Paper ID #22121High-Enrollment Mechanical Engineering Programs Meeting the Challengeof Career Advising Through a Seminar CourseMs. Rachal E Thomassie, Texas A&M University Rachal Thomassie is a second year master’s student in the Interdisciplinary Engineering program at Texas A&M University with an emphasis on engineering education. She has over five years of industry ex- perience in mechanical design and systems engineering and over seven years of experience in academic affairs. She founded two mechanical engineering affiliated student organizations and a departmental Stu- dent Ambassador program. She also co
a member of the University Research Council before pursuing doctoral studies. Prior to joining ADDU in 2008, Ms. Soledad was a Senior Team Lead for Accenture, where she worked on and managed systems maintenance and enhancement projects.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Associate Professor in Virginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 10 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes
approach to engineering education despite guiding literature that suggestsan andragogical approach may be more appropriate.3 Students who experience only a pedagogicalapproach to learning may be ill-equipped to independently navigate the larger engineering bodyof knowledge because they may see faculty as gatekeepers to learning. As the body of engineeringknowledge increases at more rapid pace, students must continue to learn to stay relevantthroughout their careers. ABET acknowledges this reality through their student outcome (i) whichrequires students to recognize the need to and engage in life-long learning.2 More appropriately,faculty may need to assist students along a transition from pedagogical to andragogical learningthroughout the
Programs. Throughouthis career he has continued to teach at a variety of colleges and universities. For the last 4 years he hasbeen a part time instructor and collaborator with researchers at the University of Maryland BaltimoreCounty (http://me.umbc.edu/directory/). He is currently an Assistant Professor at York College PA. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Take Flight Robotics: A STEM-Education Workshop for High School StudentsSummer activities and programs are important to attract students to careers inscience, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). Take Flight Robotics (TFR)was a youth outreach workshop and program that ran for one week during thesummer in 2015 and 2016 at the
with information about how the class make-up changedover three years, our paper will analyze which of the initial students stayed in engineeringat DU, which left engineering, which left DU, and how the students changed between theirfreshman and senior years. The goal of the study is to see if there is any information in thestudents’ non-academic profiles that can help determine why a student may havesucceeded in engineering at DU or decided to leave. A future objective will also address thepossibility of using the profiles of students to help move towards personalized learning inorder to aid in retention of students within the program.IntroductionSince the 1980s interest in engineering, along with other technical careers, has been on
attendance ischecked in every class with considerable penalty for unexcused absences. The course was taughtin two separate sections by two instructors.Summary of activitiesThe weekly activities listed in Table 2 are described in more detail in this section.Week 1 - A presentation was given to introduce students to mechanical engineering as adiscipline and the numerous career opportunities in the field. Students were also introduced tothe Department of Mechanical Engineering, including faculty members, research areas, thecurriculum, minors, advising resources, student clubs, and previous Capstone projects. Theassociated assignment asked students to write a short report (using Word) in which they (1)explain their choice of ME as a major, (2) select a
individually, in-class active andcollaborative learning (ACL) exercises, and problem-based learning (PBL) team projects withentrepreneurially minded learning (EML) components. However, all modules are intended tofoster a better student understanding of the theory, practices, and career opportunities associatedwithin the fluid power industry.Starting in the Fall of 2016, the authors developed the modules and implemented them inmultiple sections (taught by different instructors) of Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanicscourses in three consecutive semesters (Fall 2016, Spring 2017, Fall 2017). Pre and post surveyswere conducted to gage the impact on student learning on the fluid power content before andafter the designed activities. Both direct and indirect
other softwareThe last goal of the new curriculum was to help the students obtain internships and coops soonerin their college careers and to be better prepared for these opportunities. This is perhaps the mostdifficult goal to quantify because we do not hear from all (or even many) of the students’internship or coop employers. However, on our final class surveys we have asked the studentsthemselves if they feel prepared to work at an internship/coop:Do you feel these courses have helped you feel more prepared for working at an internship/coop? 96% answered yesFinally, to attempt to gather the general sentiment and overall feelings from the students aboutthese three courses, the last question on the survey simply asked the students for any
sequencewhere students leave mechanical engineering?The ME Graduates cohort is purposely chosen to include only those students whoremained ME majors throughout their undergraduate careers. But, a critical questionconcerns those students who leave ME: When do they leave and why do they leave? Toexamine this question, a cohort was formed of all students who entered Georgia Tech asME majors between the years of 2009 and 2011, and who graduated prior to 2017. Thiscohort is termed ME Starters, and includes n = 1185 students.Figure 5 shows graphically how many ME Starters graduate with a BSME degree. Of the25% that leave ME (some of which actually leave the university), the largest number doso between Physics and prior to Statics. Only 8% of the ME Starters
the sustainable energy area. He has a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the Florida International University. He has been member with prestigious Honor Societies such as Tau Beta Pi, Phi Kappa Phi, Sigma Xi and Golden Key. He has published number of conference, Journal papers and book chapters in energy and sustainability area. He is a reviewer of several Journals in energy efficiency area. He is a member of the Editorial Board of ASME Early Career Technical Journal. Raised in Tehran, Iran, Dr. Rayegan now lives in Houston. He has served as an instructor at Semnan University, Iran for 5 years. He was selected as the best teacher of the Mechanical Engineering Department by students during 2002-2003 academic year
students interest in sustainability (N=25) Figure 5. Students’ opinion on the impact of learning sustainable engineering to their future career (N=25)With the class size of 25, before the course, students were exposed to very limited informationabout sustainability and its application in engineering. About 52% of the class have neutral orlow interest in the class subject matter. Later learned in conversations with students, moststudents actually did not really know what it means by “sustainability”, as well as what engineerscould do about sustainability. The effectiveness was obvious for this class in terms of increasingstudents’ interest in sustainability. 96% of the students have high or very high
biomedical engineering capstone design sequence at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Glen’s educational research interests include student learning styles, increasing student engagement with hands- on activities, and more recently, creativity & design. He has received an NSF CAREER award and served as a Fellow at the National Effective Teaching Institute. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 A Foundational Engineering Science Course and Its Impact on Those Who Teach ItCurricular innovations are difficult to implement and sustain. Many innovations were developedthrough the NSF-funded Engineering Education Coalitions in the early 1990’s
research can have a variety of models asillustrated by [18]. Despite the normal perception of one-on-one (faculty/student) mentoringprogram, student’s perception of how they are best supported appears to include a multi-mentoring approach, with a network of people who take interest in the student’s success [18]. Inaddition to understanding what students perceive as supportive mentoring, whether one-on-oneor the multi-person, successful mentoring must be detailed to include five components:communication, psychosocial support, career/professional development, science integrity, andresearch development [19]. However, in order to achieve such outcomes during a summerSURE program, then an interdisciplinary/multi mentor approach would seem most
Paper ID #22452Machine Design: Different Pedagogical Approaches to Achieve Targeted Out-comesDr. Robert Scott Pierce P.E., Western Carolina University Robert Scott Pierce is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina Univer- sity. He received his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Georgia Tech in 1993. Prior to his teaching career, he spent 14 years in industry designing automated equipment.Dr. Rungun Nathan, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus Dr. Rungun Nathan is an associate professor and program chair for mechanical engineering in the division of engineering at Penn State Berks
were implemented this early in the curriculum at ourinstitution. Such efforts have however been reported in literature [10], indicating similar goals ofhelping to enhance student learning; linking theory with real-world applications, and helping todevelop career-ready students prepared for job market requirements when they graduate. Thatstudy described implementation of two energy-related student projects using COMSOL andmentioned that assessment of students’ satisfaction with the experience based on survey data wasoverall positive, but survey data was not included [10]. Our project incorporated three scaffolded and contextualized simulations that develop:(a) technical competency in modeling, (b) deeper understanding of thermo-fluids
Paper ID #21221An Arduino-Based Hardware Platform for a Mechanical Engineering Sopho-more Design CourseDr. Mark David Bedillion, Carnegie Mellon University Dr. Bedillion received the BS degree in 1998, the MS degree in 2001, and the PhD degree in 2005, all from the mechanical engineering department of Carnegie Mellon University. After a seven year career in the hard disk drive industry, Dr. Bedillion was on the faculty of the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology for over 5 years before joining Carnegie Mellon as a Teaching Faculty in 2016. Dr. Bedillion’s research interests include control applications in robotics
throughout theireducational career [13]. Similar results were confirmed for fifth graders in a separate study [14],and for learning-disabled students in [15] Another study, [16], showed that first graders learnedand retained at a significantly higher rate when imagery was used, and further, the studentsshowed higher level of creativity with usage of imagery [17], a result that can be exploited inhigher-education problem-solving. A more recent study [18] reports the effect of using visualthinking software to improve writing skills of students with mild disabilities, and another one[19] provides a practical best practice example on how visual thinking is used to enhance studentbackground knowledge.Although, these studies were performed at the level of
challenges for educators [12].Engineering education scholars Juan Lucena and Jon Leydens suggest incorporating contextualdetail into more traditional technical problems that students are presented with. They proposedoing so by asking traditional technical questions in ways that require students to interrogatepotential circumstances of problems they are given in class [13]. This can be done in ways thatdo not forfeit the technical requirements demanded of an engineer, but rather complementlearning in the classroom to better mirror (and prepare students for) the socio-technical worknecessary for acting as Engineering Changemakers or, simply, for successful careers inengineering.This paper details the first iteration of a module to incorporate
. Scholar. Dr. Wood joined the faculty at the University of Texas in September 1989 and established a computational and experimental laboratory for research in engineering design and manufacturing, in addition to a teaching laboratory for prototyping, reverse engineering measurements, and testing. During his academic career, Dr. Wood was a Distinguished Visiting Professor at the United States Air Force Academy. Through 2011, Dr. Wood was a Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Design & Manufacturing Division at The University of Texas at Austin. He was a National Science Foundation Young Investigator, the ”Cullen Trust for Higher Education Endowed Professor in Engineering,” ”Uni- versity Distinguished Teaching
approachin preparing graduates for engineering careers is to require students to attend classes, listen toinstructor’s lectures explaining the basic theories and concepts related to the subject; and observeor participate in solving example problems during lectures. Students are also asked to read thecontent of the required textbook describing the theories and concepts.Textbooks used in undergraduate engineering course cover basic concepts and theories in eachchapter and provide several example problems to help students gain a better understanding of thetheory and engineering applications. At the end of each chapter, textbooks frequently include alarge set of problems to be used as homework assignments. The purpose of homework is forstudents to gain
Paper ID #23589Development of an Introduction to Circuits Course and Lab for MechanicalEngineering Students via Systematic Design of InstructionDr. Grant Crawford, Quinnipiac University Grant Crawford, PhD, P.E., Colonel (retired) U.S. Army, is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and the Director of Career Development for the School of Engineering at Quinnipiac University. He is the former Director of the Mechanical Engineering Program at the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York. Grant graduated from West Point in 1985 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Me- chanical Engineering. He earned a M.S. degree
Vehicle Research Institute operates as a technology development center that provides undergradu- ate students with opportunities for career specific training and research. Funding comes from a variety of sources including the Department of Energy, Department of Transportation, EPA, Paul Allen Family Foundation, BP, Washington State Department of Agriculture, Whatcom Public Utility District, Boeing, Janicki Industries, Northwest Porsche Club, Danner Corp. and Fluke. Past supporters include the De- partment of Defense, Fuji Heavy Industries (Subaru), PACCAR, Mazda, Ford, Bentley (parent company Audi), Alcoa, Conoco-Phillips, CNG Fuels of Canada, Chrysler, and DaimlerChrysler. c American Society