Paper ID #20885Utilizing an Institution’s QEP and Applying Career Development and Learn-ing Principles into an Engineering FYE CourseDr. Kristine K. Craven, Tennessee Technological University Dr. Kris Craven is currently the Interim Chairman of the General and Basic Engineering (GBE) Depart- ment and a tenured Assistant Professor of the same department at Tennessee Tech University (TTU). I have been employed by TTU since 2000 primarily teaching in the Basic Engineering Program. I have also been teaching junior level courses for the Mechanical Engineering department for several years. In addition to ASEE, I am a member of
Session W1A Examples of Free-Choice Open-Ended Design Projects in a First-Year Engineering Course Jack Bringardner, Gunter Georgi, Victoria Bill New York University, jack.bringardner@nyu.edu, gunter.georgi@nyu.edu, victoria.bill@nyu.eduAbstract - This complete evidence-based practice paper can take that give them hands-on experience. The Makerinvestigates the implementation of a pilot section with Movement has helped to establish a community of Science,free-choice in selecting an open-ended design project for Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Math (STEAM) orientedthe NYU Tandon School of Engineering first-year creators. Makers who participate in these
(2011); 2) UW College of Education outstanding research award (2015); and 3) UW College of Educa- tion outstanding service award (2016). Her research interests include partnerships with in pre-service and in-service teachers in STEM Education with a focus on engineering education applications. An active member of AERA, ASEE, ASTE, NARST, and NSTA, Dr. Burrows has presented at over 50 conferences, published in ranked journals (e.g. Journal of Chemical Education), reviewed conference proposals (e.g ASEE, AERA), and co-edits the CITE-Science journal. Additionally, she taught high school and middle school science for twelve years in Florida and Virginia, and she was the learning resource specialist for the technology
Paper ID #20895Engineering Co-op Interns as Partners in First-Year Student Engagement,Mentoring, and Course DevelopmentDr. Geoff Rideout, Memorial University of Newfoundland Geoff Rideout received his B.Eng. (Mechanical) from Memorial University of Newfoundland in 1993. After working in the manufacturing and building systems consulting industries, he earned his M.A.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering from Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario and his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan. He has lectured at the University of Michigan and at the Humber Institute for Advanced Technology and Applied
Paper ID #20937A first year design experience based on SAE Aero Design contest to supportABET learning outcomes and engineering vocation in freshmen studentsDr. Ing. FELIX ORLANDO MARTINEZ-RIOS, Universidad Panamericana BS Physics (1985) by Universidad de la Habana, Cuba, MS in Computer Science (2005) and PhD in Computer Science (2010) by Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey, M´exico. Top Management Program AD IPADE Business School, Mexico in 2010. Head of Industrial Engineering from 1998 to 2000 and Head Informa- tion Technologies Engineering from 2000 to 2009 at Universidad Panamericana, Mexico city. Dean of Engineering School at
) program at ECST. He has also developed an open access, web-based audience response system (educatools.com).Dr. Deborah Won, California State University, Los Angeles Deborah Won is an Associate Professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering at California State Uni- versity, Los Angeles. Her specialization is in Biomedical Engineering and her scientific research area focuses on neuro-rehabilitative technology. Her educational research interests include use of Tablet PCs and technology to better engage students in the classroom as well as pedagogical and advisement ap- proaches to closing the achievement gap for historically under-represented minority groups.Dr. Emily L. Allen, California State University, Los Angeles
(technological, knowledge and skills societal, financial,projects in consecutive courses during the freshman year. The 12. Willingness to environmental, etc.)project connects more than 375 engineering students with work with o. Understands how elements ofeach other as well as approximately 35 high school students individuals with an ecosystem are connectedas customers to instill Curiosity, Connections and Creating different skill sets, p. Identifies and works with expertise
CONCURRENT MATH on Higher Education Spaces: Innovation, Collaboration, and Finally, student perception is explored. A survey Technology”, IGI Global, 2013, pg. 165-185.was distributed to the students at the end of the semester to [3] Ewing, D., “Using the SCALE-UP Method to Create an Engineeringgive them an opportunity to give feedback for continued First Year Engineering Course”, presented at the 2017 annualcourse improvement. The question in Figure 8 was a multiple conference of the ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section, Dallas, TX, 2017.choice list while the question in Figure 9 was a free response. [4
Paper ID #20952An Introductory Course in Electrical Engineering: Lessons Learned andContinuing ChallengesDr. Melinda Holtzman, Portland State University Melinda Holtzman received her Ph.D. from the University of Nevada, Reno. She is a Senior Instructor in the ECE department at Portland State University.Prof. Branimir Pejcinovic, Portland State University Branimir Pejcinovic received his Ph.D. degree from University of Massachusetts, Amherst. He is a Pro- fessor and former Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education at Portland State University, Electrical and Computer Engineering department. In this role he has led
studentsinformed the resultant course redesign. Additionally, the while anchoring the world-experience of the constituents,institutional setting for students in the first-year engineering regardless of how limited, to engineering practice.course at Norwich University is detailed. In [8], researchers with Vanderbilt’s Cognition and Technology group explore the usefulness of authenticUniversal Educational Contexts experiences to serve as a “hook or anchor” to incorporateHirsch et al [6] detail studies that explore negative some of the positive attributes of “apprenticeship training instereotypes students
Paper ID #20904Development of Engineering Professional Identity and Formation of a Com-munity of Practice in a New Engineering ProgramDr. Lee Kemp Rynearson, Campbell University Lee Rynearson an Assistant Professor of Engineering at Campbell University. He received a B.S. and M.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering from the Rochester Institute of Technology in 2008 and earned his PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University in 2016. He also has previous experience as an instructor of engineering at the Kanazawa Institute of Technology, in Kanazawa, Japan. His current research interests focus on instruction for
Paper ID #20939Motivation Profiles of Non-Major Computer Programmers in a Flipped Class-room EnvironmentLauren Miranda LingarAbbey WilliamsDr. Rachel McCord, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Rachel McCord is a a Lecturer and Research Assistant Professor in the Engineering Fundamentals Divi- sion at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville. She received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her research interests include the impact of metacognitive and self-regulated learning development on engineering student success, particularly in the first year. c American Society for Engineering
, mathematics, and engineering and technology teacher, as well as several years of electrical and mechanical engineering design experience as a practicing engineer. He received his Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering from Swarthmore College, his Master’s of Education degree from the University of Massachusetts, and a Master’s of Science in Mechanical Engineering and Doctorate in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Dr. Gary LeRoy Hunt, Boise State University Gary Hunt a Lecturer for the Engineering Department at Boise State University. Dr. Hunt received his Ph.D. in Education from the University of Idaho, his M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Colorado State University, and his B.S. in Engineering Science from
Opportunities for Development’ report [4] suggest the modelfifty universities in Australia, New Zealand, the United in Figure 1, which re-centers engineering in a systematicKingdom, and the Republic of Ireland. model which moves away from engineering design as a scientific/technologically focused vocation. The proposedThis paper reports on the change in 118 first year civil model reconnects engineering to its role in providingand environmental engineering student’s global products and benefits that fulfill the needs of society andpreparedness attributable to their taking a one semester, nature using technology and scientific theories.first
Transportation Information Communication Technology Climate change and agriculture Food Processing ShelterFirst Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference August 6-8, 2017, Daytona Beach, FL W1A-2 Session W1A IMPLEMENTATION
, the cumulative GPAs (Table IV) for HOME over the country. The HOME Program is a 5-1/2-week resi-students ranged from 3.03 to 3.53 as compared to 2.23 to dential bridge program, for incoming freshmen engineering3.1 for non-HOME Program students. For future study, and computer science students. This recruitment and reten-the authors recommend evaluations at regular intervals tion program seeks to attract and retain high achieving stu-with validated instruments as well as a longitudinal study. dents in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). While most bridge programs focus on providing re-Index Terms – College readiness
weeks. Currently, the four lab sections are taught curriculum changes are yet to be explored and developed, butby different faculty and are divided by disciplines within the are viewed as necessary steps to refining the collegecollege: two mechanical, one civil/environmental, and one curricula.electrical/computer. While the formatting and design processcontent for the course will be fairly uniform across all lab REFERENCESsections, the scenario, project, schedule, assignments, and [1] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, "Criteria foractivities may be customized by each instructor to better suit Accrediting Engineering Programs", 2014, 3.the students and
- Regulated Learning Profiles of Students Taking a Foundational Engineering Course. Journal of Engineering Education, 2015. 104(1): p. 74-100.8. Lawanto, O., et al., Comparing Self-Regulated Learning of Secondary Shool Students and College Freshmen during an Engineering Design Project. Journal of STEM Education, 2013. 14(4).9. Lawanto, O., et al., An Exploratory Study of Self- Regulated Learning Strategies in a Design Project by Students in Grades 9-12. Design & Technology Education, 2013. 18(1): p. 44-57.10. Turns, J.A., et al. Integrating reflection into engineering education. in 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. http://scholar. google. com. hk/scholar
experienced In the fall of 2016 a study was conducted to evaluate howthrough the study of the humanities, the environment through engineers at various experience levels – first-year, seniors,the study of the natural sciences, and the mechanisms of the and practicing professionals – use this tool to performeconomy through the study of business. Engineering students constraint analysis. [9] For this research, a subset of 15 designrequire a broad-based education, grounded not only in STEM attributes (shown as shaded attributes within Table I) was(science, technology, engineering, and math) related topics, used, so as to not overwhelm the first-year students servingbut also in the liberal arts and in
of Cincinnati, whitney.gaskins@uc.edu, burbansm@mail.uc.edu, jenkink4@mail.uc.edu Xavier University Louisiana, colatunj@xula.edu, mberger@xula.eduAbstract - The first year of college encompasses one of microaggression, conscious and unconscious biases arethe most challenging transitions a student may face sources of chronic stress and trauma that negatively impactduring their college career and/or lifetime. For minority their academic achievement [7]. Stereotype threat describesstudents in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math a condition in which students’ belonging to a group has(STEM), the transitioning experience may yield many been stereotyped causing
Carolina engineering technology, and construction managementat Charlotte’s William States Lee College of Engineering. students in the pursuit of their educational and career goals.Although the MAPS program was originally developed The program utilizes the talents and leadership of College ofand implemented through National Science Foundation Engineering upper class students to engage, direct, and(NSF) funding more than two decades ago, it is now fully support freshmen, transfer, and continuing students, new tofunded by the University as a key component of the the pursuit of an engineering or engineering technologySouthern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) degree. The MAPS program is comprised of
Paper ID #20898High School ACT Math Scores: Why and How Do We Use Them?Dr. Sungwon Steven Kim, Minnesota State University, Mankato Dr. Sungwon S. Kim joined the Mechanical Engineering faculty at MSU Mankato in January of 2011. He received his Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University (2008), working in the area of synthesizing carbon nanotubes, his M.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), working in the area of designing and analyzing double spiral heat exchangers, and his B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Korea University (2000
, Matt.Bernacki@unlv.eduThis project was supported by National Science FoundationAward number #1420491, university sponsorship and the Wonjoon Hong, Graduate Research Assistant, DepartmentUNLV Office of Information Technology. of Educational Psychology and Higher Education, University of Nevada Las Vegas, hongw1@unlv.nevada.edu REFERENCES Jeff Markle, Lab Director, Department of Mechanical[1] Chickering, A. W., and Gamson, Z. F. 1987. Seven Engineering, Jeff.Markle@unlv.edu principles for good practice in undergraduate education