Asee peer logo
advanced search
Displaying all 4 results

A Review of Electronic Engineering Logbooks Throughout the Electrical Engineering Curriculum

Conference Session
Scaling class size and technology – New Engineering Educators Division
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Steven S Holland, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Jennifer L Bonniwell, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Joshua David Carl, Milwaukee School of Engineering
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
Paper ID #21867A Review of Electronic Engineering Logbooks Throughout the Electrical En-gineering CurriculumDr. Steven S Holland, Milwaukee School of Engineering Steven S. Holland (M ’13) was born in Chicago, IL, in 1984. He received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE), Milwaukee, WI, in 2006, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical and computer engineering from the University of Massachusetts Amherst, in 2008 and 2011 respectively. From 2006 to 2011, he was a Research Assistant working in the Antennas and Propagation Laboratory (APLab), Department of Electrical and
Relevance Score: 0.018437438

Implementation and Assessment of New Techniques in Technical Writing

Conference Session
Assessment of Student Learning – New Engineering Educators Division
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hani Serhal Saad, Eastern Washington University
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
since theyare very math oriented and reluctant to recognize the importance of the topic. Butcommunication is most definitely an engineering asset that any successful engineermust have. The goal of this research is to compare the technical writingperformance of students before and after a series of changes were implemented inthe university’s technical writing course ‘Laboratory Analysis and Reports’. Thesechanges included providing more feedback to students, allowing them to resubmitassignments after an initial grading, reading assignments in front of the class,reading, summarizing and discussing technical papers in addition to otherlaboratory exercises. The results are evaluated by grading a number of student finalprojects from the pre and post
Relevance Score: 0.01720469

Failure Rates in Engineering: Does It Have to Do with Class Size?

Conference Session
Scaling class size and technology – New Engineering Educators Division
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Peggy C. Boylan-Ashraf, San Jose State University; John R. Haughery, Iowa State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
Relevance Score: 0.010752931

Improved Pedagogy Enabled by Assessment Using Gradescope

Conference Session
Assessment of Student Learning – New Engineering Educators Division
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sara A. Atwood, Elizabethtown College; Arjun Singh, Gradescope
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
assignmentsand as teaching assistants in the Strength of Materials laboratory. The instructor graded allexams.Rubric-Based Online Grading ToolA rubric-based online grading tool (Gradescope) was used in both course offerings to grade andgive feedback on exams. The grading tool is based on four fundamental principles of effectiveand efficient feedback: that it is prompt, equitable, flexible, and formative (Figure 2). gradescope • Graders:reducesgrading/mebyno/ngsimilar Prompt mistakesinsteadofrewri/ngcomments • Students:feedbackisprompt • Gradersandstudents:ensuresconsistentgrading Equitable
Relevance Score: 0.0075270524