Electromagnetic Fields I. In the spring semester, they are required to take thefollow-on courses: Electronic Principles II, Linear System Analysis II, and ElectromagneticFields II. In each of these courses, the syllabus was broken down into the basic concepts by thevery instructors who have been teaching these courses for many years. In so doing, concepts thatmay be important but not fundamental to a course was packaged into other appropriate courses.The concepts that remained behind were considered to be the very fundamental concepts, alsoreferred to as the anchoring concepts. Typically, each course has five designated anchoringconcepts. The content material relevant to each anchoring concept was cast into a learning studiomodule (LSM). Thus, there are
theleadership outcome are summarized in Table 5. The three courses most commonly cited wererequired in the curriculum and included team projects. Only 20-30% of the students completingthe assignment had taken senior design, likely accounting for the low percentage of studentsciting the course as contributing to leadership. The professional issues course had not yetcovered leadership at the time of the curriculum mapping assignment, but students had beeninstructed that they could map it to the outcomes based on the syllabus, if they chose to do so.Some courses associated with the various minors with leadership components were also mappedby students to the leadership outcome. This included business courses, engineering managementcourses, and ROTC courses
resources through their own efforts. The modified syllabus contains a list of recommended Page 9 of 44textbooks but the students were required to do independent studies from online resources. The alternateintention of not having a required textbook is to break free from the tradition of asking students to solveback of the chapter homework problems. Students were given open-ended problems which related theconcepts they learned in class to the outside world. And the students appreciated the nature of theHomework problems that were given in the course. “I really liked the way the homework maps exactly to what we are doing in class because it makesyou learn the material we are learning in class the
plan for activities. Throughout the academic year, the teacher referred to the arrival ofmaterials that never showed up. There were several reasons for this including a leadershiptransition at the school, lags in procurement and challenges in communication. Toovercome this hurdle, we ‘dusted off’ some older robotics materials from the HS closet towork with throughout the academic year. For the UMD curriculum, the program model was tested. At the service site, 1-2UMD students worked with a team of 3-4 HS students to design, build and program arobot. The course met once per week on Thursdays from 3:30 – 4:45 at the end of theschool day. Following the service visit, UMD students completed an online discussionlog of their activities
courses Faculty experience varies considerably resulting in important provisions being skimmed over or ignored Many of these identified issues largely stem from faculty experience with codes themselves.This is due to the background education of faculty and that most faculty do not or have not practicedin the industry where code knowledge is mandatory. Based on ill formatting and expertise, importantprovisions may be skimmed over or left out, or substituted by other work, and less stringentenforcement of codes in design adherence on projects. These can be compounded when a course getsmigrated from one instructor to another for various reasons. Here, specific details change becausedepartment wide syllabus information do not
the course based on completion of the11 units in the app. Note that students were told at the beginning of the class that use of the appwas required, although the syllabus did not state what role it would have in the grade. Studentswere not told that the app would be for extra credit only until the last week class. Figure 3: Completion rate of app lessons by weekOf the 102 students who opted in to the study, 10 had actually passed the pretest. To avoid aceiling effect, we took those 10 students out of our sample. The intervention in this study was theuse of the augmented reality app as a supplement to the standard course content. Students in 2 ofthe 4 sections of the class were invited to use the app. In total, 57
the first 2 weeks). The conversation should be informal in nature and faculty should allow time for additional, unexpected conversation topics. Schedule about 20 minutes per student. Have a copy of the syllabus available so you can refer to course outcomes, etc. Common questions should focus primarily on the course (outcomes, topics, projects, etc.), in addition to the following: o Ask students to share a bit about their background (could be education and/or personal in nature depending on what the student wants to share) o What are you excited about related to this course? o Is there anything you are anxious about? o Do you have any questions about the course
students (this was the case for thedynamics class at HSKA). These skriptums tend to be much shorter than textbooks, andconcentrate on the really important things.Prof Deutsch Reflections on Class StructureIn the US all instructors have to set up a syllabus, which not only displays the course ofinstruction but also defines how the final grade is determined. A typical grading scheme mighthave Homeworks at 20%, Quizzes at 10%, Midterms at 30%, and the Final Exam at 40%. InGermany this does not exist, since it’s entirely the final exam which determines the grade.Sometimes the German professors let the students do homework or have tests to make thestudents reflect on the content and work on problems, but these assignments don’t influence thefinal
education organization, astate science teacher organization, to teachers who visited the Center for class field trips, andthrough social media. Recruitment tasks were accomplished by Center education staff andpartner organizations. Interested teachers applied through an online application system during afour month submission window. To be considered complete, submitted applications had toinclude a resume, a series of short essays, and a form completed by two of their professionalreferences. Completed applications were reviewed by Center education staff, with finalacceptance decisions being made by the program manager.Participant Demographics Self-reported demographic information for the 22 teachers who have participated in theRET program is
University, University Park Amine Lehtihet is Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at Penn State with teaching and research interests in Design and Manufacturing.Dr. Vittal Prabhu, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Vittaldas Prabhu is currently a Professor in the Marcus Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engi- neering at Penn State. He received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Wisconsin- Madison. Professor Prabhu works in the area of distributed control systems with a focus on manufactur- ing and service enterprises consisting of discrete-events, physical processes, and service processes. He teaches courses in manufacturing systems, service systems, and
) law. He is the Director of the Entrepreneurship Clinic at IU-McKinney where he also teaches Patent Law and Patent Prosecution. Additionally, he teaches a three-course sequence in engineering where students learn about IP law as it applies to engineering design and engineering careers.Dr. Justin L. Hess, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis Dr. Justin L Hess is the Assistant Director of the STEM Education Innovation and Research Institute at IUPUI. His research interests include ethics, design, and sustainability. Dr. Hess received each of his degrees from Purdue University, including a PhD in Engineering Education, a Master of Science in Civil Engineering, and a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
learning strategies, including: - Traditional lecture PowerPoint presentations provided via the online learning website. - Inquiry-oriented case studies including a healthcare case study and a light rail system case study. - Active learning exercises incorporated into each class session. - A cooperative team-based system design project. - Creativity-inducing methods based application of systems engineering tools.The instructor taught the course using the same learning strategies in the Spring 2017 semester.In Fall 2017, the instructor introduced an additional learning strategy developing an Excel-basedSystems Engineering Tools Template (SETT) that provided many of the systems engineeringtools for each phase of the system
education on meeting desired learning outcomes. In one of Knowles’last works on the subject, he discussed eight steps to implementing andragogy in practice [15].These steps involve preparing the learner, creating the proper learning environment, involvinglearners in diagnosing their needs and developing appropriate objectives and plans, to name afew. Overall, these steps describe a much more collaborative learning model different fromtraditional teacher-centric instructional design at the undergraduate level. Where once a major isselected, many courses are prescribed and within those courses the objectives, syllabus, andassessment tools are determined solely by the professor and not in conjunction with the students.To determine the effectiveness of
Engineering Education, 2018 Risk Management and Ethics in Senior DesignAbstractEngineers make ethical decisions all the time in solving design problems, which is theintellectual core of engineering. They need to make those decisions and the grounds for themexplicit. Careful examination of a course’s syllabus can reveal how the ethical considerationsalready there can be made explicit. The Ethics Across the Curriculum (EAC) program at theRochester Institute of Technology (RIT) was designed to bring together faculty from diversedisciplines across the university, who would then spend time examining their syllabi, and seeinghow ethical considerations could be made explicit or naturally introduced as an integral part ofthe course, not as
during the project 4. Value the importance of being a contributing member of the communityProject TimelineTable 1 shows an example of the modified course schedule, with the activities related to the finalproject on the first column. One lab activity was eliminated and the rest were scheduled earlier inthe semester to allow students to work exclusively on this project during the last 6 weeks. Week Final Project Task Other Topics and Activities 1 • Introduction to the final project • Syllabus discussion • Introduction to measurements 2
teaching Water Resources Engineering is licensed and has years ofpractice experience. We meet regularly to develop my syllabus and discuss specific content orgeneral best-practice design questions. Through these interactions, my mentor provides me withpractical context of water resources engineering. In developing an Appropriate Technology forDeveloping Countries course, I worked with an alumnus who has over 40 years of civil andenvironmental engineering consulting experience and many years as an Engineers WithoutBorders mentor to develop course content. Given that most faculty members do not have practiceexperience equivalent to 40 years, this model may be beneficial even when faculty members arethemselves licensed professional engineers. Not
. He has taught courses focused on first-year engineering students, materials science and engineering, en- gineering design, systems thinking and engineering leadership. He has a PhD in Polymer, Fiber Science from Clemson University. His research background is in the synthesis of polymer nanocomposites and engineering education. He was trained as a Manufacturing Process Specialist within the textile industry, which was part of an eleven-year career that spanned textile manufacturing to product development. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Convergent Approaches for Developing Engineering Leadership in UndergraduatesAbstractHere we describe a shared approach to engineering
chemical engineering. Thissurprised the ChE instructor, particularly the fact that many students did not realize they could simplylook up the integrated solution online or in a textbook. We believe the solution to this is to do moreclass examples and homework on simple transient balances (like tank filling or solute mixing) prior tointroducing the project.Final Reports. Review of the 25 team reports showed them to all be very good to excellent. This was apleasant surprise to the ChE instructor who has been doing course projects for many years in this andsimilar classes. Typically there are teams whose dysfunction results in a poor report or who are simplyunmotivated and do not demonstrate the effort needed to produce good quality work. This was
modeling and graphical representation of thesystem behaviors are taught, students can relate this to the qualitative framework they havealready formed [1]. This paper proposes that these simple activities presented early in the termwill improve retention and understanding, and also improve utilization of course concepts inpost-course design work.Experiential learning techniques can be time consuming and thus challenging to incorporate intocollegiate courses with a packed syllabus. Lab equipment can be expensive to purchase andmaintain. Further, instructors may presume that students have already formed simple mentalmodels of system behaviors from earlier coursework or life experiences. To minimize thesepossible implementation barriers, the criteria
information from. This section has student respond using another four-point Likert scale,which is labeled with “N/A”, “Learned a Little”, “Learned a Bit but Not a Lot”, and “Learned ALot”, for each of these six sources: introduction to engineering course, faculty (either in class orfrom syllabus), institution’s website, student handbook, other students, or other (with a prompt toelaborate). Once this section is completed, the survey closes.Method: Survey Instrument: Modified Part Two, Faculty SurveyWhen a respondent enters that they are a faculty member the instrument directs the respondent tothis single portion of the survey. It is the faculty version of Part Two, and the instrument presentsthe same 20 scenarios to be ranked. The one difference is
learning objectives, similar tothose university faculty would detail in the objectives of a syllabus. All but eight US states haveadopted common core state standards (http://www.corestandards.org/), but most curriculumstandards for each particular jurisdiction are often detailed online and may be found with asimple internet search. Before a visit to a school is proposed, it is important to identify and assesshow the team will specifically address the curricular needs of that particular classroom. For ourparticular project, we are targeting the core standards set by the state of Utah(https://www.uen.org/core/), but each state should have similar requirements. Because this project intersects with topics from mathematics to environmental
) and a PhD (from the University of Victoria) in Computer Science, and she has developed and taught over a dozen courses at the university level. Beyond her teaching experience, she also has over a decade of industry experience as a software developer. In industry, she has a history of solving ’unsolvable’ problems. She enjoys a great deal of personal satisfaction when her analytical and problem solving skills can be applied to solve complex technical problems and when she can find creative new ways to pass the things she has learned on to the next generation. Her first teaching experience was at Ozanam Sheltered Workshop teaching adults with mental and physical disabilities. The experience gave her the
, before grades are released.SET forms might be filled out online or with paper and pencil and typically take the form of a setof Likert-type questions that probe student perceptions of the instructor, classroom environment,learning outcomes, and an evaluation of the course and instructor. Students are often asked torate the degree to which they agree (e.g., from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree”) withstatements such as “Overall, my instructor’s teaching was effective.” These scores are typicallyaveraged and used for comparisons across departments, colleges, and potentially the entireuniversity. In some cases, SET forms will include an open-ended text box where students canelaborate or express concerns not addressed in the quantitative
engineering, also addresses the need for engineering leadership intheir most recent syllabus update [6, p. 69]. The Canadian book, Fundamental Competencies forthe 21st Century Engineers, has also recognized this need, and has added leadership as anessential competency for engineers in their most recent edition [7]. The attribute of leadershiphas also been included in the new student outcomes for ABET (Accreditation Board for 1Engineering and Technology), which will become effective in the 2019-2020 accreditation cycle(replacing the “a-k” outcomes). Students must be able to “function effectively on a team whosemembers together provide leadership, create
journal articles published under her name. She has also written in thegenre of science fiction, and published books in the body-mind-spirit genre about her empathic encounterswith horses. She has taught courses in Nanotechnology Ethics and Policy; Gender Issues and Ethics in theNew Reproductive Technologies; Religion and Technology; STS & Engineering Practice; The Engineer,Ethics, and Professional Responsibility; STS and the Frankenstein Myth. Rosalyn regularly incorporatesmindfulness practices into her engineering school courses. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Dimensions of Diversity in Engineering: What We Can Learn from STSIntroductionThe challenge of increasing diversity in engineering is
health, with a particular focus on pediatric hip disorders and MRI-based methods.Dr. Juan Abell´o P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver Juan Abell´o, Ph.D., P.Eng, is an Instructor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Vantage One program at the University of British Columbia. His teaching interests include the integration of engineering science and design with language instruction. His technical research is in rotorcraft blade- vortex interaction (BVI) noise reduction. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Creating problem taxonomies for WeBWorK in mechanical engineeringWeBWorK is an open-source, online homework system widely used in mathematics at the
project was an even mix between process and product, observing the students surprise at the amount of process needed to successfully launch a commercial product. The nature of the project was very interdisciplinary crossing between, software, firmware and hardware. • Credit hours and accreditation requirement: The course was two semesters for 8 credit hours. Several learning outcomes and educational objectives were documented in the course syllabus and assessment data was collected and monitored. • Outcome evaluation: Overall this was considered a “good” outcome in that the company is now selling commercial products. Reflecting on the project there was an obvious disconnect between the industry
guidelines for engagement with individuals and evaluation of the quality of students’ work [1]. Examples of these would be a course syllabus, a program of study, student- teacher contracts, and/or any documented and written course expectations.2. Null Curriculum: Entails what is not taught in the classroom due to mandates from higher authorities, a teacher’s lack of knowledge, or deeply ingrained assumptions and biases [1]. An example of this would be teachers and school systems choosing not to explain certain concepts (e.g., Christopher Columbus’s colonization methods toward many native peoples when he "discovered" the Americas).3. Hidden Curriculum: Represents the unwritten, unofficial, and often unintended lessons, values, and
, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring communication, c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #21645design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development,her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, effective teaching practices indesign education, the effects of differing design pedagogies on retention and
SustainableDevelopment sub-goals. Also in this section are the methods used to assess the programsusing both structured (e.g. reflection ladder described in Tranquillo, 2016) andunstructured prompts. Specific assignments and a timeline of topics and lectures aregiven in Appendices A and B.Senior Capstone IntroductionOver the past 12 years, teams of 2-3 students engaged in a design sprint as a kick-off tothe senior capstone (Tranquillo and Cavanagh, 2009). Rather than pass out a syllabus fora two-semester design capstone, the challenge served as an introduction to the course. Forthe past three years, the challenge has been driven by the UN Sustainable Development 7Goals