. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 315–328, Aug. 2003.18 L. G. Yesilbas, B. Rose, and M. Lombard, “Specification of a repository to support collaborative knowledge exchanges in IPPOP project,” Comput. Ind., vol. 57, no. 8–9, pp. 690–710, Dec. 2006.19 Q. Hao, W. Shen, Z. Zhang, S.-W. Park, and J.-K. Lee, “Agent-based collaborative product design engineering: An industrial case study,” Comput. Ind., vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 26–38, Jan. 2006.20 J. M. Carroll, M. B. Rosson, G. Convertino, and C. H. Ganoe, “Awareness and teamwork in computer- supported collaborations,” Interact. Comput, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 21–46, Jan. 2006.21 J. C. Tang, “Findings from Observational Studies of Collaborative Work,” Int J Man-Mach Stud, vol. 34
, Li Q, Jiang L, et al. “Generation of Functional Human Cardiac Progenitor Cells by High-Efficiency Protein Transduction”. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2015;4:1415-1424.11. Gulden Camci-Unal, Nasim Annabi, Mehmet R Dokmeci, Ronglih Liao and Ali Khademhosseini, NPG Asia Materials (2014) 6, e99.12. Joselle M. McCracken, Adina Badea, Mikhail E. Kandel, A. Sydney Gladman, David J. Wetzel, Gabriel Popescu, Jennifer A. Lewis, and Ralph G. Nuzzo, Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2016, 5, 1025-1039.13. Falguni Pati, Jinah Jang, Dong-Heon Ha, Sung Won Kim, Jong-Won Rhie, Jin-Hyung Shim, Deok-Ho Kim and Dong-Woo Cho, Nature Communications 5, Article number: 3935 (2014).14. Hyun-Wook Kang, Sang Jin Lee, In Kap Ko, Carlos Kengla
exploration whole-group session, coveringtopics such as what is STEM, why are STEM careers in demand, what are industry certificationsand why are they helpful, wages, STEM career ladders and educational timelines. Breakoutsessions followed the whole group presentation and Q&A led by high ranking females in theschool district such as the superintendent, assistant superintendent, guidance counselors andother staff. Students, divided into groups of ten, participated in breakout sessions where theylearned how to access their chosen STEM career by creating a college roadmap—a 15 yeareducational and career plan for their future. Follow-up activities and in-classroom work allowedstudents to fully plan and understand two of their chosen STEM career
, G., Moreno, J. F., Gudeman, R. H., & Marin, P. (2000). Does Diversity Make a Difference? Three Research Studies on Diversity in College Classrooms.16. Patton, M. Q. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 3rd edn, (Sage Publications, Inc, 2002).17. Borrego, M., Douglas, E. P. & Amelink, C. T. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education 98, 53-66 (2009).18. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D. & Leifer, L. J. Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education 94, 103-120 (2005).19. Cross, K. J., Mamaril, N. A., Johnson, N. & Herman, G. in American Society of Engineering Education.
. J. Couns. Psychol. 2012, 59 (3), 424.(9) Jimenez-useche, I.; Hoffmann, S. R.; Ohland, M. W. In 7th First Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference; Roanoke, VA, 2015; pp 1–6.(10) Layton, R. A.; Loughry, M. L.; Ohland, M. W.; Ricco, G. D. Adv. Eng. Educ. 2010, 2 (1), 1.(11) Ohland, M. W.; Loughry, M. L.; Woehr, D. J.; Bullard, L. G.; Finelli, C. J.; Layton, R. A.; Pomeranz, H. R.; Schmucker, D. G. Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 2012, 11 (4), 609.(12) Oberg, K. Pract. Anthropol. 1960, July-Augus, 177.(13) Liu, O. L. ETS Research Report Series 14-15. 2014, 14 (15), 1.(14) Ockey, G. J.; Koyama, D.; Setoguchi, E.; Sun, A. Lang. Test. 2014, 32 (1), 39.(15) Brooks, L.; Swain, M. Lang. Assess. Q. 2014, 11 (4
Advisory Council and will be adopted accordingly into the course. 3- Students may be requested to take online training course on Responsible Conduct of Research for Engineers (RCRE) administered and assessed by Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative. 4- Introduction of Project Management components including using GANTT Chart.Student Measure ToolsETH – Reviews on Ethics and Engineering Professionalism related documents, videos and case studiesPR – Presentations from Environmental professionals and other guest speakersEX-Q – Final Exam questions
writing 2.40 1.20 Group Skills m. Your ability to develop ways to resolve conflict and reach 3.20 0.60 agreement in a group n. Your ability to pay attention to the feelings of all group 3.40 0.66 members o. Your ability to listen to the ideas of others with an open mind 3.40 0.66 p. Your ability to work on collaborative projects as a member of a 3.50 0.50 team q. Your ability to organize information into categories
Question All seventeen participants’ written and interview responses to the following research question are evaluated in this work: Q. Can you calculate the integral . ? Would you prefer to find an approximate answer for this integral or would you rather find the exact solution? One of the researchers interviewed the participants and interviews are video recorded and transcribed by the main author of this article. The questionnaire (i.e. written) data collected prior to the interviews are displayed in the next section.Written Responses The written questionnaire responses of the students are collected prior to the completion of the numerical methods/analysis course that
. In order to answer the question, “dDo web-based programming environments increase learner content gains during and after initialinstruction?” this study focused on a subset of the pre/post assessment questions related to thefundamental CS theory. Table 5.3.1 contains some of the questions from the actual assessment. Itis important to note that question seven, regarding the illustration of sequential operation, onlycontained graphical illustrations while all the remaining questions were related to real codestatements in one of three programming languages: C++, Python or Logo. Table 5.3.1 Assessment question and corresponding computer science concept(s). Q Session (Lang) Location Assessment Question (Summary
. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=503584&org=EECPatton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative research. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Siddiqui, J. A., Allendoerfer, C., Adams, R., & Williams, B. (2016). Integration of scholarship: Interconnections among three studies on becoming an engineering education researcher. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(6), 2352–2377.Streveler, R. A., Pitterson, N. P., Hira, A., Rodriguez-Simmonds, H., & Ortega-Alvarez, J. D. (2015). Learning about engineering education research: What conceptual difficulties still exist for a new generation of scholars? In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2015. 32614 2015. IEEE (pp. 1–6). IEEE. Retrieved from http
librarian’s services to gather literatureresearch material (in question 2), but did not state the percentage of this material that was relevantto their objectives (in question 4).***Q: see survey in Appendix ASurvey AnalysisThe following analysis was performed using the data from Table 1:• Based upon the answers to survey question 1 (Appendix A, Q1: Over the last year, approximately how many hours did you spend on background research? i.e., background searching to acquire data that would be used for either scholarship activity or classroom teaching), the total number of hours per month over the last year spent by all the faculty members (14 in total) within the College of Engineering and Technology on acquiring background research
, J. Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Vol. 124, 2002, p. 908 – 920.Anderson, J. D., 2001, Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, McGraw-Hill.Carberry, A. R., Lee, H. S., & Ohland, M. W. (2010). Measuring engineering design self‐efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 71-79.Haapala, K.R., Zhao, F., Camelio, J., Sutherland, J.W., Skerlos, S.J., Dornfeld, D.A., Jawahir, I.S., Clarens, A.F., Rickli, J.L. (2013). A Review of Engineering Research in SustainableManufacturing, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 135, 2013, p. 041014-1 – 16.Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. Stevenson, H. Assume, & K.Hakuta (Eds). Child development and education in Japan (p. 262-272). New York: Freeman.Li, Q., McCoach, D. B
://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1154354.[3] Roger Williams University. (2017). Fast Facts. Retrieved from http://rwu.edu/about/who-we-are/fast-facts.[4] National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). College Navigator: Roger Williams University. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/?q=Roger+Williams+University&s=all&id=217518.
, 54(4), 856-865.Neuendorf, K. (2002). The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SagePublications.Norusis, M. (2005). SPSS 14.0 Statistical Procedures Companion. Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall, 152, 183.Papadopoulos, C., & Roman, A. (2010). Implementing an Inverted Classroom Model inEngineering Statics: Initial Results. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, Louisville, KY.Perneger, T. (1998). What’s Wrong with Bonferroni Adjustments. BMJ, 316, 1236-1238.Piazza The Incredibly Easy, Completely Free Q&A Platform. (2015). Retrieved fromhttps://piazza.com, last accessed September 24, 2015.Quade, D. (1967). Rank Analysis of Covariance. Journal of the American Statistical Association,62(320), 1187-1200
. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (Online), 9(1), 23.[9] Lu, J. J., & Fletcher, G. H. (2009). Thinking about computational thinking. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(1), 260-264.[10] Israel, M., Pearson, J. N., Tapia, T., Wherfel, Q. M., & Reese, G. (2015). Supporting all learners in school-wide computational thinking: A cross-case qualitative analysis. Computers & Education, 82, 263-279.[11] Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48-54.[12] Bennett, J., & Müller, U. (2010). The development of flexibility and abstraction in preschool children. Merrill
of India and US”. 49th ATMAE Annual Conference, November 2-6, 2016, Orlando, FLDakeev, U., Mazumder, Q., Yildiz, F.& Baltaci, K. (2015). “Motivation and Learning Strategies of Students in Kyrgyzstan”. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2015, Seattle, WAFonseca, D., Valls, F., Redondo, E. & Villagrasa, S. (2016). “Informal interactions in 3D education: Citizenship participation and assessment of virtual urban proposals”. Computers in Human Behavior. 55 (1) 504-518Gray, S. A., Nicosia, K. & Jordan, R. C. (2012). “Lessons learned from citizen science in the classroom”. Democracy & Education, 20 (2), 1-5Reisel, J. R., Walker, C. M. & Cancado, L. (2016). “Successful Undergraduate
/ssie/under- grad/objectives-outcomes.html. 4. Large, J. (2006). Communication is engineering: Responding to needs of industry in a capstone course. 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois, 1-10. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/838. 5. Retherford, J. Q., & Ellenburg, K. S. (2016). Impacts of a university-wide service learning program on a senior undergraduate capstone course. 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 1-10. doi:10.18260/p.25548 6. Wilk, R. D. & Anderson, A. M. (2002), Development of communication skills across the engineering curriculum. 2002 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Montreal, Canada, 1-14. Retrieved from
practice. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2603-2612). ACM.[5] Lindtner, S., Greenspan, A., & Li, D. (2015, August). Designed in Shenzhen: Shanzhai manufacturing and maker entrepreneurs. In Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives (pp. 85-96). Aarhus University Press.[6] Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.[7] House, Robert, et al. "Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: an introduction to project GLOBE." Journal of world business 37.1 (2002): 3-10.[8] – (n.d.). Maker Faire. Retrieved from makerfaire.com, March 18
, Conference Proceedings. Virginia Tech, United StatesDepartment of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, U.S. Military Academy, West Point, United StatesCollege of Engineering, University of Notre Dame, United StatesDepartment of Engineering Education, United States: American Society for Engineering Education; 2011.4. Tonso KL. On the Outskirts of Engineering: Learning Identity, Gender, and Power via Engineering Practice. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense; 2007.5. Jorgenson J. Engineering Selves: Negotiating Gender and Identity in Technical Work. Manag Commun Q. 2002;15(3):350-380. doi:10.1177/0893318902153002.6. Du X-Y. Gendered practices of constructing an engineering identity in a problem-based learning
2017 ASEE Southeast Section Conferenceprompt/adaptive feedback on individual or group works. Q 8: The in-class activities helped you improve your understanding of the lectureThis metric is directly connected to the first 4 discussed above. It directly gives the impact of theclass structure and approach on the overall main goal which is student learning. Responses arechosen from the following list: (1) Strongly agree, (2) Agree, (3) Neither agree or disagree, (4)Disagree, (5) Strongly disagree.Students from UC campus are more likely to agree that the activities in class have contributed toimprove their understanding of the lecture. Similar observation was made for most students of theother campus. A percentage of students have disagree or were
E., Water cooled concentrated photovoltaic system. Int J SmartGrid Clean Energy, 2012, pp. 2–6.[33] Chong, K-K., Tan, W-C., Study of automotive radiator cooling system for dense- arrayconcentration photovoltaic system. Sol Energy, 2012, Vol. 86, pp. 2632–2643.[34] Babic, D., Murray, D B., Torrance A. Mist jet cooling of grinding processes. Int J MachTools Manuf, 2005, Vol. 45, pp. 1171–1177.[35] Royne, A., Dey, C., Design of a jet impingement cooling device for densely packed PVcells under high concentration. Sol Energy, 2007, Vol. 81, pp. 1014–1024.[36] Russell C. R. Optical concentrator and cooling system for photovoltaic cells. US patent,RE30584, 1981.[37] Zhu L., Wang, Y., Fang, Z., Sun, Y., Huang, Q., An effective heat dissipation
wireless propagation characteristics and perform specific wireless experiments outsidetraditional labs. By experimenting with the mobile platform students will enhance their hands-onand programming skills, and will become more competitive in the wireless industry job market.AcknowledgementDr. Otilia Popescu’s work was supported in part by the Virginia Space Grant Consortiumthrough the 2015 New Investigator Program.References 1. Wyglinski, A. M., Orofino, D. P., Ettus, M. N., & Rondeau, T. W. (2016). Revolutionizing software defined radio: case studies in hardware, software, and education. IEEE Communications Magazine, 54(1), 68-75. 2. Ge, F., Chen, Q., Wang, Y., Bostian, C. W., Rondeau, T. W., & Le, B. (2008, March
(3.7%) expressed dissatisfaction. Table 2 – Open-ended design project survey results (percentages) on usefulness, project management, teaming and leadership: Strongly Agree (SA), Agree (A), Disagree (D), Strongly Disagree (SD).Q# Survey Item SA A D SD SA+A D+SD4 I enjoyed the open-ended design projects. 59.3 37.0 3.7 0.0 96.3 3.76 I gained knowledge and skills that may be applied to my career from participating in the open-ended design challenges. 37.0 59.3 3.7 0.0 96.3 3.71 The program’s PBL activities have helped me
/10.18260/p.25671McDermott, R., & Varenne, H. (1995). Culture as disability. Anthropology & EducationQuarterly, 26(3), 324-348.Mihelcic, J. R., Paterson, K. G., Phillips, L. D., Zhang, Q., Watkins, D. W., Barkdoll, B. D.,Fuchs, V. J., Fry, L. M., & Hokanson, D. R. (2008). Educating engineers in the sustainablefutures model with a global perspective. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 25(4),255-263.Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1987). The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how thesociology of. The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociologyand history of technology, 17.Ramírez, M. C., Bengo, I., Mereu, R., & Silva, J. C. (2011). Participative methodology for
instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43-59. doi:10.1007/BF02505024Mitola III, J., & Maguire Jr, G. Q. (1999). Cognitive radio: making software radios more personal. Personal Communications, IEEE, 6(4), 13-18.Noam, E. M. (1995). Taking the next step beyond spectrum auctions: open spectrum access. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 33(12), 66-73.Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Sohoul, M., et al., Next generation public safety networks: a spectrum sharing approach, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 54, Iss. 3, March 2016.
(Vol. 28, pp. 425–435). Retrieved from https://uspfodc.us/resources/41/download/Engeering_Students_and_EShip_Education_- _Involvement_Attitudes_and_Outcomes.pdfEpicenter. (2017). Epicenter Program: National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation. Retrieved from http://epicenter.stanford.edu/page/aboutJin, Q., Gilmartin, S. K., Chen, H. L., Johnson, S. K., Weiner, M. B., Lerner, R. M., & Sheppard, S. (2016). Entrepreneurial Career Choice and Characteristics of Engineering and Business Students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(2), 598–613.Katz, J. A. (2003). The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education 1876-1999. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2
). Specifically, they valued practicalexamples of how to be more receptive, what to do in problematic situations, how to respond tobias, as well as the ‘coming out’ activity (3). 5.1.4. Recommendations for improvement to Safe Zone Level 1 workshopsSeveral respondents indicated that the conference workshops did not offer sufficient time (12).One suggestion, if scheduling for longer workshops is not possible, was to have the option ofparticipants to voluntarily stay afterwards for more discussion and Q&A, at the discretion of thefacilitator. Further suggestions for improvements of future Safe Zone workshops were to providehandouts as a packet at the beginning of the session (note: that was the norm but it’s possiblethat a facilitator forgot
D: Student infographic examples - Example infographic posters from fall and winterquarters. The infographic with the most votes among their peers in each section for the fallquarter is reflected below in Figures D1-D3. The winter quarter top vote earners are shown inFigures D4-D5. Figure D1: Infographic on Peer Learning from Monday section (Team D), F2016Figure D2: Infographic on Reading from Wednesday section (Team Q), F2016Figure D3: Infographic on Questioning from Friday section (Team II), F2016Figure D4: Infographic on Questioning from Tuesday section (Team 9), W2017Figure D5: Infographic on Questioning from Thursday section (Team 18), W2017Appendix E: Peer and instructor assessment of infographic examplesThe infographic rubric
state and nextsteps. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.) Handbook of Engineering Education Research (pp. 497-518). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. SanFrancisco: Jossey-BassNGSS Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States.Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Tafoya, J., Nguyen, Q., Skokan, C., & Moskal, B. (2005). K-12 Outreach in an EngineeringIntensive University. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference & Exposition (ASEE).The National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices,crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington