Paper ID #18047A Service Learning Approach to Developing a Kinect-based Showering Train-ing Game for Children Who Do Not TalkProf. Yashu Kang, Chung Yuan Christian University Dr. Ya-Shu Kang, Chung Yuan Christian University. Ya-Shu Kang is an Assistant Professor in Department of Special Education at Chung Yuan Christian University. Kang received her Ph.D. from the University of Oklahoma, and has been involved in special education for over 10 years. At CYCU, she teaches and conducts research in the area of learning disabilities, inclusive education, preschool special education, and educational technology for students with
) Chen of the Department of Civil Engineering and Construction Management at Geor- gia Southern UniversityDr. Yunfeng Chen, Georgia Southern University Dr. Yunfeng Chen is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering and Construction Management at Georgia Southern University with research focus on construction technology application, process management, and education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017STEM Education RedefinedIntroductionSTEM education is typically defined as a curriculum that covers the academic areas of Science,Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. In 2006, a congressional research service reportsuggested that there is a growing concern that the
approaches to using musictechnology to motivate interest in STEM fields, particularly engineering.SMT is a week-long, non-residential program where students are guided through severalactivities throughout the week, all centered around audio and music technology [4-7].Additionally, SMT seeks to maximize student interaction with the material they are exploring.Therefore, lecturing is minimized (most activities are limited to a 5 minute brief introduction to atopic before the students begin hands-on activity). Every student is loaned an iPad for use duringthe week, and most modules integrate our custom-developed app, AudioWorks (which we alsomake available for free via the App Store). This app, explained in detail in the next section, actsas a tool to
the high-tech and low tech applications. In addition to teaching courses such as energy systems, mechanics, mechatronics, and production, he investigates best ways to expand cutting edge technologies to the workforce.Dr. Nicola W. Sochacka, University of Georgia Dr. Nicola Sochacka is the associate director for the Engineering Education Transformations Institute (EETI) at the University of Georgia. Her research interests include STEAM (STEM + Art) education, empathy, diversity, and reflection.Kathryn Marie Youngblood, University of Georgia Kathryn Youngblood is an undergraduate researcher and environmental engineering student at the Uni- versity of Georgia. She has worked with CLUSTER to study a variety of
engineering problems. The objective of the project is to design and develop an IoTapplication to remote monitor the performance of a RepRap 3D printer including the printingprogress and the temperatures of the heated bed and hot end. Major tasks involved in the projectare: to inspect and upgrade the current 3D printer to avoid any possible compliance issuesbetween the 3D printer and the hardware components or software tools for the IoT application; toconnect the 3D printer to the Raspberry Pi microprocessor; and to design and develop the IoTapplication.The methods and algorithms of connecting a 3D printer to an IoT application is reported, and theIoT application interface and workflow will be presented in the results section. As a pilot study,this
with the STEP 1B Engineering Grant hadspecific objectives supporting these goals. They were: (1) develop and maintain an effectiveliaison between BRCC and LSU; (2) utilize scholars in a peer ambassador program facilitatingtransfer success; (3) establish a pre-transfer academic counseling program; (4) expand existingseminars to orient and integrate BRCC and other transfer students into LSU and (5) invite BRCCmath, science and engineering faculty to participate in ongoing Faculty Development.Activities of the program included outreach, professional development, advising, and developingan overall assessment tool. All scholars participated in outreach activities that consisted of Peer-to-Peer talks at BRCC each semester and Shadow Days at LSU for
mindset and hence through longitudinalstudies measure the potential impact of curriculum and co-curricular activities on changingmindset. This paper compares and contrasts two relatively new tools for assessment ofentrepreneurial mindset: (1) Entrepreneurial Mindset Profile (EMP), which has origins back to2010 at Eckerd College in St. Petersburg, Florida, and (2) Entrepreneurial Profile 10 Index(EP10), by Gallup with underpinnings in 2009. Both are web-based surveys.For this research, 70 undergraduate students majoring in math, science, or engineering completedboth instruments. Forty students were enrolled in an Introduction to Entrepreneurship course,with the remainder enrolled in an Introduction to Engineering Management course. Theinstruments
CUPP initiative, but also satisfied theirrequirements for a 3-credit Senior Capstone course, which is a mandatory requirement of theprogram. Their involvement with this collaborative project allowed the students to gainexperience with a practical, real-world engineering project and enabled them to use the skillsintroduced throughout their curriculum, as well as provide them with an opportunity to begin torefine their communication and project management skills. According to ABET (2017):“Baccalaureate degree programs must provide a capstone or integrating experience that developsstudent competencies in applying both technical and non-technical skills in solving problems”[4]. Furthermore, Dulaski (2013), has stated that similar senior capstone
thenature of the problems assigned, a stronger intuitive understanding of mechanical engineeringfundamentals irrespective of GPA, and an ability to abstract models to describe the real systems they wereanalyzing. When asked “What aspects of their education helped to nurture their creative problem-solvingskill?”, in truth, they had difficulty identifying anything. In the end, it was our belief that nurturingstudents to be creative problem solvers, capable of creating new ideas and validating their creations withmodels based upon engineering fundamentals was to be the goal of our course. In addition, a larger goalwas that this approach would also be integrated into the courses preceding our capstone modeling course.This realization has prompted us to
University develop their skills for thevarious elements of the design process throughout the curriculum, culminating in their seniordesign project I and II courses during their senior year.The program offers at least six core courses in which engineering design is included. Thesecourses are: Engineering Graphics, CAD/CAM, Manufacturing Automation, Simulation, QualityControl, and Manufacturing Design Implementation. These six major courses and some othercourses distributed throughout the curriculum include elements of design that adequately definean integrated design experience for the students in the program. During their senior year,students also may gain additional design experience in their chosen ENGR/MANE electivecourses such as Special Topics
among staff who have completed our engineering and science education research courses. 1IntroductionThe concept of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning has become a well established part ofeducational development in higher education. The implications of adopting the scholarshipof teaching and learning as an academic norm also increases the importance of understandingthe impacts this has on the daily life and thinking of higher education staff.Evaluations of educational quality, such as those undertaken by the Swedish Higher Educa-tion Authority, raise the importance of systematic quality assurance and quality enhancementfor university management. At Uppsala University this resulted in the introduction
, the overarching goal of his teaching is to impart the core content needed by the students, and to do so while encouraging inquisition and higher levels of thought. He has secured com- petitive funds to support his teaching efforts – from university, industry, and federal sources – and for his efforts has received departmental, college, and national teaching honors including the Farrall Young Edu- cator Award (2004) and the Massey-Ferguson Gold Medal Teaching Award (2016) given by the American Society of Agricultural Engineers. He has also been an invited participant in the National Academy of Engineering’s 2013 Frontiers in Engineering Education Conference. Raman chairs the ABE Engineering Curriculum Committee and
four iteration in 20 years, and given the USGBC’s goal of being on theforward edge of sustainability in construction, it is likely that our students will be utilizing anewer version from the one they learned. Furthermore, in the meantime, given the demands of amilitary career, it might be difficult for the former students to be able to maintain theircredentialing. This area represents an opportunity for further study.This study concludes that the content and format of the credentialing course needs to change. Itmust spend more time on the foundational concepts of integrating sustainability into design andless on simply obtaining specific credentials. To this end, the instructors added an applicationproject to the course where the students must
Systems Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. Dr. Allam’s interests are in spatial visual- ization, engineering design education, diffusion of evidence-based teaching practices, the use of learning management systems for large-sample educational research studies, curriculum development, and fulfill- ing the needs of an integrated, multi-disciplinary first-year engineering educational environment through the use of active and collaborative learning, real-world application and examples, problem-based and project-based learning, classroom interaction, and multiple representations of concepts. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Faculty Pre and Post Reflections
6% of STEM workers and Hispanics representing 7% ofSTEM workers [7].Traditional efforts to increase participation in STEM fields have been largely focused on improving themath and science curriculum through better recruitment and training of teachers with scholarships, loan-forgiveness, and higher pay. However, “not enough STEM graduates means not enough STEM teachers,regardless of incentives [8].” An alternative is to expose students to STEM fields early and induce them tochoose STEM careers. For example, 65% of scientists with advanced degrees developed their scienceinterest before middle school [9]. However, in underserved populations, it is not necessarily lack of theawareness of STEM fields but the socio-economic barriers that prevent
https://peer.asee.org/10826. 7. Goldberg, J.R. (2007). Capstone design courses: Producing industry-ready biomedical engineers. doi:10.2200/S00097ED1V01Y200709BME0158. Fosmire, M. (2012). Information literacy and engineering design: Developing an integrated conceptual model. International Federation of Library Association and Institutions, 38(1), 47-52. doi: 10.1177/03400352114350719. Tourino, G., & King, M. W. (2013). Engineering librarians as partners of faculty in teaching scholarly inquiry to undergraduate students through curriculum integration: The biotextiles product development course blog. 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, 1-9. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/19529.10. Denick, D
program curriculum consisting of day and nightclasses in electrical engineering and computer engineering. These programs are designed for theworking adult and are eleven weeks long. The curriculum program provides a flexible scheduleallowing students to successfully complete an ABET-accredited degree in either BSEE or BSCE.However, engineering courses for obtaining an MSEE and MSCE degree are only offered in theevening.The classes are usually 2-3 hours long meeting twice a week. In these face-to-face classrooms,the College of Engineering uses an active learning approach1-3 to encourage higher-levels ofthinking. Short 5-15 minute presentations followed by student-centered problem-solvingactivities replaced long lectures.To provide additional
andengineering. This entails a testing process with at least two demographics of this category, alongwith analysis of the resultant feedback for improvement of the model. For this paper, the Colosseum simulation project was tested with two different studentbodies: an undergraduate course and a graduate course, both on the history of ancientengineering [15]. The concept behind these two testing sessions was that it was to be used as ahomework assignment and an evaluation of the use of the program and others like it foreducational purposes, as well as integrating it into the course material proper. Because part of thecourse curriculum material focuses on the greenness and sustainability of ancient monumentsand construction processes, the Colosseum and
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test could compare their self-efficacy scores. (a) (b)Figure 3. (a) Histogram for pre-tutorial self-efficacy; (b) Histogram for post-tutorial self-efficacyIt is to be considered that the context of the delivery of these tutorials is based within a coursethat teaches advanced radio engineering topics, so it would be feasible to consider the potentialof the intervention for less-informed participants. Near the end of a semester, students in a classwill most likely feel more qualified to work on tasks based around the class curriculum than atthe beginning of the semester. These tutorials being developed would ideally have been appliedat an earlier point in the
approval of the degree byWashington’s Higher Education Coordinating Board (HEC Board)[1] and the Board of Regents ofthe University, a faculty committee was formed to lay the foundation for the EE degree anddevelop the goals, educational objectives, and desired student outcomes for the program.Of key concern to this committee, chaired by the author, was obtaining ABET accreditation assoon as possible1. Therefore, much of our planning was focused on creating a robust BSEEdegree from the outset. Particular attention was given to the Capstone Experience. According toABET, students in an accredited EE program must have a Capstone Experience: Students must be prepared for engineering practice through a curriculum culminating in a major
Scholars)According to an ACT study, student retention can be improved by integrating both academic andnon-academic factors, such as academic self-confidence, achievement, motivation, institutionalcommitment, and social support.39 In many instances and despite poor academic performance,students persist because they feel like they fit within the institution and that they are sociallyintegrated.40 Studies suggest that programs that explicitly include mentoring and support groupsimprove student involvement, motivation, and academic self-confidence and, in turn, increaseinstitutional commitment and engagement.41, 42 Inclusive, welcoming institutional environmentsand the connections students feel have been linked to persistence.43-45 Other research
potential current or future career choice.’Hulsey et al. (2006) have broken further down the second thrust above in terms of: 1. Integratingentrepreneurship within regular academic programs and curricula and, 2. Providing co-curricularand other activities and initiatives that support and develop the entrepreneurial interests ofstudents. Wilson et al. (2014) have coined the term ‘pracademic’ to highlight the importance ofthe integration of practical and academic components into entrepreneurship education.A number of studies and reports have focused on the key question of ‘What Does It Take ToBecome An ‘Entrepreneurial’ University or College?’ In their 2012 report, the EuropeanCommission proposed a list of seven (7) features that characterize
apply to early career engineers.Another study from the leadership literature presents helpful perspectives on the practice ofengineering leadership. Alvesson and Jonsson (2016) conducted an in-depth single case study ofa middle manager in a large, international manufacturing company, completing ten interviewsand eight observations of the manager in meetings [8]. Their findings challenge the dominantperceptions of leadership in the literature which are based on “assumptions of coherence,integration, context and direction” (p.13). Instead, the researchers found fragmentation betweenthe manager’s leadership ideas and practice, with noticeable differences between espousedleadership meanings and their actual use in practice [8]. This paper adds
Engineering Alliance (IEA), Washington Accord [1], European Commission,Bologna Process [2] , Accreditation Board of Engineering Technology (ABET) [3], Middle StatesCommission of Higher Education (MSCHE) [4] and National Commission of AcademicAccreditation and Assessment (NCAAA) [5] are based on an Outcome-Based Education (OBE)model and require higher education institutions and engineering programs to show studentachievement in terms of established learning outcomes. It is clearly stated in multiple researchpapers published by the National Institute of Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA) [25,26] andothers [6,28,29] that in many higher education institutions, actual Continual Quality Improvement(CQI) and accreditation efforts are minimally integrated
, J.S. (2014) Data First: building scientific reasoning in AP chemistry via the concept development approach, J. Chem Ed., http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ed500027gAlice Chow, Rice University Alice Chow is an Associate Director for Research and Grants for the Rice University Office of STEM Engagement. She conducts research in K-12 STEM education on topics such as impact of teacher profes- sional development programs on student achievement and attitudes.Dr. Carrie Obenland, Rice University Dr. Obenland is the Assistant Director for Outreach and Research at the Rice Office of STEM Engage- ment. She as her PhD in Chemistry from Rice University, as well as her Masters. Her graduate work was focused on chemical
Paper ID #18469Developing Strategies for Instruction and Assessment of Infographics for First-Year Technology StudentsAsefeh Kardgar, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Asefeh Kardgar is currently a master student in Computer Graphics Technology at Purdue polytechnic Institute, West Lafayette.Prof. Nathan Mentzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Nathan Mentzer is an assistant professor in the College of Technology with a joint appointment in the College of Education at Purdue University. Hired as a part of the strategic P12 STEM initiative, he prepares Engineering/Technology candidates for teacher
comparative judgment, integrated STEM learning, Technology & Engineering Design learning, and self-directed learning. I have taught at the middle-school, high school, and collegiate levels and am dedicated to strengthening Technology & Engineering Education.Mr. Andrew Jackson, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Andrew Jackson is currently pursuing a PhD in Technology through Purdue’s Polytechnic Institute, with an emphasis on Engineering and Technology Teacher Education. His research interests are engineering self-efficacy, motivation, and decision making. Andrew is the recipient of a 2015 Ross Fellowship from Purdue University and has been recognized as a 21st Century Fellow by the International Technology and
Technology. At Rose-Hulman, he co-created the Integrated, First-Year Curriculum in Science, Engineering and Mathematics, which was recognized in 1997 with a Hesburgh Award Certificate of Excellence. He served as Project Director a Na- tional Science Foundation (NSF) Engineering Education Coalition in which six institutions systematically renewed, assessed, and institutionalized innovative undergraduate engineering curricula. He has authored over 70 papers and offered over 30 workshops on faculty development, curricular change processes, cur- riculum redesign, and assessment. He has served as a program co-chair for three Frontiers in Education Conferences and the general chair for the 2009 conference. Prof. Froyd is a
computer science and engineering programs use Python as anintroduction to programing for similar reasons [6,8]. MATLAB was introduced next in the sequence of programming languages. The primary reasonto include it was because of the professional schools’ desire to include it in the tool set of all engineeringstudents. Also, its mathematical capabilities make it an excellent choice for future engineering andscientific modeling. Like Python, MATLAB’s interpretive environment makes it easy to experiment withcoding scripts. The integrated development environment has a similar interface to other programmingenvironments, or analysis tools (e.g. SPICE, ANSYS) students my need to learn for other courses or astools they may use in industry
Examiner, Setterfield balanced building code requirements with owner and contractor concerns. Setterfield teaches Autodesk Revit and its integration into analysis software, including Navisworks. Setterfield spearheaded a six-discipline IPD capstone resulting in student work that has been featured at various venues, including AU, the American Society for Engineering Educators and the League for Innovation in the Community College.Chad R. Bridgman, Sinclair Community College Chad currently serves as an Internship Coordinator for the Science, Mathematics, & Engineering Division at Sinclair Community College. Prior to managing the internship program he served as Aca- demic/Career Coach for Sinclair on a Department