simulation of the responsivefacade system, another one will be mainly focused on experiment design and facade daylightperformance measurements, and third student will work on the analysis and interpretation ofdata.The proposed activities The primary objective of this paper is to develop educational activities for optimizingadaptation angles in numerous environmental conditions for responsive facade systems. Thisoptimization framework provides users with maximum visual comforts in high-performancebuildings. As figure 1 presents, the proposed activities are as follows: 67 1. Activity for Identification of Active Design Variables Variables that can be manipulated in response to external
ofstudent learning includes lab reports and performance grades in the final challenge.Course overviewThis is the first course in a series designed to introduce all freshman engineering students to thefundamental concepts of engineering design that will be applied throughout their undergraduateengineering education. Blended online and physical laboratory activities are used to achieve bothoverall and specific learning objectives.The changing learning styles and expectations of today’s first-year students were considered, anda flipped classroom model was chosen to complement new problem-based-learning, design-focused, seven-week design projects in the freshman curriculum created as part of a curriculumdevelopment effort. [1] Therefore, based on the
sections.IntroductionThe traditional engineering curricula require students to take majority of their first-year andsecond-year courses in physical sciences and math before enrolling in engineering courses tocomplete their upper division. This lack of engineering-based experiences during the first yearsof students’ college experience may have a negative impact on retention, in that many studentslose interest and leave engineering during the first year, without understanding the importance ofrigorous training in math and physical sciences. Many universities have implemented innovativefirst-year programs to improve the retention[1].We started our first-year program six years ago by incorporating evidence-based practices thatprior work has shown to be effective [2
. Systematic approaches for integrating thecontents of sustainability and sustainable design are necessary to address the revised ABETcriterion.IntroductionThe Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) is currently consideringrevisions to their Criterion for Accrediting Engineering Programs [1]. These changes involve alarge shift in the intended scope of the criteria. Traditionally, the ABET criterion sought toensure quality and develop engineers that satisfy the needs of constituencies [2]. The revisionextends this goal to develop engineers who: ● can participate in a multicultural environment ● have discipline specific knowledge in usability, constructability, manufacturability, and sustainability ● are cognizant of the
various agencies serving multiple transportation modes on field trips and on-site seminars; and,- Enhance students’ leadership and professional skills through activities designed to introduce them to university life and the main requirements needed to obtain a college degree. The details of the 2017 NSTI program at Rowan University/CREATEs are presented inTable 1 below. As indicated in this table, the program lasted four weeks with each week given aspecial theme highlighting one of the three major transportation modes (i.e., Air Transportation,Water Transportation, and Surface Transportation) and Transportation Safety. The programincluded a registration, orientation, and welcome session; seasoned speaker sessions; hands
Engineering Education, 2018 Evidence-Based Best Practices for First-Year Blended Learning ImplementationAbstractThe objective of this evidence-based study is to synthesize best practices for developing flippedclassroom material in large-scale first year courses. These best practices are extracted from threeyears of flipped classroom implementation experience in both technical and design engineeringcourses mandatory for first year students. This research will present valuable lessons and analyzedifferences between the suitability of different course types for the flipped educational model.Best Practice #1: Implementation of the flipped teaching and learning approach should beassociated with three phases. Starting with a pre-classroom phase, followed
students prefer challenge-based instruction tolecture pedagogy. From the perspective of education policy, we believe these results support theincreased incorporation of challenge-based modules in new and evolving biomedical engineeringclasses.1. Introduction:Engineering educators have the important task of preparing their students to apply thefundamental knowledge, obtained in the academy, to solve complex and diverse problems intheir field(s). To legitimize this student-centered goal, as well as hold accredited engineeringprograms accountable facilitating students’ development of technical and non-technical skillsnecessary for engineering practice, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) has maintained engineering student
projects. Now in its third year of continued refinement and analysis, theUniversity is offering 5 sections of the 8 credit hour course (Full Cornerstone) and 20 sections ofa version with 2 separate 4 credit hour courses (Split Cornerstone) that run over the fall andspring semester. Each section is populated with approximately 30 first-year students from a totalfirst-year class size exceeding 700 students.With two versions implemented over the past two years, there has been enough redesign towarrant more discussion. The course redesign has been driven by feedback and evidence,fundamentally following the design process we teach in the course. The data used to drive thisredesign has come from four sources: 1) a survey of students in both the
course.IntroductionAs universities strive to graduate engineering students who can make an impact on society,engineering leadership programs have become more prominent. The National Academy ofEngineering [1] as well as various engineering professional societies highlight the importance ofleadership skills in engineering [2-6]. This trend is reinforced by the newly approved ABETCriteria for the 2019-20 review cycle that includes “the ability to function effectively on a teamwhose members together provide leadership … establish goals, plans tasks, and meet objectives”[7]. With these ABET changes come questions about how to assess leadership. Because theconversation among educators on developing leadership in engineering students is growing, thisresearch seeks to
’ research and practice, which informs howthey teach a project management course for experienced, practicing engineers as part of theMaster of Engineering Management (MEM) program [1] at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.This paper significantly updates and expands upon a paper presented to the ASEE EngineeringManagement Division at the ASEE 2016 Conference [2]. Key features of the subject program follow: Students • All students are practicing engineers, working full-time, as they pursue their graduate studies. All entering students must have at least two years of professional practice. At present, students average about eight years of preceding professional experience, with some having
survey data on students’ perceptions of learning and opinionson the methods used in the course delivery. Thus far, we have concluded that the use oftraditional hand-written homework, frequent assessment via quizzes [1], or the PearsonMastering Engineering [2] software for formative assessment did not have a significant impacton students’ performance on exams. It was also observed that neither traditional nor onlinehomework scores correlated well with exam scores; however, in-class quizzes did correlate withfinal exam scores. Most recently, using the Mastering Engineering Online system, specificallythe inclusion of the Adaptive Follow-Up modules [3], it was observed that this also lacked anyimpact on overall student performance. In fact, adaptive
. Under her mentorship, Dr. Ofori-Boadu’s students have presented 10 research posters at various NCAT Undergraduate Research Symposia resulting in her receiv- ing a 2017 Certificate of Recognition for Undergraduate Research Mentoring. She was also selected as a 2018 National Science Foundation - NC A & T ADVANCE IT Faculty Scholar. Her primary research en- gagements have been in bio-modified cement pastes, sustainable construction, and STEM education. She has received over $170,000 to support her teaching, research, and outreach projects. Overall, Dr. Ofori- Boadu’s research work has resulted in 1 book publication, 13 publications in peer-reviewed journals, 5 conference proceedings, 2 accepted manuscripts (in-press
investmentin the infrastructure of PROGRAM. “[The purpose of PROGRAM is to] Promote and sustain a culture of engineering education scholarship and innovation that reaches across all programs in the College of Engineering and promotes educational excellence and institutional diversity.”The emphasis on culture, as a key element of the proposed initiative, was notably restated withinan accompanying figure from the proposal (Figure 1). This figure conceptualizes a developingEngineering Education (ENED) culture as providing connections between educational researchand pedagogical innovation and practice. Figure 1: Conceptual Diagram of PROGRAM EcosystemIn addition, the following key principles were developed by PROGRAM
biology and a Ph.D. in science education, all from Purdue University. His research interests include integration of computers in education, particularly in STEM disciplines; e-learning; and interactive multimedia. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Examining and Characterizing Elementary School Teachers' Engineering Design-based Instructional Practices and Their Impact on Students’ Science AchievementIntroductionOver the past ten years, considerable attention has been given to introducing K-12 students toengineering concepts and practices. This is most evident in the National Research Council’sFramework for K-12 Science Education [1] and the recent
informedand beginning engineers troubleshoot their designs. To do so, we asked 7-11 years old girls withtheir caregivers to design a pneumatic ball run using pneumatic pistons in thirty minutes. Thevideo data of four cases were then analyzed. Design-based troubleshooting was observed veryoften due to the immediate feedback they received (i.e., falling the ball means a problem). Ourfindings suggest that children can engage in some aspects of troubleshooting the same way asinformed designers. 1 IntroductionNumerous reasons have fueled recent increased attention to pre-college engineering education,including an
substantive writinginstruction improvements in our College of Engineering. In this paper, we document our findingsand propose a path to improving writing instruction for undergraduate engineering students,beginning with educating our engineering faculty about best practices and helping themimplement those practices in their classes.I. IntroductionThe ability of engineers to express ideas effectively and persuasively, in both written and oralcommunications, is a critical competency that has been emphasized by both the NationalAcademy of Engineering [1] and ABET [2]. In addition to its importance in communication,writing can also be used to improve critical thinking. Substantial scholarship exists on the valueof writing-to-learn in the physical
Inclusion, Kansas State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Examining the effectiveness of Scholars Assisting Scholars program among undergraduate engineering studentsRationale and Literature ReviewRetaining engineering students is a critical issue in engineering education, especially inthe first two years of college when the attrition rate in engineering has been stubbornlyhigh.1, 2 Peer tutoring and supplemental instruction are widely used techniques to helpstudents succeed in challenging courses in universities.3-5 Peer tutoring has shown toimprove academic outcomes such as achieving higher GPAs, higher retention rates, andimproving student engagement.5-9 In this study, we
labeled as first-generation, low-income or underrepresented. In these programs, participants learn about differentaspects of STEM majors along with skills and knowledge required for applying to college.Because these programs are sponsored by external funding and networks, they can exposeparticipants to STEM opportunities and careers. Understanding participants’ attitudes towards,and understanding of, engineering and engineering careers can provide insights on how to gaugethe students’ and the community’s understanding of STEM. Thus, these programs have thepotential to broaden participation in STEM fields and increase the STEM workforce [1].It will be important, moving forward, to be able to identify the critical experiences of students inthese
Practice StyleAbstractInherent to the career trajectories of professional engineers is an expectation that they learn tointegrate communication, interpersonal and leadership skills into their technical knowledge base.While this process may feel smooth and natural to some, research suggests that others find itchallenging and require support [1-3]. Our paper examines three bodies of literature relevant toengineering leadership learning in industry contexts: industry perspectives on the skills, traitsand styles of effective engineering leaders; large-scale surveys tracking engineers’ career pathsand transitions; and ethnographic studies examining engineers’ professional identitydevelopment. Our primary reason for doing this is to ground the next
becameobjects around which we fine-tuned the selection of segments and generated analytical memos.In our analysis, we worked through the selected transcript portions line by line to code for howwomen and Target were being constructed. Proximity of constructions and logical dependency inthe reasoning were used as evidence to argue for how the constructions of different stakeholdersare entangled. Interpretations in the analytical memos were iteratively revised several timesthrough group discussions (Engle, Conant, and Greeno, 2007). Roughly, in this process, we hadthe following orientations: (1) we assumed context-dependence, in that we expected thatconstructions of stakeholders could change swiftly, (2) we attended to how multiple
coursemodel traverses from one location in time and space to another.Background: Replication vs. Mutation of the Wright State Model for EngineeringMathematics EducationThe Wright State Model (WSM) is a semester-long math course that teaches fundamentalconcepts of Calculus 1, 2, 3, and Differential Equations in an engineering context through hands-on laboratory experiences and application-rich problems. The WSM is designed to disrupt thetraditional rigid sequencing of undergraduate engineering curricula by decoupling mathematicsprerequisites from engineering coursework—introducing undergraduates to sufficientmathematical tools in the one-semester course to enable them to get started and make progress intechnical engineering coursework, regardless of
feedback into a modifiedroadmap for faculty development. Against the backdrop of the college’s strategic plan, a groupof senior engineering faculty provided discipline specific insights to ensure programmaticdevelopment that will impact the success of engineering faculty at all ranks across the college.The incorporation of an evaluation model provided new mechanisms and paradigm-shiftingapproaches to meet the core principles articulated in the college of engineering’s strategic plan.1. Introduction1.1 A national perspectiveIn addition to strategic plans and future visions, colleges around the world are exceptionallyreliant on their faculty to promote excellence and pilot the university to new heights. Therefore,it’s crucial for the college to
ofthe economy, from scientific investigation and engineering to finance, health, and nationalsecurity, demands a high quality professional computing workforce that includes the meaningfulparticipation of diverse perspectives and experiences. These perspectives and experiencesinform how personnel approach and solve a wide variety of difficult problems. Computingoccupations and degree programs, however, struggle with generating gender diversity. In 2015,only 18 percent of computing bachelor’s degree recipients were women, despite womencomprising 57 percent of bachelor’s degree recipients across disciplines [1]. Embeddingevidence-based interventions in a strategic plan is an effective approach to increasingenrollments and ultimately attaining
. Therefore, the students took these quizzes very seriously because it reflectedon their course performance.For team project-based learning, the students were assigned a task on materials’ selection usingthe Prospector® Materials Database5 or the CES EduPack6 software. An example of a materialselection activity was based on the author’s experience with an industrial client that wanted achoice of plastics materials to use as a substitute for an automobile component. The criteria forselecting the appropriate materials were that the materials should: (1) be processed by injectionmolding, (2) have maximum continuous use temperature of 230 – 350 ºF, (3) have coefficient oflinear thermal expansion (CLTE) flow of 14 x 10-6 – 16 x 10-6 in/in ºF, (4) be
comparison purposes. In this paper, results from internal and externalevaluation of student and instructor feedback via observation, interviews, survey and contentassessment will be addressed.BackgroundThe core undergraduate Circuits and Electronics sequence at RPI has focused on hands-on,student-focused instruction since the mid-1990s when studio-based pedagogy was implementedin dedicated classrooms that supported lecture, lab, simulation, and recitation activities. Whilelearning improved significantly [1], the cost and access limitations of the studio classroomsinspired the development of the Mobile Studio to make it possible to utilize studio instructionanywhere and anytime. Three courses were involved in this effort, two in the Electrical
data analysis.IntroductionThe 21st century has been characterized by a surge in the growth of clean renewable energygeneration in the form of biomass, wind, and most recently solar power. Building on a decadelong trend of double digit growth rates shown in Figure 1, global installed solar photovoltaiccapacity has now exceeded 300 gigawatts (GW) [1]. Including projects still under construction inthe fourth quarter, it is estimatedthat the United States alone Figure 1) Global solar photovoltaic energy growth globalsolarPVenergygrowthinstalled approximately 12 GW 350of new solar photovoltaics in
novice reasoning in mechanics of solids- A work in progressIntroduction Engineering degree programs such as civil engineering, mechanical engineering,materials engineering, and industrial engineering generally require an advanced course inengineering mechanics, typically in the second or third year. The course is most commonlyknown as “Strength of Materials”, “Mechanics of Materials”, or “Mechanics of Solids”. For theduration of this paper this course will referred to as Mechanics of Solids (MOS) [1]. Mechanics of Solids (MOS) has become the bridge and bond between elementary andspecialized knowledge for engineering students. Although categorized as a basic course,engineering mechanics, and MOS
students. Future work willinclude enhanced data sampling, a revision of interview questions and assessment ofparticipant’s understanding of concepts via quizzes.I. Introduction Over the past several decades mentorship programs within industrial, collegiate and K-12professional and educational environments have been of intense interest. For example, [1-4]found that undergraduate students and in particular women and underrepresented minoritystudents reported increased skills, confidence and motivation to pursue science or engineeringcareers as a result of research experiences and positive relationships with mentors. In fact,women and under-represented minorities are less likely to enter and remain in science andengineering when they do
, currentand future talent needs, potential employment opportunities for students, and transparency withthe local FM career path. The findings provide direction for the University of Oklahoma to addresseducation opportunities valuable to the regional FM industry.Key Words: Facility Management, Facility Management Education, Higher EducationIntroductionThe facility management role has long been viewed as a maintenance-focused position with littleentry-level requirements. However, the profession is beginning to be viewed more as a criticalrole within today's businesses [1]. The International Facility Management Association (IFMA)defines Facility Management (FM) as “A profession that encompasses multiple disciplines toensure functionality of the built
Engineering Education, 2018 Exploring an inquiry-based learning with peer-teaching pedagogy in a physiological signals lab courseIntroduction and BackgroundActive learning can support meaningful engagement with science concepts and practices, whichhas been known to improve students’ affect toward science [1]. Professors recognize theopportunity for students to engage in such active learning during laboratory courses and haveemployed successful methods of doing so that foster meaningful engagement [2,3,4]. Onemethod of active learning and enhancing student engagement is using inquiry-based learning in alaboratory environment. This method also helps to develop creativity and critical thinking skills[8,9] which are