team.Does our research do justice toall stakeholders? • Discussed with entire team which individuals would like to take part in transition theory work and moved forward with creating research pairings based on interest in project participationProcess Reliability The data needs to be collected and recorded in a dependable way.How can the research process • Background activity and data analysis plan documents that outline allbe made as independent as steps of the research processpossible from random • Created a separate data file that just contains questions of interest forinfluences
attention to howidentities, especially those of the underrepresented, are affected by the changes made. What welearn will lead to a clearer understanding of the changes that promote engineering identities, andhow such identities affect students’ belonging in the program and persistence in the major.AcknowledgementsThis project was funded by the NSF IUSE/PFE: RED grant #1730354.References[1] K. Deaux, “Reconstructing social identity,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol.19(1), pp. 4-12, 1993.[2] S. Stryker, and P. J. Burke, “The Past, Present, and Future of an Identity Theory,” SocialPsychological Quarterly, vol. 63(4), pp. 284-297, 2000.[3] E. H. Erikson, Identity and the life cycle. New York: International Universities Press, 1959.[4
include planning of a project. 52 43 4 0 0 4. I am interested in learning more about engineering and design through in- 30 57 4 9 0 service workshops. 5. I am interested in learning more about engineering and design through 27 26 26 17 4 college courses. 6. I am interested in learning more about engineering and design through peer 30 43 22 4 0 training. 7. I would like to be able to teach my students to understand the design 52 35 9 4 0 process. 8. I would like to be able to teach students to understand the types of problems 57 35 9 0 0 to which engineering and design can be applied. 9. Engineering and design
over the fiveyear duration of the project. Eligible applicants are evaluated based on financial need, academictalent, and interest in the field. ASPIRE Fellows receive a $2,500 per semester award for up toeight semesters. The Fellows’ progress is monitored from both an academic standpoint (i.e.,GPA) and a personal development standpoint (i.e., relationship with mentors). The ASPIREprogram success is determined by retention and graduation rates, combined with surveys thatcollect information about ASPIRE students’ external employment and perceptions of theprogram.This paper presents details of the ASPIRE program including descriptions of the recruitment andselection process, mentoring program, networking events, and academic design
any visual cue for when it has beensaturated with adsorbate. Finally, some demonstrations required pumps or other forms of moreexpensive/complicated lab equipment (for example, [9] - [11]), which would not be ideal for asimple demonstration during a lecture course.For this project, a fixed-bed adsorption demonstration was developed that is not only relativelylarge in size, is also very cheap, safe, and colorful. Furthermore, the demonstration could beeasily expanded to be a short lab activity that could be completed by student teams to examinethe effects of several key variables, such as bed height, contaminant concentration, etc.Construction details for the demonstration are provided in Appendix B. To summarize, thecolumn is constructed of a
. Ali Mehran Shahhosseini, Indiana State University A. Mehran Shahhosseini is an Associate Professor in the Department of Applied Engineering and Tech- nology Management at Indiana State University. He has published over 45 articles in different journals and conference proceedings. He has served as an investigator for research projects sponsored by National Science Foundation, Ford Motor Company, and the US Army. Before working at Indiana State Univer- sity, he was a faculty in the University of Louisville for 10 years. He also has over four years of industrial experience. He received his D.Eng. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Lamar University (USA) in 1999, M.Sc. in Materials Engineering from Isfahan
Science Department in NC State Uni- versity. He has more than seven years of experience in European projects, during which he has led three multinational teams, organized technology transfer workshops, and held presentations in international conferences, as well as for the European Commission. His main research area includes Peer Assess- ment, Learning Analytics, Service-Oriented Architecture, Model Driven Development, and the Internet of Things.Mr. Abhinav Medhekar, North Carolina State UniversityMr. Chandrasekar Rajasekar, crajase@ncsu.edu Master of Computer Science Student at North Carolina State University.Zhongcan Xiao, North Carolina State University c American Society for Engineering
and 25 EnvironmentalEngineering Majors in DoWRM. USE4WRM plans to recruit students through scholarships andincrease enrollment by 32% in ENE and 40% in WRM during the grant period. This will directlyincrease the enrollments in ENE and WRM to 33 and 21 at the end of the project period.USE4WRM will also attempt to maintain an even distribution of 7 male and 7 female studentsthrough the grant. This will increase the number of female students to 20 and that of malestudents to 34, and raise the male to female student ratio from 1:2 to 1:1.7. We will also raiseminimum qualifications for a USE4WRM scholar. The minimum GPA requirement will be 3.0and/or the minimum ACT requirement for the freshmen of 22. Table 1 provides a summary ofthe proposed
engineering students. In Integrated STEM Education Conference(ISEC), 2016 IEEE, 193-196.Ferri, B. H., Ahmed, S., Michaels, J. E., Dean, E., Garyet, C., & Shearman, S. (2009). Signal processingexperiments with the LEGO MINDSTORMS NXT kit for use in signals and systems courses. InAmerican Control Conference (pp. 3787-3792). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ACC.2009.5160602.Han, B., Zhang, C., & Qin, X. (2011). Based on Matlab signals and systems course project-driventeaching method research. In IEEE 3rd International Conference on Communication Software andNetworks (pp. 466-469). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICCSN.2011.6013873.Huettel, L. G. (2006). A DSP hardware-based laboratory for signals and systems. In Proceedings, 4thDigital Signal
Paper ID #23030Work in Progress: Dialogue Videos Foster Interaction Between HomeworkPartnersDr. Michael R. Caplan, Arizona State University Michael Caplan earned his undergraduate degrees from The University of Texas at Austin and his PhD from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Following post-doctoral research at Duke University Medical Center in Cell Biology, Michael joined the faculty of Arizona State University in 2003, and he is now an Associate Professor in Biomedical Engineering. Dr. Caplan’s research focuses on molecular cooperativity in drug targeting, bio-sensing, and cell sig- naling. Current projects
concernthemselves with how content can and should be delivered, building meaningfulpartnerships, financial sustainability, and developing meaningful research projects to helpus learn how to improve and make contributions to other, similar programs. Conclusion The UMD STS robotics service-learning program is an important part of the onand off-campus UMD STEM education community. Since 2011, the program, has offeredrobotics education programming for K-12 public schools and community centers. Overtime, the program has gone through four overlapping phases. Through each phase,program administrators identified several tensions related to the recruitment of UMDstudents and K-12 service sites, curriculum and materials
Paper ID #22630Fostering an Enriching Learning Experience: A Multisite Investigation of theEffects of Desktop Learning Modules on Students’ Learning Experiences inEngineering ClassroomsDr. Nathaniel Hunsu, University of Georgia Nathaniel Hunsu is currently an assistant professor of engineering education at the University of Georgia. He is affiliated with the Engineering Education Transformational Institute and the school electrical and computer engineering at the university. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in electronic and computer engi- neering from the Lagos State University in Nigeria, a Masters in Project management from the
postdoctoral fellow in the area of bioacoustics. He teaches dynamics, machine design, numerical methods and finite element methods. He has work for the automotive industry in drafting, manufacturing, testing (internal combustion engines—power, torque and exhaust emissions, vibration fatigue, thermo-shock, tensile tests, etc.), simulations (finite element method), and as a project manager (planning and installation of new testing facilities). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Good Practices in Finite Element Method with a Frequency Analysis ExampleIntroductionThe finite element method (FEM) allows engineers to solve different types of problems
they remove. Nearly all of the students recalled the lime and soda ash process(Figure 3). However, numerous students only provided one method instead of two. By the finalexam, however, the majority of the class remembered other methods, particularly, ion exchange.One possible reason for this is that students presented projects as a method of reviewing for thefinal exam. 80 70 Percentage of Students 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Midterm Exam Final Exam
will be considering chemical engineering thermodynamics andthereafter loop through the proceeding topics.While each instructor may have a clear concept in mind when they say “instructional laboratory”or “lab,” the activities and educational outcomes associated with these experiences vary sowidely that it’s easy to be misunderstood. The term “lab” may be applied to learning experiencesthat are replications of precise instructions, discovery-based experiences, simulations, orprogramming; they may occur from benchtop to pilot scale; they may imply a different activityevery week or a single semester-long project. United States Department of Education guidelinessuggest that the credit hours for lab is typically one half of the credit hours accorded
Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 30 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a variety of consulting firms, non-profit agencies, and government organizations, including the Rand Corporation, the American Association of Retired Persons, the U.S. Department of Education, and the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Since 2004, she been a member of the NSF-funded MIDFIELD research project on engineering education; she has served as a Co-PI on three research projects, including one on transfer students and another on student veterans in engineering.Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is
class families are more accustomed tostraightforward orders from authority figures than to the indirect communication strategies(Delpit, 1995; Melnick & Meister, 2008). Whenever instructors choose to use these indirectcommunication strategies, they need to provide students with explicit lessons on how nondirective verbal interventions are actually “code” for direct commands.Instructors interviewed in this study mentioned that email communications to some middle-eastern students sometimes seemed less effective, these students preferred face to facecommunication. So, taking few minutes in the class explaining what they need to do for anassignment or project produced better result.Effective instructors of culturally diverse students
, and associate professor of electrical engineering at Kettering University. Dr. Finelli’s current research interests include student resistance to active learning, faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices, the use of technology and innovative pedagogies on student learning and success, and the impact of a flexible classroom space on faculty teaching and student learning. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Impact of Prior Experiences on Future Participation in Active Learning
advisor for the CPP Hyperloop team, the Baja SAE racing team, and a co-advisor for the CPP ASHRAE club. He holds an active California PE license.Dr. Zhaoshuo Jiang P.E., San Francisco State University Zhaoshuo Jiang graduated from the University of Connecticut with a Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering. Before joining San Francisco State University as an assistant professor, he worked as a structural engi- neering professional at Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM) LLP. As a licensed professional engineer in the states of Connecticut and California, Dr. Jiang has been involved in the design of a variety of low- rise and high-rise projects. His current research interests mainly focus on Smart Structures Technology
creation of formal and informal entrepreneurship programs [2]. Students areexposed to business knowledge and entrepreneurial experience in project-based experiential 1formal coursework, student incubators, pitch competitions and mentorship opportunities underpracticing entrepreneurs. Shartrand, Weilerstein, Besterfield-Sacre, & Golding [3] have reportedthat, in 2010, more than half of ASEE-affiliated schools were exposing their students toentrepreneurship through formal coursework and/or extracurricular programs [3]. In the nearfuture, these numbers are likely to increase as more institutions begin focusing on developingentrepreneurially minded
prioritize what to review for the exam.Works Cited[1] M. Prince and R. Felder, "Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 123-138, 2006.[2] L. Benson, M. Orr, S. Biggers, W. Moss and S. Schiff, "Student-Centered Active Cooperative Learning in Engineering," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1097- 1110, 2010.[3] R. Beichner, J. Saul and D. Abbot, "Student Centered Activities for Large Wnrollment Undergraduate Programs (SCALE-UP) project," in Research Based Reform of University Physics, College Park, MD, American Association of Physics Teachers.[4] H. Oliver-Hoyo and R. Beichner, "SCALE-UP: Bringing
Paper ID #22311A Doctoral Teaching Program in EngineeringDr. Donald P. Visco Jr., University of Akron Donald P. Visco, Jr. is the Dean of the College of Engineering at The University of Akron and Professor of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering.Nidaa Makki Dr. Nidaa Makki is an Associate Professor in the LeBron James Family Foundation College of Education at The University of Akron, in the department in Curricular and Instructional Studies. Her work focuses on STEM curriculum integration and science inquiry practices in middle and high school. She is a co-PI on an NSF funded project to investigate the impact of
Students.Arizona State University, 2014.[27] Bledsoe, K. E. How do engineering students develop and reason with concepts of electricitywithin a project-based course?. Oregon State University, 2007.[28] Timmermann, D., and Kautz, C. Student understanding of open switches and open circuits:What do we (not) know?. In Proceedings of the Research in Engineering Education Symposium,Dublin, Ireland, accepted for publication on April 14th, 2015.[29] Kautz, C. H. Probing student understanding of basic concepts in introductory electricalengineering courses. In Proceedings of the 2008 SEFI Conference, July, 2008.[30] Peşman, H., and Eryilmaz, A. Development of a Three-Tier Test to Assess MisconceptionsAbout Simple Electric Circuits. The Journal of Educational
=Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Sure) for participants to rate their opinion of experiences inSTEM majors at their HBCU. Survey items were developed to reflect the common reasons forstudent departure as outlined in the published text Talking About Leaving and the experiences ofsenior leaders on the project from STEM fields and at HBCUs [4]. To ensure the survey focusedon the intended areas and that the researchers engaged in a comprehensive approach, each surveyitem was aligned with a research thrust area and compared with the theoretical framework. Toaccount for differences in demographic information needed, two parallel surveys were createdfor each group (Group 1 and 2).Data Collection Data were collected from students (Group 1
writing include project reports, lab reports, essays, and researchpapers.ImplementationTo highlight real-world applications of course content, I elected to add a new assignment andshort presentation to the course. The learning objective for the assignment is for each student toinvestigate and explain one real-world application of a concept in the course. To demonstrate thatthey have achieved this objective, each student writes a one-page, double-spaced, summarydescribing how their real-world application applies to a course topic. Then, to leverage the diverseexperiences of students in the course, each student is asked to share their application witheveryone in a short TED-style talk on the last day of class. Since the last day of class is usually
the role of peer mentoring andsocialization in most graduate departments 19–21. Other research at the graduate level has hinted atthe role that non-technical competencies have in the ability to complete, such as academicengineering writing 22. However, the psychological decision-making processes by which studentsdecide to leave their programs is still unknown and represents an enormous gap in the scholarship.Furthermore, it is important to employ creative sampling methods in order to study students whoare actually considering leaving or who have left their programs, but this has proven to be quitedifficult.The explicit objective of a broader project this paper represents is to capture and analyze thenarratives of engineering graduate student
choose chemical engineering as their major? We investigatedthis research question by examining information about students’ beliefs about what chemicalengineers do in the workplace and they certainty that this major was the correct choice for them.MethodsThis project used a mixed methods approach through surveys that contained both quantitativeand qualitative questions. The set of three surveys were administered. The data was gatheredover the course of one academic year from first-year engineering students at a large land-grantuniversity.ParticipantsThe survey participants were first-year students enrolled in engineering majors at a large land-grant university in the Midwest. The students in the engineering program at this school areadmitted to
been involved in collaborative research projects focused on conceptual learning in chemistry, chemical engineering, seismology, and astronomy.Dr. Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University Margot Vigeant is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from Cornell University, and her M.S. and Ph.D., also in chemical engineering, from the University of Virginia. Her primary research focus is on engineering pedagogy at the undergraduate level. She is particularly interested in the teaching and learning of concepts related to thermodynamics. She is also interested in active, collaborative, and problem-based learning, and in the ways hands-on activities such as
following week). The new sequence,entitled Introduction to Engineering Mathematics I and II (replacing Calculus I and II) andApplied Multivariate Calculus (replacing Calculus III), consists of 4-credit courses that met for 3days per week in standard format, along with a double period meeting 1 day per week. Thisscheduling preserved the 5 contact hours of the standard sequence. However, due to the doubleperiod day being used for laboratory activities 4 times per quarter and projects/recitation 6 timesper quarter, that day only counted as 1 credit hour toward the total.The laboratory activities discussed in this paper were developed to enhance the Calculus Ivariant. The labs were developed by one group of faculty and tested by another group during
propose a Fundamental Learning Integration Platform (FLIP) which creates aphysical connection between the conceptual and practical engineering concepts throughout anentire 4-year Mechanical Engineering curriculum [10]. Students were made explicitly aware ofhow each concept from their courses fits into the bigger picture through an end of semesterproject that revolved around a specific aspect of the steam engine. This concept is difficult toapply to Electrical Engineering because of the wide variety of specializations offered within themajor. While connections between areas are plentiful, creating a singular project that faculty ofall specializations will deem sufficiently applicable would be nigh impossible.Alnajjar proposes “Integrative Learning