anintroduction to rock mass rating systems. Geologic hazards such as earthquakes and landslidesare covered next, and geotechnical resources (e.g. GEER reports, USGS design maps) areutilized in the activities. In geomorphology, the topics include the interaction of the lithospherewith the atmosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere and the landforms that result from thoseinteractions. Throughout the course, the activities deliberately focus on the engineering aspectsor applications of geology.Tip 2. Decide on course layout and logistics upfrontThe authors learned not to underestimate the importance of course organization and thoroughlogistical planning to successfully teach in a flipped format. There were important questionsabout the course that the authors
able to demonstrate effective learning of the intended outcomes as each semesterprogressed. Moreover, student responses indicated that they enjoyed the process of learningthrough the different activities planned for the course.I. Introduction PhD students in an engineering major are in general expected to devote the majority oftheir time to research. For a few semesters during the PhD program, they may be funded asgraduate teaching assistants for an undergraduate course taught by a faculty member.Responsibilities of a graduate teaching assistant typically include grading, holding office hours,leading labs and help sessions, and substitute-lecturing when the faculty member has otherengagements. Serving as the instructor of record for
Paper ID #23612Tensions Arising When Teaching Scientific Disciplinary Core Ideas via Engi-neering Practices (Evaluation)Hannah Smith Brooks, University of Texas at Austin Hannah Brooks is a doctoral student at the University of Texas at Austin. Her research focuses on promot- ing equitable access through collaboration and instructional design. She is also interested in improving teacher education programs in the sciences by studying how teachers plan and structure learning using various methods. She has a BA in Biology and a M.Ed. in middle and secondary instruction from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. Her
Professor ofElectrical and Computer Engineering, while WISE honors courses are taught by affiliated STEMfaculty and staff. The majority of WISE students are residents who live together freshmen year ina designated dormitory, which is designed to promote social acclimation to campus and major.WISE first-year students all take one-credit introductory seminars on university life and STEMcareer planning; specific science and mathematics coursework varies by major, for example,engineering students begin with physics, mathematics, and introductory engineering. During thefirst year, WISE students joined five or six additional first year WISE students in a weekly studyand discussion group led by an upperclass undergraduate mentor; the mentors were trained
theworld have engaged in conversations to bring more awareness to to both sets of ideals.In September 2017, UNESCO convened the Kick-off Meeting for their “Engineering Report II”in Beijing, People’s Republic of China. The meeting was co-sponsored by the InternationalCentre for Engineering Education (ICEE), under the auspices of UNESCO (Category 2) based atTsinghua University in Beijing. The center has been affirmed by the president of the ChineseAcademy of Engineering. Content of the meeting included discussion of engineering’scontribution to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Several disciplines can beinvolved with plans to achieve outcomes related to the SDGs, however, participants in thismeeting were particularly interested in
the first author. Thesecond author was a visiting scholar who spent several months on our campus. He is anindustrial engineer with research interests in engineering and social justice. Consistent with thevision of introducing changemaking themes in required classes in the majors, the initial plan wasto do this in several ways including: Introducing some lecture topics in the context of changemaking Rewriting some homework problems to include themes related to changemaking Create two new cases with social justice, humanitarian, or sustainability foundationsIn the end, these goals proved to be overambitious. The first goal was met with modest success,but the last goals proved too difficult for reasons that will be discussed below
Paper ID #21441Multidisciplinary Research Efforts in Post-Earthquake Civil InfrastructureReconnaissanceMr. Jack Bergquist, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jack Bergquist is a undergraduate student at California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo with a major in architectural engineering and minor in Italian. He has formally been engaged in earth- quake engineering and reconnaissance research for the past year, and has a specific interest in the seismic performance of historic and vernacular structures. After graduation, he plans to continue working in this field as a structural
(baseline models) that are in current formats A project where variety of systems could be feasible Available local codes from municipalities Available utilities plans and rates for the area Structural 60’≥ high above grade or some unique configuration to force complex loadings Available geotechnical reports Lighting/Electrical Variety in the types of spaces for different lighting conditions Opportunity for daylighting Mechanical Opportunity for energy savings Construction A semi-realistic to real project budget/final price A
.” Mechanical Not a BOK “better equip mechanical engineering graduates… not only [9] with a solid technical foundation, but also with creativity, strong professional skills, and leadership within engineering and society.” (p. 15) Software 15 knowledge areas Professional practice. 2. Group dynamics and psychology. Engineering {leadership not explicitly identified as a skill} [10] Civil Engineering 16: 6 foundational, 12. Leadership. Plan, organize, and direct the efforts of a Technologist 3 technical, 7 group and self
purposes of this paper,we work from the perspective that learning is at the core of institutions of higher education.As we began our efforts to systemically advance innovations in teaching across campus, we(teaching and learning center staff) learned from preliminary interactions that faculty werestruggling to make sense of what we meant by various educational terms. Additionally, mostfaculty had no pedagogical training and little to no understanding of cognition and how to1 In an earlier paper the theoretical perspectives that inform our work is described in greater detail [6].2 We did take into account external factors in the design and planning of the interventions, but that was a secondlevel consideration and will not be addressed in this
Learning, by Brown, Roediger, and McDaniel6, has recently made this ideapopular as a guide in improving both teaching and learning practices. There are many tactics forshattering this illusion and enabling more permanent learning, many of which can be summed upby the three “big ideas” put forth by Make It Stick: 1. Learning works by getting it out, not getting it in. 2. Difficulty is desirable. 3. A growth mindset motivates.In this paper, an engineering course is examined for symptoms of illusions of learning, andimprovements to the curriculum and teaching methods are incorporated and reviewed. Thecourse of interest is MFG 480: Manufacturing Process Planning and System Design, a 3-creditengineering course for seniors that has been taught for
homework questions.Timeline of RedesignFigures 1, 2, and 3 depict the current timeline for the curriculum redesign and plan for fullimplementation. Figure 1. Redesign timeline for ENGR 120, the first course in the LWTL series. Figure 2. Redesign timeline for ENGR 121, the second course in the LWTL series. Figure 3. Redesign timeline for ENGR 122, the third course in the LWTL series.Note in Figure 1, the quarter of the initial ENGR 120 curriculum redesign there was one sectionof the course that was experiencing the redesigned content as it was being created while twosections were experiencing the course without the redesigned content. Similarly, as seen inFigure 2, in the Fall of 2017 one section of ENGR 121
Virginia Tech. He holds degrees in Engineering Mechanics (BS, MS) and in Educational Psychology (MAEd, PhD).Mr. William Michael Anderson, Virginia TechMs. Marlena McGlothlin Lester, Virginia Tech Marlena McGlothlin Lester is the Director of Advising for the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She leads the undergraduate advising team and oversees the advising process for all General Engineering students. She is responsible for the development of a hands-on, minds-on orien- tation model for all first-year engineering students, the creation of a comprehensive engineering major exploration tool, Explore Engineering, and enhancement of the academic planning resources available for first-year
. I am a former member of Dallas Robotics Group at the Dallas Makerspace, and plan to enroll in the National Stem certification program. I have completed PLTW and Robotics and Automation certificate programs, and attended Ar- duino Project and Raspberry Pie. I have been a mentor for the College Readiness and Leadership Program (CRLP) with the goal of implementing student leadership in our school. In addition, I like to work with 3D printing and design, and am a member of Enabling Hand, a team that creates and assembles prosthetic arm designs.Dr. Sheng-Jen ”Tony” Hsieh, Texas A&M University Dr. Sheng-Jen (”Tony”) Hsieh is a Professor in the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. He
bring them together as a group and a CoP [with a community, a domain, and apractice] begins to solidify.As the new community forms, the PEPS research team must support the new core whileallowing them the autonomy to make their own decisions. The PEPS researchers areproviding support by hosting a webinar where partner schools will get a chance to meet 3each other and learn about the results of the PEPS results for their respective institutions.This webinar becomes the first step for planning the joint symposium that will be the firstproduct of the new CoP. At the symposium, information about the new practice (usingresearch-based decisions to inform the design of career services and programs) will
students andsubsequent choice of engineering as a major and career. To develop engineering-specific theories of how engineering identities are formed, thispaper describes the methodological plan for understanding interest and identity development ofthree middle-school populations participating in engineering summer camps offered by theCollege of Engineering at the University of Nevada, Reno, NV: (1) women in engineering (2)first generation students and, (3) open-enrollment engineering camps. The research designleverages existing quantitative surveys along with focus groups and observations based on aselected set of questions from these surveys.Research Design, Methods and InstrumentsThe research design for this project is based on
development of the MEA curriculum is guided by content experts to ensure that thecurriculum is culturally relevant, connects with the community, aligns with state content standards,and is developmentally appropriate for middle school students.Objective 2: Teacher Professional DevelopmentTeacher professional development (TPD) on the use of CR MEAs is conducted for seven teachersin grades four through six. The TPD is designed to focus on increasing teachers’ knowledge, skilland confidence in using an instructional method that is math and science rich and culturally andcommunity relevant. The TPD is designed to encourage teachers’ collaboration in planning,teaching, observing, revising, and sharing lessons learned from the implemented CR MEAs.Objective
. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 The Diversity of College Engineering Degrees: The Roles of Geography and the Concentration of Engineering Degree Production Executive SummaryIntroductionTo meet the growing demand for a larger technological and scientific labor force in the UnitedStates, a prominent policy goal is to expand and broaden participation in science and engineeringcollege programs (e.g., [1], [2]). Previous
-course survey also emphasized the effectiveness of thisnew method in terms of addressing the learning objectives of the course (Figure 1).Future developments To further deepen this research, we plan to (1) maintain and further develop the active learning aspectsof the course by enriching the teaching with other voices and perspectives and (2) design a robust andobjective method of assessment of the active learning elements of the course. To address our first objective, we will update the papers that are studied on a regular basis to keepthem current. We will also introduce new perspectives by developing a system of online annotation of thepapers. The instructors will use annotations to draw the students’ attention on the ideas of
resulted (last column of Table 1). Some groups that included reactantrecycle reported only minimal improvement in conversion associated with the recycle. In thecase of a vinyl chloride process (performed by two different groups), hydrochloric acid generatedas a by-product of a third reactor was recycled back to the beginning of the process where it wasutilized as a reactant in one of the first two parallel reactions. Besides reactant recycle, threedesign groups included recycling of non-reactant chemicals added for the express purpose ofproduct recovery (triethylene glycol for water recovery, paraffin oil for isobutylene recovery, anddibutyl phthalate for maleic anhydride recovery). In the future, the instructor plans to requestthat the students
environment with other students and the course instructor.We plan to utilize evidence-based evaluation techniques to assess the effectiveness of the course(and individual features of the course) toward student learning. Possible evaluation methods willbe discussed, and feedback from the audience will be encouraged.Keywords: Chemical Engineering, Engineering Education, Bridging Course, Online Course,Continuing Education1. INTRODUCTIONChemical engineering graduate programs often receive applications from students whoseundergraduate degree is in chemistry, physics, biology, or another engineering discipline. Thesetypically are excellent students with undergraduate research or work experience, but their lack ofchemical engineering background can present
imaging of solar cells (cont).Figure 12d. Thermal imaging of solar cells (cont).Figure 12e.Educational ImplementationThis work was developed and performed by undergraduate and graduate engineering students inEngineering Technology, Electrical Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering as specialproblems and student research projects. Dissemination of this work is planned as follows. Wewill develop laboratory modules (2 to 3 hour session) for combined imaging, thermography, andlaser scanning in courses for materials science, renewable energy, measurements, and qualityassurance. We are also developing topics for Senior Design Projects and undergraduateindependent study. This work offers opportunities for students to work with image processingand
was and showing briefexamples. Then students had fifteen minutes to work individually on generating their maps usingpencil and paper. They were told that their maps would be collected but not evaluated for agrade. Electronic copies of the maps were made, and maps were offered back to the students inthe last day of lecture for the semester.As a preliminary start to this work in progress, ten maps chosen at random from the 2016 and2017 semesters were evaluated in random order according to the holistic rubric from Besterfieldet al. It is also planned to use a more hierarchical rubric to reevaluate the rubrics. Ultimately thiswill be done for each of the approximately 90 mind maps from both the 2016 and 2017iterations. Scores on the maps will be
between fall or spring semestersor over the study period years. The video server system was also able to provide information on the operating systembeing used on the students’ devices. This allowed us to understand whether the students weretypically watching videos on Windows laptops/computers, Apple Mac devices, Androidsmartphones/tablets, Apple iPhones/iPads, or Chromebook laptops. Understanding the deviceand device screen size allowed us to move towards continuous improvement plans of the videosas smaller items would be difficult to present on small device screens. Figures 6 and 7 showthat, a Windows laptops/computers were generally used to watch the videos and this did notchange over a typical semester. This usage pattern was steady
question tailored to the class in which they are enrolled. This is accompanied with aninventory list to allow students to begin to formulate their planned investigative experiments. Proposalsare reviewed by both teachers and the graduate student instructor assigned to their student team, inadvance of their lab trials. After their first lab visit, students debrief with their graduate studentinstructor and determine areas for improvement for the next visit to complete a usable data set. Studentsconclude the program by providing an assessment of their findings and a quantitative recommendationto address their assigned problem in the format of a poster presentation as part of the final symposiumheld at the IBBME. The chronological timeline of
75 10,275 2018-2020 Yrs 2-4 participant feedback; augment evaluation plan*Estimatedbasedontheaveragehighschoolteacherbeingresponsibleforabout137studentseachyear[4]To develop the NEET program, NEWT’s educational team hosted 15 environmental scienceteachers for a two-day brainstorming session to determine the educational needs of teachers andidentify the ERC nanotechnology topics to be incorporated into the pilot NEET program.Teachers were selected to participate in the brainstorming session based on years of teachingexperience in environmental science and teaching in a high-needs district. The session includedpresentations of NEWT research, instructional practices and strategies discussions, and a hands-on lesson
identify high risk students. The educatorcould then implement an intervention plan for that individual or group of individuals to ensuretheir success in the course. This study specifically addresses three research questions pertaining tothe motivation of students in design courses. RQ1: Does a correlation exist between motivational factors and student success in Freshman Cornerstone Design? RQ2: Does a correlation exist between motivational factors and student success in Senior Capstone Design? RQ3: Does a correlation exist between changes in motivational factors and student success in Senior Capstone Design for the same cohort of students?2. BackgroundIn this study, the authors use a modified version of
commonly practiced whencovering the LSM topics puts greater emphasis on content coverage than inculcating the aboveskills in students [10]. This means that despite our best intentions, there is a misalignmentbetween the way LSM topics are covered and how KI modules are planned, resulting in studentsnot being adequately prepared to make the most of the KI activities. Thus, there is a need totailor the way in which the LSM content is delivered to ensure that not only is the contentcoverage adequate and timely but also that the students are being better trained in the higherlevel skills of learning. For this purpose, the authors of this paper have developed a new activelearning model to be used for content delivery during the LSMs.Active learning is
practice with important needs of intended users, 2)begin planning for transfer to widespread practice from the very start of the development process,3) engage the intended users as early as possible…, 4) incorporate research approaches that willdetermine why the practice is effective, and 5) plan for the fact that many users will want to adaptthe practice to match their needs and work environment.” (p. 389). Similarly, Furco and Moely(2012) state that securing faculty buy-in into a project necessitates clear communication regardingthe goals of the innovation, opportunities to gain expertise with the innovation, perceptions ofinstitutional commitment, and rewards.Teaching and learning centers and faculty developers have the potential to help
also contribute to the success of our program in other ways; for example: By facilitating internships and co-ops via participation in career fairs; By way of monetary gifts;Cal Poly annually hosts two career fairs attended by over 150 companies and organizations.Some participating alumni use the opportunity to showcase the technology they work on bydelivering technical seminars. While student internships do not translate into programimprovement, they have a positive impact on student academic performance and immediateemployability. Also, internships help with the 'crystallization' of career plans and professionalidentity of students [4].In our college the procurement of lab equipment, conference attendance, and professionalmemberships