Asee peer logo
Displaying all 12 results
Conference Session
Technical Session 4b
Collection
2017 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting
Authors
Jason Matteson, Northern Arizona University; David M Richter, Northern Arizona University
Tagged Topics
Pacific Southwest Section
2017 Pacific Southwest SectionMeeting: Tempe, Arizona Apr 20 Paper ID #20705Broadening and deepening engineering students’ perspectives on moralityand ethicsDr. Jason Matteson, Northern Arizona UniversityMr. David M Richter, Northern Arizona University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Broadening and Deepening Engineering Students’ Perspectives on Morality and Ethics Jason Matteson1 and David M. Richter2 1 Philosophy and 2Mechanical Engineering
Conference Session
Technical Session 4a
Collection
2017 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting
Authors
Elizabeth Fife, University of Southern California
Tagged Topics
Diversity, Pacific Southwest Section
the ethical and policy implications of thetechnologies they review. The Grand Challenges provides a useful “anchor” to help studentsapproach engineering through awareness of ecosystems, sustainable development, resourcemanagement and appropriateness of technology for more holistic solutions. Such anunderstanding can help students become better decision-makers as they gain appreciation for thenon-technical issues that affect engineering. Communication skills are also furthered throughfocusing on impact and consequences of technology (or the lack thereof). Students gainawareness of their role as engineers and the need for responsible dissemination of information toguide choices that affect the quality of life for all.IntroductionThe National
Conference Session
Technical Session 2d
Collection
2017 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting
Authors
Patrick McDonnal, Indicate Technologies, Inc, Santa Clara, CA 95050; Jean L. Lee, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
Tagged Topics
Pacific Southwest Section
retention rates have beenlinked to one’s disposition towards a method of learning [8, 9]. In other words, if astudent is more inclined to learn using a particular method, then they are more likely tobenefit from using that method. This was studied using the survey by querying studentsabout a hypothetical assignment from MATE 232 (Materials, Ethics, and Society). Thenthey were asked questions about which assignment submission method they were moreinclined to choose and which assignment submission method they thought would resultin greater retention of information. An example of the hypothetical assignment is shownin Appendix B.ResultsEnvironmental ImpactAssignment components that were identified by at least 70% of survey respondents’answers were
Conference Session
Technical Session 3c
Collection
2017 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting
Authors
Pitiporn Asvapathanagul, California State University, Long Beach
Tagged Topics
Diversity, Pacific Southwest Section
theirgraduation. Our CE 101 class contents are provided in the next section.CE 101 Class InformationThe introduction to civil engineering and construction engineering (CECEM) managementcourse is a one unit general education (GE) course and a required course for all CECEMstudents. CE 101 contents include several components, including (i) civil engineering andconstruction engineering management as a profession, (ii) current trends and challenges, ethical,social and environmental issues in professional practice, (iii) professional organizations andlicensure combined with (iv) communication and lifelong learning skills for professionalpractice. A 50 minute lecture is arranged once a week for a total of 14 lectures for one semester.An approximate 5 to 6
Conference Session
Technical Session 4a
Collection
2017 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting
Authors
Yongping Zhang P.E., Cal Poly Pomona; Xudong Jia, Cal Poly Pomona; Jon Bumps, Caltrans, District 8; Du Lu, Caltrans, District 8
Tagged Topics
Pacific Southwest Section
- simulation, etc.) 6) Improved presentation skills 7) Continuous bonding efforts. Many team members became friends in the learning process and the friendship is maintained very well after graduation.The student outcomes are based on the standard ABET a-k outcomes. a: Apply Knowledge—An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering b: Experiment Analysis— An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data c: System Design— An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability d: Teamwork— An
Conference Session
Technical Session 2c
Collection
2017 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting
Authors
Andrew Danowitz, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
Tagged Topics
Pacific Southwest Section
background andmotivation for performing this study. I then discuss my efforts to study student impressions ofinformal collaboration versus formalized group work in a sophomore level digital design course.Finally, I discuss the measured results, and implications for future work.Motivation and BackgroundWhile well managed team-based assignments can have positive effects on student outcomes, ifnot implemented properly, team-based assignments can have a negative effect on studentlearning4. In these scenarios, team performance can be hampered by intra-team competition,mutual distrust, differing work ethics, and uneven distributions of labor among group members.The danger of suboptimal groups can be especially acute for students in engineeringfundamentals
Conference Session
Technical Session 1c
Collection
2017 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting
Authors
Michael R. Caplan, Arizona State University; Courtney Michelle DuBois; Samantha Brenna, Arizona State University ; Neal Arthur Shulman, Arizona State University; Jerry Coursen
Tagged Topics
Pacific Southwest Section
Design and Development II (alpha prototyping of a blood glucose meter), Biomedical Product Design and Develop- ment III (alpha, beta, and gamma prototyping of student designed projects), a course in biomedical ethics, and oversees an off-site undergraduate clinical experience. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Curiosity and Connections (Entrepreneurial Mindset) in BME Sophomore DesignIntroductionA contemporary approach to meeting the educational needs of students focused primarily on jobprospects can potentially be enhanced by seeking to instill the entrepreneurial mindset.1 TheKern Foundation defines students as having the entrepreneurial mindset
Conference Session
Technical Session 5a
Collection
2017 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting
Authors
Jeffrey Thomas Yan; James LeRoy Dalton, Cañada College; Kattia Chang, Engineering Student at Cañada College; Bianca Corine Villanueva Doronila, Canada College; Victor Josue Melara Alvarado, Canada College; Christopher Thomas; Ian M Donovan, San Francisco State University; Kartik Bholla; Amelito G Enriquez, Canada College; Wenshen Pong P.E., San Francisco State University; Zhaoshuo Jiang P.E., San Francisco State University; Cheng Chen, San Francisco State University; Kwok Siong Teh, San Francisco State University; Hamid Mahmoodi, San Francisco State University; Hao Jiang, San Francisco State University; Kazunori Okada, San Francisco State University; Xiaorong Zhang, San Francisco State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, Pacific Southwest Section
supporting 4.25 4.43 0.18evidence.I have the ability to analyze data and other information. 3.96 4.39 0.43*I understand science. 3.71 4.00 0.29I have learned about ethical conduct in my field. 4.18 4.07 -0.11I have learned laboratory techniques. 3.82 3.93 0.11I have an ability to read and understand primary literature. 3.82 4.07 0.25I have skill in how to give an effective oral presentation. 3.79 4.29 0.50*I have skill in science
Conference Session
Technical Session 5a
Collection
2017 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting
Authors
Alexander Sebastian Furlanic, San Francisco State University; Philip A. Thomas, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo ; Panfilo Jesus Armas, SFSU; Rene Parra Medina, San Jose State University; Jackie Lok; Amelito G Enriquez, Canada College; Wenshen Pong P.E., San Francisco State University; Cheng Chen, San Francisco State University; Kwok Siong Teh, San Francisco State University; Xiaorong Zhang, San Francisco State University; Hamid Mahmoodi, San Francisco State University; Zhaoshuo Jiang P.E., San Francisco State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, Pacific Southwest Section
science. 3.71 4.00 0.29 I have learned about ethical conduct in my field. 4.18 4.07 -0.11 I have learned laboratory techniques. 3.82 3.93 0.11 I have an ability to read and understand primary literature. 3.82 4.07 0.25 I have skill in how to give an effective oral presentation. 3.79 4.29 0.50* I have skill in science writing. 3.43 3.89 0.46* I have self-confidence. 4.29 4.21 -0.08 I understand how scientists think. 3.71 3.89 0.18 I
Conference Session
Technical Session 1c
Collection
2017 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting
Authors
Aldin Malkoc, Arizona State University ; Mackenzie Honikel, School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering at Arizona State University; Jeffrey Thomas La Belle, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, Pacific Southwest Section
medical device prototype.Gamma PrototypeStudents are posed with the task of developing a final prototype board game usingvarious engineering skills such as Computer Aided Design (CAD) and machiningtools. The students are given complete freedom over the development of the gamebut are required to develop rigorous explanation for all design additions to theboard game. Through this process students learn statistical analysis, design ofexperiment techniques, decision-making techniques, and fundamentals ofbusiness and technical management. Additionally, aspects of technical,regulatory, economic, legal, social, and ethical aspects are employed and asked toof students to consider when developing the prototype.Design Challenge (DC)The design challenge is
Conference Session
Technical Session 5c
Collection
2017 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting
Authors
Deana R. Delp, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, Pacific Southwest Section
the faculty give students technical content alongwith social context, critical analysis, and ethical consequences of their work19. A more generalapproach where the students understand basic engineering principles, but also the ability toresearch and learn more specialized knowledge as they need it, is more common place inengineering education19. Many freshman engineering classes use individual and group work,“hands-on” projects, written communications, and oral presentations as an introduction to futureengineering coursework. Research shows improved learning outcomes and higher retention rateswhen students are involved in an interactive learning environment 11. Employers have concurredwith this by requesting more focus on oral and written
Conference Session
Technical Session 3b
Collection
2017 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting
Authors
Brandon J Leung, San Jose State University; Yuting Huang, Canada College; Fernando Lorenzo, 3D Convenience; Sergio Rodriguez-Reyes, San Jose State University; Janine Criselda L. Young, University of California, Berkeley; ali attaran; Amelito G Enriquez, Canada College; Cheng Chen, San Francisco State University; Zhaoshuo Jiang P.E., San Francisco State University; Wenshen Pong P.E., San Francisco State University; Hamid Shahnasser, San Francisco State University; Kwok Siong Teh, San Francisco State University; Xiaorong Zhang, San Francisco State University; Hamid Mahmoodi, San Francisco State University
Tagged Topics
Pacific Southwest Section
4.25 0.18I have the ability to analyze data and other information. 4.39 3.96 0.43*I understand science. 4.00 3.71 0.29I have learned about ethical conduct in my field. 4.07 4.18 -0.11I have learned laboratory techniques. 3.93 3.82 0.11I have an ability to read and understand primary literature. 4.07 3.82 0.25I have skill in how to give an effective oral presentation. 4.22 3.79 0.43*I have skill in science writing. 3.89 3.43 0.46*I have self-confidence. 4.21 4.29