this study is associated with. The larger study sought tosample students at or very close to the time period during which they will select theiroccupational or graduate school plans, and to sample consistently from a single college majorthat had relatively stable enrollments and career prospects. The latter criteria help minimizeunobservable error in job preference measurement due to market effects. The leadershipconfidence and risk orientation relationships discussed in the Literature Review section of thispaper have no known theoretical inconsistencies across the range of engineering majors;however, while we believe that this study’s results should generalize across all engineeringmajors, our dataset does not allow us to empirically validate
insights about a problem space andknowing how to synthesize at just the right level of specificity to be maximally generativewithout becoming swamped by all the challenges of “making it work” [24]. Rather than seekinginsight through a systematic, precise analytic or synthetic framework, designers find insightthrough productive and continuous interplay between analytic and synthetic modes of practice.5. Fail Early, Fail OftenThis mantra is widely expressed across design thinking communities [25]. The premise is thatthere is much to be learned from low-risk failure, and that rather than striving to avoid failure bycareful planning and robust analysis, failing early in the design process will provide quicker,higher density learning so that success
andmanagement—often framing management as the bureaucratic straw man against whichleadership shines. Drawing on the work of Komives [5] and Bass [6], we locate this distinctionin the source of an engineer’s influence and authority. When an individual’s authority is rootedprimarily in organizational structures and is enacted through project planning, budgets, orcompany policies, we characterize it as “positional,” following Komives, or “transactional,”following Bass. When an individual’s influence stems from his or her capacity to motivate andinspire others, and is less clearly derived from organizational policies or structures, wecharacterize it as “process-based,” following Komives, or “transformational,” following Bass.By using the position/process
developing camaraderie with the group. A second example, aligned with the focusgroup interview result, shows how group ownership facilitates perspective taking & mentalflexibility: Also, a lot of us have never been in a setting like this where the project is entirely our own. I think we are also learned a lot about ownership and responsibility. Because the projects are our own we've also grown in our technical communication skills. In any project, especially when there is a language barrier, you have to be very clear about your ideas and plans. I've noticed myself being able to communicate my ideas more clearly to my team, others involved and other groups who are interested [student 4].This excerpt illustrates that this student is
the eighth day, participants had completed the construction of their solar heater orwater treatment system. They developed lesson plans, prepared pre- and post-assessments forstudent learning, wrote a report on the process they used to design their system and how thesystem works, and reflected on their own engineering design learning experience. Throughoutthe professional development, participants worked either collaboratively, independently, or a mixof both as they completed the design challenge. While participants received the same explicitinstruction and had the same requirements (i.e., consistent activities and assignments), theirexperience differed in the amount of interaction they had with other teachers and theundergraduate student
• family/work balanceWants: Wants: Wants:• to be entertained (in class) • prestige • group work experience• instructor involvement • industry experience • money• a plan for the futureBehaviors: Behaviors: Behaviors:• distracted in class • looks for time-saving • works in a study group• doesn't read textbook shortcuts to problem • consults the course TA solving • falls asleep in class due to overextended scheduleConstruct persona
assess student performance in a chemical engineering curriculum,” in Proceedings of the Fall 2016 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference, 2016. [6] J. C. Guarino, J. R. Ferguson, and V. K. C. Pakala, “Quantitative assessment of program outcomes using longitudinal data from the FE exam,” Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, vol. 23, p. 1, 2013. [7] R. Helgeson and E. Wheeler, “Passing the Fundamentals of Engineering examination as a graduation requirement in a general engineering program: Lessons learned,” Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2006. [8] O. Pierrakos and H. Watson, “A comprehensive ABET-focused assessment plan designed to involve all program faculty
grading and quiz responses. Limited When there are little to no consequences for not Plans and contingencies should be developed from the start of the consequences for training or not taking training seriously, there is little to term to reward authentic training participation and punish improper training no incentive to push UTAs to do so. inauthentic or non-participation. Philosophical Many UTAs do not have a proper understanding of the Repeatedly communicate the intentions of grading (identifying misunderstandings intentions of LO-based grading or calibration training. LO competence) and training (calibration, not how-to-grade). It is
do with motivation,” (Max Post).Max explains that this motivation comes from the fact that “You are all in the same boat, andyou guys are all wanting to build a product that you're all happy and proud to display,” (MaxPost).2. Team BAlex also had insight on the hackathon environment and its motivational aspects, “I think themotivation is definitely higher. I would say so because, I mean, there's more at stake here. It's notonly the prizes, but it's also the social aspect, and it's really just fun staying up all night coding tohave these sessions. It's four in the morning. You're tired, but your creativity is still flowing,”(Alex Post). Prior to hacking, Mark explained their plan for managing the team, “Like our idea,divide it up into
students to write, all in a learning community setting. A scarcity ofresources should not prevent an engineering school from providing scientific writing assistanceto graduate students, as they can encourage the growth of a peer learning community.5.2 Future workAs stated earlier, our learning community has been growing and continues to grow organically tomeet the needs expressed by students. Therefore, we plan to continue to develop new ideasarising from student feedback and hope to recruit more and more students, faculty, and staff intothe learning community.In the near future, we intend to develop online toolkits for students to organize and animateactivities on their own. For example, if a group of students would like to organize a
and potential collaborationbetween engineering librarians and mechanical engineering faculty. For the course in this study,the plan for next year will be to use these instructional activities again. It also has started thediscussion of where additional library collaboration earlier in the mechanical engineeringprogram would be appropriate and beneficial. This additional exposure and training will buildfamiliarity with information fluency skills, which may be perceived as difficult, but are essentialin the professional environment.Works Cited[1] G. Kerins, “Information seeking and students studying for professional careers: The cases of engineering and law students in Ireland,” Inf. Res. Int. Electron. J., vol. 10, no. 1, Oct. 2004.[2] S
. Part of the grade is assigned based on the relative performance of the team’s solution compared to the best team. Because performance is measured in several categories, the team that is best in one category may not be in another. The demonstration periods provide key points for groups to observe and reflect.Our interest in experimentation and prototyping has been motivated both by our anecdotalobservations of many senior design teams and advice from industrial contacts. In the seniordesign process, students often attempt to build a final product without adequately planning forsubsystem interactions, non-ideal component behavior, verification of engineering assumptions,and other aspects where prototyping and design iterations
industry; and a critique of how focuson the social license to operate in the mining industry can hamper sustainable communitydevelopment efforts. Guest speakers came from industry, from consulting firms that focus oncommunity engagement, and from academia. For their final essays, students synthesized thesemester’s reading to critically analyze the potential for CSR to deliver shared social,environmental, and economic value to stakeholders. In groups, they gave presentations on thearticles, lead one class discussion, and created a stakeholder engagement plan for a real worldengineering project. The course focused primarily on the community engagement dimensions ofCSR, with gestures to the role played by engineers and engineering.Spring 2017
the professor either directly or indirectly by not completing the assignment.On one particular recent occasion, this method revealed that almost 14% of the students in myupper-level Computer Science class did not have the skills to write a relatively simple piece ofcode. Most of the students had a good reason for not having developed coding skills, and onceidentified, I could give those students the extra attention they needed since they also agreed thatthey had a deficiency. At this level, the three important steps are to 1) identify deficiencies, 2) havethe student agree to devote the time and effort required to overcome the deficiencies and 3) lay outa plan for the student's success.3 Another Experience: From Mathematics to Computer
their abilities in mathematics and/or science and they challengedthemselves by choosing to take advanced courses in their curricular plans (Martinez Ortiz et al.,2017).Intrinsic motivation is not the only correlation to self-determination. Self-determination alsocorrelates to educational phenomenon such as optional functioning, personality integration, socialdevelopment, internalization of extrinsic motivations and personal well-being (Reeve, Hamm, andNix, 2003; Deci & Ryan, 1985b, 1987, 1991, 2000; Deci, Vallerand, Pelletier, & Ryan, 1991;Grolnick & Ryan, 1987; Ryan & Deci, 2000; Sheldon & Kasser, 1998; Vallerand, Fortier, & Guay,1997).Self-Determination “is the ability to have choices and some degree of control over
product development. Within Renk he was involved in the business of gears boxes, transmissions and test equipment. In 1992 he became CEO of MAN Miller Druckmaschinen GmbH and was responsible for production, logistics, quality, services, personal and factory planning. He also was responsible for a certain product range of the parent company MAN Roland AG. Prof. Dr.-Ing. U. Lindemann succeeded Professor Ehrlenspiel in 1995 as head of the Institute of Product Development at the Technical University of Munich. Within the time since 1995 until today he served as Dean for Study Affairs and as Dean of the Faculty Mechanical Engineering. Today he is a member of the Academic Senate of the Technical University Munich. He is
Planning a project Asking questions Following directions Listening 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 PRE-SELF EFFICACY SCORE POST SELF-EFFICACY SCOREFigure 3. Impact of STEAM ACTIVATED! program on self-efficacy14The apparent losses in self-efficacy were associated with statements associated with ‘includingthe perspectives of others in decision making’ (-6.65%), ‘listening’ (-4.93%), and ‘setting goals’(-3.48%). Prior to participating in the program, the girls had more favorable perceptions abouttheir self-efficacy in relation to
to create a curb cut replacement plan. Engineers designaccessible transportation infrastructure and policymakers implement accessibility policies butoften these roles are performed in isolation. Co-teaching allowed us to put engineering inconversation with policy making. We also strategically assembled student teams so that eachteam was comprised of students from each of the engineering departments 1. This providedstudents the opportunity to engage with members of their cohort whom they may have littlecontact with over the course of their studies as a result of sub-discipline tracking. Importantly,course participants also collaborated with representatives from city and the county agenciescharged with managing the local sewer system and a
total of 4computational thinking competencies: Abstraction, Algorithm and Procedures, PatternRecognition, and Problem Decomposition. Pattern Recognition was the most observed CTcompetency with 5 instances. Sam engaged in Abstraction on 4 occasions when giving buildingblocks representations of real world objects (i.e., a stack of rectangular blocks referenced as awall). The Algorithm and Procedures competency was observed during moments where Samfollowed instructions from his mother to participate in building structures. We observed only 1instance of Problem Decomposition when Sam discussed the plans for building the puppyplayground at the beginning of the task. Case #2: DanDuring the engineering design activity, we observed 9 instances
.Bradley, E. H., Curry, L. A., & Devers, K. J. (2007). Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health services research, 42(4), 1758-1772.Breuker, J. A., Elshout, J. J., Van Someren, M. W., & Wielings, B. J. (1986). Thinking-aloud and protocol-analysis. Tijdschrift voor Onderewijsresearch, 11, 241-254.Cardella, M. E., Atman, C. J., Turns, J., & Adams, R. (2008). Students with differing design as freshmen: Case studies on change. International Journal of Engineering Education, 24(2), 246-259.Brown, A. L., & DeLoache, J. S. (1987). Skills, plans, and self-regulation. In R. s. Siegel (Ed.), Children’s thinking: What develops? (pp. 3-35
academic quality. • Demonstrate accountability. • Encourage, where appropriate, self-scrutiny and planning for change and needed improve- ment. • Employ appropriate and fair procedures in decision making. • Demonstrate ongoing review of accreditation practice. • Possess sufficient resources.This clarifies ABET’s role as one of accrediting programs through a focus on continuous im-provement, curriculum, student outcomes, skilled faculty, and adequately resourced programs.The accreditation criteria discussed above makes that clear. While compliance with federal lawsis important, it is not regarded as an indication of a commitment to continuous improvement andexcellence in education. Furthermore, since ABET accredits programs
, planning, and implementing design solutions. Theauthors found that students who participated in the creative lab demonstrated a higher confidencein continuing in engineering coursework than those who did not. As the study states, “Creativityis an important attribute for engineers practicing their profession in a global society” [12].Although students struggled with the open-ended nature of the design problems, they enjoyed thecourse and saw the value in the addition to their curriculum. Illustrating the importance of incorporating real-world engineering design problems, Odehet al. write, “Nowadays, engineering education needs to meet the requirements and needs ofbusiness and industry. This can be achieved by collaborating with the local
educator and the industry professional field those questions. In practice, theprofessional fields questions about project implementation, while the educator fields questionsabout project requirements. When students are happy with their project, they upload their WARfile to the server and the educator grades it (project grading is not automated).Live, online Q&A sessions are held one evening per week and only last about an hour.Attendance is not mandatory, but we do require students to view the recording if they cannotattend. Even though they are called Q&A sessions, we almost always have something planned. Acommon occurrence is that the educator will share his screen and will begin going through theproject on his computer. The industry
disengage in certain circumstances. Although it identifies eight dimensions of moral disengagement (moral justification, euphemistic labeling, advantageous comparison, displacement of responsibility, diffusion of responsibility, distortion of consequences, attribution of blame, and dehumanization), the scale is most correctly used as a measure of the single higher order concept of moral disengagement. • Experiences (17 items): Students were asked about their participation within the last two years and their plans to participate in the future in seventeen types of experiences: 1. Volunteer regularly (1+ time per month for 6 months longer) 2. Mission or volunteering trip (any location) 3. Work or internship in a non-profit
, and responding to students’ ideas in ways that help students build on their priorknowledge (Richards & Robertson, 2016; Sherin, Jacobs, & Philipp, 2011). As Ball & Cohen(2013, p. 16) put it, “Examining student thinking is a core activity of [teachers’] practice.” Inorder to help teachers develop their responsiveness, teacher educators and teacher professionallearning communities typically rely on artifacts of classroom practice (i.e. examples of studentwork, video or audio recordings of classroom events, or field notes on classroom events) toanalyze pedagogical moves/approaches, to investigate the possible consequences of theirpedagogical approach for students’ learning, and to consider intentions and plans for futurepedagogical