- Conference Session
- Design and the Capstone Experience
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Shayne Kelly McConomy, Florida A&M University/Florida State University; Ruturaj Soman; Nikhil Gupta, Florida A&M University/Florida State University; Chiang Shih, Florida A&M University/Florida State University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Design in Engineering Education
Boothroyd-Dewhurst method To redesign a product and reduce B Hitachi method 5 assembly cost, I am aware of C Lucas method standard tools. D Critical Path method E All of the above Table 9 Sample Syllabus Focus survey to be used in EDM Q. no. Question Question mapping 1 How vital is customer assessment for the success of any project? Learning outcome How confident am I to successfully use customer assessment tools such as for 2
- Conference Session
- Design Assessment
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Kimberly Cook-Chennault, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey
- Tagged Divisions
-
Design in Engineering Education
- Conference Session
- DEED Postcard Poster Session
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Ang Liu, University of New South Wales; Yuchen Wang, University of New South Wales; Yun Dai, University of Southern California
- Tagged Divisions
-
Design in Engineering Education
, comments and Q&A, and peerevaluation of a CR’s helpfulness. The massively crowdsourced customer reviews should besystemically filtered and analyzed to be useful for design practice and education. This isnecessary because most of the CRs are ill-structured with inconsistent information. Therefore,student designers must be systemically guided to abstract useful information from CRs.Recommender system is an important theoretical foundation of the proposed CR-FF method.Recommender systems are broadly used by ecommerce platforms to recommend newproduct/service (e.g., restaurant movie, book, news, jobs, services, education, etc.) tocustomers. A number of practically feasible recommendation approaches, techniques, andalgorithms have been developed
- Conference Session
- Student Empathy and Human-Centered Design
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Lexie Mitchell, Colorado School of Mines; Leslie Light, Colorado School of Mines
- Tagged Divisions
-
Design in Engineering Education
in Spring 2015, the ITD program created new class activitiesto help students understand the difference between their perceptions and experiences of aproblem, and those of the people actually affected by that problem.These activities include: ● Subject Matter Expert (SME) Talks: Experts present on various aspects of the problem, followed by a 20-minute Q&A session. ● User Empathy Experience: Re-creation of the problem context on class premises, where students execute project-relevant tasks. ● Stakeholder Engagement Experience: Students are sent off campus to observe and interact with users/stakeholders. ● A reflection assignment: Analysis of what they thought were problems for the users compared with what
- Conference Session
- FPD and DEEDs Joint Postcard Sessions
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Jessica Daniels; Sophia T. Santillan, Duke University; Ann Saterbak, Duke University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Design in Engineering Education, First-Year Programs
a larger change from Survey 1 to Survey 2 than from Survey 2 to Survey 3. Thethree highest changes were seen in developing a prototype for a design challenge (Q8), settingdesign criteria (Q5), and using an iterative process to complete the design challenge (Q10).Table 3. Engineering design process results. Survey 1 Survey 2 Survey 3 Difference Q Step P value Average Average Average btw 1 & 3 Identifying a design problem from 1 3.40 4.30 4.20 0.80 <0.005 the community Incorporating