manufacturing equipment to safeguard the machine operator from moving robotic equipment traveling at above‐head level. The company provided the project specs. The students set to design and simulate cages design using SolidWorks CAD/CAM software. Students, the faculty advisor, and the graduate student visited the company during the project execution and had regular contact with the company advisor, during the semester, to seek feedback and test their designs. By the end of the project, the students were able to successfully design new cages to meet the company requirements. This paper describes the project in more detail, how team members worked together, the company’s feedback, guidance to students, and the company’s plans to implement the final
checks; helps toschedule and staff the build sessions; and plans and runs the capstone events. Makers receive anhonorarium, project materials, a capstone event budget, and a small travel stipend. Theseexpenses are partially funded by a small grant from the Parents Council and other donors.The first MIR was an amateur astronomer who led students in the fabrication of a telescope.Using this telescope, more than 500 students and community members have been able to viewthe moon, planets and stars during the capstone event as well as other events both off campusand at the planetarium on campus. The second MIR was a local engineering professional who ledworkshops in the fabrication of Arduino-based musical circuits. Students played their
positions. Project teams that moved forward were presented Figure 1. Our interdisciplinary approach with the opportunity to participate in a semester- long course designed to support them as theyworked through the iterations necessary to create a plan for market readiness and a full proposalapplication for funding consideration. Although participation in the course was not required inorder to submit a full proposal application, it was “strongly recommended,” and 95% of applicantschose to participate in the course. Applicant teams were given the option of having existingstudents working on their
the experienced during the process. process. Table 8: Rubric for LO5 Assessment (Manufacturing a Part in the AFL). Assessment: Meaningful Assessment Evaluation Hansen argues that for assessment to be meaningful, it must assess for understanding. Assessment for understanding “requires careful planning and a variety of assessment approaches” (Hansen, 2011, p. 94). Hansen lists 8 principles for meaningful assessment, again adapted from Wiggins (Wiggins, 1998). Below, Hansen’s 8 principles, applied mostly to LO5, use manufacturing processes to manufacture a part, show how meaningful assessment is accomplished in this course: 1. Use
the Initiating, Planning,Monitoring, Executing, and Closing Process Groups, with the primary focus on the PlanningProcesses and very minimal focus on the Closing Processes. The second half of the semester isdedicated to the same Economics topics covered in the original course, but are covered in a muchmore concise way.Guidelines for project acceptance criteria were formalized. Among other things, it wasdetermined that more emphasis was needed on developing industry-sponsored andmultidiscipline projects. In order to increase the availability of true multidiscipline projects, aformal agreement was formed with the Mechanical Engineering Senior Capstone program tocreate official multidiscipline teams in which both groups of students now report to
students, andexamples of classroom application as well as select student artifacts from this class are includedfor illustration. However, the instructional ideas presented are expected to be broadly applicable.JustificationCritical thinking is defined by characteristics such as “interpretation, analysis, evaluation,inference, explanation, and self-regulation” (Facione, 1990, 2011; Romkey & Cheng, 2009). Itis linked with responsible decision making and the level of intellectual curiosity and inquirynecessary to research societal challenges, solve complex problems, and discover new solutions(Facione, 1990; Schafersman, 1991). Effective critical thinking incorporates other higher-levelskills such as planning, written and verbal communication, and
undergraduate careers,2) students who were enrolled in traditional engineering majors before an industry experience(either engineering or education) convinced them to switch into the E+T (or just teaching)pathway, and 3) students who were enrolled in E+T but then left the program for a traditionalengineering major. After Table 4, short narrative statements for each of the interviewees provideadditional detail on how they tell the stories of their E+T involvement. Table 4. Summaries of spring and fall 2016 interview participant trajectories. Trajectory to E+T Status in E+T Plans Immediately Following Student Degree Pathway Program
identified in Lean Manufacturing. 18.4% What are the 5 major goals or principles of lean manufacturing? 15.4% What does 5S stand for? 11.2%In the first survey only a small number of students were able to apply actual lean manufacturingideals to their project. Most of the responses stated that teams could reduce material waste andscrap, design for easier manufacturing, or make cost effective decisions when procuringmaterials. Additional responses also included being more environmentally conscious, makinglightweight designs, and planning more effectively.Overall, the results from the second survey demonstrated that comprehension was muchimproved when
provide a description of ourmethods, which includes the site where the intervention was conducted, the design of theintervention, the data collection process, and the data analysis approach. Then, we present theresults of the intervention and provide a summary of the conclusions, implications, andrecommendations for our planned next steps in this research direction. The results of this studyare meant to inform a more thorough, mixed methods assessment of the simulation game’s nextimplementation, as well as to refine and iterate the game’s design.BackgroundContemporary engineering work primarily involved solving problems related to decision-makingamong alternatives, troubleshooting malfunctioning systems, and design, all of which requiresome level
learn about designing andbuilding a system from the ground up.Despite the different physics responsible for generating the light, both components of the datacollection module, the Cherenkov and charge detectors, use identical readout electronics. Studentsare responsible for all aspects of designing the readout electronics, including selecting the SiPMvendor and model, designing the SiPM biasing electronics, testing the SiPMs, designing theintegrator circuit, and implementing the SiPM bias and integrator designs on PCBs. Students arealso responsible for soldering surface mountcomponents onto these PCBs, designing andimplementing a test-plan, and debugging circuits. Forthe schematic circuits shown in Figure 3, the studentsconstruct the circuits
the students tocollaborate on their research experiments, help them learn how to participate in scientificquestioning, and provide them with a framework for their research experience. It also fostersstudent-student relationships as they work together to plan their presentations and regularly learnabout the group members’ research experiences. In one expanded weekly meeting, the REUgroup takes a half-day field trip to tour a local industry or governmental partner to focus oncareer options.At the conclusion of the 10-week research experience, the students present their researchfindings in a competitive formal poster session to research faculty, staff, and students at the RiceUniversity Summer Research Colloquium. Participants complete
future when hecontinues, “In view of that, I’ve been doing some internships. I’ve had a couple of internships. Ithink it’s enough to help me lecture, but to get out in that field more is going to be helpful.”Mark perceived he will not have enough industry experience, which led to him to plan a moreimmediate future goal in industry. He is able to directly find usefulness in his graduate-leveltasks to his future because he put a lot of thought into defining his future self. For this study, the five participants displayed different conceptualizations of task value.Note that each participant was not asked about how tasks directly relate to their defined futures,but rather how they valued the tasks they were performing. Mark is the only
exploited in the design and construction of authentic problem-based projects related to understand. Demonstrations and Evaluations: Under this focus area, performers were asked to develop a demonstration and test plan that allows for the evaluation of the methods, tools and materials being developed in Focus Areas 1, 2, and 3. The demonstrations were to be carried out at a defense training facility and/or a civilian training facility (e.g., vocational technical school) and/or a non-traditional learning environment (e.g., a Makerspace).CurriculumThe curriculum is divided into two main sections: 1) electromechanical systems-specific moduleswhich taught core concepts, and 2) quadcopter kit-specific modules which taught how to use
Paper ID #20321Use of Model-Based Definition to Support Learning of GD&T in a Manufac-turing Engineering CurriculumDr. Derek M. Yip-Hoi, Western Washington University Dr. Yip-Hoi received his Ph.D. from the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan in 1997. His dissertation research focused on developing Computer-Aided Process Planning methods and software tools to support automation of machining on Mill/Turn machining centers. Follow- ing his Ph.D., he worked for several years with the NSF Engineering Research Center for Reconfigurable Machining Systems at the University of Michigan. His work
. Students were tasked with developing two general designs of a multi-purpose event center, considering maximum capacity, ways for people and vehicles to enter and exit the property, and a layout of a general plan for the property. 2. Water runoff. Students created a 100-year flood plan in which they calculated the total runoff for a 100-year flood plan and designed two drainage systems, describing the advantages and disadvantages of each. 3. Structures. Students designed a simple 3D model of the building and produced elevation sketches for the front, side, and back of the building. Additionally, students were tasked with incorporating novel features to make the structure eco-friendly. 4
. Y-circles are engaging in a process of discovery and inquiry to bridge theengineering education research-to-practice gap. Research studies have been planned and will beconducted to answer questions to understand (1) how educators involved in X-teams use designthinking to create new pedagogical solutions; (2) how professional formation pedagogy in themiddle years affects student professional ECE identity development as design thinkers; (3) howECE students overcome barriers, make choices, and persist along their educational and careerpaths in the middle years; and (4) the effects of department structures, policies, and procedureson faculty attitudes, motivation and actions.This paper describes the project, efforts that led up to the project
/satisfactory or competent. The student performance isestimated in percentage for each performance indicator for any selected learning outcome.Figure 29 shows the assessment results for Design learning outcome where student performanceis depicted for each of the performance indicators associated with Design outcome. As seen, thestudents performed above 75% for all the performance indicators. It appears that studentperformance is the lowest in developing design strategy/planning/timeline along with designanalysis using governing equations. These performance indicators will need further attentions forfuture projects. Performance Indicators1) Design 2) Experimentation 3) Oral 4
Undergraduates (REU) programs shows that 91% of these research experiences are provided tojunior and senior students21. Developing successful research programs is particularly challengingin community colleges, most of which do not have on-going research programs. Establishingcollaborations between research universities and community colleges is key to engaging studentsin research early in college.This paper is a description of how a small engineering program in a Hispanic-Serving communitycollege has developed a research internship program that is specifically designed for communitycollege students. The paper will also highlight the results of the first year of implementation of theprogram and future plans for improvement.2. Overview of ASPIRES Program
prior to the implementation of the reform effort. Hence, it iscritical to develop and employ a change strategy that extends the typical “best practice” approachthat is typical in STEM reform efforts [15]. Rather, successful strategies of a comprehensivechange approach should be continual, coordinated, and focused, and should address bothchanging the pedagogical conceptions of key and varied stakeholders in a STEM instructionalsystem, as well as affording stakeholders with an iterative cycle of performance evaluation andcontinual feedback [16]. To address these issues, the ADI Workshop will develop and implementa comprehensive and expansive dissemination plan, derived from the Four Categories of ChangeStrategies model [17], and developed in an
antibiotic resistance as a significant global threat to health and development and have noted that we are on course to quickly enter a post-antibiotic era – an end to modern medicine. In recognition of this threat, the May 2015 World Health Assembly is expected to adopt a Global Action Plan on antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The conservation of current antibiotics is particularly important for combatting AMR. The development of new therapeutics is critical, but ultimately a temporary fix if the global community does not practice measures to conserve antibiotics. Antibiotic stewardship is challenging because it hinges on a variety of social and behavioral phenomena. Social science, while
of the developmenthas occurred during the summers. During the first summer, we developed an initial prototype of thesoftware which included a teach pendant, an industrial robot arm, basic robot movement controls,and a very limited programming interface. In the second summer, we made extensive improvementsto the software so that it is now fully capable of being used in educational settings. In the future, ourgoal is to identify and fix bugs as well as add new features. We plan fully support two simultaneousrobots in the software and make it run better on a variety of different devices. More informationabout planned future work is in Section 4.3 RobotRun OverviewThe RobotRun software was originally written in the Processing programming
documents within the established design budget. This will be turned in as Part 2 Project Team Assignment. The Architect will email the documents to the instructor and get to them to the Contractor and Owner. 4. Beginning Part 3 of the Project Team Assignment, (Once Part 2 is completed), the plans and specifications will be given to the Construction team. The Contractor will have time to review the documents and prepare any written RFI’s, and review the project to make sure it can be built according to the requirements. RFI’s to the Architect (copy the instructor via email) are due on the date listed on the schedule.(At least one RFI from the Contractor is due as part of this assignment.) 5. RFI Responses
research as part of the graduate level plan of study. Unlike traditional engineeringdegrees which test theory from a quantitative or positivist position, CM programs often relate toissues that are more difficult to measure using strictly quantifiable metrics. Because themanagerial issues faced by CM graduates deal with human interaction and behavior, research inthe built environment often resembles social science research to a greater degree than traditionalscientific research. As graduate programs in CM expand, students need opportunities to gainexperience with a range of research methodologies that are available to complete valid researchon construction management issues. Previous research indicated that educators active in graduateeducation for
. This assessment-centered teaching and learning framework helps connectspecific learning objectives to broader learning goals or competencies and on-going formativefeedback targeting student progression on specific learning objectives. Our plan is to refine theframework using a design-based research approach. Following the description of the model andits development, we present results from the first cycle of implementation. We conclude bydiscussing hybrid ways for combining traditional methods of assessment with the ability tohighlight performance expectations and the appropriate uses of the framework in the classroom. IntroductionAs a gateway to engineering, first-year engineering or introduction to
, suchas proposing alternatives to a product or different assessment plans based on their ownexpertise and experiences. For example: “When we were deciding on the choice of materials in making the intelligent eraser,whether it should be a wet wipe or a dry wipe, I proposed to use the materials in spongemops to prevent dust of chalks, because I used to use the sponge mop to clean theblackboard when I was in high school. Then, we had a try and decided on using thatmaterial to make our product.” ——Lily “I would search online for useful information first about force transducers in themarket. For example, I’d like to know what is this products made of, how big it is
paper describes the embodiment of these goals byhighlighting several key features of the seminar. We conduct quantitative and qualitative analysisof several data sources (surveys, instructor reflections, field notes, and coursework) to assess theextent to which the embodiment of our values helped us meet our goals. Finally, we describechallenges and identify areas where we were not meeting our goals and describe some of theaspects of the seminar that we plan to revise in the next iteration.IntroductionEngineering education research has increasingly focused on the learning and teaching ofdesign,1-7 including design thinking and associated “soft” skills such as communication andteamwork. Another trend is the growing number of schools of
students, especially women and underrepresented minorities. Strategies includedhigh school STEM career majors and STEM College Academies that built on national models,such as Project Lead the Way; middle school STEM exploration activities and summer camps;high school Individual Graduation Plans; program revision to include secondary andpostsecondary faculty and student cooperative projects and mentoring using a technologyplatform for remote equipment and process diagnostics and collaboration; faculty development;and broad industry involvement in curriculum development, internships and co-op opportunities,scholarships, and Foundation support. The second project (Curriculum Infusion: A Modular andOnline Approach to Train Renewable Energy Technicians
and VEX IQ provided by Robomatter. ROBOTC for VEX Robotics 4.x (VEX EDR & VEX IQ) P/N: robotc-vexedr-vexiqThe VEX online Video Tutorialshttp://www.education.rec.ri.cmu.edu/products/cortex_video_trainer/ were completed in thefollowing order. The programs were introduced at beginning of each class. Students were askedto preview each tutorial as homework to make programming time in class more efficient. It wasevident which students followed preview advice and those that did not. Lab time was also madeavailable during lunch and two days after school (Tuesdays and Thursdays 2:30 – 5:30)Fundamentals 1. Programmer and Machine 2. Planning and Behaviors 3. ROBOTC Rules Part 1 4. ROBOTC Rules Part 2Setup 5. Updating
%); Undeclared Engineering (26%); Civil and EnvironmentalEngineering (14%); Engineering Mechanics/Astronautics (9%); Biological Systems Engineering(6%); Engineering Physics (6%); and Nuclear Engineering (5%)) agreed to participate and fund amulti-disciplinary hands-on design course. Last year, we analyzed student retention data overthe past three decades and correlated the data with the introduction to engineering course takenas freshmen. [1] Analysis of course-specific retention data did not clearly align with otherresearch suggesting a positive relationship between hands-on design and retention ofunderrepresented minorities. [2-5] Thus, we plan to implement and assess changes to coursestructure and curriculum to determine best practices to create a
resiliency, transportation facility planning and design, high- way safety, and active living by design. He teaches courses in capstone engineering design, engineering management, transportation engineering, geographic information systems, and land surveying. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Advancing Diversity Initiatives in the Civil Engineering Profession: Outcomes of an NSF S-STEM Grant at a Regional Undergraduate Teaching InstitutionA student scholarship and enrichment program was established in 2012 to help address thepersistent problem of underrepresented minority, female and socioeconomically disadvantagedstudents enrolled in civil engineering