education had numerous benefitsincluding improved learning and achievement in science and mathematics; increased awarenessof engineering and the work of engineers; understanding of and the ability to engage inengineering design; interest in pursuing engineering as a career; and increased technologicalliteracy.2Initially, individual states led the effort to include engineering in K-12 education. More recently,attention has shifted to the national level with the integration of engineering design into the NextGeneration Science Standards (NGSS). The NRC notes that the insight and interest students gainfrom this integration should “help students see how science and engineering are instrumental inaddressing major challenges that confront society today
curriculum.An approach to enhance spatial thinking or spatial reasoning skills is learning three-dimensional(3D) modeling [4]. 3D modeling involves several steps and design decisions to make sure that afeasible design is made. Learning 3D modeling is supposed to not only enhance students’ designdecisions but also improve their spatial thinking ability. With the proliferation of consumer-level3D printing, Virtual Reality (VR), and Augmented Reality (AR), there is a sparked interestamong educators to teach 3D modeling using tools like Tinkercad in formal and informal settings[5], [6]. An additional benefit of 3D modeling knowledge is the career path it opens. Severalcompanies and industries are in the need for 3D designers for a variety of projects
’ work experiences.Prof. Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Patrice M. Buzzanell is a Professor in the Brian Lamb School of Communication and the School of Engineering Education (courtesy) at Purdue University. Editor of three books and author of over 150 articles and chapters, her research centers on the intersections of career, gender communication, lead- ership, and resilience. Fellow and past president of the International Communication Association, she has received numerous awards for her research, teaching/mentoring, and engagement. She is working on Purdue-ADVANCE initiatives for institutional change, the Transforming Lives Building Global Commu
concepts using the Azelis line of construction additives and admixes for the mortar and concrete industry. Previously, Jessica worked as the principal scientist for the startup construction consulting company Concrete Process and Science (CPS). Before joining CPS Jessica was the Senior Scientist for CalStar Products a masonry products company specializing in the use of supplementary cementitious materials. Early in her career she performed numerous research projects for the Federal Highway Administration and through the University of Wisconsin-Madison including the use of nanomaterials for use in construction materials. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018
same” as the scientific method, and often taught this to theirstudents. Also, many teachers prior to the program where not aware of the disciplines ofengineering and how these areas of study translate into engineering careers, products, andservices. During group and individual interviews of teachers, many remarked that they weresurprised at how long it took graduate students to work on design engineering experiments,equipment and procedures, where students would often iterate when something did not work asplanned. They indicated that they would take these types of experiences back to their classroomsto illustrate to their students the cyclic nature of the engineering design cycle. Interviewquestions are provided in the Appendix.Table 12
Associate School Head in the School of Civil and Environmen- tal Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2010 and is working on a study to characterize prac- ticing engineers’ understandings of core engineering concepts. He is a Senior Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education.Ms. Dominga Sanchez, Oregon State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Exploring Faculty Beliefs about Teaching Evaluations: What is Missing from Current Measures? AbstractIn this research paper, we
, “Validation of the five-factor model of personality acrossinstruments and observers.,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 81–90, 1987.[22] L. D. Walsh, M. Onorato, and S. V. K. Simms, “Ethical Sensitivity and Its Relationship toPersonality and Area of Study,” SAM Adv. Manag. J., pp. 11–20, 2016.[23] A. Triki, G. L. Cook, and D. Bay, “Machiavellianism, Moral Orientation, Social DesirabilityResponse Bias, and Anti-intellectualism: A Profile of Canadian Accountants,” J. Bus. Ethics,vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 623–635, 2017.[24] A. Godwin, G. Potvin, Z. Hazari, and R. Lock, “Identity, Critical Agency, and Engineering:An Affective Model for Predicting Engineering as a Career Choice,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 105, no.2, pp. 312–340, 2016.[25] G. L. Downey, J
performance is one of many reasons why students drop out ofSTEM career programs [22]. Aside from transfer students who may experience high stress due tochanging school cultures, students who perform poorly on initial exams may suffer from poorself-esteem and doubt their ability to succeed in engineering. Such self-doubt may result inemotional disengagement with learning tasks. Disengaged and poor-performing students areoften at risk of withdrawing from engineering courses, such as statics, that they deem to becognitively challenging. Because resilience is particularly relevant for students who experienceinitial poor performance, we will study the resilience/academic performance relationships ofstudents who struggle initially in statics and either
, and K.A. Orvis, "Understanding how peer mentoring and capitalization link STEM students to their majors," The Career Development Quarterly, 2012. 60(4): p. 343-354.10. REDACTED.11. Brown, A.L. and R.A. Ferrara, "Diagnosing zones of proximal development," L. Vygotsky: Critical assessments: The zones of proximal development, 1999. 3: p. 225-256.12. Bruner, J.S., Toward a theory of instruction. Vol. 59. 1966: Harvard University Press.13. Akbulut, Y., S. Şendağ, G. Birinci, K. Kılıçer, M.C. Şahin, and H.F. Odabaşı, "Exploring the types and reasons of Internet-triggered academic dishonesty among Turkish undergraduate students: Development of Internet-Triggered Academic Dishonesty Scale (ITADS)," Computers
were implemented this early in the curriculum at ourinstitution. Such efforts have however been reported in literature [10], indicating similar goals ofhelping to enhance student learning; linking theory with real-world applications, and helping todevelop career-ready students prepared for job market requirements when they graduate. Thatstudy described implementation of two energy-related student projects using COMSOL andmentioned that assessment of students’ satisfaction with the experience based on survey data wasoverall positive, but survey data was not included [10]. Our project incorporated three scaffolded and contextualized simulations that develop:(a) technical competency in modeling, (b) deeper understanding of thermo-fluids
-Kendall trend test, 2011, r package version 2.2.[22] M. M. Nuata, “Assessing college students’ satisfaction with their academic majors,” Journal of Career Assessment, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 446–462, 2007.[23] R. H. Nowaczyk, “The relationship of problem-solving ability and course performance among novice programmers,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 149–160, 1984.[24] D. D. Nulty, “The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 301–314, 2008.[25] R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2017.[26] Ridgell, Susan D
]-[11]. Although more and more educatorsrecognize the value of using active learning, how to effectively implement it is lessstraightforward. How is “effectively” defined in this context? What are appropriate ways toassess student learning? What methods work best in which situations and for what kinds ofstudents? As a new professor, how can I get my career going and also put in the time required toteach in the best way possible particularly if that is different than how I have been taught? or Assomeone who has been teaching in a more traditional lecturing style for years, why should I/howcan I change my methods? After 14+ years of university-level teaching, 18 different coursesfrom freshman to graduate-level at my current institution
regarding pre-requisite knowledge; and 2) how the Hardware Security courseimproved their understanding and confidence of ECE concepts. Student knowledge fromprevious courses varied, but the post-course data show that students improved theirunderstanding and confidence in various topics. The data also point to possible weaknesses inthe students’ past courses, which can be used as feedback to improve the respectivedepartment curricula. Overall, the course evaluations showed student growth in hardwaresecurity and progress in reinforcing ECE fundamental knowledge. The work presented here will help ECE faculty and departments deploy similar curriculato prepare students for a cybersecurity career and provide an evaluation of student
] S. R. Spodek, L. Gerhardt, and D. J. Mook, “Study abroad: Impact on engineering careers,”age, vol. 8, p. 1, 2003.[5] E. J. Berger and R. Bailey, “Designing short-term study abroad engineering experiences toachieve global competencies,” in ASEE Annual Conference Expo, vol. 21, 2013, pp. 1–21.[6] J. B. Ross, K. V. Johnson, and K. W. Varney, “A multidisciplinary approach to studyabroad,” in American Society for Engineering Education. American Society for EngineeringEducation, 2011.[7] J. Nelson, “Developing an international study abroad program that is sustainable from bothfaculty and student perspectives,” in American Society for Engineering Education. AmericanSociety for Engineering Education, 2009.[8] T. Seager, E. Selinger, and A. Wiek
particular must also have, or rapidly develop,excellent diagnostic skills on a variety of platforms, as they must support students oftenexperiencing the languages and platforms for the first time. Augmenting instructor experiencewith appropriate Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) to guest lecture on particular topics (e.g., UserExperience and User Interface Design, iOS, JavaScript) has proven valuable, both for theexperience such SMEs can provide, but also for students still learning about the wide variety ofengineering and software development careers available.The complexity added by a hardware component creates additional complexity for a course ofthis nature. Designing an IoT product, including the enclosure and electronics, requires a varietyof
Paper ID #21221An Arduino-Based Hardware Platform for a Mechanical Engineering Sopho-more Design CourseDr. Mark David Bedillion, Carnegie Mellon University Dr. Bedillion received the BS degree in 1998, the MS degree in 2001, and the PhD degree in 2005, all from the mechanical engineering department of Carnegie Mellon University. After a seven year career in the hard disk drive industry, Dr. Bedillion was on the faculty of the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology for over 5 years before joining Carnegie Mellon as a Teaching Faculty in 2016. Dr. Bedillion’s research interests include control applications in robotics
Paper ID #22238Assessing the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge in the Affective DomainDr. Norman D. Dennis Jr. P.E., University of Arkansas Norman D. Dennis, Jr., is a University Professor of Civil Engineering serving as the Senior Associate Dean of the College of Engineering at the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. Before joining the U of A faculty in 1996, he served in the US Army as an engineer officer for 24 years. During his military career Dennis had the unique opportunity to build roads, airfields and other facilities on five different continents and spend over 11 years as a member of the faculty at the US
. ● Discuss why you believe that the major you identified is the best fit for you in terms of turning your passion into a career to meet the three, five and ten year goals. Include at least two example to support your choice of major. ● Provide three specific examples and explain how the non-technical, non-academic programs you have chosen will help you in achieving your goals. ● Reflect on your commitment to your engineering, engineering technology, or construction management degree. Describe, in detail, why you are – or are not - more committed now than before to your chosen major, the College of Engineering, and/or UNC Charlotte,Successful Completion of the AssignmentYou will submit this assignment to your manager
impact higher education deprivesthose creating the policies of the perspectives and skills of engineers.For most of his career, the author of this paper would have fit the description of an engineeringfaculty member who was fairly aware of what was being done with regards to policies impactinghigher education, but would have had no role in the creation or implementation of the policiesand would have not even recognized what he could have done. But, through a series of events,the author found himself in a key faculty governance role at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM) during the tenure changes in Wisconsin. Here, the author will describe hisrole and activities, as an example of how engineering faculty can get involved in
prison time and owing large fines for various chargesstemming from an emissions-cheating scandal [4], [5]. Actions do have consequences. It isbetter to learn this axiom early, rather than late, in an engineering career. Engineering studentsare reminded of this throughout the course.The engineering-ethics guidance provided to students in the course may be summarized in thefour practical points below. 1. Work hard and do a good job 2. Do the right thing a. Be able to sleep at night b. Be able to look yourself in the mirror 3. Make executives earn their salaries 4. Do NOT go to jail!The first point is fairly self-explanatory and
model, visualization, whole brain thinking.IntroductionIn the 2015 movie “The Martian,” the main movie character (Matt Damon), stranded on the planetMars, spoke about how problem solving enabled him to survive and get rescued [1]. In the movie,the actor stated, “you begin by solving one problem, then the next problem and if you solve enoughproblems you get to go home.” For movie-goers, The Martian movie helped to illustrate theimportance of problem solving. However, for most people in general, the importance of problemsolving goes beyond outer space. For people to be successful in their careers, relationships andlives, they must be effective problem solvers [2]. For students to achieve both personal and careersuccess, they need to develop their
, Competencies, and Trust Measured in Student SurveysAbstractAerospace engineering students at the Florida Institute of Technology are required to complete a3-semester capstone design project. In their junior year students propose topics, form teams, andwrite a proposal for their senior project, then as seniors they complete preliminary and detaileddesign, then fabricate and test their system. Their efforts culminate in a Student DesignShowcase, where industry participants judge the final projects. Many students identify thecapstone design project as the most significant event in their academic career. In this paper wedescribe changes made in the aerospace engineering capstone curriculum during the 2016-2017season and
core is easily scalable and designed for higherdimensional data.5 Table 2: Rating scale pre-survey questions analyzed. For each of these eight statements, the learners were asked “To what extent do you agree with the following statements?” and could select from a five-point ratingscale ranging from “Strongly Agree” to “Strongly Disagree.” The statements are shown here in the order asked. Pre-course survey statement (i.e., question) Code “I'm taking this because I want to learn about the subject” Personal Interest “I'm taking this course to do my current job better” Personal Interest “I'm taking this course to improve my career prospects
ourlecture halls, and preparing for their professional careers. This next generation of engineers haslived their entire lives as beneficiaries of the information technology revolution. They are skilledin instantaneously researching a topic on the internet and making global connections with a fewswipes of their fingers. These skills give digital native students awareness of themultidisciplinary facets (social, cultural, political, economic, and technical) of contemporaryengineering problems as well as prime their penchant for team integration [3], [4]. ABET, the higher education accrediting body that helps set an engineering student onto theroad towards professional licensure, also recognizes that multi-disciplinary teamwork is arequisite skill
[5]. The module producedstatistically significant gains in students’ understanding of the concepts presented; however, theirmodule did not include microfabrication [5]. A conference proceeding described student projectsbased on point-of-care diagnostic devices, which allows students to integrate foundationalknowledge and skills in a technology that will benefit society, particularly developing nations[6]; however, their microfluidic chips were manufactured with CO2 laser cutting, which is notyet as accessible as other rapid prototyping technologies. Lab-on-a-chip research has also beenused as a course-based project, showing gains in knowledge, confidence in abilities, interest, andlikelihood of pursuing a career in this area; however, after
job market. are analytical in perspectives andCourse 6 1) Case analysis of Two case ethical expectations about the sweatshops; 2) Student analyses and a reasoning. role of ethics in their choose and analyze a case final report. careers. related to corporate ethics; 3) A semester-long project on a Fortune 1000 company and LPU’s performance on corporate social responsibility and sustainability. 4) In-class ethics debate on an ethical dilemma.Course 7 Two 50-min lectures on
group. General (0/4) (3/4) Another set is (1/4) Success to me (2/4) Definitely communication social skills, would be getting the talking to larger knowing how to student to calm groups of people. interact with people. down, finding out what the problem is.Context 3: MIME and ENGR Recitation (four LAs)MIME 101, ENGR 111, and ENGR 199 are introductory engineering courses. MIME 101provides students with an overview of mechanical, industrial, manufacturing, and energy systemsengineering careers and
project manager, senior engineer and consultant. He has taught and developed undergraduate and graduate courses in power electronics, power systems, renewable energy, smart grids, control, electric machines, instrumentation, radar and remote sensing, numerical methods, space and atmosphere physics, and ap- plied physics. His research interests included power system stability, control and protection, renewable energy system analysis, assessment and design, smart microgrids, power electronics and electric machines for non-conventional energy conversion, remote sensing, wave and turbulence, numerical modeling, elec- tromagnetic compatibility and engineering education. During his career Dr. Belu published ten book chapters
clinical settings and of real life problems I should be expecting as an engineer.” “I expect to gain insight on what the real world applications of the biomedical engineering field are and what might really interest me as career/internship/research pathways after I graduate.” “Taking this course, I will develop greater insight into what I will be doing in the field when I graduate. Through the clinical observations and discussions, my problem-solving and leadership skills will improve while my experience and knowledge in biomedical engineering will increase.” “When I research biomedical engineering, what I find generally gives a narrow look and broad explanation at what exactly I can do with my degree. Although I am very interested in what I find
globally. To be ready to enter the workforce upon graduation, today’s engineering studentsare expected to develop the skills and knowledge that are fundamental to engineering careers in theirundergraduate years. The Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) has determinedthat fundamental skills include social skills, such as how to communicate effectively or function inmultidisciplinary teams, as well as proven technical skills, such as an ability to apply knowledge of math,science, and engineering [6], [18]. These skills can be referred to collectively as 21st century skills as theyprepare an engineer for contemporary work [7].The acquisition of 21st century skills by undergraduate engineering students may be catalyzed byengaging