learneddramatically shifted towards the above average and well above average categories after theimplementation of the 3D technology project. Another set of questions in which the majority of the students agree on their perceivedlearning is shown in Figure 6 for the first year and Figure 8 for year two. In this set of questions theagreement of the students was higher than 60% and lower than 70% for year one and between 80%and 82.6% for year two. Here we can see that the 3D technology project had a high impact in theareas of time management, engineering career awareness and planning, research methods andtechniques, critical thinking concepts, and unit systems and conversions. From previous research wehave confirmed the fact that engineering students
advocates for change in their future careers. Hatchery Units are onecredit courses that are designed to address gaps in students’ technical knowledge identified bylocal industry, infuse ethics and social justice in the undergraduate computer science curriculum,and build communities of practice while providing a more streamlined integration experience fortransfer students to the program. Guided by Rawl’s [33] theory of social justice, the team willwork with students and faculty to create an environment that is welcoming and supportive for allundergraduate CS students and encourage graduates of the program to work to promote thesevalues as future computer science professionals. The development of these values will bepromoted by building communities
UK. He started his career in the UK as the Senior Research Assistant at the SERC Engineering Design Centre. He joined Brunel University in 1995 where he worked for 18 years before joining United Arab Emirates University in August 2011. During his stay at Brunel he has worked with many British industries. Dr Sivaloganathan is a keen researcher in Design and was the Convenor for the International Engineering Design Conferences in 1998 and 2000. He has been a regular participant of the ASEE annual conference during the past few years. He has published more than 85 papers in reputed journals and conferences.Dr. Essam K. Zaneldin P.E., United Arab Emirates University Dr Essam Zaneldin earned his PhD in 2000 from the
on multidisciplinaryteams are required to attend all training sessions with their teammates.Our engineering program utilizes team-based project learning in several course beginningfreshman year. In these courses, the engineering professors introduce the concepts of teamwork,collaboration and conflict resolution. These concepts are reinforced at several points throughoutengineering students’ academic career in other lab courses and even in some lecture courses, butthey are not the focus of those courses.So for capstone we decided to focus on professional skills almost exclusively during lecture, andbegan bringing in outside experts to lecture on different topics related to professional skills.While we brought in experts on project management
activities are detailed below:1. February 24th- 2016, Capital Area Science and Engineering Fair Volunteering2. February 26th-2016, Capital Area Science and Engineering - Award Ceremony3. March 9th-2016, STEM Career Launch Volunteering4. March 24th-2016, NSF STEM club talk on storm water runoff and pollutants in water supplies.In addition to the above events, the NSF-STEM club officers participated in CentralPennsylvania food bank as a community service and organized a fund raising event at April 28,2016, where newer members (mentees) and older club members (mentors) participated. Below,in Figure, 1 is the flyer that they used. Fig 1: Flyer used in one of the NSF STEM club fundraising activitiesThe impact of the NSF STEM
students at Macalester College as one contributionto countering this blind spot. In developing this course, our primary interest was to give studentsat an early stage in their academic experience an introduction to engineering, whether they cameto college with the idea of possibly pursuing a career in engineering or whether they wanted toget a deeper understanding of the influence of engineering on the world in which they live. Forthat reason our orientation in this course was different from the orientation found in Bucciarelli’sand Drew’s proposal for integrating the liberal arts with engineering (2015). As we were notprimarily interested in preparing future engineers, our course was less technically(mathematically) focused. Our course was also
in many educational institutions. The purpose of thismixed method study was two-fold. First, the researchers examined faculty member’s reactions toworking in a culturally diverse environment. Secondly, the researchers wanted to uncover bestpractices or strategies that might improve cultural awareness in workforce development in termsof navigating daily life within an educational institution. This study delved into the experiencesfaculty members reported having in their workplace. The study involved 224 faculty membersacross various departments and career statuses working at a public coeducational researchinstitution in the United States of America. The survey and interview responses to apredetermined set of questions were analyzed in order
student learning. Tamara Moore received an NSF Early CAREER award in 2010 and a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) in 2012.Siddika Selcen Guzey, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Guzey is an assistant professor of science education at Purdue University. Her research and teaching focus on integrated STEM Education.Mr. Kyle Stephen Whipple, University of Minnesota c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Middle School Students’ Engineering Discussions: What Initiates Evidence-Based Reasoning? (Fundamental)Introduction and literature reviewAs part of an effort to remain internationally competitive, the United
course make you wantto stay in E-Lead?” Seventeen students (65%) responded that the course made them want to stayin E-Lead somewhat more or much more. Only four students responded that the course madethem want to stay somewhat less or much less. Only one student surveyed did not stay in the E-Lead program but stated that they “did not enjoy any engineering program. I enjoyed the classbut not the engineering part. I'm majoring in […] special education K-12.” Further, the responsesto the open-ended question about how this course helped students make progress towardsacademic, work, and degree goals provided us with insight on retention. Thirteen responsesexpressed that the course helped enforce the choice to pursue an engineering career. Seven
. Future work implies the application of a quantitativequestionnaire to discuss national and international implications.Introduction Over the last two decades, ABET has become a major change agent in engineeringeducation worldwide. In 1996, ABET’s Board of Directors shifted its emphasis on outcomesrather than inputs by adopting the widely known accreditation criteria EC2000. Criterion 3specified five technical and six professional skills that engineering graduates must face thechallenge of international competitiveness.1 Lattuca, Terenzini and Volkwein (2006) documentedthe impact of the engineering criteria EC2000 on engineering programs2. Schools of Engineeringworldwide have modified their curriculums to reinforce career preparation and
seniors at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), who have interest in pursu- ing STEM disciplines at the graduate-level. Annually, Dean Vaughan supervises direction of the 4-week FAME/UD Summer Residential Program for 30-35 high school students, the RISE Summer Enrichment Program for incoming engineering freshmen and, in the past, the HEARD (Higher Education Awareness Response in Delaware) Project, a college awareness program, funded by the Department of Education through Philadelphia GEAR UP for College Network. Globally in the College, he manages academic programs and policies that impact the careers of all engineering students at both the undergraduate and graduate level. Dean Vaughan is focused on
in new strategies to problem solution. Inthinking of these two extremes in mindset, it becomes apparent that neither is a “correct” mindset for all engineeringdisciplines or career opportunities. However, making both faculty and students aware of this difference may providesubstantial advantages in both the educational, and future career, environments. The present study is recognized as being very preliminary. For example, the students in this particularuniversity are selected through a relatively rigorous admission process, likely resulting in a number of impacts onthe mindset of the incoming student. Further, the sample size (approximately 250 responses) is relatively limited.Despite the preliminary nature of this research, a
thatintend to foster open communication, trust, and a willingness to solve problems, and (4) retakingthe survey to investigate if students perceptions have changed. Results of the study show that,through the interdisciplinary senior project and the structured activities planned, students’perceptions of each other’s disciplines, roles, and stereotypes changed, and they were able togain a better understanding and appreciation of each other’s disciplines, and work collaborativelytowards the project goals. The study, thus, shows the potential that incorporating sucheducational activities and experiences in students’ learning environment could positively affecttheir careers making them ready for the increasing trend of integration of designer and
grant funding over his career from NIH, NSF, AFOSR, and other sources. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Improving the Requirements Inspection Abilities of Computer Science Students through Analysis of their Reading and Learning Styles1. IntroductionDue to the complex nature of software development process, there is an increasing demand forskilled software engineers that is expected to grow more in future [1]. Students are expected tograduate with the necessary skillset for pursuing their careers in software industry. However,research [2] reports that students in academic settings mostly work on small scale projects andlack an exposure to industrial strength artifacts as well as team
consortium of engineering education).Nupur Kulkarni, Cares for the environment - I am a Certified Leed Green Associate. I enjoy spending my hobby time in Photography, painting and traveling. Ardent faith in ethical behavior and a strong desire to make a career in ’spaces and local mediums’ Graduating in June 2017 from Savannah School of Art and Design – Geor- gia (USA) in Architecture after B. Arch from S.P. Pune University. Technical Skills such as AutoCAD, Google SketchUp, Photoshop, InDesign, Coral Draw, Illustrator, Premiere Pro, V-Ray, and Microsoft of- fice. Participated in several competitions viz. Essay writing ’Pune, People, and Places’, Green School Competition by Ethos ’In Big Tree Paradigm’ - focused on
identified (by faculty as well asstudents).46 Damages included 6 broken windows, 4 missing books, and assorted missing officesupplies. 17 students were later ordered to pay $250 for not leaving the building when ordered.47 Figures 25 (above), 26, and 27. Students occupy the Engineering Library, Carpenter Hall, April 26, 1972.46 Figure 28. Protestors outside Carpenter Hall.46 Other disruptions to the building occurred in February 7, 1972, when Honeywell, a militarycontractor, came to recruit at the Career Center. Students chanted loudly outside interviewdoors.48Engineering Librarians After 1973Below is a listing of more recent engineering library
career in engineering. Brown and colleagues (2014) demonstrate the role of peer networks andsocial capital in interactive engineering classrooms. And Hilpert and Husman (2016) developed a measureof interactive engagement that describes the complex and adaptive ways students rely upon the social andintellectual capital of their peers to develop innovative solutions to engineering problems. These studiesprovide points of leverage for complex systems research to be integrated into studies of classroominteraction and collaboration, instructional strategy use, and how environment shapes student learning. Similar to the nature of learning environments, motivation, affect, and engagement are widelyaccepted to be composed of complex combinations
motivations for this include “accommodation” of student interests andpreferences in hopes of influencing student learning outcomes and team effectiveness, whileproviding an efficient and fair method of assigning students to project teams.3. Objectives, Assumptions and MethodologyIn the interest of understanding how team selection might impact project results in a capstonesetting, we collected and analyzed data on over eight-two capstone project teams over foursemesters. The data consisted of a combination of quantitative and qualitative parametersincluding academic performance, practical engineering experience, career interests, projectpreferences, personality, and technical skills used to assign individual students to project teamsover four
centered on the integration of STEM concepts in K-12 and postsecondary classrooms in order to help students make connections among the STEM disciplines and achieve deep understanding. Her work focuses on defining STEM integration and investigating its power for student learning. Tamara Moore received an NSF Early CAREER award in 2010 and a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) in 2012.Hillary Elizabeth Merzdorf, Purdue UniversityTingxuan Li, Purdue UniversityMiss Amanda C. Johnston, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 From Standards to Classrooms: A Content Analysis of How Engineering is
by year in school.By examining many different possible models from the multiple linear regression analysis, twocandidate models were selected that can provide some insight. The first candidate model is amultiple linear regression with no interaction terms (Table 5). Student major is clearly animportant consideration. The model estimates that non-majors score about nine points lowerthan majors. Also quite significant was the year term. Earlier academic career students hadabout four points higher per year modeled scores. The gender effect is not as significant but theestimated effect is four points lower for women. The cohort coefficient is the least significant.Table 5: One candidate multiple linear regression model used to describe the
Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 16(3-4), 377-401.[12] Forsyth, D. R. (2009). Group dynamics. Boston: Cengage Learning.[13] Wilkinson, S. (1996). The factors affecting the career choice of male and femalecivil engineering students in the UK. Career Development International, 1(5): 45-50.[14] Huang, G., Taddese, N., Walter, E. (2000). Entry and Persistence of Women andMinorities in College Science and Engineering Education. Education StatisticsQuarterly, 2(3): 59-60.[15] Takahira, S., Goodings, D. J., Byrnes, J. P. (1998). Retention and performance ofmale and female engineering students: An examination of academic andenvironmental variables. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(3): 297.[16] Stephen, M. (2007). A study into the factors that
University.Prof. Nassif E. Rayess, University of Detroit Mercy Nassif Rayess is an associate professor at University of Detroit Mercy (UDM), He teaches design, in- novation and entrepreneurship. He received his Ph.D. from Wayne State University and joined UDM in 2001. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Using Design Thinking Principles to Develop New Community Centered Engineering Educational Initiatives for High School Students (A Work in Progress)IntroductionThe pathways of a typical high school student towards careers in engineering are fraughtwith obstacles; chief among them is a misconception that engineering is a singularlytechnical pursuit devoid of human interests
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Middle school girls as “experts” to elementary students: A coding trial.The objective of this “work is progress” is to allow middle school girls to become the “experts”,rather than the students, in computer science and engineering outreach. The hypothesis is thatleading outreach will cause middle school girls to self-identify in STEM while acting as rolemodels for the younger students. Although the number of women in STEM fields has beensteadily growing, this has not been true in computer science. Over the past 20 years, thepercentage of women earning computer science degrees has decreased from 28% to 18%.i This isa problem not only because these women are missing out on a lucrative career
Professor at LeTourneau University. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering Technology from LeTourneau in 1994 then proceeded to spend 16 years in industry focusing on machine and civil design as well as project management. In 2010 he began his teaching career at his alma mater to share his experiences with engineering and technology students. He earned a masters in Engineering Project Management from Eastern Michigan University in 2014. He is currently a co-PI on the schools NSF-STEP retention grant. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Six Years of Freshman Retention Efforts: Where are We Now?AbstractThe First-Year Initiatives for Retention Enhancement (FIRE) project
professional development program that includes targeted lab-based research experience focused on computer science (CS) and engineering aligned with Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) and advanced lesson study • To build and maintain long-term collaborative partnerships between middle and high school teachers and the research community that positively impact student achievement and career paths. These programs have served middle and high school teachers and their students in urban settings. To date, we have served 70 middle and high school teachers and their 10,398 students (combined in seven years; 2010-2016). Accordingly, the programs have both broad-based anddeep impact on teachers and students.Impact focused assessment and
theirwork but also a broad entrepreneurial mindset with a clear understanding of the societalunderpinnings of engineering decision making and the need to address diversity [12-15].Additionally, the ways in which students can be engaged through the use of online educationalresources, and the corresponding use of online tools to assess student learning, have changed theways in which students can access educational opportunities as well as dramatically altered cost-of-delivery models of education [16].More broadly, data from industry suggests, and have been supported by recent Gallup surveys,that the attitudes, behaviors, and motivations (what one might call “mindsets”) of engineeringgraduates are increasingly important to their future careers
-STEM programs. Program Successes Weaknesses Insights for Future S- Element STEM Program GPA High GPA Difficult for students to Set minimum GPA at Requirement requirement made rebound if they performed 2.5 for Freshman students’ cognizant poorly during any retention and then 2.75 of the importance of particular semester, thereafter. academic especially early in their performance. academic careers (which is a particular problem at a
. Tressa Kay Mikel, University of California, BerkeleyAida Marie MoralesMiss Sanya SehgalDr. Melissa L. Whitson, University of New Haven Associate Professor of Psychology c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 A Three-Year Study of Adult Undergraduate Engineering StudentsAbstract Adult learners belong to a large group of individuals for whom lifelong learning is both adesire and a necessity and for whom career changes are or will be the norm. This topic is notexclusive to engineering, but impacts many STEM professionals. Adult learners also includethose who may have significant family responsibilities, medical issues, work obligations,returning veterans/active service military people, or
awareness related to success in biomedical engineering design problem solving?MethodsStudy participants were enrolled in a first year introductory biomedical engineering (BME)course that introduced the field through BME specialization introductory lectures, prospectiveBME career guest lectures, and team-based hands-on design challenges. This two unit courseconsists of one 50 minute lecture and a 3 hour discussion session focused on engineering designeach week of a 10-week quarter. There were 142 students enrolled in this introductory course.Study data collection occurred during two subsequent quarters, as illustrated in Figure 1. Allstudy participants were enrolled in the same lecture, however may have attended differentdiscussion sections
, J.C. 2005. “Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter?” Gender and Education, 17(4), pp. 369-386.[2] Suresh, R. 2006/2007. “The relationship between barrier courses and persistence in engineering.” Journal of College Student Retention, 8(2) pp. 215-39.[3] Lumsdaine, M. and Lumsdaine, E. 1995. “Thinking preferences of engineering students: Implications for curriculum restructuring.” Journal of Engineering Education, 84(2), pp. 193-204.[4] Smith, T.Y. 2000. “Science, mathematics, engineering and technology retention database.” Research News on Graduate Education, 2(2).[5] National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. 2011. Women, Minorities, and