fell into two areas: earning acollege degree or affinity for their major. This finding was surprising given that most earlylearners are uncertain of academic goals [4]. Driven by this evidence, self-reflection shoulddeepen student discipline-specific understandings.Research activities centered on a university-specific electronic portfolio: the PersonalDevelopment Plan (ePDP), enabling students to more effectively map out and navigate theiracademic and co-curricular experiences, as well as their subsequent careers. The ePDP is apersonalized planning process that enables students to understand, implement, and chart progresstoward their degree and college goals. For more than 10 years, the university has integratedpersonal development planning
experiences that are essential in thetechnology programs.All educational entities involved in the process recognized worth in their efforts for theirinstitution such as an increase in enrollment, curriculum development around new technologies,and opportunities for funding of new equipment. Faculty workload increase is minimal due to asmall rise in class sizes.The Utah State Board of Education (USBE) recommended upon the approval of the AASControls Technology degree that all post-secondary institutions develop similar pathways as partof the USBE strategic plan, Education Elevated, that result in credentials with labor marketvalue.CollaborationNorthern Utah manufacturing is a diverse group that includes industries in aerospace anddefense, energy and
solutions for small-scale gold miningcommunities), Vietnam (low-cost prosthetics), South Korea (technical training of North Koreanrefugees), Kenya (drinking water), and Madagascar (drinking water and sanitation).As part of their partnership agreement, MUSE and WFP have collaborated through UNHRDLAB in: designing and developing relief items and logistics solutions for the supply chain,focusing on cost-effective green technologies and on reducing packaging waste (thus enhancingefforts in emergency preparedness planning and response operations); and sharing knowledgeand building capacities.The Mercer Partnership with UNHRDThe unique partnership between MUSE and UNHRD has grown since late-2014, as describedbelow by academic calendar year.2014-2015. The
advantages of pursuing an independent study with the interested students were: • More faculty involved with different expertise (especially valuable at an institution with fewer faculty and less specialization) • The fall semester after the Materials Science course permitted planning to begin the project in the spring and give the project more time with a two-semester option • Less time required for course design • Increase our department’s research experiencesThere were four students who expressed the strongest desire to learn more about materials afterthe junior course. Faculty thought that this was a good number for an independent study project;Friend and Beneat [5] note that undergraduate research teams should be reasonably
” in their mathematics coursework due toAdvanced Placement or dual enrollment credit. That is, the students may be enrolled in thetraditional engineering and science courses for first year engineering majors but be taking moreadvanced level mathematics courses simultaneously. In such cases, these students already havesome “spare room” in their degree plan should they need to withdraw from or re-take a course.Because one of the objectives of the scholarship program is to create some buffer in participatingstudents’ curricula, students who are ahead in mathematics are considered ineligible for thisprogram.Other scholarship selection criteria include grades in the first year mathematics, engineering, andscience courses; participation
Post Deviation I am interested in careers that use science 3.78 4.00 0.98 0.1610 I am interested in careers that use mathematics 3.69 4.12 0.75 0.0030 I am interested in careers that use technology 3.91 4.24 0.79 0.0190 I am interested in careers that involve engineering 3.94 4.12 0.64 0.1100 I plan to use STEM in my future career 3.93 4.17 0.54 0.0140 I am interested in careers that involve STEM 3.82 4.12 0.53 0.0030 STEM interest average 3.92 4.07 0.31 0.0080As can be seen in Table 3, there was a significant upward change in
resourcegaps if a school or program experienced a poor enrollment and a lower budget. In general,library collection development decisions were driven by budget policies rather than byuser need.In 2011, KSL formed a task force consisting of faculty and several librarians. The goalwas to create a collection and budget strategy that adapted with new research needs andreflected a fairness in meeting all faculty expectations for access to databases, journals,and books (i.e. prevent subscription inflation from overtaking the book budget). The taskforce proposed a plan that was approved by the Faculty Senate. The plan allowedlibrarians to decide how to allocate collection development budget dollars, since they
including standards, assessments, and curricula[27]. The curricular unit used in this study was designed and developed with guidance from boththe STEM integration framework [24] and The Framework for Quality K-12 EngineeringEducation [27]. The latter framework identifies nine key characteristics of quality pre-collegeengineering; the first of these characteristics, the Process of Design (POD), is most pertinent tothis study. POD has six sub-indicators which represent the fundamental characteristics of designprocesses: problem, background, plan, implement, test, and evaluate. POD can be broken intotwo stages: problem scoping and solution generation. The problem scoping stage is composed ofidentifying the problem, criteria, and constraints and
Number Factor Names Abbreviation 1 Problem Solving/Logical Thinking PS 2 Engaging Stakeholders ES 3 Value Creation VC 4 Risk Management RM 5 Career Plan CP 6 Ability to Learn AL 7 Analyze Market Conditions MC 8 Systems Thinking ST 9
three weeks of the term were just a hack fest); used notextbook and our own lecture notes (that was a lot of preparation work) to a classic softwareengineering tome as the textbook (which only half the students bought and few of them read);had teams create full use case requirements, specification, design, and test plan documents(Document Engineering again) to preparing user stories, design, and simple acceptance testspecifications (this seems like about the right mix); in different versions, we had the projectimplemented in C++, Java, and Python and as a desktop application and a web application; it hasbeen delivered blended [4] and completely face-to-face. In one version of the course, we chooseone of the classic texts with the idea that in
camp program.The logistics were co-determined by the participating institutions and were based on the planned,annual activities of the experienced outreach organization. The experiences of the US studentcohort mirrored the activities (on a modified timeline) that participating Canadian studentsendured. For this project, we worked within a qualitative research paradigm to explore theelements of the collaboration. Data collection thus far for the project was conducted through twomethods: document analysis and open-ended survey. Document analysis examined the physicalartifacts [9] from the Canadian and US outreach groups, including agenda, program schedules,manuals, curriculum documents, and training materials. Documents were assessed
will benefit his/her academic career, why the applicant should be considered for this program, and what is his/her 5 year plan including academic studies and professional career.Applications are reviewed using a review matrix by a committee in the College of Engineering.Students who accept the SPURS scholarship must graduate from their respective degree programwithin 3 years from receiving the scholarship. Students will remain in the program as long ashe/she is a full-time engineering student and maintains a cumulative GPA of 3.00 or higher.Students must participate in at least two SPURS Workshops each semester, meets with theirfaculty mentor at least two times a semester and COE academic advisor, and career counselor atleast once
this article is todescribe the approach, in particular how it attempts to alleviate the issues above, and a plan toassess its success as it is phased in to the curriculum.Course DescriptionOur Professional Topics in BME course is a two-credit course that runs in the fall trimester. It ison track for junior year students, who begin the four-trimester senior design sequence thefollowing spring trimester. The course meets for two lecture periods for each of the ten weeks inthe term. It runs as a single section of approximately 50 students, meeting in a large lecture hall.The course outcomes are as follows: • Identify what constitutes human subject research and describe the IRB approval process • Identify ethical considerations for
about career plans with faculty,discussing academic performance with faculty, and discussing course material with facultyoutside class. Lower satisfaction with instruction and student-faculty interaction sets the tone forlearning; first-year and senior-level students reported lower levels of engagement in tasksassociated with higher-order learning, reflective and integrative learning, and quantitativereasoning.Instructional Strategy. The instructional material of the program draws on current evidence-based pedagogy andcourse design to teach faculty and staff how to create and/or reinvent STEM courses to belearner-focused and engaging. The aims are to increase student learning, improve studentoutcomes in gateway (high-enrollment, first-year
from underrepresented communities continues to be achallenge. One of the ways stakeholders are addressing this challenge is by developing youthout-of-school programs to pique interests in STEM fields (Valla & Williams, 2012).With the amplification of national interest in attracting underrepresented youth to STEM fields,the presence of out-of-school programs aimed at attracting these students has grown (Perna,2002). Building on more than 10 years of experience conducting SEEK camps in cities across theUnited States, NSBE has planned and implemented more than 16 camp sites with plans toexpand over the course of the next few years. NSBE led the expansion process through theselection of site locations, fundraising, hiring site leaders and
work in progress paper introduces a first-year introduction to electrical engineering courseat the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE) along with a data analysis plan. The purposeof the course is three-fold: to introduce new students to the major through a number of engaginglaboratory exercises, to introduce new students to other students in their cohort and to electricalengineering faculty at the university, and to reinforce high-school-level mathematics in thecontext of engineering problems.This work-in-progress paper will provide the history of the introduction to electrical engineeringcourse and how it has been modified within the past three years. This paper will also introducethe analysis plan to obtain information on the
togenerate coherent explanations of natural phenomena; they understand how claims are justified;how to represent their thinking to others; critique one another’s ideas; and revise their ideas inresponse to evidence and argument. The hallmark of this pedagogy is its adaptiveness tostudents’ needs and thinking, and examples of this approach have set new standards for rigor andequity in practice across several subject matter areas [6] - [9].Windschitl, Thompson, Braaten, and Stroupe [2] define four high-leverage practices for scienceteaching that make up what they refer to as “the core repertoire of ambitious teaching” (p. 880).These practices include constructing big ideas (planning of a science lesson); eliciting andinterpreting students’ ideas
Paper ID #24562Connecting with first-year engineering students’ interest in social responsi-bility issues through ethics lessonsMs. Kathryn Waugaman, University of Colorado Boulder Katie is an undergraduate student researcher at the University of Colorado, Boulder. She is interested in why students choose to study engineering and what retention methods are successful for universities, particularly in underrepresented communities. She is a Senior in Mechanical Engineering and plans to work in renewable energy when she graduates in December.Dr. Janet Y Tsai, University of Colorado, Boulder Janet Y. Tsai is a researcher
Technol- ogy and Infrastructure for the NSF Center for e-Design at the University of Central Florida. Dr. Yousef developed a strategic plan for information technology for the center. Dr. Yousef authored several refereed publications including book chapters, journal papers, and conference papers. He was also either the PI or the Co-PI in many research projects related to Cost Engineering, Cost and Quality Effectiveness, Cost Modeling, System of Systems Interoperability, Supply Chain Management, Decision Support Systems, Knowledgebase Systems, and Database Management. During his career Dr. Yousef earned the award of Excellent Service from the department of Industrial En- gineering and Management Systems in 2006, and
Paper ID #22385LEED R LabTM : Which Compliance Path is Best for Your University?Mrs. Janet Fick, Ball State University Janet Fick is an Instructor in the Construction Management program in Ball State University’s College of Architecture and Planning. She has taught in the areas of sustainability, immersive projects, Auto- CAD/Revit and construction management for fifteen years. She is a Registered Architect and LEED AP with more than twenty years professional experience in the architecture, interior design and construction management fields.Dr. James W. Jones, Ball State University Dr. James W. Jones is the Chair of the
willask members of the audience to first think about challenges and opportunities they’veencountered at various parental stages including prior to having children, while parenting smallchildren, and while parenting older children. We will then have members of the audience discusstheir experiences in small groups. Finally, we will encourage sharing with the audience at large.Vision for panelists:We plan to include five panelists with diverse experiences including people who: ● Have small children while on the tenure-track ● Have older children while on the tenure-track ● Have achieved tenure with children ● Have adopted children ● Had children during graduate school ● Had children post-tenure ● Have chosen not to pursue a
week’stopics. Students maintained Strategy Documents to plan and evaluate weekly academic goals(e.g., splitting up weekly problem sets into daily quotas). In lieu of a final exam, students wroteFinal Papers in the form of a letter to their high school self (or to a friend in high school). Theseletters included what students wished they had known before coming to college and whatstudents wanted to share from the “Engineering the Mind” course.Data analysisWe used multiple methods to analyze the data because we wanted to capture various nuances ofthe course. For quantitative methods, we calculated the average score of the items for each scalefor each student. For example, the mindset scale had eight items, each with a score ranging fromone to six (Likert
make a specific step-by-step plan to achieve my goals. I used tothink I could never be a leader. I am not afraid to think about myself as a leader, I started toimagine that I could be a leader now.” The value of the course is to develop leaders to excel in adiverse workforce. It provides students with an awareness of the barriers, biases and challengesto diversity in engineering, and provides strategies that can be used to improve satisfaction in theengineering workplace and in academia.Keywords: Engineering management, engineering education, leadership, diversityIntroduction:Last Spring semester, 2017, an Associate Professor in the Department of EngineeringManagement, Systems and Technology (EMST), and five engineering students piloted a
ChallengeAbstractASCE’s Grand Challenge to civil engineers is to significantly enhance the performance andvalue of infrastructure project over their lifecycles. [1] ASCE wants to drive transformationalchange in infrastructure projects from planning to design to project delivery. How does ASCEmove from the strategic vision to the detailed implementation? The paper’s objective is toanswer that question in part by highlighting the role played by proposed changes to the civilengineering knowledge framework, specifically, ASCE’s Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge(BOK) as it undergoes revision for a Third Edition.Knowledge may be the most strategically significant resource the profession can possess. Thetraditional view of civil engineering has always been about the
, project management, strategic planning, preconstruction, and sustaining the built environment. At Purdue, Benhart also leads the Healthcare Construction Management program and works with the first ASHE (American Society of Healthcare Engineering) student chapter. His position allows him to further develop construction education in the built environment and be an in- dustry advocate for the next generation of builders. He is also very involved in field supervision training programs, both at Purdue and on the national level. He focuses on the sustainability of our industry by mentoring the retiring baby boomers with new foremen and superintendents. Benhart also has an exten- sive resume in industry. His previous position
semester of 2017, an official partnership between the RCSC and theEngineering and Science Projects in Community Service (EPICS@mines) program at the SouthDakota School of Mines and Technology (SD Mines) was formed to help the RCSC meet thisgoal. The EPICS@mines program allows students to earn course credits for partnering with thecommittee to investigate, monitor, and plan an initiative for improving the energy efficiency ofcity buildings to meet Energy Star Building Certification. The creation of the student designteam has had a positive impact on students and the community and it has led to the developmentof unanticipated partnerships in the community.IntroductionTown and gown relations have long been considered important to the success of a
,this program is engineering discipline specific, open only to incoming students enrolled in thefall semester, and it is closely tied to the first engineering course offered at the university. Bootcamps at University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) and University of Washington (UW)are similar, but they focus on Math and Writing or Science and Math respectively [15], [16],which means that students will not necessarily meet others in their major.All incoming freshmen engineering students are encouraged to apply to E-FIT, which is designedto suit students of all ability levels. Currently, there is space for 132 students (approximately20% of incoming engineering students) to participate, but the program plans to be available to allincoming
shifts from pure modeling to that of an understanding of the organizational principles andsystems, having a specific behavior. The first project makes use of an SDC Publications textbook[1]. This also enables students to learn the tools of the software, become familiar witharchitectural and construction methods, and understand details employed in the design andconstruction of residential buildings. The first project is in the format of a tutorial where studentswork on constructing a single family residence which comprises of a basement, first floor, andsecond floor. Students are also to interior design the kitchen, bathroom, and office on the secondfloor. The second project consists of the plan and design of a single floor for a single
, proceeds through feasibility andprototyping courses and culminates in a business plan preparation course. There are also threepracticum courses included in the minor that provide focused experiences for students in relatedthemed areas.The program has graduated over 100 students and continues to see a robust enrollment of about12% of the engineering students and is the largest subscribed minor in the College ofEngineering. After a decade of offering the engineering entrepreneurship minor, the program wasevaluated to identify its strengths and determine if any modifications needed to be made.The program evaluation was based on the collection and analysis of several forms of dataincluding course syllabi, focus groups with current students, and
Paper ID #21943Industry experience: Consulting; since 1987; Had major or partial role in: I) performing research forindustry, DOE and NSF, and II) in several oil industry or government (DOE, DOD, and NSF) proposals.Performed various consulting tasks from USA for several oil companies (Jawaby Oil Service Co., WAHAOil and Oasis Co., London, England). The responsibilities included production planning, forecastingand reservoir maintenance. This production planning and forecasting consisted of history matching andprediction based on selected drilling. The reservoir maintenance included: water/gas injection and gas liftfor selected wells to optimize reservoir production plateau and prolonging well’s economic life.Terra Tek, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT