Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Neelam Prabhu Gaunkar, Iowa State University; Mani Mina, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

their learning. This includes thetime to allow gradual maturing by the students to understand the process of their learning.Finally, based on the reflections provided by the student, there is more evidence of theirawareness and eagerness to realize the value of lifelong learning.In our courses, during each lecture, students engage in activities/problem solving and discusstheir thoughts, ideas and reflections with their teams. Through these reflections, the studentsreview and summarize their learning from previous lectures and at the same time they activelyengage in the process of thinking and deliberation within the classroom.A day in the non-calculus based class Every class, starts with a brief review, open discussions and Q/A of the last

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Soheil Fatehiboroujeni, University of California, Merced

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

Y. Lincoln, Competing paradigms in qualitative research: Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage Publications, 1994.[15] Q. Zhu and B. K. Jesiek, “A pragmatic approach to ethical decision-making in engineering practice: Characteristics, evaluation criteria, and implications for instruction and assessment,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 23, pp. 663–679, Jun 2017.[16] S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth, “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410–8415, 2014.[17] K. A. Smith, S. D. Sheppard, D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson