Systems” wherehe presents IT tools examples and has a discussion of pedagogy. Our DSP senior-level course has four (4) studentoutcomes: (a). an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering; (c). an ability to design asystem, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental,social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability; (e). an ability to identify, formulate,and solve engineering problems; and (k). an ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessaryfor engineering practice. A recommended companion text for the course includes Matlab-based problem solvingapproach [8]. The authors of the text use innovative
, SunMicrosystems, Google, Microsoft, Heineken, Hyundai, Twitter, Cargill, Facebook, Linkedin,Boston Consulting Group, Bain and Company, TATA.The following topics were topics that the students selected to cover in their case studies: Motivation, job engagement Job characteristics, employee involvement, rewards & recognition Team building, group decision making Team work, hiring team players, team processes Communication, Leadership, trust mentoring Organizational structure Organizational culture, climate, socialization, ethical organizational culture, spirituality Hiring, selection, training, development, performance evaluation Organizational change, stress management, organizational
, NY: Cambridge UniversityPress.[4] Tank, K. M., Moore, T. J., Dorie, B. L., Gajdzik, E., Sanger, M. T., Rynearson A. M.,Mann, E. F. (in press). Engineering in early elementary classrooms through the integration ofhigh-quality literature, design, and STEM+C content.[5] Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. QualitativeResearch Journal, 9(2), 27-40.[6] Derry, S. J., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., ... & Sherin,B. L. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection,analysis, technology, and ethics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 3-53.[7] Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative
. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, University of Colorado, Boulder Jacquelyn Sullivan has led the multi-university TeachEngineering digital library project, now serving over 3.3M unique users (mostly teachers) annually, since its inception. She is founding co-director of the design-focused Engineering Plus degree program and CU Teach Engineering initiative in the University of Colorado Boulder’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. With the intent of transforming en- gineering to broaden participation, Sullivan spearheaded design and launch of the Engineering
HonestEconomics and project management OrganizedLife-long learning Likes to LearnParticipants and SamplingThe survey population was a convenience sample of 50 grade 12 enrolled in two differentadvanced placement physics classes in a local private secondary school. 20% of the surveypopulation identified as female. Human subjects research approval was obtained through theuniversity ethics board. The private standing of the school was advantageous as it allowed forhuman subjects research approval at the school level without a long consultation process with acentral school board. As most of the participants were minors the letter of consent obtained boththe
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He conducts research on training and development with a specific focus on professional development, ethics, and coaching.Dr. Michael Wade Keller, University of Tulsa Michael Keller is an associate professor of mechanical engineering at the university of tulsa. His research and teaching interests are in solid mechanics, both experimental and theoretical, and materials science.Rami M. Younis, The University of Tulsa c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Fostering Graduate Student Professionalism Using Developmental Coaching Techniques Fostering Graduate Student Professionalism Using Developmental Coaching TechniquesIntroductionGovernment agencies
-defined engineering technology problems g. An ability to apply written, oral, and graphical communication in both technical and non- technical environments; and an ability to identify and use appropriate technical literature h. An understanding of the need for and an ability to engage in self-directed continuing professional development i. An understanding of and a commitment to address professional and ethical responsibilities including a respect for diversity j. A knowledge of the impact of engineering technology solutions in a societal and global context k. A commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvementThe field of manufacturing is wide, and engineering and technologists
Ethics for the Donald. P. Shiley School of Engineering. His research is in nonlinear vibrations as it applies to structural health monitoring, and assistive technology. He is currently working on grants related to teaching in STEM fields and laboratory curricular development and is active in developing international research opportunities for undergraduates.Mr. Daniel Anderson, University of PortlandMr. Jose Israel Bastida De Jesus c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Increasing Engagement in Materials Laboratory with Backward Design and QuadcoptersAbstractThis paper describes a laboratory experiment that was designed to increase student engagementand enhance student
laboratory are used for the assessment of our engineeringprogram. The outcomes that are assessed are as follows:4Outcome (a): an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, basic science and engineeringscienceOutcome (c): an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs withinrealistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainabilityOutcome (e): an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problemsOutcome (g): an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary forengineering practiceOutcome (k): an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary forengineering practiceIn the
to share these developed skill sets within their tribal and urban communities.Activities and presentations the IOU-NA students participate in include 1) Native NationsInstitute: Workshop on Tribal Governance, 2) Laser Radiation Safety Training, 3) Chemical LabSafety Training, 4) Research Ethics Training, 5) Optics Research Workshop, 6) Sloan ScholarSpeaker Series, 7) Research Plan and Lab Notebook Training, 8) Kathryn Kellner PresentationSkill Lecture, 9) Dr. Julius Yellowhair, Sandia National Labs Presentation, 10) Joshua John,Raytheon Presentation, 11) GRE Preparation Course, 12) GRE Tutoring Sessions 13) GRE FinalReview, 14) Graduate School Symposium, 15) Don Asher’s “Getting into Grad School”Seminar, 16) Performing Research on
Clinical Assistant Professor in the Department of Technology Leadership and Communication in the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at Indiana University-Purdue Uni- versity Indianapolis (IUPUI). Pat has been a member of the faculty for over 32 years. She has previously served as Associate Chair and Associate Dean in the School. Pat teaches leadership, ethics, sustainabil- ity, and study abroad courses. She has held a number of leadership roles in the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) including four terms on the ASEE Board as well as serving two times as the Chair of Engineering Technology Council. Pat is a Fellow of ASEE. Her research interests include sustainability and study abroad
particular occasions, the online student was asked to communicate with the in campusclass students. In one occasion, she presented her project for the class students andanswered their questions. A presentation of the long distance student was a memorableexperience for the class students, as she was assigned to present about her constructionjob experience, professional ethics, and her suggestions for their job search. That was avery attractive session for the in campus students, as the communication was possiblesuch that she could see the class students with the front camera, and they could see herface and her presentation on the screen. The adjustments have been prepared before theclass for such communication.The above consideration created a
the multi-dimensional historic perspectives and conditions that affect problem What are the diversity in ethics among the social units/populations Various conditions of problems What are the conditions and potential conditions that affect future behavior, characteristics, & functions of a problem solution What are the cultural, geographic, economic, etc. conditions What are the various points of view & value judgment Essential Elements of Analysis Holism & reductionism analysis must be done together o Determine the needs of the system and how each of these needs interact o Determine the needs of each domain within the system’s and how each of these needs interact o Determine how
4.57 ideas (1.11) (0.98) I am able to understand and apply medical 3.43 4.71 product development best practice (1.62) (0.95)^ I understand the patenting process 2.57 4.57 2.0 (0.71) 4.6 (0.55) (1.72) (0.98) I have an appreciation of the regulatory and 2.71 5.14 3.0 (1.51) 4.8 (0.44) reimbursement processes (1.89) (0.69) I am able to apply knowledge of mathematics, 4.6 (1.51) 5.2 (1.30)^ science and engineering I understand professional and ethical 4.86
year may provide a foundation that will solidify and integrate student’s education [8].III. Redesigning ‘Foundations of Engineering’ Course As evident from the literature review teaching should combine theoretical knowledge with practical skills, while understanding its social, cultural, and ethical implications on learning. This philosophy involves going beyond classroom-type, lecture- based education, and emphasize practical skills in real world projects. In general, first year engineering students are fascinated by how industrial products are made and are curios regarding novel methods for making products. Exposure to advanced manufacturing technologies and the need for integration of technologies from several
exist outside of classroom but that maynot be leveraged by already time-constrained engineering students. By embedding elements ofcareer development and professionalism into the engineering curriculum, students are exposedfrom freshmen year on to the key professional skills that employers seek from graduates asmodelled by the industry professionals themselves, including: critical thinking/problem solving;oral/written communication; teamwork/collaboration; information/technology application;leadership; professionalism/work ethic; career management [8]. With more than 70% of openpositions being secured through networking [9], it is important to introduce students to this skillas early as possible in their college career, and to ensure that
20.7 Liberal Education 5 17.2 Multidisciplinary Engineering 4 13.8 Educational and Research Methods 3 10.3 Engineering Economy 2 6.9 Engineering Ethics 2 6.9 Engineering Management 2 6.9 Industrial Engineering 2 6.9 NSF Grantees Poster Session 2 6.9 Aerospace Engineering
forinstitutions to follow in undergraduate engineering programming includes: engineeringknowledge; problem analysis; design/development of solutions; investigation & experimentation;modern tool usage; engineers and society; environment and sustainability; ethics; individual andteamwork; communication; project management and finance; and lifelong learning15. Guidelinesto assess these (or similar) competencies are created within each of the oversight organizations.The overarching purpose of these guidelines is to aid in the relevance and technical strength ofengineering students’ preparation for professional practice. Subsequently, educators andresearchers globally have applied the recommended guidelines and assessment frameworks togauge development of
: Committee on Undergraduate Science Education Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education, "Transforming Undergraduate Student Education in Science Mathematics, Engineering and Technology," National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1999.[8] National Research Council: Committee on the Fundamental of Assessment, Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment, J. W. Pellegrino, N. Chudowsky and R. Glaser, Eds., Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.[9] A. El-Zein, A. Airey, P. Bowden and H. Clarkeburn, "Development of a Course on Environmental Sustainability, Ethical Decision-making and Communication Skills in Engineering," in International Conference on Engineering Education, 2007
student responses to the case studyimpressions survey.MethodologyEach course used two cases. “A Case in Point: From Active Learning to the Job Market,”published at the National Center for Case Studies Teaching in the Sciences (NCCSTS), served asthe common case to acquaint students to the NCCSTS pedagogy. Each participating facultymember also selected a second case that matched a lab or interactive hands-on modulecorresponding to content typically covered in their course. NC A&T developed a case to presentto the students the concepts of e-waste and risk assessment. The case was designed to teachstudent about disposal practices in the US versus third world countries for E-waste and discussenvironmental ethics and justice. In this case, students
(2) published,peer-reviewed literature articles for each technique intended for use as a point of reference.Copies of the journal articles were provided with summarized background information on eachtechnique along with a defense for the decision made for the choice of method (as assessed in theCSU Critical Thinking Value Rubric).Proposed Approach: Student apprentices were to build the proposed framework for theirindividual testimony from an instrument based tool box to use as a road map to the get to the rootcause of the PBL scenario. They needed to identify the key skills and competencies required toconduct their analyses, such as research ethics, content knowledge and informational literacyskills; practical and problem-solving skills
finding internships to every cohort during their first program semester.They also offered a service called “interview stream” for students to practice interviewing skills.Invited experts spoke on topics such as personal finance and ethical issues. Local speakers withSTEM industry experience talked to students about careers in forensics and clinical laboratories.COMPASS scholars attended two presentation and discussion sessions with Dr. Theresa Duelloof the University of Wisconsin-Madison, who has significant experience advising students andplanning for graduate school. The Collegial Academy of the North Carolina Academy of Science(CANCAS) workshop held off-campus at Pfeiffer University offered plentiful opportunities forCOMPASS scholars to learn
integrating with an LMS. Each instructor needs to consider the way assignments arestructured, what sort of academic misconduct could occur, and which tools are best to combat it.Bibliography 1. McCabe, Donald L., (1997), “Classroom cheating among natural science and engineering majors.” Science and Engineering Ethics, 3: pp. 433-445. 2. Haines, Valerie J., George M. Diekhoff, Emily E. LaBeff, and Robert E. Clarke, (1986), “College cheating: Immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude.” Research in Higher Education, 25, pp. 342-354. 3. Diekhoff, George M., Emily E. LaBeff, and Robert E. Clarke, Larry E. Williams, Billy Francis, and Valerie J. Haines, (1996), “College Cheating: Ten Year Later.” Research
? Students’ LessonsLearned Documents were used to investigate this. Students were asked to state opinions abouteach major document they worked on and to discuss any lessons they learned that they plan tocarry into the future. They were also asked to comment on the quality of the course,effectiveness of advisors, and work ethic of teammates. Responses were compared between2013, during which EE422 and EE464 were only loosely tied together, and 2014-2015, afterEE422 material was formally connected with EE464 and continued to be applied in EE465. Thefeedback implies that after rigorous application of PM material throughout the entire project wasrequired student appreciation for the material improved and intra-team conflicts were morereliably resolved
& Technology, a Graduate Research Assis- tant in Purdue Polytechnic Institute, and is serving on the research and evaluation team for the Transdis- ciplinary Studies in Technology (TST) program. Her interests include adapting learning experiences for cross-cultural instructional and online instructional environments; with a values-based, ethical focus. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Moving Towards Individual Competence from Group Work in Transdisciplinary EducationAbstractCollaboration has been identified as a key 21st century skill, vital for success in multidisciplinaryenvironments that are increasingly common in engineering and technology
assistance with the consent of the instructor, and maintain effective working relationships among the members. Instructors also monitor group progress, give feedback on how well each group is doing, report each group’s progress to the class as a whole, and insure adherence to accepted standards of: ethics, social responsibility, and safety.Success in implementing cooperative learning is attributable, in large measure, to: properplanning, efforts, dedication, and foresight of the instructor. Experience definitely is a majorfactor. A proper start for instructors wanting to try active learning for the first time(including cooperative learning) is to step into it gradually, and to seek continuous feedbackas to how
environmental engineering, this courseprovides an opportunity for assessment of the ability to design and conduct experiments, analyze,and interpret data; the understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; the ability tocommunicate effectively; and knowledge of contemporary issues. It also provides anopportunity to assess knowledge of chemistry and a biological science; and to analyze andinterpret data in more than one major environmental engineering focus area. For an existing,ABET-accredited baccalaureate degree in civil engineering, this course provides an opportunityfor assessment of knowledge of contemporary issues; and to apply knowledge of (one of) fourtechnical areas appropriate to civil engineering. It also provides an opportunity
rates.The main goal of this study is to understand how interdisciplinary instruction affects students’ability to identify, formulate, and solve problems, function on multidisciplinary teams, engagewith contemporary issues, communicate effectively in writing, verbally and visually, developappreciation of the impact of planning and engineering solutions in a variety of societal contexts,and develop understanding of their professional and ethical responsibilities. Soft skills, such ascommunication, team spirit, leadership, sociability, time management, documentation,presentation, ethics, negotiation, etc., are all critical in successful delivery of a standout App. Oursurvey questions cover these aspects in a succinct manner.Evaluation Design for
exercise their thinking. Depending on the focus of the questions, thestudents may be more motivated to investigate the subject matter, may gain a deeperunderstanding of course concepts, or may improve their skills through hands-on experience usingthe knowledge in problem solving and design derived from the exercises. There are many waysof using class exercises in the classroom setting. For a small class size, the teacher may simplyuse an exercise to engage students in discussion and hands-on practice. For larger classes, thestudents can be assigned to small groups using the class exercise as an instrument leading togroup projects. Woods and Howard [8] effectively used class exercises for InformationTechnology students to study ethical issues. Day