Asee peer logo
Displaying all 29 results
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rachal E Thomassie, Texas A&M University; Kathryn Kirsch, Pennsylvania State University; Eric R Marsh, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Timothy J. Jacobs, Texas A&M University
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
one new online learning module introduced each week; themodules are structured such that a discussion of the week’s topic is offered first, with a gradedassignment given at the end. Discussion content is shared with students through onlineperiodicals, instructional videos, case studies, and worksheets.The content in each course was curated specifically to address the students’ relevant needs. Thetiming of the course offering in junior year is critical because students are first entering theirspecific discipline at that time: content is focused on developing plans for themselves andidentifying goals. In the senior year course, content is focused on helping students properlyassess full-time job offers and adjust to life beyond college. This
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Huihui Qi, Grand Valley State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
sustainability b. Evaluate a product/ engineering system’s environmental impacts using Life Cycle Assessment c. Design/ redesign a product/ engineering system to using the engineering principles to improve environmental impactsThe achievement of these goals was assessed through students’ self-evaluations and analysis ofstudents’ coursework. In addition, the objectives are also planned to be assessed throughstudents’ capstone senior projects. But at the time of creation of this work-in-progress paper, thestudents who took this course have not worked on their senior project yet, as a result, this part ofthe assessment is planned to be conducted once the students worked on their senior projects. Toextend and complete this work-in-progress, it
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sreenidhi Krishnamoorthy, University of California, Davis
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
process to using thosemethods is equally important to achieve the desired results in colleges thatcurrently use lectures as the primary mode of teaching. The planning processinvolved in such a transition and its effectiveness was investigated by using themechanical engineering department in a leading R1 university as case-study,where a departmental policy of promoting active learning methods inundergraduate classes was newly implemented. Professors and teaching assistantsinstructing mechanical engineering courses in this college were interviewed tounderstand the steps they went through to transition to using more active methodsof teaching. Data collected from instructors-of-record in 5 different sophomoreand junior level courses revealed their
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 11
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Seth Norberg, U.S. Military Academy; Tim Ashcraft, Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, United States Military Academy; Matthew Miller, United States Military Academy; Michael J Benson, U.S. Military Academy
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
] methodology begins withthe students completing a detailed step by step cookbook style lab and then allowing students in groupsof two develop lab plans based on the following topics: objective, data to be collected, equipment,procedure, equations required for data reduction, how data is to be presented, and then references.In summary, these papers introduce a traditional step-by-step lab procedure often referred to as“cookbook” style labs and then move to more open-ended labs increasing in complexity and reportingrequirements where the students formulate a problem, select and manipulate the equipment, executethe experiment, and then write a technical lab report. Attempting to build on this crawl-walk-run styleof executing laboratories, the methodology
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kathryn R. Gosselin, San Jose State University; Nicole Okamoto, San Jose State University
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
multi-disciplinary teamsME graduates: 1. Participates fully in team, respects team members' opinions, resolves conflicts (if any) 2. Demonstrate team leadership by taking responsibility for various tasks, motivating others to reach project goals 3. Communicate ideas in ways that teammates can understandThe teamwork outcome was recently revised by ABET to be Outcome 5: “an ability to functioneffectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative andinclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives.” This change will requiresome minor revisions to the performance criteria and rubrics, but the general conclusions aboutthe assessment improvement process remain the same.The peer
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 9
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hadas Ritz, Cornell University; Meredith N. Silberstein, Cornell University; Nelly Andarawis-Puri, Cornell University
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
Stress [kPa] 100 50 0 0 5 10 15 Strain [%]ENGRD 2020 Discussion Activity —2—Uniaxial Tension Test Group Members:A1. Spend a few minutes brainstorming with your partner about what data you will need to collect. Use the space below to plan your experiments. For example, you may want to make an empty table which lists all the data you plan on collecting.A2. Get approval from your TA of your experimental plan before proceeding.ENGRD 2020 Discussion
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Breigh Nonte Roszelle, University of Denver; Karen Kaye Langenberg, Indigo Education Company; Jason Andrew Roney, University of Denver; Matt Gordon P.E., University of Denver
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
students as seniors, comparing the maleversus female students.Another area where gender showed differences was the change in skills reported by thestudents between freshman and senior year. As shown in table 1 there was some change ineach skill for both genders, however the women had much greater variance betweenfreshman and senior year. The male students did not have any area that changed more than10%, while the women had several. They had a greater than 10% decrease in DecisionMaking, Flexibility, Futuristic Thinking, Goal Orientation, Interpersonal Skills, Leadership,Persuasion and Presenting. The two areas they had a greater than 10% increase wereDiplomacy Tact and Planning Organizing.Table 1: The percentage change in soft skills between
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Simon Thomas Ghanat P.E., The Citadel; Dena Garner, The Citadel; Jason Howison, The Citadel; Rebecca A. Hunter, The Citadel; Breeanne Baker Swart, The Citadel; Shankar Madhab Banik, The Citadel; Michael P. Verdicchio, The Citadel; Nathan John Washuta P.E., The Citadel
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
productive.In addition, part of this program must include appropriate training and support for those who arementoring the students. Assessments need to continually redefine desired outcomes and goals ofsuch programs.Another shortcoming was that the program gave students and faculty a stipend, but it did notprovide any research related expenses. This is potentially limiting for some projects if faculty donot plan for student researchers far enough in advance.Changes that will be made for the upcoming summer program will include faculty sessions toprovide structure and methods for appropriate mentoring. In addition, SURE students will bepaired with a faculty member who is not a part of the research project, serving as a role modeland guide for
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 8
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Julie Mendez, Indiana University-Purdue University Columbus
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
engineering courses. This paper will describe theimplementation of standards-based specifications grading (SBSG) in a sophomore-levelthermodynamics course, offered in a hybrid (approximately 80% online) format, in a mechanicalengineering curriculum.Description of CourseThe course was offered in a hybrid format for the first time in the 2017 fall semester. The coursewas taught in a traditional in-person format in the 2016 fall semester by the same instructor usingSBSG. The original plan for the hybrid course involved a face-to-face meeting approximatelyonce every two weeks, for approximately two hours (one lecture hour and one recitation hour).However, the instructor found out a few months before the start of the course that she would beout of the
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 7
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Trung H. Duong, Colorado State University-Pueblo; Nebojsa I. Jaksic, Colorado State University, Pueblo
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
robot and acomputer was developed. Modern and state-of-the-art programming environments, such asMATLAB Robotics Toolbox, or free version of Robotics Toolbox from Peter Corke, etc., can beused to communicate and control the robot. Bypassing the provided and outdated software retiredtogether with the robots by their manufacturers, students now have a greater flexibility to chooseprogramming languages as their preference. Moreover, they can utilize many open source and up-to-date libraries to create their own software to solve vast problems ranging from forward/inversekinematics/dynamics, path planning, to robot vision and learning in a graphical user-friendlyenvironment. This work was implemented at Colorado State University-Pueblo
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Carmen Cioc, University of Toledo; Sorin Cioc, University of Toledo; Richard A. Springman P.E., University of Toledo
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
importance that life-long learning and intellectual curiosity have on people’slives.Our experience has been largely positive and we plan to expand our capstone project list toinclude more such projects.Project #1: EZ Loader – Fall 2017This project was developed by five students enrolled in the Engineering Technology Department.Two of them graduated with a major in Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET), two with amajor in Electrical Engineering Technology (EET), and one with a major in EET with MEconcentration. The mechanical engineering majors designed and laid out the EZ Loaderprototype, including developing designs, machining, fabrication, and assembly for the mountingpoints, bevels, housings, the conveyor and the roller assembly. The electrical
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 11
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Liping Liu, Lawrence Technological University; James A. Mynderse, Lawrence Technological University; Robert W Fletcher, Lawrence Technological University; Andrew L Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
Thermodynamics, thisfaculty member also assigned the same Thermodynamics student activities to students enrolled inIntroduction to Thermal Systems and Applied Thermodynamics. Data was collected for both ofthese courses in addition to the planned Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics sections. Figure 1 Courses with modified content highlighted in the BSME curriculumThrough 2016 Fall to 2017 Fall, the developed modules were implemented to introduce studentsinto the area of fluid power. Eight different instructors were involved and a total of 239 studentswere exposed, as shown in Table 1. Results in different courses are presented in sections below. Table 1 Course sections covered and number of students introduced to fluid power Semester
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
PS Dhanasekaran, University of Minnesota, Duluth; Ping Zhao, University of Minnesota, Duluth
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
. Assessment establishes thatraise in student engagement and learning is significant. Student engagement calculated for thetotal class registration against the actual number of students present for that day. Actualengagement will be little higher, if the student engagement is computed against the actualnumber of student present in the class. However, it is evident that student engagement andlearning improved, using above method to solve problems through active learning. As a futurework, authors plan to establish a method to measure and present the increased effectiveness ofactive learning in such courses.References[1] Jenny A. Van Amburgh, et al, A Tool for Measuring Active Learning in the Classroom,American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 2007
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Elizabeth A. Reddy, University of San Diego; Breanne Przestrzelski, University of San Diego; Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego; Imane Khalil, University of San Diego
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
contextual detail in traditionaltechnical problems that we are developing as part of a Heat Transfer course in MechanicalEngineering in University of San Diego’s Shiley Marcos School of Engineering. Here, wedescribe the design and integration into the course and evaluate the results using student memosand classroom observation. Based on this analysis, we have developed further plans for moduledevelopment. Detailed instructor guides and materials are available in the Appendix.Course ContextStudent PopulationIn Fall 2017, 28 students were enrolled in this section of a Heat Transfer course, including 5women and 23 men. Two of these students were simultaneously enrolled in courses designed todeal extensively with engineering praxis that engages social
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 8
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amir Karimi P.E., University of Texas, San Antonio; Randall D. Manteufel P.E., University of Texas, San Antonio
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
to solve problemsindependently, 60% of students indicated that they had either used or were planning to use thesolution manual to do their homework assignments. Forty-one percent (41%) of respondentsbelieved that using solution manuals in completing homework assignments has the same learningbenefit as solving problems independently; 57% of students indicated that using solution manualwhile doing homework assignments provides the same educational experience as solving theexamples in the textbook; and 95% indicated that solving homework problems is essential forlearning the materials and succeeding in the courses they were enrolled in.Table 2. 2010 anonymous course surveys conducted in three different thermodynamic classes: 5
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Bobby G Crawford P.E., Quinnipiac University; Jose Antonio Riofrio, Quinnipiac University; Richard Melnyk, U.S. Military Academy
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
do aftercompletion of this particular unit of instruction. The LOs are presented to the students at thebeginning of each lesson (often written on the board before the start of class). As an example, thefirst lesson (“Introduction / Definitions”) has the following LOs: 1. Explain course administrative policies 2. Explain why the study of Circuits is important to Mechanical Engineers 3. Define fundamental Circuits terms (charge, current, voltage, power) 4. Measure voltage across and current through a circuit element 5. Calculate power and energy produced or consumed by a circuit elementAs with most courses in the School of Engineering at QU, the theory (lecture notes) andproblem-solving are planned and
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 7
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michelle Soledad, Virginia Tech, Ateneo de Davao University; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Cheryl Carrico P.E., Virginia Tech
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
Interview Prompt EVT Linkage What happens in a typical class period? (Participants were asked to describe Activity specific teacher activities that the class usually engage in and the kind of interactions that happen behaviors; teacher strategies in the classroom) Student engagement & performance; student ability Please describe how you plan and make decisions for class. What role do your Activity specific teacher students’ beliefs play in these decisions? behaviors; teacher
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mark David Bedillion, Carnegie Mellon University; Karim Heinz Muci-Kuchler, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Walelign Messele Nikshi, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
student teams to apply what they are learning to the conceptual design ofa simple product. Product Design and Development by Ulrich and Eppinger [21] is used as thecourse textbook and the product development process considered is for “market pull” products oflow to moderate complexity. The main topics covered in the course include: • Introduction to the product development process. • Product planning. • Introduction to basic systems thinking and systems engineering concepts. • Identification of customer needs. • Setting target specifications. • Concept generation. • Product architecture. • Concept selection. • Prototyping. • Concept testing.The course is structured as a two-credit lecture portion with a
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 8
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Agnes Germaine d'Entremont P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Juan Abelló P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
of future OPL taxonomies inengineering.Overall, it was helpful developing related subjects’ taxonomies in parallel, not only because itallowed for consistency of style and language, but because we could ensure that material in thereferenced textbooks that crossed into another subject could be appropriately categorized withthat other subject.We developed guidelines for keywords that may help to ameliorate the limitations of the searchfunction and lack of cross-referencing in the OPL. A controlled vocabulary for some of thefacets we identified (such as problem type) would be an asset to have, and may be something todevelop in the future. We hope these guidelines can provide consistency across engineeringsubject areas and institutions.We plan
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 9
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Luis E. Monterrubio, Robert Morris University
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
postdoctoral fellow in the area of bioacoustics. He teaches dynamics, machine design, numerical methods and finite element methods. He has work for the automotive industry in drafting, manufacturing, testing (internal combustion engines—power, torque and exhaust emissions, vibration fatigue, thermo-shock, tensile tests, etc.), simulations (finite element method), and as a project manager (planning and installation of new testing facilities). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Good Practices in Finite Element Method with a Frequency Analysis ExampleIntroductionThe finite element method (FEM) allows engineers to solve different types of problems
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Morteza Nurcheshmeh P.E., Western Kentucky University
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
sizes, and developed a projectmanagement plan that allowed them to propose a final design. In the Fall 2015 semester thedesign phase was finished with an in-depth description of reasoning for major decisions. Designdocumentation included detailed model drawings, component specifications sheets, calculations,and vendor information. The proposed design was approved at the end of that semester by thelocal company and a $20,000 budget was provided to students by the industry sponsor to buildthe system. During the following Spring 2016 semester students worked on acquiring thecomponents, building the device, programming, and testing. The goals of the project wereaccomplished by the end of the Spring semester.The device built was very favorably
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Pattabhi Sitaram, Baker College, Flint, Michigan; Anca L. Sala, Baker College, Flint
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
programthrough proper planning and execution. The 223 quarter credits, equivalent to about 149semester credits, have been reduced to 120 semester credits, thus enabling full-time students tograduate in 4 years as opposed to 5 years in the quarter system, and also better positioning ourprogram to be competitive with programs of other institutions, especially those in our vicinity.The reduction in the semester credits was possible through reviewing the curriculum, combining,modifying, and eliminating courses, without diluting student learning or deviating from ABETrequirements. Both full-time and adjunct faculty members were involved in the Q2S conversion.The semester system went into effect in fall 2017. There is no quantitative assessment of theimpact
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gregory Martin Freisinger, U.S. Military Academy; Richard Melnyk, U.S. Military Academy; Brian J. Novoselich, U.S. Military Academy
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
AdultDevelopment. 11(2): p. 103-110.23 S. Bell, "Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future," The ClearingHouse: A Journal for Educations Strategies, Issues, and Ideas, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 39-43, 2010.24 Abd-El-Fattah, Sabry. “Garrison’s Model of Self-Directed Learning: Preliminary Validationand Relationship to Academic Achievement,” The Spanish Journal of Psychology. 13(2): p. 586-596. ISSN 1138-7416.25 Jones, B.; Paretti, M.; Hein, S.; Knott, T., “An Analysis of Motivation Constructs with First-Year Engineering Student: Relationships Among Expectancies, Values, Achievement, andCareer Plans”, Journal of Engineering Education, October 2010.26 Carberry, A., M. Ohland, and C. Swan (2010). A pilot validation study of the
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jessica Lofton, University of Evansville; Jared T. Fulcher, University of Evansville; Dick Blandford, University of Evansville
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
students and 1 transfer student. High school GPA was onlyreported for 50 students of the total sample including 4 female students and 1 transfer student.The authors realize that the data are limited for this study and plan to keep expanding the data setwith future graduating classes.SAT scores were not available for all students in the sample. In the event that a student reportedACT score but no SAT score, the ACT math score was converted to an equivalent SAT mathscore using College Board’s concordance tables [10]. It should be noted that there is errorassociated with converting between ACT and SAT test scores, however the concordance tablesthat were used achieved a 0.89 correlation between ACT and SAT math scores. With this highcorrelation the
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Brett Batson, Trine University
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
techniques committed to by students.Thermodynamics 1. Preview-read-review 42.9% 2. Use the intense study cycle for Practice Problems 71.4% 3. Chapter or concept mapping 19.0% 4. Practice teaching the material 61.9% 5. Flashcards 9.5% 6. Other 9.5%The two students who marked “Other” described their plans as
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 7
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Todd Letcher, South Dakota State University; Gregory J. Michna, South Dakota State University; John D. VerSteeg, South Dakota State University; Sarah M. Michna, South Dakota State University
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
plan to beginaddressing some of the changes requested by the students, such as more online video tutorialsand online written notes and perhaps a course manual/textbook as a reference for the entire set ofcourses.References[1] M. Lord, “Seeing and Doing: Revamped curricula show freshmen what it means to be anengineer,” ASEE Prism, vol. 21, p. 34, September 2011.[2] D. W. Knight, L. E. Carlson, and J. F. Sullivan, “Staying in Engineering: Impact of a Hands-On, Team-Based, First-Year Projects Course on Student Retention,” in Proceedings of the 2003American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2003.[3] M. Hoit and M. Ohland, “The Impact of a Discipline-Based Introduction to EngineeringCourse on Improving Retention
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 11
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kathryn Anne Wingate, Georgia Institute of Technology ; Aldo A. Ferri, Georgia Institute of Technology; Karen M. Feigh, Georgia Tech
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
counting terms when the student is on professional internship or co-opemployment; terms when students studied abroad are included. The outlined MEcurriculum at Georgia Tech institution suggests that a student should graduate with 129credit hours in 8 terms, or 4 years. The average time to graduation was 9.8 terms, whichis roughly 5 years. As seen in the figure, time to graduation tends to increase as the gradethat they received in these foundational classes decreases. For all courses, ‘A’ studentsgraduated on average in 9.4 terms, which is more than a term longer than Georgia Tech’sME curriculum plan. In general, ‘F’ students graduate on average two terms (1 year) laterthan ‘A’ students- however, due to small sample sizes and high variances, there
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 11
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Edward James Diehl P.E., University of Hartford
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
the usefulness of these cartoons was an afterthought, so an important lesson learnedwas to plan out a way to evaluate the benefits before the semester ended and the studentsdispersed. The end-of-course survey could have been modified to include questions about thecartoons which would have provided more student feedback data.The author changed universities in Fall of 2017 and as of the writing of this article is midwaythrough teaching Dynamics at the new school. Newtdog and Wormy are featured prominently,and a renewed focus on using the cartoons as catalysts for discussion has led to improvedengagement, especially helpful with a new faculty member. There has been more cartoondiscussion at the introduction of each new topic, and images such as
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alex C. Szatmary, King's College
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
assess student performance in a chemical engineering curriculum,” in Proceedings of the Fall 2016 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference, 2016. [6] J. C. Guarino, J. R. Ferguson, and V. K. C. Pakala, “Quantitative assessment of program outcomes using longitudinal data from the FE exam,” Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, vol. 23, p. 1, 2013. [7] R. Helgeson and E. Wheeler, “Passing the Fundamentals of Engineering examination as a graduation requirement in a general engineering program: Lessons learned,” Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2006. [8] O. Pierrakos and H. Watson, “A comprehensive ABET-focused assessment plan designed to involve all program faculty