California.Prof. Donald S. Remer PhD, PE, Harvey Mudd College Donald S. Remer, PhD, PE, was the Oliver C. Field Professor of Engineering Economics and Management at Harvey Mudd College when this project was initiated. He has a B.S.E. from the University of Michigan and a MS and PhD in Chemical Engineering with a minor in Business Economics from Caltech. He has been a Clinic Advisor on over 60 engineering clinic projects during his 42 years at Harvey Mudd. He is also the President of the Claremont Consulting Group, which does short course training, coaching, and consulting in the areas of business case analysis, cost estimation, and project management. His clients range from small entrepreneurs to Fortune 500 companies
Directors, President’s Club, Nittany Lion Club, ASEE, ASME, AIAA, AKC, GRCA. He has been honored with a LMC/KAPL Leadership Award, GE Phillippe Award, PSEAS Outstanding service award, Jaycee International Senatorship, and an ESM Centennial Fellowship. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Using a Systematic Review to Identify Leadership Competency Needs Across Engineering DisciplinesBackgroundSince ABET and industry began calling for leadership and professional skill development inengineering students in the early 2000’s, the literature involving engineering education andtraining has evolved to include a variety of studies and articles to address this gap in
involved pilot testing and refining concise, generalized measures of the variables ofinterest. The leadership role confidence and risk orientation measures presented in this sectionwere designed based on the literature, tested in advance with a smaller sample of 99 respondents,and then refined based on pilot test respondent feedback about clarity. We believe this approachaligns with this paper’s scope of testing unifying hypotheses that support and generalize uponprior findings.In conceptualizing a leadership confidence variable, we utilize a “role confidence” approachsimilar to Cech et al.’s measurement of confidence toward achieving professional outcomes [40].We designed our measure as a means of differentiating among students who felt they were
ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2010.[3] M. Klassen, D. Reeve, C. Rottmann, R. Sacks, A. E. Simpson, and A. Huynh, “Charting the Landscape of Engineering Leadership Education in North American Universities,” in American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, 2016.[4] R. Paul and L. Cowe Falls, “Engineering leadership education: A review of best practices,” in American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, 2015.[5] National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2005.[6] E. F. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Östlund, and D. R
leadership theoryin engineers’ professional identities,” Leadership, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 351–373, 2015.[10] G. Warnick, J. Schmidt, and A. Bowden, “An experiential learning approach to developleadership competencies in engineering and technology students,” presented at the ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, Indianapolis, 2014.[11] O. Pierrakos, M. Borrego, and J. Lo, “Assessing learning outcomes of senior mechanicalengineers in a capstone design experience,” in American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI, 2007.[12] K. S. Cameron, R. E. Quinn, J. DeGraff, and A. V. Thakor, Competing Values Leadership,2nd ed. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., 2014.[13] K. A. Lawrence, P. Lenk, and R. E
development of a host of professional, interpersonal, andpersonal skills [8]. While these programs were developed independently of Rottmann et al.’s2015 work, there is a convergence between the explicit and implicit models of leadership thatemerge from these four programs, Rottmann et al.’s model, and other recent models ofengineering leadership, as discussed further below.The four programs that serve as case studies here have curricula that were developed, inengineering leadership and more broadly, from a similar starting point: careful consideration ofthe skills and abilities required of 21st-century engineering graduates in response to calls forengineering education reform from professional engineering bodies over the preceding decade.For example
programs tend to focus on leadership asa set of skills or experiences bolted onto a traditional engineering education with limited formalevidence of the impact these experiences have on student development.The purpose of this study is to test the effect of experiences engineering students have in leadershiproles on their perceived gains in leadership skills, using a national dataset. The framework guidingthis study is a model for engineering leadership identity constructed from Lave and Wenger’scommunities of practice model and Komives et al.’s model for leadership identity development(LID) which recognizes that the engineering formation process is, at its core, an identitydevelopment process. Engineering leadership is theorized to develop from
environmental [8], chemical [3], and mechanical engineers [9], as well ascivil engineering technologists [11]. International standards for engineering education alsoendorse the importance of leadership [12].Table 1. Summaries of Disciplinary Bodies of Knowledge in Engineering Engineering Number outcomes Leadership-Related Outcome(s) Discipline(s) [reference] All engineering 30: foundational (3), 24. Leadership: “move a team or group into new areas; professionals technical (16), identify the individuals and groups that could be positively or [2] professional (11) negatively affected by the change and describe those impacts to each of the
intrapersonal and interpersonal skill development, diversity andinclusion, group dynamics, and group development.The students frequently reported how concepts like the SBI feedback model [38] have supportedthem greatly with the development of their intrapersonal and interpersonal skills. The SBI modelhelps deliver more effective feedback because the students focus their feedback on specificsituations (S) and behaviors (B), and then outline the impact (I) that these behaviors had on them. “I adore the SBI model. Using it forces me to rethink the situation before sharing feedback which gives me an opportunity to evaluate exactly what the impact on me really was. Secondly, I have found that people are more receptive to the feedback
. Policysciences, 4(2), 155-169.[15] Heifetz, R. A. (1994). Leadership without easy answers (Vol. 465). Harvard UniversityPress.[16] Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share thevision. Organizational dynamics, 18(3), 19-31.[17] R. Lingard & S. Barkataki (2011). Teaching teamwork in engineering and computerscience. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2011 (pp. F1C-1). IEEE.[18] Kuh, G. D. (2008). Excerpt from high-impact educational practices: What they are, who hasaccess to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities.[19] Warnick, G. M., Schmidt, J., & Bowden, A. (2014). An experiential learning approach todevelop leadership competencies in engineering and
principles and trends), this participant rated them 16, 17, 15, 8, and 3 outof 100, respectively. The variation in faculty responses, as shown in Figure 3, promptedquestions regarding the potential role and impact that faculty training, development, and supportprograms may have on faculty knowledge of leadership; the source(s) of prior faculty training;and the potential alignment between industry and academia regarding these competencies. Figure 3: Faculty agreement with industry for selected competenciesWe recognize that, as a qualitative data collection instrument, these survey responses werelimited and devoid of context. However, aligning with our conceptual framework, weacknowledge that such responses are imbued with a variety of contextual
Education: A Review of Best Practices” 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 14-17, 2015, Seattle, Washington, USA.[6] Bayless, David J. and T. Richard Robe, “Leadership Education for Engineering Students”, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Washington DC, Oct 27-30, 2010.[7] Farr, J. V., & Brazil, D. M. (2009). Leadership skills development for engineers. Engineering Management Journal, 21(1), 3–8.[8] Farr, J. V., Walesh, S. G., & Forsythe, G. B. (1997). Leadership development for engineering managers. Journal of Management in Engineering, 13(4), 38–41.[9] Goodale, M. J. (2005). The right stuff: Traits and skills of effective leaders. Leadership and Management in
must make space for Unless engineers recognize the socio-(s) professional, communication engineers’ multiple, technical nature of their field, it will and interpersonal skills to divergent career paths— be difficult for them to think of complement their technical technical, managerial, themselves as leaders and accept their training. project management, professional responsibilities. entrepreneurial & hybrid.Data sources -Industry Surveys -Longitudinal surveys -Organizational