thinking needs further attention.2The complexity in defining and understanding critical thinking is one of the major challenges forengineering educators and students.25-27 Hicks, Bumbaco, and Douglas argued that exploration ofinterconnection between different philosophical concepts, in particular critical thinking,reflective practice, and adaptive expertise, may help educators to better understand and applyeach concept.28 Yet, some scholars critique the traditional viewpoints on critical thinking. Clarisand Riley identified four major themes that engineers generally have given too little attention, orno attention at all: power/knowledge relationships, transgressive validity, reflection andreflexivity, and praxis and relationality.29In this paper
module. The students are required to write a short reflection covering thefollowing three questions: What are the main points?, How is the material useful to you?, Whatmore information do you think should be included?.LaboratoryThe three-hour laboratory each week developes a diversity of hands-on skills covering the basicsof each discipline and associates the lecture and laboratory exercises toward the guided designproject, a physical prototype of a medical research device. Laboratory topics were developedthrough interactions with and input from our student advisory committee (BSAC), studentsurveys, industry including co-op and employer surveys and the external advisory board. Theskills that were utilized most frequently by students in their
" mentoring which focused developing theresearch skills of inexperienced undergraduate researchers, whereas the other five provided"supervisory" mentoring continued to concentrate on obtaining technical (research) results fromundergraduate researchers.This paper focuses on the first implementation of a new mentor workshop designed to includedesirable training practices from previous programs, but also to incorporate significant elementsof trainee self-reflection and small-group sharing, as well as practice in communicating thebroader context and motivation of research. The workshop was designed and delivered incollaboration with higher-education science-communication and professional-developmentspecialists based at Museum of Science Boston was
and effort to high priorityactivities that require both immediate and sustained, long-term attention. Another goal of thistime management framework is supporting one’s well-being, which can often be neglected. ThePRIDE framework for time management consists of five components: Priorities, Reflection,Implementation, Deadlines, and Emotions. These five components are considered when makingdecisions about individual tasks and setting plans for each day, week, or semester, or for acomplex project.The audience of this paper includes new faculty, faculty at all experience levels who are lookingto tune-up their time management practices, and faculty who have assumed additionaladministrative roles.Introduction and BackgroundTime management is as
deepermetacognitive skills through guided reflections. The University Libraries staff, as well as guestlecturers from public health and the humanities, are providing resources to bolster students’research and discovery skills, and the Writing Center on campus has pledged technicalcommunication and presentation support. Figure 3 serves as a visual display of the course andlearning objectives and elements. Each student group (typically four or five members) is alsoassigned a faculty mentor, who will facilitate relationships with partner agencies and provideinsight into the possible ramifications of proposed solutions. By committing their time andenergy to an outside organization, they will define their own knowledge gaps and opportunitiesfor advanced
used as the overarching tie in the leadership “S-triangle”pedagogy, which is illustrated in Figure 1. This approach links understanding of self, style, andsituation through hands-on application of leadership experience and discussions withPaper 18207 Page 2experienced leaders, as well as exploration of focused activities to help students reflect onleadership roles and characteristics.This work is the third evolution of an assessable “hands-on” capstone project for the semester-long leadership development course. The original effort was added to the curricula as a separateand late-in-class activity to reinforce learning through application. [5] This effort was
Paper ID #18355Technological and Engineering Literacy Classes from different perspectives:A pilot studyDr. Mani Mina, Iowa State University Mani Mina is with the department of Industrial Design and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Iowa State University. He has been working on better understanding of students’ learning and aspects of tech- nological and engineering philosophy and literacy. In particular how such literacy and competency are reflected in curricular and student activities. His interests also include Design and Engineering, the human side of engineering, new ways of teaching engineering in particular
anengineering degree and write a reflective comprehensive report at the end of the course.Previously published results reported a positive impact on first-year engineering studentretention and performance after the first year of implementation of the DYP program. The resultsof the four-year longitudinal study confirm an increase in overall GPA and persistence for thefirst-year, but more remarkably it shows that the DYP program has a long term sustainable effecton student success. Results show statistically significant differences in GPA and persistence ratesbetween the DYP cohort and control cohort for all years. The DYP cohort showed higher overallGPAs: +0.53 year one, +0.33 year two, +0.31 year three and +0.26 year four (p<0.001, exceptfor year
, being two faculty from the College of Liberal Arts (Interior Design program), onefaculty from the College of Agriculture (Landscape Architecture program), and three from thePurdue Polytechnic Institute (two faculty from Construction Management Technology, and onefrom Mechanical Engineering Technology). The authors´ academic ranks also vary, includingfour assistant professors, one associate professor, and one full professor.The methodology for this study includes collecting individual reflections from the facultyinvolved. Faculty members were provided with twelve guiding questions to help them focus ontheir expectations about this collaborative process and experience during the early planningprocess. All faculty members involved in the DCI
is a doctoral student at Texas A&M University. Her research interests are in meta- analysis, Bayesian methods, and latent variable modeling.Dr. Debra A. Fowler, Texas A&M University Dr. Debra Fowler serves as the Director of the Center for Teaching Excellence at Texas A&M University. Following 16 years working in industry she completed a Ph.D. is in Interdisciplinary Engineering with a specific focus on engineering education from Texas A&M University. Her research areas of focus are faculty perspectives and growth through curriculum design and redesign, interdisciplinary teaching and learning, reflective eportfolios and professional development of graduate students related to teaching.Dr. Raymundo
approach innovation. She serves on the editorial boards of Science Education and the Journal of Pre-College Engineering Educa- tion (JPEER). She received a B.S.E with distinction in Engineering in 2009 and a B.S. degree in Physics Education in 1999. Her M.A. and Ph.D. degrees are in Science Education from Arizona State University earned in 2002 and 2008, respectively. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 WIP: Assessing Middle School Students’ Changing Conceptions of DesignAbstractDesign is a complex, ambiguous, and iterative process. Expert designers place extra emphasis onparticular design activities, such as framing problems, practicing idea fluency and reflecting ontheir design process
engineering course is feasible without wholesale rethinking of the content.Hopefully, this paper will encourage statics instructors, and engineering instructors in general, toconsider taking steps to balance the EPS approach with acknowledgement of the human andsocial context in which engineering work takes place.MethodI identified example problems based on real-world situations that illustrate core technical ideaswithin the Statics curriculum. I then elaborated the problem description to place the situation in ahuman and social context. While keeping the technical questions basically unchanged, I added“Reflect” questions at the end of the problem.These questions require the student to move beyond the numbers, think about the relationshipbetween the
ofdynamic fields without some form of scaffolding to aid them, while others prefer to learnkinesthetically by doing hands-on practical examples. A lab was designed to enable students tovisualize a mathematical vector field in real-time as well as post-processing (replay the event) foranalysis and reflection. The combination of hands-on (kinesthetic), documentation (read/write),collaborative (auditory discussion), and visual results in a single lab is intended to benefitstudents with different learning styles. This serves to reinforce student understanding of themathematics of vector fields in electromagnetics.The EM Fields course is 4 credit hours and generally held in an electrical and computerengineering teaching lab. Students are grouped into
Review’ where they answer questions to assess theircurrent skill level and motivations. Next, students are presented with “Core Content,” a collection of resourcesfrom multiple disciplines. The third step is a “Knowledge Check” of close-ended and open-ended questions withfeedback given from a remote grader. In the fourth step, students are presented with an “Application” task, inwhich they are prompted to take the knowledge they have learned and apply it to a given design challenge.Students must meet with a coach to present their “Application” task outcomes and receive real-time feedback.Finally, the “Reflection” serves as the final part of the block when students ruminate on what they have learnedand consider how they will apply their newly
, David K. Probst Department of Physics and Engineering Physics Southeast Missouri State University Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 AbstractMany concepts in physics and engineering courses cannot be understood easily. Althoughpowerful computers with advanced software can generate fancy animations, students still cannotgrasp these concepts without spending time reflecting on them. In the past, homework was thetool used by instructors to challenge students and enforce their learning. Unfortunately, nowmany students can bypass this challenge and directly go to the solution manual for answers,which is widely available from the
Demanding Organized Engaging Approachable Patient Exciting Interested Motivating Prepared Respectful Energetic Understanding Fun PersonableImpact of Gender in ClassroomGenerally, gender is perceived as a negative for women in the classroom as it pertains tostudents’ perceptions of instructor effectiveness, as reflected in student evaluations. Forinstance, MacNell et al. (2014) found that students rated an instructor with a male identity higherthan female instructor possessing a female identity for online courses regardless of theinstructor’s actual gender. When female
situated learning perspective has been deemed to offera theoretical rationale for ‘inquiry-based’ and ‘problem solving’ approaches to science teachingand learning, where scaffolding and other forms of social support serve a prominent role in students’learning process.26 A model of instruction employing situated learning theory has been proposedand proven to yield a practical framework for classroom practice.25,27 Ref. 25 suggested that thekey components of this model include: (1) cognitive apprenticeship and coaching; (2)opportunities for multiple practices; (3) collaboration; (4) reflection; and (5) technology. Cognitiveapprenticeship methods allow students to enculturate into authentic practices through socialinteraction. Cognitive
appears to involve thecognitive, affective, social, and psychomotor domains of learning, which has been proposed asproviding an effective way to improve ethical reasoning. For assessment of ESI learning, anaverage of two methods were used per course with a maximum of 8 methods reported; 10% didnot assess ESI knowledge. The most commonly used assessment methods were: group-basedwritten assignments (47%), individual reflections (33%), and individual homework assignmentsgraded with a rubric (31%). Instructor satisfaction with the ability to assess the outcomes ofsocietal context and ethics instruction was weakly correlated with the number of assessmentmethods used (correl. coeff. 0.25). Among all survey respondents 62% believed thatundergraduate
module explains a number of basicconcepts related to the design problem. Students are asked to develop solutions to real-worlddesign problems to explore the specialization areas within the discipline, practice their problem-solving skills on real, sometimes "messy" problems, grow their engineering intuition and learn todistinguish between realistic and improbable solutions. Students will compile a learningportfolio throughout the semester documenting their design solutions for each module, as well asself-reflections on their initial choice of specialization and the impact modules had on theirchoice of specialization (either confirming their initial choice or providing evidence why analternative may be a better fit).The intended advantages of
. Describe some of the risks and opportunities of working abroad.10. Understand the ramifications of engineering in an emerging economic power.Instructional MethodsTo achieve the educational outcomes, a series of lectures, site visits and guest speakers arearranged using the identified country specific issues as the underlying themes. For example, the2011 version of the course planned the activities in China so that students would have first-handexperiences associated with the learning goals mentioned above. These activities includedengineering site visits, presentations and discussions led by the hosts, students’ reflections in groupdiscussions and students’ individual journaling. The class visited four types of sites: 1. Engineering sites such
an employment agreementbetween pipe fitters and the city’s engineering department. Each team learns how toprepare for the negotiation by exploring each other’s needs, interests, and positions.Then, the students negotiate and experience the challenges of reaching an agreement thatsatisfies both parties. Our assessment materials include the outcomes of the negotiationsthemselves (whether teams reached an agreement and whether they met their ownrequirements) as well as student reflective essays on the experience and what theylearned. We present this course module as a case study that can be adapted in differentclassrooms. Introduction and statement of the problemIn 1970, Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI) created a unique and innovative
structured reflective practices throughout the engineering curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Work in Progress: An Interdisciplinary Course Designed to Assist First YearStudents in Planning and Preparing for Success in the NAE Grand ChallengeScholars ProgramAbstractThis Work in Progress paper describes an interdisciplinary course for first year engineeringstudents focused on exploring the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Grand Challenges,and recognizing societal issues that influence engineering solutions to those challenges. Thiscourse is offered as a part of the NAE Grand Challenge Scholars Program (GCSP) at ArizonaState University (ASU) to help students develop a personal plan for
another as well as relate to how their discipline is practiced [2]. Students who are not able todevelop an alignment in a given discipline in higher education may change majors or drop out toseek a sense of belonging elsewhere.Diversity is one of the greatest challenges to the engineering profession today. Manyengineering schools struggle to attract and retain a student population that reflects the diversityof the general population. One of the key reasons cited for students leaving STEM is theperception of a chilly climate, especially by those who are members of underrepresented groups[3]. Furthermore, there is compelling evidence that diversity among students and faculty iscrucially important to the intellectual and social development of both
of how to provide students with opportunities to explore other majors (guided or directedchoice) while still helping them feel grounded in their own tentative choice. From informalconversations, it is clear that our students have a perception of engineering that may notnecessarily be real – and certainly that difficulty is key (Stevens, 2007). Part of the goal oflearning objectives within our program is to make them available to students and reiterate themthroughout the course sequences in order to demonstrate that difficulty is not the endgame, nor isit productive to think in that fashion. Use of Reflective and Liberative Pedagogies Both the first and third introductory course make significant use of reflective responsesand
the researchers to see which students were comfortable inidentifying as artistic. From these results, we were able to further discern characteristics of the‘artistic’ students from their answers to the previous star questionnaire both from the start andend of the semester.In addition to the survey questions, the students also were tasked with a reflection on the processof designing a Christmas ornament through sketching and then with CAD, which resulted in 3Dprinted physical objects. The open-ended reflections shed light on how the students approachedthe process of design and what they wish they had focused on more. Through this study, weaimed to gather a better understanding of the artistic profiles of first-year engineering studentsand will
training concurrent with the first term that they teach.Since the seminar occurs during their teaching activity it is based on reflection in action andreflection on action. While this work has helped align GTAs and LAs to our intent in studiopractices, this work is complex and we are seeking ways to further develop this knowledge andskill.PLC Work Around Inclusive Teaming. During the 2017-18 academic year, School facultymembers (all of whom will have completed the DPD Academy), will come together in aProfessional Learning Community (PLC). PLCs are collegial groups that provide teachers acrossdisciplines facilitated opportunities for extensive inquiry-based faculty development around afocal point. This group’s focal point will be the design of
observed that students are often unable to see a broader perspectiveof why they are studying various topics and required classes. Students seem to be less able tomake the connections that they need to make between the different classes and disciplines. Thispaper discusses a computer technology curriculum and its weaknesses, subsequent changes thatwere implemented with a program overhaul, and an assessment plan that was devised todetermine if those changes were effective towards meeting the learning goals.The changing expectations of both students and their future employers motivated us toreexamine and overhaul the way we teach computer technology. We revised our student learningoutcomes to better reflect industry needs and to make assessment more
this model in the compressible flowclass with examples, students’ reflections and feedback. Students found this model to bedifferent and more effective than traditional graduate classes and were able to connect,apply, understand and appreciate the relationship between the complex mathematicalequations and the real-life applications. It was also found that creating a portfolio takes moretime and effort when compared to traditional exam based class and the workload might needto be reduced.I. Introduction Preparing graduate students to be successful in all aspects of their career has remained avelleity for many years in academia. Recent study finds that the perceptions of the students in theircompetence in the workforce does not align with
. CN supports all common browsers and platforms, and is also accessible throughiOS and Android Apps.Although CN includes many of the features of a traditional learning management system (LMS),CN offers several unique benefits, and is quite distinct from typical LMS systems such as Canvasand Blackboard. It is notable that the CN interface highlights student contributions, rather thanfaculty-defined course structure. The bulk of the screen “real estate” is devoted to a running listof students’ posts and reflections on posts. The appearance is similar to a Facebook “wall.”Students and faculty can post freely to this area in a number of formats, including “posts,”“polls,” and “reflections” on previous input. Posts may include images, videos, links
in order to gain insight into the largerand multi-faceted culture in which these experiences take place5. This approach places value onthe subjectivity of the researcher, acknowledging the inherent bi-directional influences betweenthis individual and the culture they are studying. The autoethnography herein focuses on onestudent’s experiences of identity formation and reflection spurred by his involvement in aresearch project about engineers’ imaginaries of “the public.” These experiences are discussedin three journal entries and analyzed with the lens of identity formation described below.Through this research, the student was able to gain a deeper understanding of experiencesfoundational to his personal and professional identities as well