specifically, responses from Question 2 of the firstand second activities were qualitatively evaluated using the rubric presented in Table 4. Thisparticular question, which was repeated in both activities, prompts the students with “Whatinformation do you think you need to know to answer the driving question? List all of the factorsand/or variables that are needed and identify which ones are the most important. For eachfactor/variable listed, offer a rationale for why it is needed. For example, through whatmechanism/s does it affect strength enhancement?” The rubric was designed to gain an overviewof the general state of student understanding of nanomaterials at the nanoscale and theirrelevance in the context of cement mortar. Scores of Poor, Good
. Science Education, 78:527–554, 1994. [3] B. Chen, M. West, and C. Zilles. Do performance trends suggest wide-spread collaborative cheating on asynchronous exams? In Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, 2017. doi: 10.1145/3051457.3051465. [4] J. A. Kulik and C.-L. C. Kulik. Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58:79–97, 1988. [5] K. A. Lack. Current status of research on online learning in postsecondary education. Ithaka S+R, 2013. [6] McGraw-Hill. McGraw-Hill Connect. URL http://connect.mheducation.com/. [7] H. Pashler, N. J. Cepeda, J. T. Wixted, and D. Rohrer. When does feedback facilitate learning of words? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning
be more directly comparable with Senior Exit Survey responses and FE Exam scores. 3. Expand course-based Embedded Indicator results to include sample standard deviation allowing analysis of sample variance and evaluation of standards with regard to acceptable lower distribution limits for student performance, rather than merely a comparison of a student average.References 1. Little, D. L., Quardokus Fisher, K., Brown, S. A., Koretsky, M., Bouwma-Gearhart, J., “Measuring Student Perceptions of Engineering Classroom Activities and the Use of Such Measures by STEM Faculty: The Development of the Student Class Activity and Engagement Instrument,” Proceedings of the 122nd American Society for Engineering
-study Scholar. She served as chair of S-STEP from 2013-2015 and is a current Co-PI of two National Science Foundation (NSF) funded grants: Designing Teaching: Scaling up the SIMPLE Design Framework for Interactive Teaching Development and a research initiation grant: Student-directed differ- entiated learning in college-level engineering education. Her research centers on facilitating and studying her role in faculty development self-study collaboratives. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Applying Conjecture Mapping as a Design-Based Research Method to Examine the Design and Implementation of a Teaching Development Project for
impacting them and their students (if they are, in fact, teaching inclassrooms).Just over half (51%) of the respondents indicated that they were K-12 teachers (almost one-quarter of whom had been teaching for at least 20 years), 6% indicated that they were “K-12educator[s] in an informal learning setting,” 3% “engineer[s] engaged in K-12 outreach,” and 2%“community member[s] engaged in K-12 outreach.” Another 38% of respondents identified withan “other” category, which included students, homeschool teachers, university faculty,community college instructors, as well as a self-described curriculum developer, a scienceinstructional coach, and a teacher’s aide.The users varied in how often they reported teaching TeachEngineering curriculum in
/218525261154.Andrade, H. L., Wang, X., Du, Y., & Akawi, R. L. 2009. "Rubric-referenced self-assessment and self-efficacy for writing." The Journal of Educational Research 102 (4): 287-302.Elawar, M. C., & Corno, L. 1985. "A factorial experiment in teachers’ written feedback on student homework: changing teacher behavior a little rather than a lot." Journal of Educational Psychology 77: 162–173.Griffin, J., & Minter, D. 2013. "The rise of the online writing classroom: Reflecting on the material conditions of college composition teaching." College Composition and Communication 140-161.Harvey, R., Johnson, F. S., Newell, H. L., Dahm, K., Marchese, A. J., Ramachandran, R. P., ... & Von
. Pinnell, M., et al. Can service-learning in K-12 math and science classes affect a student’s perception of engineering and their career interests. in 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. 2008. IEEE.25. Furco, A., Advancing Service-Learning at Research Universities. New Directions for Higher Education, 2001. 2001(114): p. 67-78.26. Conway, J.M., E.L. Amel, and D.P. Gerwien, Teaching and learning in the social context: A meta-analysis of service learning's effects on academic, personal, social, and citizenship outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 2009. 36(4): p. 233-245.27. Holland, D., et al., Identity and agency in cultural worlds. 1998, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ Press.28. Wortham, S., From good
studentsprovides mutual benefits, particularly improved understanding of stakeholder requirements forthe engineering students and the realism of working with a product development team for theadvertising students. Achievement of certain student outcomes targeted in engineeringaccreditation criteria is an added benefit.AcknowledgementsThis material is based in part upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant Number 1159626. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References Cited[1] Don Dekker, Stephen Sundarrao, Rajiv Dubey, 2007, “Capstone Design and theRehabilitation Engineering Program
further refined the compassionate design framework itself which is the subjectof a journal paper that is currently under review.References[1] Kirkpatrick, A. T., Danielson, S., Warrington, R. O., Smith, R. N., Wepfer, W. J., & Perry, T. (2011). VISION 2030 Creating the Future of Mechanical Engineering Education. In Proceedings for the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education Conference, June 26-29, Vancouver, British Columbia.[2] Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational technology research and development, 48(4), 63-85.[3] Shuman, L. J., Besterfield-Sacre, M., & McGourty, J. (2005). The ABET "Professional Skills" - Cant They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed
–624 (2012).3. Tursz, T., et al; Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 8, 177–183 (2011).4. Disease, Committee on A Framework for Developing a New Taxonomy of Disease, Board of Life Sciences, Division of Earth and Life Sciences, N. R. C. of E. N. A. Toward Precision Medicine: Building a Knowledge Network for Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease. Toward Precision Medicine: Building a Knowledge Network for Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease (2011). doi:10.17226/132845. Chivers, T. Genomics: the revolution that’s transforming medicine. The Telegraph6. Jordan, T. C. et al.; mBio 5, (2014).7. Daack-Hirsch, S. et al. Integrating Genetics and Genomics into Nursing Curricula. Nurs. Clin. North Am
conclusion of the course. Interviews were semi-structuredwith questions focused on students sharing the experience of intercultural growth. Students wereasked to recount and interpret specific experiences of intercultural growth. Phenomenologicalhermeneutic analysis is underway with discussion to be provided at a future date.The students’ responses on the pre-trip survey indicate not only a strong desire to learn aboutdifferent cultures, but also an awareness of a lack of intercultural competence in their lives. Forexample, one student states, “I hope that this experience continues to expand my horizons andhelp[s] me develop a better worldview.” Another student states, “I like to think that I amproficient at nonverbal communication, but I now
, 2016.[4] D. Doorn, S. Janssen and M. O'Brien, "Student Attitudes and Approaches to Online Homework," International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 4, no. 1, 2010.[5] R. L. Bangert-Drowns, C.-L. C. Kulik, J. A. Kulik and M. Morgan, "The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-like Events," Review of Educational Research, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 213-238, 1991.[6] D. M. Nguyen, Y.-C. Hsieh and G. D. Allen, "The Impact of Web-based Assessment and Practice on Students' Mathematics Learning Attitudes," Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 251-279, 2006.[7] J. P. Carpenter and B. D. Camp, "Using a Web-based Homework System to Improve Accountability and Mastery in
Engineering from the University of Illinois in Urbana- Champaign.Dr. Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Robin S. Adams is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and holds a PhD in Education, an MS in Materials Science and Engineering, and a BS in Mechanical Engineering. She researches cross-disciplinarity ways of thinking, acting and being; design learning; and engineering education transformation.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) enay Purzer is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education. She is the recipient of a 2012 NSF CAREER award, which examines how engineering students
integrated engineering curriculum ongraduation rates and student satisfaction: A longitudinal study," Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 93, p. 23, 2004.[2] S. S. Courter, S. B. Millar, and L. Lyons, "From the students' point of view: Experiences in afreshman engineering design course," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 87, pp. 283-288,1998.[3] D. W. Knight, L. E. Carlson, and J. F. Sullivan, "Staying in engineering: Impact of a hands-on, team-based, first-year projects course on student retention," Proceedings of the 2003American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, vol. 8, p. 1,2003.[4] Cindy P. Veenstra, Eric L. Dey, and Gary D. Herrin. A model for freshman engineeringretention. Advances in Engineering
also slow the process ofdiscovering groundbreaking research due to prioritizing and giving a huge amount of time intraining and tutoring, instead of students already have developed and gained experience on thosepractical skills. The vision is to incorporate a set of guidelines that can be taken into considerationin order to ease the transition from an inexperienced student into a high-end proficient student thatwould not need huge time investment on teaching. In addition, an infrastructure model will beshown with capabilities to scale up/expand and adapt to each college needs without restructuringeverything all over again.INTRODUCTION:The earliest 3D printing technology was developed in the late 1980’s and was referred to as rapidprototyping
projectchanges, but also to raise their level of professional skills in expecting, coping with, accepting, managing,and even embracing uncertainty as preparation for their professional careers. These are skills andperspectives that we can also embody as faculty, to serve as examples and role models to our students.References:[1] Dutson, AJ, Todd, RH, Magleby, SP, & Sorensen, CD, “A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 17 (1997) pp 17-28.[2] Furnham, A & Ribchester, T. “Tolerance of Ambiguity: A review of the Concept, Its Measurement, and Applications”, Current Psychology, Vol. 14, No. 3 (1995) pp 179-199.[3] Mohammed, S, Okudan, G, &
recommend something to you but you have to do everything you want, you have to choose what you want to do.’ He always says this to me. I didn’t like this actually because this is like being responsible...He told me that if he train me like this, this is better for my future...if I do this decision[s] on my own.”The guidance that Trisha’s advisor provided in research and the program allowed her toself-manage. Trisha’s interview indicated that her advisor offered a guided approach that did notinfringe, but rather pushed Trisha to be autonomous throughout her graduate experience. We seeclear evidence of this in her description of her advisor’s statements of choice within her research,“you have to choose what you want to do
in key concepts is not affected by differentinstructors and offered class times. Through engineering a board game students’improvement in innovation, prototyping, and design is strongly supported. Thisunique pedagogy is an effective measure for teaching and learning that can at anygrade level truly help students prepare for their senior design.Appendix 1Figure 8: A comparison of a board game and medical device. The left columnuses an example of the process a board game has to address before getting tomarket. The right column shows the process a medical device ,specifically a bloodglucose meter, needs to consider before market.References1. Malkoc A, Krause S, Ankeny CJ. Value of Student Resources in Materials
intensive, immersive 3-weekinternational program, ENGR 290: Engineering in a Global and Societal Context,4 forundergraduate engineering students. As opposed to many short-term study abroad courses thatreturn to the same sites on a regular basis, ENGR 290 addresses a consistent set of course outcomesin a manner that may be adapted to a variety of course themes and locales. The program has beendelivered as shown in Table 1.Table 1: ENGR 290 course locations, subtitles/themes. Year Location(s) Subtitle/Theme 2004 United Kingdom Transportation & Environment 2006 United Kingdom Transportation & Environment 2007 Argentina Water Resources
type of discussion and the other activity to the other discussion tool. While in the Piazzaactivity, they engaged in a forum-based discussion and critiqued each others answers on Piazzafor the next 48 hours, the CONSIDER discussion phase was organized as two 24-hour rounds,where students engaged in a rounds-based discussion and posted their responses anonymously asdescribed in Section 2. Figure 3 shows an example discussion in CONSIDER. The student whosealias is S2 disagrees with S1’s initial post (indicated by the red background for that post) and pro-vides explanation for why she disagrees with S1 in the text box at the bottom of the screenshot. InPhase-3 for both conditions, students were asked to submit their final answers to the same ques
by NSF, Air Force and DoD. She have several publications regarding to the research and educational projects.Dr. James D Kiper, Miami University James Kiper is Chair and Professor of the Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering at Miami University. He teaches a variety of courses across the CS and SE curricula. His research is in the areas of software testing, software risk assessment, design rationale, and computer science and software engineering teaching and learning.Dr. Gursimran Singh Walia, North Dakota State University Gursimran S. Walia is an associate professor of Computer Science at North Dakota State University. His main research interests include empirical software engineering, software
Learning Framework for Design and Development of Environmental Data Acquisition System Enhances Student Learning in Undergraduate Engineering Courses,” 2015 ASEE Conf. Proceedings, Seattle, WA, June 14-17, 2015, Paper ID 11520 4. Kolb, D. A., Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1984. 5. Harb, J. N., Durrant, S. O., and Terry, R. E., ”Use of the Kolb Learning Cycle and the 4MAT System in Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 82, April 1993, pp. 70-77. 6. Harb, J. N., Terry, R. E., Hurt, P. K., and Williamson, K. J., Teaching Through The Cycle: Application of Learning Style Theory to Engineering
an ambitiousproject for three students in an eight-month time frame, but nevertheless, the students were ablefor build an attractive, cost-effective system to perform automated part compliancemeasurements, potentially contributing to improved productivity.Table 1: Project Evaluation Criteria Score : 0 (unsatisfactory) to 5 (excellent) [range] average Demonstrates ability to apply knowledge of their discipline(s) [3.2-4.8] 4.6 Demonstrates mastery of the techniques and skills of the discipline
goal to theequipment available, a results section, because we have taught results on the worksheet project,should be routine, and a discussion section should provide benchmarks to which the results arecompared for validation purposes.As a final, open-ended project, we ask students to propose an investigation of their own.Following lectures on project design, identifying benchmarks and preparing proposals, we gavethem this task: Constrained by the equipment that we can provide and the place(s) where datacan be taken, the students are to propose a data collection project of their own, for bonus points.Under a 2-week time limit, the student teams will propose in a homework submission of 2 pages,a data collection project of their choosing. They
unmanned systems both air and ground. His team deployed a bomb finding robot named the LynchBot to Iraq late in 2004 and then again in 2006 deployed about a dozen more improved LynchBots to Iraq. His team also assisted in the deployment of 84 TACMAV systems in 2005. Around that time he volunteered as a science advisor and worked at the Rapid Equipping Force during the summer of 2005 where he was exposed to a number of unmanned systems technologies. His initial group composed of about 6 S&T grew to nearly 30 between 2003 and 2010 as he transitioned from a Branch head to an acting Division Chief. In 2010-2012 he again was selected to teach Mathematics at the United States Military Academy West Point. Upon returning
. Seattle, WA; 2012.13. Morris MH, Avila RA, Allen J. Individualism and the modern corporation: Implications for innovation and entrepreneurship. J Manage. 1993;19(3):595-612. doi:10.1016/0149-2063(93)90006-9.14. Kirton M. Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. J Appl Psychol. 1976;61(5):622-629. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.61.5.622.15. Lozano F, Sabicer A. Creativity and Innovation: Building Ecosystems to Support Risk Taking, Resiliency, and Collaboration. Lib Educ. 2016;102(2).16. Ferguson D, Ohland M. What is Engineering Innovativeness? Eng K-12 Educ. 2009;28(January):1-35.17. Edmonds EA, Weakley A, Candy L, Fell M, Knott R, Pauletto S. The Studio as Laboratory: Combining Creative Practice and Digital
literature, PDI deviates from current collaborativelearning approaches in one notable way: the authority in the classroom shifts from the facultymember(s) to Student Instructors (SI). These Student Instructors are students that previouslycompleted the course and returned to take on the responsibility for the design and delivery oflearning experiences in the classroom. Faculty, therefore, assume a coaching role with the SIsand no longer act as the source of knowledge, educational material, and content delivery for thecourse.This research paper delves into the impact that this learning experience has on studentmotivation. Using a survey developed based on the MUSIC Model of Academic MotivationInventory®, the authors asked students to report their
Engineering Education, Vol. 105, No. 4, October 2016, 630-654[9] Loftus, M. U.S. New and World Report Best Colleges 2014, U.S. News & World Report L.P., Washington D.C.,2013, 25 – 28[10] Bathal, R. “Retrospective perceptions and views of engineering students about physics and engineeringpracticals”, European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 36, No.4, 2011, 403-411[11] Nelsen, M.S. and Traub, S. “Clinical Skills Training of U.S. Medical Students” Academic Medicine, Vol. 68,No. 12, 1993, 926-928[12] Rothenberger, J., Jafari, S., Morteza, S., Schnabel, K.P., Tschumi, C. “Evaluation of Medical Students’Attitudes and Performance of Basic Surgery Skills in a Training Program Using Fresh Human skin, Excised DuringBody Contouring Surgeries” Journal
hybrid power systems and microgrids. The topics covered include the needs andbenefits of distributed generation, wind and solar energy potential assessment, models of energystorage devices, power electronic interfacing, life cycle assessment and cost analysis, and gridintegration issues. The benefit of such broad coverage is to give the students a comprehensiveview of the various RES components. Each student picks one area to explore further by studyingand presenting one or two research paper(s) to the class as well as doing an end-of-term projectdeveloping a written report and presenting the results of their work to the entire class.The objective of this course is to present and introduce the students to various renewable energytopologies and
] Freeman, S., S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, M. Wenderoth. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. PNAS 2014 111 (23), 8410-8415, 2014.[2] Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93:223–231, 2004.[3] Knight J.K., Wood, W.B. Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biology Education, 4(4), 298-310, 2005.[4] Michael J. Where's the evidence that active learning works? Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4), 159-67, 2006.[5] McConnell, J.. Active learning and its use in computer science. In