]. Research shows that student interest in STEM field decreases as their grade levelsincrease [2]. It is expected that in the next five years, there will be a shortage of talented andskilled employees in STEM fields [1], [2].Among the reasons that U.S. students lack interest in STEM fields is their perception that formalK-12 STEM education is not directly relevant to their daily life experiences [3], [4]. Themathematical and scientific content presented in formal settings does not appear to be directlyuseful in their day-to-day experiences and their interactions with others in their community.Content knowledge is often presented in a way that seems compartmentalized and impractical [3]– [7]. Especially in their social interactions with peers, family
ideation was twofold: deter procrastination and encouragecomfort in writing and drawing in front of each other. These methods also encouraged mini-critiques as a way of further exploring each other’s ideas.The first was a simple brainstorm of potential areas of problem solving for their centraldesign question. Each team sat around a table covered on one large sheet of newsprint paper.The students were given 10 minutes to write out key words and thoughts. After 10 minutes,they moved clockwise to review, critique, and expand on the ideas written by their teammate. The process was repeated until all original thoughts had been thoroughly expandedupon. These was presented to the students as the catalyst for designing their solutions.Before they could
Recognition for Undergraduate Research Mentoring. She was also selected as a 2018 National Science Foundation - NC A & T ADVANCE IT Faculty Scholar. She has received $170,000 to support her teaching, research, and outreach projects. Overall, Dr. Ofori-Boadu’s research work has resulted in 1 book publication, 12 publications in peer-reviewed journals, 5 conference proceedings, 3 manuscripts under conditional acceptance, 4 accepted abstracts, 29 presentations at na- tional conferences, and 27 poster sessions. In 2016, her paper to the Built Environment Project and Asset Management journal was recognized as the 2016 Highly Commended Paper. In 2015, Dr. Ofori-Boadu established her STEM ACTIVATED! program for middle-school
of web-based learning that supportsstudents’ learning activities. In other words, it comprises collaboration with social mediatechnologies (Web 2.0) that provide instructional scaffolding through internet-based applications[9]. There are several social network sites or social media technologies, such as Skype,Facebook, Instagram, You Tube, Twitter, Whatsapp, We Chat and Line. Such learningenvironments provide students with information, engage and enhance their learning activities andguide them in the learning process through scaffolding [10], [11]. This is informal onlinelearning. Moreover, this approach increases interaction between instructors and engineeringstudents as well as peer-to-peer interaction.Zuniga and Shahin [12] pointed out
expectations held for a role incumbent” [6, p. 12]. This stage consistsof the preparatory and recruitment phases of a student into the doctoral program, where the student’sknowledge about graduate education is mostly based on stereotypes and generalizations. In the formal stageof the socialization process, the student receives formal instruction regarding the role. The student, as anapprentice, observes older students in the same role of pursuing a Ph.D. and learns the normativeexpectations of the role. The student’s interactions are mostly informative and aim to integrate them into therole. The informal stage consists of the student learning of the informal expectations of the role. In thisstage, student “develop their own peer culture and social and
satisfies the Disciplinary Communication General Education requirement; thus, learnersmust have satisfied Entry Level Writing and Composition.PreparationThe first quarter of the sequence, normally taught in fall, is devoted to acclimating learners to theindustry management model. The quarter begins in a highly structured lecture format withdesignated class times and assigned (mock) project teams (discussed later in detail). Lecturetopics correspond to project framing activities which are applied to the mock project with clear,ordered deadlines and direct instructor feedback. Around week six, instructors begin thetransition to the role of facilitator while students self-assemble into capstone project teams. Atthis point, one lecture session per week
health of a company. She has published her research in Journal of Business Logistics, International Jour- nal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management and peer-reviewed proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education.Dr. Mary E. Campbell, Texas A&M UniversityMary K. McDougal, Texas A&M UniversityMs. Lauren Neala Holder, Texas A&M University Ph.D. student in geoscience education at Texas A&M University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engagement in Practice: Engaging Undergraduate Students in a Multidisciplinary Service-Learning EnvironmentBackground and motivationIn today’s integrated society, professionals and students alike
report improved levels of satisfaction in studies of flipped classrooms [9],[23] andspecifically in engineering courses [4],[13]. Research has shown a student preference for theflipped class model relative to traditional models [9],[24]-[27]. Student engagement within theclassroom setting and with peers is also facilitated by the flipped class model [23]. Interestingly,some research suggests high-performing students benefit more than weaker-performing studentsfrom a flipped class [27]. In addition, flipped classrooms have been shown to be impactful forretaining people of color in STEM [28].1.3 Why did we attempt a flipped class?While the flipped classroom approach may not be appropriate or effective for all types ofcourses, instructors, or
assessments intended for the public (which many are). Learning how peer review is done, and the role of critical feedback, is a critical piece of the standard process. This means both writing peer reviews and reading/ comprehending existing reviews.Study MethodThe research involved study over a 2 year period. We asked faculty who taught a full-semesterlife cycle assessment course that used our textbook as a resource to participate and eleven facultyat different institutions volunteered. These institutions included eight doctoral, highest researchlevel universities, and one each of doctoral - higher research, doctoral - moderate research, andmasters institutions. The courses included mostly courses for graduate students but
academic potential, and the ability for transferadmission. ETS scholars could renew their scholarships for up to three semesters (approximately2 years) if they demonstrated progress toward their degrees and maintained a minimum 2.75cumulative grade point average (GPA). Students who fell below the requirements were placed ona one-semester probation period and received a counseling session with their academic facultyadvisors to discuss academic difficulties.In addition to the scholarships, ETS participants attended the Success Seminar Series along withstudents participating in the TAMU Engineering Living Learning Community (ELLC). TheELLC housed students in a common dormitory, conducted seminars, provided peer-tutoring, andfacilitated networking
. Examining the pattern of instructor and student activity during the observed class (seeTable 1) suggests that these activities were both active and well-aligned with the learningoutcomes. For example, the instructor only spent a small portion of class time lecturing (20%)and addressing students as a whole group (24%). Instead, he directed students to work in smallgroups, where they spent the majority of class time (76%). The instructor assigned five grouptasks during the observation and spend his time monitoring students’ work (56%) and interactingwith small groups (56%). Students, in turn, spent most of class discussing with their peers (68%)and engaging in Level 1 activities (64%), such as calculating and following procedures, andLevel 3
minute.Dr. Hui Ma, University of Virginia Hui Ma received her Ph.D. in applied mathematics from the University of Alabama at Birmingham in 2012. In her current role as an APMA faculty member at UVA, she teaches applied math courses to engineering students. Her goals in teaching are to help students develop the confidence in their own ability to do mathematics and to make mathematics a joyful and successful experience.Prof. Bernard Fulgham, University of Virginia Bernard Fulgham received his PhD in Mathematics in 2002, writing his thesis in the field of non-associative algebras with advisor Kevin McCrimmon. He began teaching Applied Mathematics at the University of Virginia in August 2004 and became an assistant
opportunities. In the 2012-13 academic year the unmet need for the average Wartburg student was $18,770 the $10,000 scholarship provided by the ACES program significantly reduces this. Cohort formation provides a support structure in a community of like-minded scholars with diverse backgrounds. Creating a small community in which students feel comfortable and supported has been found to increase students’ overall satisfaction with college [1] and retention in STEM fields. Mentoring connects students with peers, faculty, and alumni who can share experiences and direct them to resources. Effective mentoring has been shown to improve academic performance [2], improve retention rates for women and
students have more time with the faculty member, more time to interact withand learn from their peers, and more time to ask questions and clarify concepts in class [17].Advantages for the faculty member are that they can witness in real-time where studentsstruggle, identify learning bottlenecks and address them with the class, and incorporate just-in-time teaching strategies [18]. There are also disadvantages documented in the literature. Facultylose some control over the presentation of content as they focus on student needs and just-in-timeinstruction where helping students learn may become more important than the content covered[19]. There are also disadvantages for students, because they must become more self-directedlearners and take more
successful students will be able to do at the end of the course because of thecourse. These new skills the students will have should include at least some that are higher-level(create, evaluate, analyze…) and will likely also include some that are lower-level (recall, define,explain…). As an instructor, your first job is to analyze what skills the students must gain inyour course in order to be successful – in later courses, as a working scientist or engineer, etc.Then write student-focused learning outcomes that are SMART (originally defined by GeorgeDoran as Specific, Measurable, Assignable, Realistic, and Time-Related but slightly re-definedto apply to student learning outcomes). Many courses have learning outcomes that are writteneither in terms
Mathematics Department was formed in 2002, and it is akey component of our active mathematics learning community. Currently it has 130 activestudent members, and that number is roughly half of the number of UTA mathematics majors.The average number of the SURGE scholars has been 20, which is about 7% of all UTAmathematics majors and about 15% of the MAA Chapter members. All of our SURGE scholarsare very active in the MAA Student Chapter, and they hold key leadership positions there.Over the last ten years, our MAA Chapter has become a great venue for mathematics majors tointeract with faculty, build a peer support network, develop study skills, enhance professionaldevelopment, perform community services, organize social activities, gain leadership
12engineering topic of self-healing infrastructure, explore contextually relevant knowledge,synthesize actual self-healing concrete samples, and synthesize online and offline findings topresent in front of a peer audience. They are also well-suited to project-based courses and“unconference” sessions that inculcate greater interaction and collaboration between participants.For instance, at the time of writing, Elsevier’s Engineering team has partnered with a series ofAiChE Regional Student Conferences to launch similar sessions having as many as 100participants, to provide a professional development experience around real industry corrosionmitigation and asset management challenges. The format is agnostic to the particular challengeor toolsets used and
demand for graduates who have hands-on experience with ERP software has increasedsignificantly [14]. More so, graduates who have completed ERP coursework have seen a nearly a$4,000 higher average salary than their peers who have no ERP experience [10]. This iscomparable to previous research that has shown career success regarding salaries and promotionsfor students related to performance on simulations [8].An effective set of simulations to develop student knowledge of business process and ERPsystems has been developed by the ERPsim Lab at HEC Montreal https://erpsim.hec.ca/en. TheERPsim Lab has a suite of business simulations using a live SAP ERP software environmentaccessed through the SAP University Alliance (UA). The SAP UA has over 3,200
, environmental, and societal impact of manufacturing.For this activity, students formed themselves into teams of 2-3 students. Part of the lecture timewas devoted in the beginning to explain students about the module, rubrics, assessments anddeliverables. A feedback on student progress was given in week 3 during in class lecture time.Module activities were performed out of class majority of the time. The project stages were asfollows: (i) Week 1-2- Types of Souvenirs-Manufacturing process decided and e-mailed.(ii) Week 3-4- the economic and environmental, impact of manufacturing –paper submission.(iii) Week 5- Report and Presentation. Guidelines about how to write a bid were also given [9].These are given in Appendix 1.To jump start student discussion
. Once ascholar has graduated from NCSU, he/she does not need to repay any of the financial aid back tothe program, nor does he/she need to submit any progress reports back to the STEM Scholarsprogram after graduation.Program ActivitiesAlong with maintaining a high academic merit, each scholar is expected to participate in at leastone extracurricular activity. This includes industry internships, undergraduate research, studyabroad, writing/tutoring services, faculty seminars and workshops, and academic/service on-campus organizations. Participation in such activities enhances students’ academic maturationand professional skills. It helps develop professionalism, teamwork, and time-management skills,which will benefit students in their future
UTAs activity has evolved; in several cases they aresuperseding Graduate Teaching Assistants. First year students relate more with second yearstudents than with graduate students, seen as much older than their peers. Time UTAs spendtutoring students is now greater than it used to be at the beginning of the program. Some of themeven hold regular office hours for specific tasks, for instance Matlab or R.Now that their role is more relevant, their inexperience can have a greater impact on the class. Inaddition we are recruiting many more UTAs, and we cannot expect from all of them the sameexceptional response we had from the few.Literature ReviewAccording to the National Center for Educational Statistics, nearly half of undergraduate STEMmajors
student’s schedule.Universities generally staff career services offices for their students, offering a host of resourceson finding internships, writing resumes and cover letters, and practicing effective interviewstrategies. However, nearly 40% of students never even visit their universities’ career servicesoffices [1]. Disseminating useful information on career and professional development, therefore,must occur through the individual department. And, the timing of such exposure should be suchthat the student can contextualize any career advice received; giving students advice in interviewstrategies, for example, when they are in the midst of finding internships is more effective thanadvice given pre-college, which is naturally proffered in the
performancerelative to the traditional instructional format [14].In STEM education, the flipped classroom model has been found to be used mostly used to teachpure science and mathematics courses. This model has rarely been used to teach subjects from theapplied science, technology, and engineering fields [5]. In a recent study of fifty-eight peer-reviewed research studies on flipped learning in the higher education STEM disciplines, resultsindicate that only about 6% of these studies were conducted in the applied science, technology,and engineering domains [5]. There are a few works where a flipped model has been usedsuccessfully in the applied science, technology, and engineering disciplines ([3]; [7]; [10]; [11];[13]; [10]; [16]). Similar to the non-STEM
yearengineering and computer science students.At UIUC, Redshirt students take a course for credit that focuses on academic support, studyskills, and engineering projects. This course is similar to an introductory engineering coursetaken by all first year students, but has a stronger focus on academic and professionaldevelopment. Students are also required to take a writing course, introductory chemistry course,introductory physics course, and a math course.Pre-matriculation Summer Programs/Community-BuildingAll Redshirt programs have a required pre-matriculation summer program to help students get ajump start on their academics and begin bonding with their Redshirt peers, though theseprograms look quite different from school to school. At CU-B, UW, UIUC
engineering research.Northwestern University’s Master’s Certificate in Translational Biomedical Researchdistinguishes itself from existing programs within Northwestern University and translationalMaster’s (MS) programs offered at other peer institutions in the background of the participatingstudents and its focus. Participants are recruited from the MS student pool within the school ofengineering. The curricular focus is on the integration of engineering in the translationalpathway.The interdisciplinary program is designed to immerse the students in the integrative approachand experience needed to take their engineering background to the clinical space and industry.The certificate program capitalizes on the existing extensive research collaborations
well-being of a patient undergoing physiological recordings as the ultimate goal. Every problemrequires the students writing a discussion addressing the likelihood of having a diagnostic errorand its clinical consequences. The students are required to support their argumentation usingquantitative predictions, the applicable device standards and the medical practicerecommendations issued by the medical societies. The instructor provides handouts with“extracts” and interpretations from the standards that have been either purchased by theUniversity or obtained trough the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) UniversityOutreach Program. For example, the American Heart Association recommendations along withthe International Electrotechnical
comprehensive understanding of the specific needs ofthe customer and sponsors/stakeholders. Solution to this struggle is not addressed in theseSystem Engineering resources. Several of these resources cannot be taught in a few lecturesessions or exercised as in-class activities. Based on our survey, 80 to 90 % of students face thisproblem irrespective of the available resources. The novelty of the 4-step method/approachintroduced in this paper is the logical breakdown of the required steps for defining productrequirements into simple questions and tasks, which can be quickly incorporated as in-classworkshops, peer review exercises, case studies of previous projects and/or sponsor meetings.Moreover, the method tasks and questions can be applied to a wide
earthquake damageimages, coding and testing the machine-learning algorithm, to writing papers for and presentingat conferences. In addition, the unique nature of this project exposes students to a field andpossible career path they may not have encountered in their typical course of study. The authorsprovide a comprehensive discussion of the results of faculty and student surveys/ interviews andconclude by highlighting some of the greatest benefits of the multidisciplinary project. They alsopoint out lessons learned engaging in a project with a large scope, diverse experts (who havelimited knowledge of the partnering disciplines), and a number of undergraduate students whobegan as novices in their respective research area.Introduction:The
socioeconomicbackgrounds, social positioning influences peer-to-peer relations and their status within anengineering team. Furthermore, we aim to explore how this position relates to their engagementwith engineering concepts, practices, and habits. We expect the rich examples of how K-12students experience status in collaborative engineering projects to inform curriculum design andinstructional practice.The methods applied follow a case study approach where video-recorded observations of peerinteractions and one-on-one interviews comprise the data in this case. The case is a two-weeksummer engineering camp for students in grades 6-8. In this case study, we conducted interactionanalysis of the video data by coding peer-to-peer exchanges and the associated impact
demographics of our country are changing at a rapid pace. According to thelast American Community Survey (ACS) from the Census Data (2015), 71.81% of schoolage individuals, who are speakers of languages other than English, identified themselvesas Spanish speakers. Soon, Hispanics and Latinx will become the largest minority in ournation. In this population, 60% of the households are considered by the system as LimitedEnglish Proficiency with low levels of college attainment (US Census, 2015). Yet, yearsof educational reform have no resulted in educational gains for students who are Englishlearners. For instance, during the 2011 NAEP writing assessment, 99% of eighth- andtwelfth-grade students classified as English language learners (ELL) performed