Conference Session

Classroom Strategies – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ralph Ocon, Purdue University Northwest

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

learning objectives that werelisted in the course syllabus and summarized in Table 2. At a minimum, the CPS Assignment wasdesigned to satisfy Learning Objectives 1, 2 and 5. The assignment also satisfied some of theABET criterion required by program accreditation. Incidentally, the learning objectives were thesame for both the online and face-to-face courses.Table 2: (OLS 35000) Course Learning Objectives. This course satisfies ABET criterion c, e, g, h and j- The Course Objectives are: 1. List and explain 5 reasons why creative thinking and problem-solving are important in today’s global economy. (h, j) 2. Describe the 5 components of the Creative Problem Solving Process. (c, e) 3. Create a Mandala. (c, e, g) 4. List 5 major barriers to

Conference Session

Assessment of Student Learning – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sara A. Atwood, Elizabethtown College; Arjun Singh, Gradescope

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

mechanical engineering courses over two successive cohortsand want to share key features that may appeal to both new and experienced engineeringeducators to support improved pedagogy. These include the ability to: • grade student submissions online in any location, • change the point value associated with a particular mistake once and apply to the entire population, • quickly reference similar mistakes instead of rewriting the same comment, • retain a digital record of the student work, and • return feedback digitally outside of classroom time.The online rubric-based grading tool can facilitate feedback that is prompt, equitable,explanatory and formative. Such tools can inform opportunities to re-teach and re-test in

Conference Session

Scaling class size and technology – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Geoffrey Recktenwald, Michigan State University; Allison Godwin, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Anant Sahai, University of California, Berkeley; Matthew West, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Paper ID #23578A Corporate Organizational Model for Scaling Class SizeDr. Geoffrey Recktenwald, Michigan State University Dr. Recktenwald is a lecturer in Mechanical Engineering at Michigan State University where he teaches courses in in mechanics and mathematical methods. He completed his degree in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics at Cornell University in stability and parametric excitation. His active areas of research are dynamic stability, online assessment, and instructional pedagogy.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant

Conference Session

Classroom Strategies – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vimal Kumar Viswanathan, San Jose State University; John T. Solomon, Tuskegee University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Preparation in TIED UPIn TIED UP, the course material preparation begins with the identification of the concepts involved in thecourse. Firstly, the course syllabus is revisited to identify the basic concepts involved in the course. Thefirst module (Kinematics) has been divided into 36 discrete concepts, as shown in Figure 1. For the designof the delivery materials, each concept is treated separately. Similarly, the second module is divided into39 basic concepts.Once the concept list is ready, the next step is to analyze the resources associated with each concept. Thetextbook contents and the previous lecture material are analyzed carefully to identify the pre-requisiteknowledge necessary to understand that concept. This procedure is according to the