applications. Several EE professors had agreedupon a System Engineering curriculum scheme (See Figure 2). At the yearend of2013, the capstone DCS then was renamed as“Dynamic System Simulation andImplementation (DSSI).”DSSI aimed to help students synthesize and integrate skillsand knowledge acquired throughout the SE course.Figure 2: An illustration (at round 0) of System Engineering curriculum scheme that categorizes 100-300 courses into cornerstone, keystone and capstone, respectively.Self-improvement from round 0 to round 1From round 0 to round 1, the DCS professor decided to do self-reflection on previousSC syllabus and examination of System Engineering course structure. Figure 3 listsfour standard steps in system engineering design shown in
StudentsFigures 8 and 9 demonstrate the assignment grades for graduate and undergraduate students,respectively. Histograms and the adjusted normal probability plots demonstrate that both cohortswere very successful in securing high grades. One student from each group did not turn in theassignment and therefore received zero.Table 5 summarizes evaluation results both the course and instructor received at the end of the Fall2017 and Fall 2016. In total, 23 students responded to the questions and filled out the online surveyout of 25 registered students in Fall 2017. On the other hand, 20 out of 27 students responded tothe questions at the end of Fall 2016 in which the IMSG was not offered as an activity to thestudents. The results indicate that the overall
receivedinclude: • “The course was really easy with easily understood concepts, but the test had a lot of true false that were difficult. It seemed like the tests were designed to trick not test.” • “The course seems to be more of a survey of many concepts and ideas as opposed to a set of connected concepts that build on one another. This is okay, but I feel like some of the lectures could be reorganized for more flow.” • “I liked that Learning Suite (the online schedule and grading system) was very organized, and the course structure was the same all semester, but I didn’t learn much…It would be more appropriate as a 400 level course to be less broad and delve more deeply into
for meeting many of the country development objectives. There have been numerous approaches to improve the abilities of professors to prepare and deliver courses. Structured independent learning using published resources (e.g., books, online), workshops, seminars, and mentoring are among the most common. This paper describes a peer mentoring program to build the capacity of water resources and environmental engineering professors in Pakistan. The program is delivered using an online learning management system, Canvas. The peer mentoring is conducted through weekly interactions via video conferencing with additional learning facilitated through Canvas. Structured instruments guide mentor review and feedback on the creation of syllabi, lesson
their senior projects as the culminating effort towardsgraduation. This course includes lectures in technical writing and technical reporting techniquesas highlighted in Table 5. Table 5 Senior Project Class (EGT417) syllabus activitiesCombined with the EGT291W class, vertical integration offers additional opportunities for thestudents to improve their writing and communication skills. Attention was also given in theattainment of the students’ outcome “g” (SO7) which is mapped according to the ABETaccreditation criteria [22] as depicted in Table 6, below: Table 6 Table of Course EGT417 Competencies to Students Learning OutcomesConclusionDespite the inconclusive results of the survey, a wealth of evidence can be found in
st 1 year 64% 61% 85 + 42 = 127 2nd year 23% 25% 31 + 17 = 48 rd 3 year 8% 9% 10 + 6 = 16 4th year 5% 5% 7 + 4 = 11 During the first week of the semester, students self-enrolled in teams of 6 or 7 for an out-of-class design project using the self-sign-up group feature of Canvas (Instructure, Salt Lake CityUT); these same teams were also used for all in-class learning activities. Class periods devoted toactive learning where indicated as such on the course syllabus and schedule. On these scheduled
thebranch that contains the earliest instance of that file), but experience has shown that this structuregreatly facilitates the overall management of the course. Some simple automated scripts havebeen developed to help manage this structure and organization, keeping content synchronizedacross branches, as well as to perform some automated checks on the Courseware (e.g.,compliance to coding standards, integrity of internal cross-reference links, etc.).Courseware DeliveryEach week of the course addresses a new concept or technology with a lecture, including live-coding demonstrations, and accompanying Courseware including the assignment for the week(see Course Syllabus, below, for details). Courseware, including the solution for the previousweek and
understand the content while also preparing them for commonpoints of confusion or difficulty.Curriculum Implementation, Evaluation, and RefinementUpon completion of the summer program, participating teachers will have formed a syllabus andinstructional materials for an engineering design-centric course. They are expected to implementthe resultant course or modules in their schools within one (1) academic year of programparticipation. Hk Maker Lab provides ongoing financial and pedagogical support for theseclasses. The financial support ($1000/year) is used to purchase supplies necessary for the labactivities and design work. Pedagogical support is supplied by an Hk Maker Lab program teammember, who joins the teachers in their classes as a de facto
hosted CC faculty members for a paid 9-weeksummer professional development program. A CC faculty member is paid $9,100 stipend in 3installments throughout the summer. Additionally, at the end of the internship, the CC facultymembers have the option to receive an additional $1,000 implementation stipend. Thisadditional stipend is received by the participants if they incorporate a portion of their researchinto a lesson plan, syllabus, or other course material.Recruitment and SelectionDeans and chairs of science, math, and engineering departments were contacted in order toadvertise this program. The funding did not provide for housing, so the selection was limited tothose community colleges that were close to UCB. Given the size of the state of
members, lead to a greater understanding of student needs and how best to accommodate them while considering the unique approach to learning and teaching at Olin College. One of the initial difficulties in accommodating Ella’s needs in a course like this may spring up as the course begins. Ella’s challenges with executive functioning combined with her high anxiety and former reliance on a regular planning with instructors may not coincide well with a course that is individualistic and self-paced. Such a course may not typically have a syllabus with clearly defined deadlines. Also, because instructors and faculty members are responding in real time to student work, being able to anticipate or plan for long-term learning objectives becomes very
12engineering topic of self-healing infrastructure, explore contextually relevant knowledge,synthesize actual self-healing concrete samples, and synthesize online and offline findings topresent in front of a peer audience. They are also well-suited to project-based courses and“unconference” sessions that inculcate greater interaction and collaboration between participants.For instance, at the time of writing, Elsevier’s Engineering team has partnered with a series ofAiChE Regional Student Conferences to launch similar sessions having as many as 100participants, to provide a professional development experience around real industry corrosionmitigation and asset management challenges. The format is agnostic to the particular challengeor toolsets used and
have documented: elective face-to-face courses [3],[4], online courses [5], course concentrations [6], [7], capstone experiences [8], [9], and project-based courses embedded in the engineering curriculum [2], [10]–[12]. Most studies on entrepreneurship education have analyzed psychological outcomes, such asself-efficacy and entrepreneurial intent [13]. Few of them have explored short and long-termeffects on professional competencies and career goals [14]. Some of them have used classroomassessment techniques and academic records to understand students’ conceptions ofentrepreneurial learning [15], [16], but more efforts are needed to explore how students learn aboutentrepreneurship as they develop ownership of their ideas [17]. This article
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Changes in Student Perceptions of Their Abilities on the ABET Student Outcomes to Succeed During the First-Year Engineering ProgramAbstractThe purpose of this study is to explore students’ perceptions of the engineering enculturationfactors corresponding to the eleven ABET student outcomes and how their perceptions of theirabilities change over time through the FYE program. During the 2016-2017 school year, 662students, taking two consecutive First Year Engineering (FYE) foundation courses at asouthwestern university, responded to at least one of the three online surveys arranged over timeas either pre or post semester surveys and answered to the questions asking about
include, among others, experiential learning, internationalizing curriculum, online learning, and educational technology innovations.Prof. Yuting W. Chen, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Dr. Yuting W. Chen received the B.S. degree from University of Illinois - Urbana Champaign in 2007, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in 2009 and 2011, all in Electrical Engineering. Prior to joining the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign as a lecturer in 2015, she worked at IBM Systems Group in Poughkeepsie, NY in z Systems Firmware Development. Her current interests include recruitment and retention of under- representative
the course based on completion of the11 units in the app. Note that students were told at the beginning of the class that use of the appwas required, although the syllabus did not state what role it would have in the grade. Studentswere not told that the app would be for extra credit only until the last week class. Figure 3: Completion rate of app lessons by weekOf the 102 students who opted in to the study, 10 had actually passed the pretest. To avoid aceiling effect, we took those 10 students out of our sample. The intervention in this study was theuse of the augmented reality app as a supplement to the standard course content. Students in 2 ofthe 4 sections of the class were invited to use the app. In total, 57
the first 2 weeks). The conversation should be informal in nature and faculty should allow time for additional, unexpected conversation topics. Schedule about 20 minutes per student. Have a copy of the syllabus available so you can refer to course outcomes, etc. Common questions should focus primarily on the course (outcomes, topics, projects, etc.), in addition to the following: o Ask students to share a bit about their background (could be education and/or personal in nature depending on what the student wants to share) o What are you excited about related to this course? o Is there anything you are anxious about? o Do you have any questions about the course
students (this was the case for thedynamics class at HSKA). These skriptums tend to be much shorter than textbooks, andconcentrate on the really important things.Prof Deutsch Reflections on Class StructureIn the US all instructors have to set up a syllabus, which not only displays the course ofinstruction but also defines how the final grade is determined. A typical grading scheme mighthave Homeworks at 20%, Quizzes at 10%, Midterms at 30%, and the Final Exam at 40%. InGermany this does not exist, since it’s entirely the final exam which determines the grade.Sometimes the German professors let the students do homework or have tests to make thestudents reflect on the content and work on problems, but these assignments don’t influence thefinal
education organization, astate science teacher organization, to teachers who visited the Center for class field trips, andthrough social media. Recruitment tasks were accomplished by Center education staff andpartner organizations. Interested teachers applied through an online application system during afour month submission window. To be considered complete, submitted applications had toinclude a resume, a series of short essays, and a form completed by two of their professionalreferences. Completed applications were reviewed by Center education staff, with finalacceptance decisions being made by the program manager.Participant Demographics Self-reported demographic information for the 22 teachers who have participated in theRET program is
learning objectives, similar tothose university faculty would detail in the objectives of a syllabus. All but eight US states haveadopted common core state standards (http://www.corestandards.org/), but most curriculumstandards for each particular jurisdiction are often detailed online and may be found with asimple internet search. Before a visit to a school is proposed, it is important to identify and assesshow the team will specifically address the curricular needs of that particular classroom. For ourparticular project, we are targeting the core standards set by the state of Utah(https://www.uen.org/core/), but each state should have similar requirements. Because this project intersects with topics from mathematics to environmental
journal articles published under her name. She has also written in thegenre of science fiction, and published books in the body-mind-spirit genre about her empathic encounterswith horses. She has taught courses in Nanotechnology Ethics and Policy; Gender Issues and Ethics in theNew Reproductive Technologies; Religion and Technology; STS & Engineering Practice; The Engineer,Ethics, and Professional Responsibility; STS and the Frankenstein Myth. Rosalyn regularly incorporatesmindfulness practices into her engineering school courses. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Dimensions of Diversity in Engineering: What We Can Learn from STSIntroductionThe challenge of increasing diversity in engineering is
project was an even mix between process and product, observing the students surprise at the amount of process needed to successfully launch a commercial product. The nature of the project was very interdisciplinary crossing between, software, firmware and hardware. • Credit hours and accreditation requirement: The course was two semesters for 8 credit hours. Several learning outcomes and educational objectives were documented in the course syllabus and assessment data was collected and monitored. • Outcome evaluation: Overall this was considered a “good” outcome in that the company is now selling commercial products. Reflecting on the project there was an obvious disconnect between the industry
guidelines for engagement with individuals and evaluation of the quality of students’ work [1]. Examples of these would be a course syllabus, a program of study, student- teacher contracts, and/or any documented and written course expectations.2. Null Curriculum: Entails what is not taught in the classroom due to mandates from higher authorities, a teacher’s lack of knowledge, or deeply ingrained assumptions and biases [1]. An example of this would be teachers and school systems choosing not to explain certain concepts (e.g., Christopher Columbus’s colonization methods toward many native peoples when he "discovered" the Americas).3. Hidden Curriculum: Represents the unwritten, unofficial, and often unintended lessons, values, and
SustainableDevelopment sub-goals. Also in this section are the methods used to assess the programsusing both structured (e.g. reflection ladder described in Tranquillo, 2016) andunstructured prompts. Specific assignments and a timeline of topics and lectures aregiven in Appendices A and B.Senior Capstone IntroductionOver the past 12 years, teams of 2-3 students engaged in a design sprint as a kick-off tothe senior capstone (Tranquillo and Cavanagh, 2009). Rather than pass out a syllabus fora two-semester design capstone, the challenge served as an introduction to the course. Forthe past three years, the challenge has been driven by the UN Sustainable Development 7Goals