helps ensure that software behavesaccording to its requirements. We will discuss testing practices used in software engineering andhow they relate to teaching software testing. We then introduce the theoretical and conceptualframeworks that form the foundation for our study.2.1 Software TestingTesting is a critical part of software development. By some estimates, 41% of informationtechnology budgets in North America are spent on quality assurance and testing. 1 Softwaretesting helps ensure the correctness of the software being developed, and there are several testsuite quality metrics used in industry to ensure that a test suite properly verifies the behavior ofthe software it tests.One widely-used test suite quality metric is code coverage
need to focus on better training for the students and the professors. Students enjoyedthe Scrum class more than they did the less innovative second half of the semester. Overall, thissmall pilot showed some promise as a way of teaching mechanical engineering with greaterstudent ownership of learning. Agile methodologies hold considerable promise especially forhigher-level classes such as mechanical senior design.Introduction: Student Engagement vs Student OwnershipIn 1987 Chickering and Gamson published their famous “Seven Principles for Good Practice”which codified what many good teachers have always known: a good teacher must engage thestudents in their own learning [1]. Education research has made great strides towardsencouraging greater
undergraduates) tend to fall into two categories: i) theoretical CS courses are "all math" requiring proofs andrigorous formal reasoning that many CS and other engineering students aren't (yet) comfortable with; and ii) "why dowe need all this theory anyway" if our career goal is to become software engineers, develop the next cool mobile app,and similar. Yet, most research universities, as well as quite a few non-research colleges, require at least 1-2 semestersof core undergraduate coursework in theoretical or foundational CS.We summarize some interesting lessons learned from teaching theoretical CS to mostly undergraduate upperclassmen(as well as a few non-traditional students) at two prominent public research universities in the US Pacific Northwest
).Synthesisbetweentopicswasachievedthroughalaboratoryprojectoutsideofclassandanexamneartheendofthesemester.Theflipped-classroomexperiencewasevaluatedviastudentsurveysattheendofthesemesterwherestudentsrankedtheiragreementwithvariousstatementsona7-pointLikertscale.BackgroundMuchresearchhasbeendoneabouthowtobestteachstudentsandoftenactivelearningmethodssuchasgroupdiscussion,workingproblemstogether,hands-onactivities,andstudentexperimentationleadtoimprovedstudentoutcomeswhenutilizedinclass.Forexample,Smithet.al.[1]investigatedtheeffectofstudentshavingdiscussionstogetherontheirunderstandingofconceptquestions.CarlWiemanhasdoneavarietyofexperimentsaboutvariousactivelearningtechniquesattheuniversitylevelintheUnitedStatesandCanada,summarizedinhisrecentbookImprovingHowUniversitiesTeachScience[2
thevarious tools provided by the ROS framework together with sensors to collect and analyze data.The communication among the robots is used to map and clean an industrial or office environmentmore efficiently.BACKGROUND RESEARCHA robot vacuum cleaner is an autonomous vacuum system that can make intelligent decisionsbased on sensor inputs. The first robot cleaner that appeared on the market was Electrolux Trilobite[1], a vacuum system developed by James Dizon and purchased by the appliance manufacturerElectrolux. In 2001, the British technology company Dyson built a vacuuming robot known asDC06 [2]. However, due to the high cost, it was never released on the market. In 2002, theAmerican advanced technology company iRobot launched the Roomba floor
strategically on students’ experiences and knowledge from pastcourses. The goal of this committee is to improve the quality of student learning by consideringnot only course content, but also by considering the quantity and timing of various types of skillbuilding. Technical communication (TC) is one of these common threads. We believe thesequence of instruction related to various forms of technical communication (written, oral, anddrawing skills) should intentionally develop students’ abilities so that by graduation they areprepared for a professional engineering environment.Several research studies have identified the gap between engineering students’ writingexperiences and the expectations of professional writing in the engineering workplace [1], [2
writing-intensive courses typically are taken in the first or second year,leaving engineering students without critical writing and communicative course supports as theymove beyond their sophomore year.In today’s changing engineering curriculum, there is an opportunity to use writing to supportengineering instructional goals and expected student learning outcomes. Evidence from aCanadian national survey of engineering graduates indicates that the need for technical writing iswell-understood—most recent engineering graduates who participated in surveys and focusgroups requested that more opportunities for engineering-based writing and presenting, coupledwith in-depth feedback, be provided to future engineering students [1].The implementation of
professional engineering areconsidered and questions the public should seek answers to are listed. From the perspectivesof technological literacy two issues are considered, namely fake news, and the role ofprejudice in public perceptions of what happened.It is concluded that a radically different approach to the design of the curriculum will berequired if the public are to become engaged in engineering and technological literacy.IntroductionIn 2017 the TELPHE division of ASEE published the fourth edition in its series of handbooksin which the authors responded to a paper by Heywood in which he discussed the problemsfacing those who would establish a community of scholarship in technological andengineering literacy [1]. This commentary may be regarded
modern technologyappropriately to take advantage of the speed and power of calculation but not impede conceptualunderstanding and learning. As technology continues to change, it is important that engineersretain the conceptual understanding so they can adapt to new tools and still solve futureengineering problems. It is hoped that through this literature review, good practices for properlyusing technology to supplement and improve mathematics education in undergraduateengineering can be compared and expanded upon.IntroductionThe mathematics ability of undergraduate engineering students has seemingly declined over thedecades [1, 2]. Due in part to the increased role of technology in their studies as well as theincreased focus on application of
videos, which are publiclyavailable, that include examples of both prohibited behavior and encouraged behavior forindividual assignments. All scenarios now reference examples in calculus, chemistry, and physicscourse to make them more widely applicable across a broader range of science and engineeringdisciplines. The authors offer suggestions on how to utilize the videos along with additionalacademic integrity-related resources, such as syllabus language, a reflection assignment, anassignment cover sheet, and a form prohibiting sharing course-related documents.1. IntroductionAcademic integrity issues are among the most stressful that faculty face, and the statistics onstudent cheating rates and attitudes about cheating are troubling [1][2][3
an essential part of the testingprocess because the standard specimens ensure meaningful and reproducible results.1 Tohelp improve students’ critical thinking, hands-on experience, and potential researchinterest, an enhanced tensile testing laboratory project was developed that accounts forspecimen condition and variability.MET students at two campuses of XXXXX University participated in this enhancedpolymer tensile testing laboratory project. Campus A is a commuter campus with abalanced population mix of traditional and non-traditional students and typicalengineering technology class sizes of 10-20. Campus B is a large residential campuspopulated by traditional students, transfer students, and a handful of non-traditionalstudents. At Campus
from (1) attempting to integrateengineering practices and core ideas in non-NGSS states; (2) a need to focus on scientificconcepts and engineering practices at the same time; (3) the time required to engaged inengineering practices; (4) different epistemological norms of scientific and engineeringcommunities; and, (5) attempting to balance authenticity and feasibility inside scienceclassrooms. We anticipate that these tensions will arise whenever educators attempt to developdesign tasks that integrate engineering practices and core ideas of science for use in scienceclassrooms. While we are unable to provide definitive recommendations for resolving the fivetensions prior to beginning a new curriculum or instructional development project
parameter [1]. Thetransactive energy approach offers a way for producers and consumers to more closely balanceenergy supply and demand based on technical and economic factors. One of the transactiveenergy principles as to maintain system reliability and control while enabling optimal integrationof renewable and distributed energy resources. Transactive energy systems should be scalable,adaptable and extensible across a number of devices, participants and geographic extent [2].One of examples of a scalable system is residential microgrid. Energy sharing across aneighborhood promotes sustainability through the efficient utilization of local energy resourcesand reducing reliance on the utility grid [3]. In traditional grid, houses are connected to the
) from the University of Washington. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 The ‘Structured’ Engineering Design Notebook: A New Tool for Design Thinking within an Engineering Studio Design CourseIntroduction The foundation of engineering itself is design [1], as design “has been widelyconsidered to be the central or distinguishing activity of engineering” [2]. Designthinking—which is applicable across all design fields—can provide engineering studentswith a useful set of tools to help them develop a designerly mindset and to support thecomplex work of engineering design. Design thinking “refers to how designers see andhow
Student Divisions in2017.IntroductionThe ASEE Diversity Committee (ADC) is one of twelve Advisory Committees to the AmericanSociety of Engineering Education. Established in 2011 with the goal to increase diversity andinclusiveness in the engineering profession, in 2017 it is comprised of 15 members acrossvarious divisions. An excerpt from the ADC's broad Statement on Diversity [1] expresses that“ASEE believes that diversity and inclusiveness enriches and is essential to educationalexperiences and innovations that drive the development of creative solutions in addressing theworld’s challenges.” With the goal of increasing diversity and inclusiveness in the engineeringprofession, the committee organizes several types of diversity-related conference
gender identity, race, national origin, ethnicity, religion, age, sexual orientation, disability, political affiliation, or family, marital, or economic status. a. Engineers shall conduct themselves in a manner in which all persons are treated with dignity, respect, and fairness. b. Engineers shall not engage in discrimination or harassment in connection with their professional activities. c. Engineers shall consider the diversity of the community, and shall endeavor in good faith to include diverse perspectives, in the planning and performance of their professional services [1].Prior to Canon 8's adoption
exit the discipline [1]. Important factors in student attrition from STEM disciplinesinclude: 1) instructional experiences such as first-year Mathematics courses and facultyexpectations [1][2] and 2) individual self-efficacy, epistemologies, and goal orientations [2][3].In order to enhance student cognitive and affective outcomes and retain students in STEMdisciplines, undergraduates have been used as Learning Assistants (LAs), course UTAs, and labUTAs with positive results [4][5][6]. For example, UTAs used in an inquiry-based generalchemistry laboratory context have similar student content knowledge gains as GTAs in the sameposition [5]. As another example, in a large-enrollment introductory physics course, studentshave significantly higher
Effective Communication Skills for the 21st Century. Thispaper describes the development, content, management, and lessons learned from the first year ofadministering the program.IntroductionThis Evidence-Based Paper describes a professional development program developed byVillanova University. Technological advancements, globalization, and critical world issues areprofoundly transforming the engineering profession [1]. Today’s engineering graduates are nolonger needed to perform routine assignments that can be accomplished by trained technicians oradvanced computerized systems. Instead, both the public and private sectors are seekingengineering professionals who are driven to innovate, lead, and manage in ways much differentthan their predecessors
Accounting Office (GAO) estimates that in 2015 the percentage of all faculty membersteaching at four-year institutions in the U.S., including part-time, in non-tenure-track appointments was61% [1]. Considering only full-time positions at four-year universities, the percentage of non-tenure-trackappointments was 34%. Data from the 2014 ASEE survey of engineering programs in the United Statesshows that the percentage of non-tenure-track appointments in engineering departments is 8.9%.Non-tenure-track appointments are growing much faster than tenure-track appointments. From 1995 to2011, the number of tenure-track positions increased by 9.6% while the number of non-tenure-track full-time positions increased by 109.2% [1]. The reasons for this increase
world asan empty vessel, waiting to be filled with knowledge. These ideas influenced subsequent earlyscholars in education. Locke’s work suggests that the responsibility of teachers is to inputknowledge into students, and that students demonstrate that they have learned by outputting thatsame knowledge, providing the foundation for what is widely recognized as the “traditionalist”form of education today. While later philosophers and educational scholars pushed back againstthe idea that students are little more than passive, empty vessels and that the simple input-outputmodel is representative of learning [1], Locke’s philosophy persists in many disciplines,particularly those that historically involve traditionally rigid ways of thinking and
ChallengeAbstractASCE’s Grand Challenge to civil engineers is to significantly enhance the performance andvalue of infrastructure project over their lifecycles. [1] ASCE wants to drive transformationalchange in infrastructure projects from planning to design to project delivery. How does ASCEmove from the strategic vision to the detailed implementation? The paper’s objective is toanswer that question in part by highlighting the role played by proposed changes to the civilengineering knowledge framework, specifically, ASCE’s Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge(BOK) as it undergoes revision for a Third Edition.Knowledge may be the most strategically significant resource the profession can possess. Thetraditional view of civil engineering has always been about the
cultural change surrounding gender.Gender in EngineeringEngineering has been described as a hegemonic, masculine culture [1]. Societal and interpersonalgender dynamics, a lack of role models, and lack of community in the field can cause women toalter their gender presentation and sense of self or to leave ‘feminine traits’ at the door in order tofit in [2]. It has also been documented that women in engineering experience a slowerdevelopment of engineering identity and a diminished sense of belonging [3]. LGBTQ+ peoplein STEM have reported similar experiences, including a rate of closeting that is double thenational average for all LGBTQ+ persons, and report higher levels of harassment anddiscrimination than their ‘straight’ peers [4]. While the
assessment tools to measure the effects ofthe project on students’ grades and retention. The toolkit includes: (1) pass rate and GPA inCalculus I, (2) longitudinal analysis of pass rates and GPA in subsequent courses, (3) impact ofCalculus I on retention in STEM and retention at BSU, (4) all of the above comparing students inreformed Calculus vs traditional Calculus, (5) all of the above for underrepresented minorities,women, or other demographic subsets. While these tools were originally developed to study theCalculus I project, they are available for studying the effects of other courses on studentacademic performance and retention.In this paper, we briefly describe a rebuild of Calculus II, overhauled in the 2015-16 school yearfollowing the same
is a fundamental skillset that students must learn inorder to become effective innovators in the biomedical device industry. One of the initial steps inthis process, needs-finding, involves the observation of stakeholders and identification ofproblems in order to determine potential areas for innovation [1]. However, following theidentification of these needs, a filtering process is often employed, wherein external influencessuch as market dynamics, competition, and intellectual property influence the potential for thesuccessful development and commercialization of solutions in these needs area [2]. Oftentimes,these needs are inappropriately filtered for feasibility rather than potential, leaving behind someof the greatest insights for
engineering concepts into their lessons. However, notsurprisingly, limited resources such as time, money, materials, and knowledge, restrict efficientcurricula implementation. We believe these findings reemphasize the need for STEMprofessional-development programs to educate K-12 teachers about engineering and will beuseful to others interested in integrating engineering into K-12 curricula.IntroductionIn 2002, the National Academy of Engineering began advocating to incorporate engineering andtechnology in K-12 education due to the significance of engineering and technology in today’ssociety [1], [2]. In 2013, the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) [3] integratedengineering into K-12 curriculum emphasizing that engineering establishes vital
moreengineers by the year 2022 [2]. In addition, the progressive retirement of the baby boomergeneration will result in the loss of just as many engineers, creating a need for more than amillion engineers to enter our workforce in the next five years [1]. Unfortunately, not enoughstudents are entering engineering programs in college and thus are not pursuing careers inengineering [7-8]. Two of the more critical reasons for this are the absence of engineering topicsin K-12 science, technology and mathematics curriculum [9-13] and the chronicunderrepresentation of women [8,14-17] and minorities [8,17-18].The Need for Effective STEM Education: Too many students lack an interest in engineering,due in part to a general lack of public knowledge about what
attendees ultimately apply and areadmitted. We are continuously seeking ways to improve the event based on participant, faculty,staff and graduate student feedback.IntroductionAccording to the National Science Foundation, women and underrepresented minorities (AfricanAmericans, Hispanics, and Native Americans) represent 24.1% and 6.4% of the engineeringgraduate student population nationally [1]. These data confirm the need to increase theparticipation of these groups in engineering graduate education. With representation ofunderrepresented minority students and women so low, there are concerns about the ability tocreate the most innovative solutions to the most challenging engineering questions in society.However, increasing representation of
Engineering’s (NAE) Center for Engineering Ethics and SocietyAdvisory Group and Infusing Ethics Selection Committee selected 25 Exemplars of EngineeringEthics Education (NAE, 2016). In evaluating the applicants’ submissions they looked for ninekey characteristics. The following are examples of how online learning and webinars could beutilized as tools to help institutions deliver the NAE’s exemplary characteristics 1, 4, 7, and 9. 1. Provides an interactive format that encourages active learning: Synchronous online learning is when the instructor or TAs meet with students live in real-time through webinars / web conferencing or simple text chat. When used properly, these tools can be highly interactive. Discussion forums allow for