Full-Time Staff Daytime 15 Fall 2016 Full-Time Faculty Daytime 15 Adjunct Faculty Evening 15The course content covers four topics: modeling of dynamic systems, analysis of dynamic systems,integrating mechatronic systems, and feedback control systems. A list of detailed learningobjectives for the overall course and individual modules are provided to students. The prerequisiteCircuits and Electronics course did not include a laboratory prior to Fall 2016. Therefore, inaddition to the planned learning objectives, Mechatronics serves as a first hands-on experiencewith electronics for many students. As an example, the overall course-wide
/students-and-young-professionals2/student-design/. Accessed January30, 2017. Appendix A DESIGN PROJECT ASSIGNMENTPROJECT CHOICESChoose one of the following 2 projects:1) PROJECT1 water treatment plant was hit with the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) by theDepartment of Environmental Protection (DEP) because they exceeded their Barium level intheir well water supply. Barium is a primary contaminant and must meet the new DEP limitsthat went from 4mg/l to 2mg/l. The well is a secondary water supply with springs being theprimary water source. Why is the Barium level elevated? What are the options to treat theelevated Barium level? What are the costs with each option?2) PROJECT2
capability analysis, measurement systemanalysis, specification and tolerances, and acceptance sampling plans. Students typically take thiscourse in the second year of their masters program. The course learning outcomes are (a) Defineconcepts in quality and quality management; (b) Apply statistical tools in analysis andapplication of Statistical Process Control; (c) Produce and employ control charts; (d) Explainsampling process; and (e) Design acceptance sampling procedures for quality control.The course work and activities typically include a term paper, a term project, homework, in classexercises and discussions, quizzes and two exams (midterm and final). During the study periodthe author added the library training and a factory visit to the class
introductory physics course-sequence. Additionally, there has been minimal physics education research (PER) on MLMs within the setting of smaller terminal bachelor’s degree engineering programs, as most PER research occurs at large research institutions. Our study’s goal is to test the efficacy of incorporating commercially available web-based MLM content into introductory physics courses at Wentworth Institute of Technology, a small program that offers terminal bachelors in engineering. The study will be separated into the following two stages: stage one will consist of two professors instructing calculus-based Engineering Physics I and II, both with and without MLMs from various providers. In the fall term, we plan to
and thinking through writing. Exploratory writing exercise involved atopical discussion of stormwater treatment process. A formal writing exercise was given in theform of a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) assignment which included a peer–review session prior to final grading. A reflective writing exercise was included to summarizelearning experiences through classroom and writing activities throughout the semester to identifyareas of strengths and weaknesses and accomplishments and pitfalls and areas/topics for futuredevelopment.Student learning experiences and the effectiveness of writing exercises were discussed. Thebenefits of writing exercises were evaluated through the ABET outcomes and a survey andevaluation of students
students to active concept based instructions and learning helps to establishrelevance with a student’s prior experience in a given field, enhances student learning, helps infacilitating an unparalleled understanding of content, and helps students to apply the knowledgein real life scenarios4. Active Learning by Projects and Activities Actions geared towards Addressing a Problem Skill Based Concept Identification Concepts & Ideas Plan In-Class Learning Activities Knowledge Identify Curriculum and Teaching
limited to these three surveys. When we began planning forour third year, we felt that we needed more data to better understand how participants were reacting to ourprogramming, especially when taking into account the significant changes we were proposing. More specif-ically, our prior survey framework was limiting our understanding of whether or not we were truly helpingparticipants improve their familiarity and preparedness to become competitive in the faculty job market. Inother words, we wondered if individual sessions were beneficial to participants in terms of enhancing theirpreparation of faculty materials and contributed to their overall familiarity.In this paper, we expand our program evaluation significantly in the third year by
from the outcomes assessment plan that he helped devise and implement as ABET Coordinator. Address: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad del Turabo, PO Box 3030, Gurabo, Puerto Rico, 00778. Tel. 787-743-7979 x 4182 E-mail: jcmorales@suagm.edu c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Language or problem-formulation difficulties? An FE Exam experiment in a Hispanic Setting Juan C. Morales, Ph.D., P.E. Universidad del TuraboAbstractThis paper describes and discusses the results of an experiment that was conducted by the authorin a course that trains mechanical engineering
technology in context and framing it to a larger understanding. This professor plans to provide a balance between these two opposing but realistic goals as the course continues to evolve.4.3 Anecdotal DataOther anecdotal data and observations are used to assess the effectiveness of this holistictransformation. Note that these are informal comparisons, since the transformation was rapid andincluded all transformational elements concurrently, without strictly controlled, measured,progressive steps.The professor’s perception is that learning has improved to the point where he is incorporatingmore differential content into the course, and the students continue to perform at a higher levelsince the transformation. The class learning environment
edge of wing fuel, passengers, cargo Wing Area, 18.6 m2 Span, s * c, chord A or SA for non-tapered wingsEstimating Aerodynamic LiftThe overall vehicle weight is supported by both hydrodynamic lift and aerodynamic lift. Theproportion of lift due to aerodynamic lift will increase with velocity. Students are introduced tothe basic lift equation: Flift or Lift Aero (LA in N or lbs.) = ½ ρ v2 Cl A where ρ = mass density ofair (sea level for this project), v = velocity, Cl = lift coefficient, and A = the plan area of thewing. For this project, using non-tapered wings, w * c = A, plan
assessment based on objectives for studentlearning, a final report, and a final presentation. EDP assignments, as mentioned in the previousparagraph, included: a problem statement, a list of criteria and constraints aligned to the problemstatement, an evaluation matrix, descriptions and drawings for three possible solutions, and anexplanation of why the chosen design was deemed the best. Reflection questions were intendedas a metacognitive activity for the teachers to prepare how to instruct the EDP to their students.The final report and presentation were designed to demonstrate the teachers’ understanding ofthe EDP and solar energy concepts and to assess their plans for using EDP in their class. Mastery grading: Course products were graded
. Scholarships were awarded to four cohorts with five students selected in 2011-2012 (Cohort1), seven students selected in 2012-2013 (Cohort 2), twelve students selected in 2013-2014 (Cohort3), and twelve students selected in 2014-2015 (Cohort 4). The scholarship was limited to foursemesters of financial support at an average $3,750 per semester with the exception of Cohort 1.Initially, the plan was have all scholars in each cohort begin the program in the fall semester. Asthe associates degree program was implemented at BRCC, approximately the same number ofBRCC students were on track to transfer to LSU fall and spring semester. Thus, the scholarshipswere awarded each semester.Cohort 1 (2011-2012)The first cohort of five students received the Pathway
allmodule activities. Other than being a mnemonic device to students, it will be used to receive andprovide input of activities. For example, after retrieving the lab test results, players will be askedto insert the measured data into their mobile device. This information, on its turn, can be used inany of the virtual environments or will be used in player interactions with their mobile device.Likewise, data from the virtual field test (CPT) will be communicated to the mobile and can beused to plan the physical lab tests, as to what tests need to be done and why. Game characters,such as local officials or representatives from the US government or the US Army Corps ofEngineers, will contact players by means of text messages, e-mails, and pre
class continues toperform better, space in courses at the upper-level of the curriculum are more likely to befilled with students who started a freshman and who are progressing in the curriculum.The freshman class at the school of engineering has significantly increased in numberswithin the past couple of years; the infrastructure and focus on essential services that canbetter serve the current undergraduate population at the school of engineering is of primeimportance.Students with Academic DifficultiesIt is important that students who are having academic difficulties with their coursework atpartner institutions have a plan of action towards their future in these programs both atthe community college (short term) and at school of engineering
bring the individual ideas together and create a concrete path to move forward. The teampersonally requested quotes for all the items they needed. This did require effectivecommunication between the team members and with the vendors prior to purchasing in order toprevent overlaps and confusion. As items were received, they were documented and verifiedbased on their estimated costs. Parts were also verified as they came in and any corrective ormachining process were planned and scheduled. Testing of certain processes such as PVCwelding was also performed as well.One of the initial challenges with this project was realizing and understanding the scope. Theconceptual design had been created, but the exact dimensions and properties of some of
instructors on what areas to focus on when planning forfuture offerings of the course.References[1] Guskey, T. R. (2005). Formative Classroom Assessment and Benjamin S. Bloom: Theory, Research and Implications. In the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.[2] Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., and Madaus, G. F. (1973). Learning for Mastery. National Laboratory for Higher Education.[3] Bloom, B. S., and Carroll, J. B. (1971). Mastery learning: Theory and Practice. Ed. James H. Block. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.[4] Keller, F. S., Sherman, J. G., and Bori, C. M. (1974). PSI, the Keller Plan Handbook: Essays on a Personalized System of Instruction. Menlo Park, Calif.: WA Benjamin.[5] Onipede, O
programs to families at all socioeconomic levels typically demands substantialfundraising. Given the considerable effort and resources required to plan and deliver high qualityprogramming, perhaps the most salient metrics of success from an institutional and donorperspective would be evidence that middle school programs attract more women into STEMmajors, benefiting higher education and society in general, or that programs provide direct valueto the institution in terms of recruitment.Based on the many social psychological factors that inhibit women from entering STEMdisciplines, recruitment strategies targeting women are critical to increasing diversity attechnological institutions or within schools of science or engineering at larger
students as is described below.The Triple Bottom Line LessonOnce the methodology was fully developed, the Sustainability Triangle and Index wereintegrated into a single lesson to introduce civil and environmental engineering (CEE) students atthe University of Wisconsin-Platteville to the concepts of sustainability and the triple bottom lineas a means of evaluating engineering design alternatives. By providing a framework forevaluating alternatives, students learn that sustainability is integral to the design process. Thelesson is scheduled within the first two weeks of a three credit Introduction to Infrastructurecourse which: • introduces civil infrastructure; social, political, historical, sustainability, and planning implications of
activities.Background of the PartnershipIntroduction of quality higher education resources from the western countries to China can betraced back to the early 20th Century. The purpose was to rapidly develop an effective model forChina’s higher education system to train talents that were desperately needed by the country. Inthe spirit of China’s reform and opening policy, the Chinese central government approved a 5-year strategic plan from the Ministry of Education in 2004 that emphasized the importance offurther opening the education system and encouraging international cooperation as one of thekey strategies of China’s educational development. One year earlier, the State Council passed theRegulations of People’s Republic of China on Chinese-Foreign
, themajority of the students believed that if they knew what the correct answer should be, they coulddraw the diagrams using the drawing tool (Fig. 9-g). It is not clear to the authors if the “difficulty”in object manipulation was associated with the fact that when students didn’t know the solution ofthe problem, they would just try random attempts using the drawing tool, and felt as if thedrawing itself was the frustrating part of the problem solution. Based on observation of studentsduring office hours, we noticed that students were spending a lot of time trying to place theobjects precisely on the canvas, even tough it was announced that the tolerances were very large.To remediate this, we plan to include more messages about tolerances in the
tools. It wasapparent that traditional teaching in a classroom was having limited results with overall passiveaudience which was partially engaged in the transfer of knowledge. The process of the coursemodification took significant planning effort along with lengthy restructuring of the material andcreating extensive supporting material that would assist students with actively engaging in thelearning process.The paper describes some of the modifications made to the course along with the resultsachieved over the four semesters that the course has been taught in the new format. The resultsindicate that modifications resulted in anticipated positive outcomes as students’ overall scoresimproved indicating better mastery of the material and ability
ABET briefings not to rely solely on surveys, exit interview data, tracking ofgraduates, etc. Many of our students go on to graduate schools, go to work for aerospacecompanies and rise to positions of great responsibility, work for government labs, industry, etc.,become MDs, lawyers, work in non-aerospace high tech companies, etc. None of this couldhappen without life-long learning. Professional success in today’s world provides strongevidence of the attainment of this SO, but there is nothing in current student work that provides agood way to measure this. Even a writing assignment that asks students to predict their futureeducational plans is merely another type of “survey”. We found no way to realistically measurethis student outcome
aclassroom: “weekly” (20%), “monthly” (15%), “5-10 times a year” (11%), “2-4 times a year”(10%), “once a year” (6%), and “never” (38%). The authors were surprised by how manyrespondents browsing the collection (and volunteering for a survey) reported that they had“never” taught curriculum from the collection in a classroom, which prompts the question: whatwere they doing on TeachEngineering? Many of them also reported that it was their first time onthe site, making it reasonable to guess that some hadn’t yet had the opportunity to teach thecurriculum in a classroom, but they might have had plans to do so in the future. Of those whohad taught curriculum from the site in a classroom, 94% anticipated that they would continuedoing so in the
researchercollaborated together to design scientific interview protocol and questions which attainedgood expert validity. In process of research, the researcher made some adjustments oninterview protocol and questions to improve the effectiveness. In addition, the researchercombined literature analysis and in-depth interview to improve the reliability. In order toevaluate the protocol, methods and strategies, and to clarify the interpretations and ideas, theresearcher had his advisor comment and review on the research plans, findings andconclusions as they developed. The interview protocol includes following questions: 1. External quality assurance is important at Purdue for what purposes or objectives? Why is it important for these things? 2
36 151 Strategic Plan 2015-2020 11 Codes of Ethics ASCE Code of Ethics 12 4 22 123 (COE) ASME Code of Ethics 13 2 18 51 National Society of Professional 2 19 97 Engineers (NSPE) Code of Ethics 14 Profession-wide ABET Criteria for Accrediting 31 22 103 Position Statements Engineering Programs 15 (Prof-wide Position) National
ecosystem are experiential in nature involving steps towardcommercialization or creating a startup (Duval-Couetil, Shartrand, & Reed, 2016). Theseactivities include the development of a business plan, consulting with practicing entrepreneurs,interviewing potential customers, delivering pitches, applying to grants, and prototyping aphysical product or application. What are not as common, however, are activities that focus oncultivating an entrepreneurial mindset (EM). A mindset can be defined as framework for makingpredications and judging the meanings of events in one’s world (Yeager & Dweck, 2012). Thistrend is changing, however, due to the increasing set of EM focused activities sponsored by theKERN Family Foundation. While the activities
Improving math skills, (STARS) in Engineering Program. Providing community- based support system10 A Comprehensive Plan with Emphasis on Improving math skills, yes Math Preparation to Improve Retention providing community-based and Graduation Rates in Engineering support system, application Fields. of classroom concepts in industry11 Engineering Learning Communities: Improving math skills, Relationships, Results, and Retention. Providing community- based support system
andphysical disabilities. These community based projects were added based upon student interestsand research indicating that women and minorities are likely more interested in projects with asocietal or humanitarian objectives. Additionally, while the Baja and Formula projects are a largeattractor for mechanical engineering students, the ECE students have little engagement in theprojects.As will be discussed in the findings section, a key element of this study is examining the facultyroles and student reactions to these two project types (competition and community-based). Asignificant challenge with the community-based projects is the need to source, plan, and managethe projects outside of the capstone semester. These elements will be discussed in
internship and study abroad opportunities.Mr. Mathew Verghese, Virginia TechNick Falls, Virginia Tech Nicholas Falls was born in Roanoke, Virginia on June 30, 1995. After graduating from James River High School, he attended Virginia Western Community College where he received an Associate’s degree in Engineering in 2015. Upon graduation from community college, he transferred to Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University where he studied Electrical Engineering with plans to graduate in the spring of 2018. Over the summers he worked as an intern at Gala Industries where he worked along side elec- tricians reading and troubleshooting schematics and wiring the equipment. He was also involved in an the LEWAS lab, an
an effective study environment (time and location), seeking helpfrom peers and teachers and engagement in planning and monitoring activities, to name a few5.Because SRL is so complex, there is not a single SRL approach or strategy that students can betaught that will be applicable in all situations. In fact, situation, or context, dependence is one ofthe areas in need of further research so we can better understand the contextual factors thatimpact engagement in SRL6. Research in SRL has already suggested that contextual factors suchas degree of instructor scaffolding7, pedagogical approach used in the classroom8, genderbalance9, learner’s interpersonal relationships as well as school policy or structure10, impactengagement in self-regulated